ENTRY GUIDELINES

Revised January 2011

INTRODUCTION The WEF Student Design Competition is intended to promote real world design experience for students interested in pursuing an education and/or career in water/wastewater engineering and sciences. This competition tasks individuals or teams of student members within WEF to design and present a program meeting the requirements of the problem statement. For More Information, contact: Lauren Zuravnsky, Sub-Committee chair for the WEF Student Design Competition P: (804) 204-2425 or Email lzuravnsky@greeley-hansen.com Dianne Crilley, WEF Staff Liaison to the SYPC P: (703) 684-2445 or Email Dcrilley@wef.org The WEF Students & Young Professionals Committee (SYPC) is always looking for interested persons to help further the activities supported by the committees. If you are interested in helping or becoming a member please contact Dianne Crilley. BACKGROUND The original student design competition concept was based on a student competition held within the Florida WEA. The concept was then expanded to the national level and organized by the WEF SYPC. The WEF competition is intended to be the culmination of various MA level competitions where the students groups, who won at their MA level, will compete nationally. The WEF SYPC feels this competition promotes interest within students that will prove to be extremely valuable as they enter the professional world. A WEF Student Design Competition Sub-Committee was formed to lead the effort in establishing a WEF Student Design Competition to be held annually at WEFTEC. It is the intent of the WEF Student Design Competition Sub-Committee to promote this competition at the MA level as well as nationally. These guidelines represent a general guide to what the Sub-Committee envisions, however, not every MA or student group will be able to follow these initially. Below is a schematic of the intent of this competition.

Design Competition @ MA Level Design Competition @ MA Level Winner from each MA to compete at WEFTEC Winner at WEFTEC

Design Competition @ MA Level

Design Competition @ MA Level

Each MA will choose a design problem for each competition (i.e., traditional wastewater and environmental) and distribute to participating schools within the MA. Students will be given a

semester period of time to finalize their design with the appropriate recommendations. If more than one school participates in the MA, student teams will present their designs during a WEA Student Design Competition to be held at the MA level. The winner of each MA competition will be invited to compete at WEFTEC later that year. If there is only one participating school within the MA, that schools student team may compete at WEFTEC, assuming they meet the guidelines set forth herein. If a team chooses to participate in a MA joint competition (2 or more MAs in a single conference) and are not the winner of the competition, they may not participate in the WEF Student Design Competition held annually at WEFTEC. If multiple schools are willing to participate but their MA does not host a WEA Student Design Competition, these schools may be invited to compete at WEFTEC on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of the WEF Student Design Competition Sub-Committee. Furthermore, it is at the discretion of each MA to adopt and/or change rules of these guidelines as needed to suit the MA in order to have a successful competition.

STUDENT DESIGN COMPETITION The student design competition is based on problems relating to the environmental field including sewer design (collection & distribution system analysis), wastewater treatment plant expansions, biological treatment, reuse, constructed wetlands, sustainability efforts, etc. The scope and extent of the project should be at the level of a senior or graduate engineering/science student in a design or capstone course. Students are expected to work with little assistance from an advisor and/or professor and the students are expected to work together as a team to recommend a solution. Students may use whatever references or resources they choose. Students are expected to perform the necessary calculations for the project. This is not intended to be a research project or literature review. Although some initial literature review and/or research will be required, the bulk of the project should incorporate pertinent calculations for the design. For example, if the project involved a wastewater treatment plant expansion, judges should look that each team performed the following: Hydraulic profile; Preliminary sizing of major equipment (aeration basins, clarifiers, chlorine contact chambers, etc.); Incorporate information from different manufacturers; Population analysis to determine design flow rates; Preliminary cost evaluation; and Decision matrix (provide why you ended up with that particular process or design etc.). The WEF Student Design Competition will be hosting two competitions at WEFTEC, a wastewater design and an environmental design competition. Students will need to specify which group they believe their project falls into (final grouping is at the discretion of the SubCommittee). The wastewater design competition is intended to include the traditional wastewater design projects, e.g. hydraulic capacity design, upgrades to existing systems, biosolids handling, etc. The environmental design competition is intended to include the current contemporary engineering topics, e.g. sustainability, water reuse, wetland construction, etc. Both competitions will follow the same guidelines and the same scoring system. Each MA competition may only select one team to participate per competition, with a maximum of two

teams from each MA. However, individual considerations will be given to teams on a case-bycase basis. All of the design work should be submitted in the design notebook, clearly labeled and referenced. See below for information regarding the notebook. Timeline: Experience and conversations with students who have participated in this type of competition in the past indicated the need for the problem statement to be given approximately 3 to 4 months prior to the competition. A sample timeline is shown below to give relative timeframes that would be ideal for the competition to be successfully completed on the MA level. It should be noted that the dates are given only as a guideline and may be adjusted to suit the MAs and/or student chapters participating. The WEF Student Design Competition specific timeline follows later in this package. 1. MAs coordinate with consulting firms/industry and the MAs Student Activities Committee to develop a problem statement and assemble design competition packets. (November) 2. MAs distribute the problem statement to interested student chapters. This would start the beginning of the competition. (January) 3. MA level competition held. (April) 4. The winner from each MA to compete nationally at WEFTEC. (September/October) REQUIREMENTS OF THE WEF STUDENT DESIGN COMPETITION 1. TO BE ELIGIBLE, each presenter must be a WEF student member who:

has been selected by his/her student chapter to participate, and/or has been certified by the individual member association as a student member in good standing.

