Professional Documents
Culture Documents
htm 1
Islamic Embryology
T H Huxley
I've completed an analysis of the errors in Islamic Embryology for Mukto-mona
readers.
“Islamic Embryology” is derived from both the Qur’an and the Hadith, and is quite
consistent across all the contributing sources. The core of the story can be found
in the Qur’an, 022.005:
There are a handful of additional ayaat that deal with this subject, and none of
them disagree with this basic scenario. Yet there is more to learn from the Hadith,
particularly that of Bukhari and Muslim. Again, the accounts are quite consistent,
and the additional information they provide is important.
The first of these tells us about developmental timing: Sahih Bukhari Volume 4,
Book 54, Number 430:
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Articles/huxley/islamic_embyology.htm 2
“Allah's Apostle, the true and truly inspired said, "(The matter of the
Creation of) a human being is put together in the womb of the
mother in forty days, and then he becomes a clot of thick blood for
a similar period, and then a piece of flesh for a similar period.”
These exact details are also given in Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 55, Number
549. Sahih Bukhari Volume 8, Book 77, Number 593, Sahih Bukhari Volume 9,
Book 93, Number 546, and Sahih Muslim Book 033, Number 6390.
The key information gained from all these Hadith are that the three phases
(Nutfah, Alaqah and Madghah) each takes 40 days, for a total period of 120 days
from conception to the point at which the embryo becomes a foetus.
“The Prophet said, "Allah puts an angel in charge of the uterus and
the angel says, 'O Lord, (it is) semen! O Lord, (it is now ) a clot! O
Lord, (it is now) a piece of flesh.' And then, if Allah wishes to
complete its creation, the angel asks, 'O Lord, (will it be) a male or
a female?”
This detail is repeated in Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 55, Number 550 and
Sahih Muslim Book 033, Number 6397, and all of them are quite clear that the
embryo is neither male nor female until after the Mudghah phase is reached,
some 80 days (by Islamic counting) after conception.
So, then, these are the details of embryology as reflected in the Qur’an and the
Hadith.
These then are the details that must be correlated with actual embryonic
development to evaluate the accuracy or inaccuracy of the Islamic account. The
question is actually a simple one:
Does this account describe the first 120 days of embryonic development or
doesn’t it?
Taken together, the three phases of Islamic embryology take 120 days to go from
conception to the point where the embryo becomes a foetus (i.e. an identifiable
human baby), or right around 17 weeks. Does this reflect what we now know
about embryonic development?
The answer is patently, no. The human embryo becomes a foetus around week
9, or roughly half the time Islamic embryology requires. By day 56 the foetus is
essentially a complete, though tiny, human being with all organ systems in place,
and all tissues developed. This is right in the middle of what Islam calls the
“alaquah” phase. In other words, the developing person is already a complete
human being at a point where the Hadith insists it (not he or she) still has almost
three weeks remaining as a “clot of congealed blood.”
In fact, there are no developmental milestones which can be mapped to the three
40 day periods required by Islamic embryology, even though they are stressed in
several authoritative Hadith.
The three Islamic phases of development are described in a very visual way,
allowing for an informed evaluation of the accuracy of those descriptions. This
might be expected if for no other reason than that during the Prophet’s day, there
was not even the idea of a microscope, and any descriptions offered would
reasonably be of objects that were visible to an unaided eye. And this is exactly
what we find.
And certainly, each of the three Islamic stages is described at a visible level of
scale. A drop of seed, a clot of blood, a lump of flesh; all of them are objects of a
size with which the ancient Arabs would have been familiar.
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Articles/huxley/islamic_embyology.htm 4
The Arabs believed that the woman served simply as an incubator for a child that
was fully contained in the father’s seed. There was no understanding of the
actual biology of sexual reproduction, and no such understanding is apparent in
the Qur’an.
Instead, the Qur’an tells us that the “drop of seed” remains exactly that (a drop of
seed) for the entire nutfah phase (40 days according to Bukhari and Muslim).
What actually IS happening during those 40 days, and how might it be said to
resemble a “drop of seed?”
The actual “drop of seed” provided by the male dissipates within minutes of
ejaculation, so even before conception, the literal “drop of seed” no longer exists.
