Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ACMA
ACT
ACMA
ACT
Name of BB - Mr. Arvind Gupta (ACMA-ACT) Team members - Mr. N.Prakash, Mr.I.P. Batra (UCAL Fuel Systems Limited,Gurgaon)
DOE Project
Cost of Poor Quality Breakup
Rework Cost Machining Cost Raw Material Cost : NIL : Rs 56,448/: Rs.1,22,162/-
Intangible Savings
1. Internal Customer Satisfaction. 2. Smooth flow of products. 3. Learning of Systematic Approach to solve the problem. 4. Breakthrough in the company towards the attitude.
ACMA
ACT
4
Phase 1- Definition
Problem definition
Response definition - Attribute Instrument to be used - Visual R&R study details - Not Required Potential SSVs from FMEAs\ Brain storming Brain storming
ACMA
ACT
5
Shainin DOE, Version: 1.1,Jan03
Response to be measured
- Bore Unclean ( Attribute)
Specification
- No Unclean
ACMA
ACT
SSVs are:
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Mounting Hole Dia. 6.5 +0.2/+0 Mounting Hole Position w.r.t. Bore (X axis) 24 +/- 0.05 Mounting Hole Position w.r.t. Bore (Y axis) 28 +/- 0.05 Mounting Face Flatness 0.05 Max Step in Bore Diameter 35 at Casting Stage .
ACT
8
ACMA
Throttle Body
35 Bore Unclean
ACMA
24 +/- 0.05
28 +/-0.05
ACT
Throttle Valve
Throttle Body
ACMA
ACT
10
ACMA
Fixture
Boring Bar
ACT
11
Shainin DOE Tool selection - Paired Comparison Data collection - Yes Analysis of Data - Yes Conclusion based on data - Yes
ACMA
ACT
12
ACMA
ACT
S.N. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 COUNT =
Dimn 28+/-0.05 27.93 27.94 27.96 27.97 27.98 27.99 28.00 28.00 28.01 28.03 28.04 28.05 28.05 28.06 28.06 28.06 5.5
Result B B G G B B B B B G G B G G G G
Hole 2
Not A Cause
Not A Cause
15
ACMA
ACT
Not A Cause
ACMA
10
ACT
Hole 2
Result B B B B B B B B G G G G G G G G
Hole 1
S.N. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Result B B B B B B B B G G G G G G G G
6.61 6.62 6.63 6.63 6.63 6.64 6.64 6.64 6.66 6.66 6.66 6.66 6.66 6.66 6.67 6.67 16
6.62 6.62 6.62 6.63 6.63 6.63 6.65 6.66 6.66 6.66 6.66 6.67 6.67 6.67 6.67 6.67 12
Root Cause
COUNT =
ACMA
ACT
Root Cause 17
ACMA
Result B B B B B B B B G G G G G G G G
6.61 6.62 6.63 6.63 6.63 6.64 6.64 6.64 6.66 6.66 6.66 6.66 6.66 6.66 6.67 6.67
Since the count is =16, Mounting Hole size Dia 6 mm is one of the strongest cause of the problem
ACMA
ACT
19
6.61 6.62 6.63 6.63 6.63 6.64 6.64 6.64 6.66 6.66 6.66 6.66 6.66 6.66 6.67 6.67 16
GOOD ---6.66 ~ 6.67 mm BAD------6.61 ~ 6.64 mm Drg. Spec. 6.50~6.70mm Variation in the Process 6.61 ~ 6.67 = 0.06 mm(within Spec.) Locating Pin size---6.57mm Clearance between Pin and locating hole GOOD Max.6.67-6.57=0.1mm Min.6.66-6.57=0.09mm BAD Max.6.64-6.57=0.07mm Min 6.61-6.57= 0.04mm
ACT
20
ACMA
Phase 3 Improvement
Conclusions ( Root Cause):
From the analysis ,it is evident that clearance between Locating Pin & Mounting hole varying from 0.09 to 0.1 result in GOOD Product wherein clearance ranging between 0.04 to 0.07 mm result in BAD product. So we need to maintain the clearance between Pin & Hole min 0.09 mm.
ACMA
ACT
21
Phase 3 Improvement
Opportunities available
Option No.1:To Change the Spec of Hole Size from present 6.5+0.2 to 6.66+0.06mm ( To maintain min clearance 0.09) which requires drill size change & also sought approval from customer as the drawing is customer approved. Subsequent fitment at the customer end was also a constraint, so
Option no.2 : To modified the Pin size from present 6.57 to 6.52 to maintain minimum clearance of 0.09 mm ( As per data for GOOD parts).Option
-2 ,Implemented.
ACT
22
ACMA
Phase 3 Improvement
After the countermeasure taken, 100 % inspection of the parts carried out visually on the machine for bore unclean problem. Rejection found to be ZERO out of total 15,000 parts made till now.
ACMA
ACT
23
Phase 4 - Control
Tool drawing Has been modified & standardized for the locating pin size 6.57 to 6.52 mm. FMEA has been updated. Control Plan( maintenance) has been revised for the pin change frequency.
ACMA
ACT
24
Phase 4 - Control
MATERIAL :EN 31 HARDNESS :40~50 HRC QUANTITY :1 NOS ALL SHARP CORNERS TO BE CHAMFERED
ACMA
ACT
25
FUNNELING BY 6 SIGMA
Bore Unclean DOE TOOL Paired Comparison DOE TOOL
ACMA
ACT
3rd Qtr
4th Qtr
26
Phase 4 - Control
Variation analysis:
Since the variation in the hole size is less than 50 % of the tolerance , Pre-control chart has been implemented on the machine to record the variation in the hole size due to drill worn out at hole drilling stage.
ACMA
ACT
27
Phase 4 - Control
Scatter plot has been introduced on the machine to record the no .of parts produced and the variation in hole size to find out (optimize) Tool ( drill ) Life.
ACMA
ACT
28
Phase 4 - Control
ACMA
ACT
29
Phase 4 - Control
Although problem now seems to be easy ,but it was difficult in the beginning to find out the root cause of the problem as generally it is perceived that more clearance between hole & pin will cause the problem whereas in this case , it was a case of less clearance causing the problem.
Learning:
To avoid the twist of the part while mounting on to the fixture ,Min clearance between the locating pin & hole shall be kept 0.1 mm approx( Subject to fitment and function of
the part).
ACMA
ACT
30
Shainin DOE, Version: 1.1,Jan03
Project Completed
ACMA
ACT
31
ACMA
ACT
32