You are on page 1of 10

0'?.

'@A'%$

Wireless Backhaul Market from an All-IP


Perspective#
!"#$%&'()*#+,*&-.-%#
)*/#&0'#+).)1'/2%#3')4#

!"#$%&'$(')$*'+,--'.)/$0&1.'$2#"/$3,4.%'5-/$67$89:$";9$7<=<><$

56#

Wireless Backhaul from an All-IP Perspective

September 2010

Table of Contents
List of Figures _________________________________________________ 5
List of Tables__________________________________________________ 7
Questions Answered by This Report ______________________________ 8
1. Executive Summary _________________________________________ 9
2. Key Findings ______________________________________________ 11
3. 4G Backhaul Requirements __________________________________ 14
3.1

A Comprehensive Throughput Analysis for 4G Backhaul____________ 14

3.2

Where in the Aggregation does Microwave Fit? ____________________ 15

3.3

Will X2 Interface be a Headache?________________________________ 16

4. Microwave Regulatory Update________________________________ 17


4.1

Microwave Licensing in USA (FCC) ______________________________ 17

4.2

Microwave Licensing in Europe (ETSI) ___________________________ 19

5. Ethernet Microwave Backhaul Market Update Q2 2010 ___________ 21


5.1

Market Overview _____________________________________________ 21

5.2

Microwave Market Shares ______________________________________ 22

5.3

Microwave Shipments by Frequency Band________________________ 24

5.4

Migration from TDM to Pure Packet Microwave ____________________ 26

5.5

Future Microwave Market Evolution _____________________________ 26

6. Wireless Backhaul Equipment Analysis________________________ 27


6.1

Backhaul Solutions ___________________________________________ 27

6.2

Frequency Support ___________________________________________ 29

6.3

Maximum Throughput _________________________________________ 31

6.4

Pure Packet vs. Hybrid Architecture _____________________________ 33

6.5

Embedded Switching Capacity__________________________________ 34

6.6

Ethernet Demarcation _________________________________________ 35

6.7

Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) ____________________________ 36

7. Wireless Backhaul Vendor Profiles____________________________ 37


7.1 Alcatel-Lucent _______________________________________________
7.1.1 Vendor Overview ____________________________________________
7.1.2 Financial __________________________________________________
7.1.3 Backhaul Solutions __________________________________________
7.1.4 Product Overview ___________________________________________
7.1.5 SWOT ____________________________________________________
7.1.6 Future ____________________________________________________

37
37
38
38
39
41
42

7.2 Aviat Networks _______________________________________________


7.2.1 Vendor Overview ____________________________________________
7.2.2 Financial __________________________________________________
7.2.3 Backhaul Solutions __________________________________________

42
42
43
44

Maravedis 2010-All Rights Reserved

Wireless Backhaul from an All-IP Perspective

September 2010

7.2.4 Product Overview ___________________________________________ 45


7.2.5 SWOT ____________________________________________________ 49
7.2.6 Future ____________________________________________________ 49
7.3 BridgeWave _________________________________________________
7.3.1 Vendor Overview ____________________________________________
7.3.2 Financial __________________________________________________
7.3.3 Backhaul Solutions __________________________________________
7.3.4 Product Overview ___________________________________________
7.3.5 SWOT ____________________________________________________
7.3.6 Future ____________________________________________________

50
50
50
50
51
53
53

7.4 Ceragon ____________________________________________________


7.4.1 Vendor Overview ____________________________________________
7.4.2 Financial __________________________________________________
7.4.3 Backhaul Solutions __________________________________________
7.4.4 Product Overview ___________________________________________
7.4.5 SWOT ____________________________________________________
7.4.6 Future ____________________________________________________

54
54
54
55
56
59
60

7.5 DragonWave _________________________________________________


7.5.1 Vendor Overview ____________________________________________
7.5.2 Financial __________________________________________________
7.5.3 Backhaul Solutions __________________________________________
7.5.4 Product Overview ___________________________________________
7.5.5 SWOT ____________________________________________________
7.5.6 Future ____________________________________________________

