Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.AquafreshScienceAcademy.com
DORSAL POSTERIOR
CIRCUMVALLATE
PAPILLAE
CIRCUMVALLATE
PAPILLAE DORSAL POSTERIOR
DORSAL MIDDLE
DORSAL ANTERIOR
www.AquafreshScienceAcademy.com
For further information visit:
www.AquafreshScienceAcademy.com
250
numbers were higher at the DPCP in
200 the slight/moderate group than in the
150 strong malodor group.
100
50
Effect of tongue cleaning on
0 bacterial load
DA DM DP DPCP LP VP
Tongue area At the IADR/CED symposium on oral
Total anaerobes DA = Dorsal anterior
malodor, Dr Allaker highlighted that
Total aerobes
Gram-negative anaerobes
DM = Dorsal middle
DP = Dorsal posterior most odor-causing bacteria are found
VSC-producing bacteria
Streptococcus salivarius
DPCP = Dorsal posterior to the
circumvallate papillae beyond the reach of normal oral hygiene
LP = Lateral posterior
VP = Ventral posterior procedures. To further investigate this,
Bordas et al’s Archives of Oral Biology
Data are presented as mean±SE (n=50) paper (2008) studied whether tongue
cleaning provided an improved method of
reducing tongue bacterial load compared
Relationship between with tooth brushing.
bacterial load and
After collecting and analysing samples
oral malodor of tongue coating before and after tooth
In several studies, it has been identified cleaning, they found that:
that the dorsal posterior of the tongue
makes the primary contribution to • tooth brushing alone had no significant
oral malodor (summarised in Bordas impact on tongue bacterial populations
et al 2008). However, in the past little • tooth brushing and tongue scraping
attention has been paid to the area consistently, but modestly, reduced
posterior to the circumvallate papillae bacterial populations
(DPCP). In order to investigate this, an • tooth brushing and thorough tongue
organoleptic assessment using an intensity cleaning with a high speed aspiration
scale where 0=no malodor and 5=very device resulted in highly significant
strong malodor was performed. Subjects reductions in bacteria.
were subdivided into those with slight/
Further reading moderate malodor (intensity score 1–3) or
Allaker RP, Waite RD, Hickling J et al. Topographic strong malodor (intensity score 4–5). Their
distribution of bacteria associated with oral
malodor on the tongue. Arch Oral Biol 2008; 53 study revealed that:
(suppl 1): S8–S12.
Bordas A, McNab R, Staples AM et al. Impact • subjects with strong malodor had higher
of different tongue cleaning methods on the
bacterial load of the tongue dorsum. Arch Oral levels of total anaerobes, Gram-negative
Biol 2008; 53 (suppl 1): S13–S18.
www.AquafreshScienceAcademy.com