The case could certainly be made that the fertilized egg resembles a seed until
about day 13 or fourteen, but the “drop” is long gone, replaced with a microscopic
egg that moves through a period called the “Blastocyst.” But by the beginning of
the third week, the embryo has already begun to differentiate into a Trilaminar
embryo with the three layers of ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm. A mere two
and a half weeks after conception, the embryo no longer looks anything like a
“drop of seed,” while the Islamic tradition indicates that the nutfah stage should
last for an additional three weeks.
The word “Alaqah” is a bit more ambiguous than “nutfah,” and so has been
translated a bit more flexibly by Islamic apologists. Although consistently
translated as a “clot of blood” by multiple translators, there are a handful of
instances where it is rendered as “a leech-like clot.” This is the phase that
(according to Bukhari and Muslim) should last from about day 41 to day 80 after
conception.
Among the many images of Allah’s creative power reflected in the Qur’an and the
Hadith, the image of man having been created from a clot of blood is one of the
most common, showing up over a dozen times in the Qur’an, Bukhari and Islam
alone.
What actually IS happening during those 40 days, and how might it be said to
resemble a “leech-like clot?”
The period of development covered by the “Alaqah” stage includes from week six
until week eleven after conception. The first two weeks of this “phase” actually
encompass the final two weeks of embryonic development, for at that point the
baby is essentially completely formed, and from here on out is known as a
foetus.
Interestingly, at no time during this period (or any period for that matter) does the
embryo or fetus resemble a “clot.” And while dependence of the placenta might
be described as being vaguely “leech-like” in that it is attached to the uterine wall,
no one would ever confuse the embryo or fetus with a leech.
For over three weeks of the supposed “Alaqah” phase, rather than a “leech-like
clot” the fetus is actually a fully formed human being, ranging in size from 35 mm
to about 80 mm in length.
Interim Conclusion: The Qur’an and Hadith are in error describing the embryo as
a “leech-like clot” for any period of time, and certainly wrong in assigning the
period from 41 to 80 days for such a phase.
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Articles/huxley/islamic_embyology.htm 6
If there were anytime during which the embryo might be described as a “lump of
flesh,” that would have been much earlier, perhaps during the fourth week. But
even then, the embryo was quite organized and complex, hardly “chewed” in any
sense of the word.
Interim Conclusion: The Qur’an and Hadith are in error describing the embryo as
a “morsel of flesh” for any significant period of time, and certainly wrong in
assigning the period from 81 to 120 days for such a phase.
Discussion 3 – Gender
According to multiple Hadith, it is only after the Mudghha phase (days 81-120)
that an angel of the Lord determines the gender of the baby. But in fact, modern
genetics shows that the gender of the baby is determined at the moment of
conception, and is therefore already set some four months before Islam asserts
the question is even asked of Allah.
Conclusion: The authors of the Qur’an and the Hadith had no idea as to the
genetic nature of gender, and assumed wrongly that it was assigned by
Allah months after it was actually determined by genetics. The Islamic
model is wrong again.
In articles published widely across Islamic web sites, Dr. Moore goes on the
record to provide a generous assessment of the Qur’an and Hadith in the light of
modern knowledge about embryology. But a review of his “analysis” shows the
extent to which he had to twist both the Islamic scriptures and modern science in
order to get the “facts” to correlate.
1) He liberally translates Arabic into terms that no Arabic speaker would consider
justified, but that allows him to pretend the Arabic is closer to truth than it really
is. For example, in spite of the fact that almost three-dozen translations of
“Alaqah” found on line never once exclude the word “clot,” Moore writes instead
that “The word "Alaqah" refers to a leech or bloodsucker.”
One might speculate on the reasons Dr. Moore might have for this travesty of
embryology, but actually the answer is a simple one. He was apparently quite
well paid for essentially no real additional work. The textbook he delivered to the
Saudi Universities that commissioned the work is titled, "The Developing Human:
Clinically Oriented Embryology with Islamic Additions." (ISBN 0-7216-6472-5).
The base textbook is work that Moore had apparently completed years before,
while the “Islamic Additions” appear to be the work of an Abdul-Majeed A.
Azzindani, and not Dr. Moore’s at all.
And an interesting side bar (of no real importance, but entertaining none the less)
is that the Acknowledgments for the book recognize a number of “distinguished
scholars” who supported the book with time or money. And number 6 on the list?
T.H. Huxley