60
60
61
62
63
65
65

7.6 Ericsson ____________________________________________________


7.6.1 Vendor Overview ____________________________________________
7.6.2 Financial __________________________________________________
7.6.3 Backhaul Solutions __________________________________________
7.6.4 Product Overview ___________________________________________
7.6.5 SWOT ____________________________________________________
7.6.6 Future ____________________________________________________

66
66
66
67
68
71
71

7.7 Exalt _______________________________________________________


7.7.1 Vendor Overview ____________________________________________
7.7.2 Financial __________________________________________________
7.7.3 Backhaul Solutions __________________________________________
7.7.4 Product Overview ___________________________________________
7.7.5 SWOT ____________________________________________________
7.7.6 Future ____________________________________________________

72
72
72
72
73
76
76

7.8 Huawei _____________________________________________________


7.8.1 Vendor Overview ____________________________________________
7.8.2 Financial __________________________________________________
7.8.3 Backhaul Solutions __________________________________________
7.8.4 Product Overview ___________________________________________
7.8.5 SWOT ____________________________________________________
7.8.6 Future ____________________________________________________

77
77
77
77
78
80
80

7.9 NEC ________________________________________________________


7.9.1 Vendor Overview ____________________________________________
7.9.2 Financial __________________________________________________
7.9.3 Backhaul Solutions __________________________________________
7.9.4 Product Overview ___________________________________________
7.9.5 SWOT ____________________________________________________
7.9.6 Future ____________________________________________________

81
81
81
81
83
86
86

Maravedis 2010-All Rights Reserved

Wireless Backhaul from an All-IP Perspective

September 2010

7.10 Nokia Siemens Networks (NSN) _________________________________


7.10.1 Vendor Overview ___________________________________________
7.10.2 Financial__________________________________________________
7.10.3 Backhaul Solutions__________________________________________
7.10.4 Product Overview ___________________________________________
7.10.5 SWOT ___________________________________________________
7.10.6 Future ____________________________________________________

86
86
87
87
88
92
92

7.11 SkyFiber ____________________________________________________


7.11.1 Vendor Overview ___________________________________________
7.11.2 Financial __________________________________________________
7.11.3 Backhaul Solutions__________________________________________
7.11.4 Product Overview ___________________________________________
7.11.5 SWOT ___________________________________________________
7.11.6 Future ____________________________________________________

93
93
93
93
94
97
98

8. Annex: Table of TDM Capacities ______________________________ 98


9. Acronyms ________________________________________________ 98
10. Bibliography _____________________________________________ 101

Maravedis 2010-All Rights Reserved

Wireless Backhaul from an All-IP Perspective

September 2010

List of Figures
Figure 1 Point-to-point microwave backhaul revenue 2010 ....................................................... 21!
Figure 2 Point-to-point microwave backhaul by region .............................................................. 22!
Figure 3 Microwave backhaul vendor market share Q2 2010.................................................... 23!
Figure 4 Microwave backhaul vendor evolution 2010 ................................................................ 24!
Figure 5 Point-to-point microwave backhaul revenue by frequency band.................................. 25!
Figure 6 TDM vs. hybrid vs. pure-packet operation by revenue................................................. 26!
Figure 7 Point-to-point microwave forecast 2010-2015.............................................................. 27!
Figure 8 Parts of a mobile backhaul network ............................................................................. 28!
Figure 9 The need for a large number of cells ........................................................................... 29!
Figure 10 Frequency band support chart ................................................................................... 30!
Figure 11 Microwave transmission atmospheric absorption ...................................................... 30!
Figure 12 Memorylink Gigahertz performance in interference ................................................... 31!
Figure 13 Ethernet frame terminology........................................................................................ 32!
Figure 14 Comparative maximum throughput chart by model ................................................... 32!
Figure 15 Key Ethernet OAM standards .................................................................................... 35!
Figure 16 Mean time between failures comparison chart........................................................ 37!
Figure 17 9500 MPR IDU (various sizes) and multipurpose ODU (valid for both split mount and
outdoor configurations) ....................................................................................................... 40!
Figure 18 9500 MPR indoor RF unit........................................................................................... 40!
Figure 19 Eclipse packet node, E-LINK 1000EXR and Eclipse EDGE ODU ............................. 45!
Figure 20 Eclipse packet node throughput................................................................................. 46!
Figure 21 Eclipse packet node with IRU600 indoor RF unit on top............................................ 47!
Figure 22 BridgeWave FlexPort outside (with one and two foot antennas) and inside views,
respectively ......................................................................................................................... 51!
Figure 23 BridgeWaves innovative Adaptive Rate and Modulation mechanism ....................... 52!
Figure 24 Left: FibeAir IP-10 IDU and RFU-C; Right: FibeAir 3200T IDU.................................. 57!
Figure 25 Ceragons FibeAir outdoor enclosure......................................................................... 57!
Figure 26 Ceragons RFU-HS and RFU-HP radio units ............................................................. 58!
Figure 27 DragonWaves Horizon Compact (left), Quantum (middle) and two SDU versions
(right)................................................................................................................................... 63!
Figure 28 Mini-link 80 GHz demonstration at MWC 2010 .......................................................... 68!
Figure 29 Mini-link ODUs: short haul (left) and long-haul (right) ................................................ 70!
Figure 30 Ericsson Mini-link TN/LH IDUs: AMM 2p (top left), AMM 6p (bottom left) and AMM
20p (right)............................................................................................................................ 70!
Figure 31 Exalt ExtendAir and ExploreAir (front and back)........................................................ 74!
Maravedis 2010-All Rights Reserved

