You are on page 1of 2

For further information visit:

www.AquafreshScienceAcademy.com

Science focus RESOURCE

Science focus on...


tongue mapping
The large surface area of the The effect of tongue cleaning on the Results showed that:
tongue dorsum provides a complex interaction between the
distribution of bacteria on the tongue, • on the dorsum of the tongue, there was
unique environment that a trend towards increasing bacterial load
promotes accumulation of bacterial load and oral malodor has
been revealed in research and is when moving from the anterior to the
microorganisms and oral posterior surface of the tongue
discussed below.
debris. It has recently been • the most heavily colonised tongue
shown that there is a direct Topographic distribution of site was the dorsal posterior to the
relationship between the circumvallate papillae
bacteria on the tongue
distribution of bacteria on • the relative proportions of bacterial
In their paper in The Archives of Oral
the tongue, bacterial load group remained similar at each site,
Biology (2008), Allaker et al provided
and oral malodor. the first detailed mapping of the tongue with Streptococcus salivarius being
surface in relation to the bacteria consistently lowest.
associated with oral malodor. The study To hear Dr Allaker discuss the findings
analysed the type and load of bacteria from this study go to the IADR/CED
present in cultures collected from six areas Symposium section of the Aquafresh
of the human tongue. Science Academy website.

The human tongue

DORSAL POSTERIOR
CIRCUMVALLATE
PAPILLAE

CIRCUMVALLATE
PAPILLAE DORSAL POSTERIOR

LATERAL POSTERIOR VENTRAL POSTERIOR


(UNDER THE TONGUE)

DORSAL MIDDLE

DORSAL ANTERIOR

www.AquafreshScienceAcademy.com
For further information visit:
www.AquafreshScienceAcademy.com

Science focus RESOURCE

Bacterial counts by tongue area anaerobes and volatile sulfur compound


(CFU/sample x105) (VSC) producing bacteria recovered
from the DPCP than those with slight/
350
moderate malodor
300
• total aerobe and Streptococcus salivarius
Bacterial counts CFU/sample x105

250
numbers were higher at the DPCP in
200 the slight/moderate group than in the
150 strong malodor group.
100

50
Effect of tongue cleaning on
0 bacterial load
DA DM DP DPCP LP VP
Tongue area At the IADR/CED symposium on oral
Total anaerobes DA = Dorsal anterior
malodor, Dr Allaker highlighted that
Total aerobes
Gram-negative anaerobes
DM = Dorsal middle
DP = Dorsal posterior most odor-causing bacteria are found
VSC-producing bacteria
Streptococcus salivarius
DPCP = Dorsal posterior to the
circumvallate papillae beyond the reach of normal oral hygiene
LP = Lateral posterior
VP = Ventral posterior procedures. To further investigate this,
Bordas et al’s Archives of Oral Biology
Data are presented as mean±SE (n=50) paper (2008) studied whether tongue
cleaning provided an improved method of
reducing tongue bacterial load compared
Relationship between with tooth brushing.
bacterial load and
After collecting and analysing samples
oral malodor of tongue coating before and after tooth
In several studies, it has been identified cleaning, they found that:
that the dorsal posterior of the tongue
makes the primary contribution to • tooth brushing alone had no significant
oral malodor (summarised in Bordas impact on tongue bacterial populations
et al 2008). However, in the past little • tooth brushing and tongue scraping
attention has been paid to the area consistently, but modestly, reduced
posterior to the circumvallate papillae bacterial populations
(DPCP). In order to investigate this, an • tooth brushing and thorough tongue
organoleptic assessment using an intensity cleaning with a high speed aspiration
scale where 0=no malodor and 5=very device resulted in highly significant
strong malodor was performed. Subjects reductions in bacteria.
were subdivided into those with slight/
Further reading moderate malodor (intensity score 1–3) or
Allaker RP, Waite RD, Hickling J et al. Topographic strong malodor (intensity score 4–5). Their
distribution of bacteria associated with oral
malodor on the tongue. Arch Oral Biol 2008; 53 study revealed that:
(suppl 1): S8–S12.
Bordas A, McNab R, Staples AM et al. Impact • subjects with strong malodor had higher
of different tongue cleaning methods on the
bacterial load of the tongue dorsum. Arch Oral levels of total anaerobes, Gram-negative
Biol 2008; 53 (suppl 1): S13–S18.

www.AquafreshScienceAcademy.com

You might also like