Wireless Backhaul from an All-IP Perspective

September 2010

Figure 32 Exalt IDUs of EX-s (left) and EX-i (right) .................................................................... 74!
Figure 33 Exalts semi-protected configuration .......................................................................... 75!
Figure 34 Huawei OptiX RTN 605 and RTN 620 IDUs .............................................................. 79!
Figure 35 Huawei SWOT analysis ............................................................................................. 80!
Figure 36 Frequency band-capacity matrix for NECs microwave products............................... 83!
Figure 37 NEC PASOLINK NEO TE .......................................................................................... 84!
Figure 38 NEC PASOLINK NEO IP IDU .................................................................................... 85!
Figure 39 NEC PASOLINK NEO ODUs Type 1 (left) and Type 2 (right) ................................... 85!
Figure 40 NSN FlexiPacket ODU for ETSI market (left) and ANSI market (right)...................... 90!
Figure 41 NSN FlexiPacket FirstMile (top), FlexiHub 1200 (mid) and FlexiHub 2200 (bottom) . 91!
Figure 42 NSN FlexiHybrid IDU ................................................................................................. 91!
Figure 43 SkyLINK OLU (left) and CST (right) ........................................................................... 94!
Figure 44 Electromagnetic spectrum diagram............................................................................ 95!
Figure 45 Example of sway for a 15 m tower ............................................................................. 96!
Figure 46 SkyFiber SWOT analysis ........................................................................................... 97!

Maravedis 2010-All Rights Reserved

Wireless Backhaul from an All-IP Perspective

September 2010

List of Tables
Table 1 IMT-Advanced cell spectral efficiency minimum requirements ..................................... 14!
Table 2 Number of 4G eNodeBs backhauled by a microwave link ............................................ 15!
Table 3 Microwave on-demand licensed frequency bands (ULS licensing)............................... 18!
Table 4 Common microwave frequency bands in ETSI countries.............................................. 20!
Table 5 Regulatory status of 60 GHz and 80 GHz bands in Europe.......................................... 20!
Table 6 point-to-point microwave shipments Q1-Q2 2010 ......................................................... 25!
Table 7 Traditional microwave backhaul classification by capacity............................................ 28!
Table 8 Traditional microwave backhaul classification by link distance ..................................... 29!
Table 9 Hybrid and pure packet support among wireless backhaul vendors ............................. 34!
Table 10 Ethernet OAM support within the microwave market .................................................. 36!
Table 11 Alcatel-Lucent microwave product offering ................................................................. 39!
Table 12 Alcatel-Lucent SWOT analysis.................................................................................... 42!
Table 13 Overview of Aviats microwave products..................................................................... 45!
Table 14 Eclipse packet node IDU options ................................................................................ 48!
Table 15 Aviats microwave products power consumption......................................................... 48!
Table 16 Aviat SWOT analysis................................................................................................... 49!
Table 17 BridgeWave SWOT analysis ....................................................................................... 53!
Table 18 Ceragon microwave product offering .......................................................................... 56!
Table 19 Radio unit options available from Ceragon ................................................................. 58!
Table 20 Ceragon SWOT analysis............................................................................................. 60!
Table 21 DragonWave microwave product offering ................................................................... 62!
Table 22 Ericsson microwave product offering .......................................................................... 67!
Table 23 Exalt licensed microwave product offering .................................................................. 73!
Table 24 Exalt SWOT analysis................................................................................................... 76!
Table 25 Huawei microwave product offering ............................................................................ 78!
Table 26 Huawei Ethernet switching capability comparison ...................................................... 79!
Table 27 NEC SWOT analysis ................................................................................................... 86!
Table 28 NSN microwave product offering................................................................................. 88!
Table 29 NSN SWOT analysis ................................................................................................... 92!
Table 30 Hierarchy of the most common SONET/SDH data rates ............................................ 98!

Maravedis 2010-All Rights Reserved

Wireless Backhaul from an All-IP Perspective

September 2010

Questions Answered by This Report

What frequency bands does each major backhaul vendor support?

What are the drawbacks of unlicensed frequency bands?

What is the maximum microwave throughput achieved for a single channel?

What compression techniques have microwave vendors developed in order to increase


throughput?

How does microwave equipment manage TDM and packet traffic at the same time?

What embedded switching features do microwave vendors implement in their


microwave equipment?

What is MEF and what are its certifications for?

Are mobile operators worried about the migration to IPv6?

What functionality do microwave vendors add to Ethernet in order to add reliability?

What are the most reliable vendors in the wireless backhaul space?

What throughput is required for 4G backhaul purposes?

In which parts of the backhaul network can microwave be deployed?

How much growth did the microwave market experience in 2010?

What are the market shares of the most important microwave vendors ?

Which frequency bands generated the most revenue in Q2 2010?

What will be the size of the microwave market be in 2015?

What are the wireless backhaul equipment offerings of the most important vendors in
the industry?

What are the strengths and weaknesses of each vendors products?

What are the opportunities and threats for the major vendors?

What are these vendors plans going forward?

And much more!

Maravedis 2010-All Rights Reserved

Wireless Backhaul from an All-IP Perspective

September 2010

1. Executive Summary
Global downturn still affecting microwave market
Despite the increasing demand for data services, the global downturn continues to impact
mobile carriers deployment decisions. In the second quarter of 2010, the total size of the pointto-point microwave market was US$1.07 billion. This figure represents a 4.3% decrease with
respect to the previous quarter, when the size of the market reached US$1.12 billion. Latin
America was the only region that saw an increase in microwave shipments in Q2 2010 (15.6%,
to reach US$120.45 million worth in shipments).

Huawei aggressively climbing microwave shipment ranking


During the second quarter of 2010, Huawei experienced a sharp 51.6% growth in microwave
shipments (US$186.85 million in shipments during Q2 2010), which has propelled it to second
place on the podium, just behind market leader Ericsson (US$197.25 million in the same
quarter). Huawei, which introduced its first microwave products in 2007, has overtaken other
vendors who have been in the market for longer, thanks to unique financial support and a
favorable environment in its mother country.
The two traditional market leaders, Ericsson and NEC, experienced considerable decreases in
their shipments (23.7% and 29.1%, respectively) between the first and second quarter of 2010.
The other vendors covered in this analysis did not show much change in shipment levels
between Q1 and Q2, although there was an interesting battle between Alcatel-Lucent
(US$118.80 million) and Nokia Siemens (US$115.91 million), which follow a very similar
strategy with their respective microwave portfolios.

Pure packet microwave is the future


Today the biggest trend is to deploy hybrid systems, since they offer the most secure method of
keeping 2G and 3G networks working by adding packet capacity for 4G services. However,
hybrid microwave system shipments decreased by 1.9% to US$744.75 million in Q2 2010. From
all the vendors covered in this report, only Ericsson and Ceragon have exclusively hybrid
equipment in place to support Ethernet services.
Pure packet, the most advanced microwave backhaul technology to-date, increased its
shipments by 5.6% to US$198.92 million in Q2 2010, although it still has a very small market
share compared to hybrid microwave. Besides 80 GHz solutions in the classical 6 to 38 GHz
range, which are mostly pure packet, only NSN and Alcatel-Lucent are fully committed to pure
packet microwave, offering this equipment for any kind of new deployment. DragonWave and
SkyFiber are the only vendors covered in this report who do not offer hybrid solutions
(exclusively pure packet).
TDM microwave shipments decreased 26.4% in just one quarter, totaling US$126.43 million in
Q2 2010. Given the increased flexibility and cost effectiveness of carrier Ethernet backhaul, this
decrease is reasonable. Vendors are not recommending TDM links for new short haul
deployments; most TDM links are long haul, since there are still microwave vendors offering this
kind of technology for trunk applications.

Encouraging future for microwave


The slowdown experienced by microwave from Q1 to Q2 2010 will not last long, since operators
really need to upgrade their backhaul links in advance to enable higher radio access speeds
that could cause their cellular networks to struggle. The auction of spectrum for 4G networks in
many countries especially in Europe, a microwave-heavy region will urge operators to take
another look at their microwave deployments to see whether they are prepared to handle the
foreseeable data traffic growth. The deployment of 4G networks, especially in urban areas,
should cause the demand for microwave links to increase, although given current uncertainty
we propose a conservative estimate of US$9 billion in revenue by 2015.
Maravedis 2010-All Rights Reserved

Wireless Backhaul from an All-IP Perspective

September 2010

New spectrum for cost-effective backhaul


Besides the traditional 6 to 38 GHz bands (with slight differences depending on whether ANSI
or ETSI spectrum allocation is used), operators are looking for new portions of spectrum to help
them deploy 4G networks. Microwave vendors are responding to these needs by trying to
support a wider range of frequency bands. For instance, Ericsson and NEC have developed
equipment for new adjacent bands to traditional spectrum 42 GHz and 52 GHz, respectively
although without much market demand as of yet.
Larger carriers such as Clearwire USA are adopting millimeter wave (80 GHz) solutions. As a
result, most microwave vendors offer or plan to offer 80 GHz products, be they in-house
developed or supplied under OEM agreements. Of all the microwave vendors covered in this
report, only Ceragon, DragonWave and Exalt are lacking 80 GHz products in their commercial
offerings.
Vendors such as SkyFiber are offering Free Space Optics technology to mobile carriers, who
are trialing it successfully. Sophisticated mechanisms are being devised to solve traditional
problems of FSO such as vibration and sway sensitivity. Of the advantages that FSO represents
compared to other unlicensed wireless solutions, most important is the absence of
radiomagnetic pollution.

The throughput battle


The evolution from TDM to packet microwave is enabling the development of compression
techniques that increase the effective throughput being experienced at the Ethernet port level.
There are three kinds of packet compression techniques employed by microwave vendors:
header compression, inter-frame gap suppression and payload compression.
Although this report recommends 180 Mbps and 135 Mbps as the most suitable backhaul
capacities for downlink and uplink, 1 Gbps is currently the reference point all microwave
vendors are trying to achieve. Millimeter wave equipment, FSO solutions and most traditional
microwave solutions through the combination of XPIC and 56 MHz channels are the alternatives
for reaching this capacity.

Advanced networking capability


Following the trend of technology convergence, microwave vendors are progressively
integrating more advanced networking features. All equipment analyzed in this report exceeds
MEF 22 recommendation of four prioritization levels, with some vendors such as Ericsson,
Huawei, Exalt and BridgeWave offering eight. Surprisingly, none of the vendors covered in this
report have detected any demand for IPv6 support, being reduced to a simple milestone on their
roadmaps.
In addition to MEF certification, microwave equipment needs to offer carriers the possibility to
monitor performance of each the network in order to detect any malfunction. This is why OAM
(operation and maintenance) standards have been developed to incorporate this functionality.
Concretely there are three standards commonly implemented in the industry for Ethernet OAM:
IEEE 802.1ag, Y.1731 and IEEE 802.3ah. SkyFiber, Exalt and Aviat are the only vendors
covered in this report that do not implement any of the OAM protocols available. It is interesting
to see that some rely on companion networking equipment to implement them, such as in the
cases of NSN, Ericsson and NEC.

Maravedis 2010-All Rights Reserved

10

You might also like