To be thus certified, a new WEF student member must have filed an application and paid the required dues for membership before the first day of the month prior to the designated competition. The same holds true for continuing student members. **The WEF Student Design Competition Sub-Committee realizes that schools willing to participate may not have a WEF Student Chapter. Therefore, as long as the participants are WEF student members they will be allowed to participate. 2. Student members who have graduated at the time of WEFTEC will be allowed to participate. 3. Teams may consist of more than four members. However, a maximum of four team members shall be permitted to present. If required, one additional team member may be on the presentation platform but shall be dedicated solely to advancing the presentation slides. 4. Two teams per MA competition. Generally the winners of the MA level student design competition will be automatically invited to compete in the WEFTEC Student Design Competitions. Additional teams may be selected based on availability at the discretion of the WEF Student Design Competition Sub-Committee. 5. Student members will compete through written and oral presentations.

a. Written: A design notebook complying with the requirements set forth in this document must accompany each entry. b. Oral: Each teams presentation will be 20 minutes followed by a 10-minute question and answer period. The presentation should be in PowerPoint format and able to be loaded onto a general laptop available at the competition site. Any time remaining or in excess of the 20 minutes may be added to or subtracted from the 10-minute question and answer period. c. Both written and oral presentations are subject to questioning during the question and answer period. However, questioning is limited to the judging panel only. ENTRY FEE There is no entry fee for the competition. TIMELINE OF THE WEF STUDENT DESIGN COMPETITION:
DATE April 1, 2011 ACTION ITEM Teams shall notify appropriate Regional Liaison of their intent to participate in the WEFTEC Student Design Competition. Teams shall inform the Regional Liaison whether or not their local MA will be hosting an MA level Student Design Competition. Teams shall submit the completed Entry Form to the Sub-Committee Chair. See Attachment A. Team shall submit an abstract (brief summary of the design), not to exceed 200 words. The project name, team name, advisors name, and entrant's names shall also be included with submission but will not count towards the 200-word limit. See Attachment B. Sub-Committee will notify the teams regarding the number of CDs and hardcopies of notebooks required for submission. Team shall submit a package containing hard-copies of the design notebook and at least the required number of CDs. Package shall be postmarked no later than this date. WEFTEC STUDENT DESIGN COMPETITION (Date TBA)

May 25, 2011

August 3, 2011

August 24, 2011

September 1, 2011

October 2011

Regional Liaisons: See Attachment D or contact: Dianne Crilley (WEF Staff Liaison to the SYPC) Phone: (703) 684-2445 Email: Dcrilley@wef.org Sub-Committee Chair, WEF Student Design Competition: Lauren Zuravnsky Greeley and Hansen 9020 Stony Point Parkway, Suite 475 Richmond, VA 23235 Phone: (804) 204-2425 Email: lzuravnsky@greeley-hansen.com

NATURE AND MANNER OF PRESENTATION It is recognized that environmental professionals must possess a well-developed ability to communicate both orally and in writing. The competition is designed to emphasize the value of delivering both high quality written and oral technical presentations. Scoring of the design will be determined through an evaluation of both the competitors written and oral presentation skills, along with the technical content of the problem solution. Written and oral skills will be evaluated separately and the scores will be added for the total score (see Scoring Sheet - Attachment C). The written submission (submitted in electronic format) will be evaluated by the judges prior to the oral presentation and scores submitted prior to the oral presentations. The written submission will be available to the judges during the oral presentation for their reference and questions may be posed to the teams based on information contained in the written submission. All scores will be kept confidential until after the competition.

DESIGN NOTEBOOK REQUIREMENTS A vinyl, non-flexible, single volume, three-ring binder (not greater than 1-inch in size) shall be used to compile documents that describe the entry for judging. A CD containing an organized and easily viewed electronic copy of the design notebook shall also be created. An original hard-copy of the notebook and copies of the CD must be submitted to the Sub-Committee by the stated deadline. The Sub-Commitee will inform students of the number of required CD and hardcopies. The project name, team name, and entrant's names shall be affixed to the spine and front of the design notebooks, as well as labeled on each CD. Teams are encouraged to print their notebooks double-sided and incorporate sustainable practices into their submittals. The design notebook and each CD shall include, in the following order: 1. Entry Form - Please use the original entry form supplied (see Attachment A). Please check which design group the presentation will fall into. 2. Abstract Provide a brief summary of the design, not to exceed 200 words. See Attachment B for a template to be used for the abstract submittal. 3. Project Description Provide a description of the project or program, including the following information: A summary of the project team, including: o Each team members role in the effort o The names of any other individuals that assisted in the effort A discussion of the design solution (not to exceed 20-pages*). The discussion must cover the salient facts upon which the recommendation is made, give a clear analysis of the evaluation technique, and present a clear recommendation of action. Relevant data should be presented in the discussion in a clear form. All elements shown on the judging form should be addressed. Formatting to include 1-inch margins on all sides; Calibri, Arial, or Times New Roman Font with a minimum 11-point font size. Color diagrams, charts and photographs that reflect the unique features of the project. Each is to be identified with an appropriate descriptive caption. Graphics/photos can be included within the project description and will count toward the 20-page limit, or can be included as supporting documentation in the appendices and will not count towards the 20-page limit. *The number of pages used in the discussion is checked to ensure compliance with the 20-page limit. Noncompliance may result in penalties (see below).

4. Supporting Documentation Provide drawings, calculations, tables, submittals, cost estimates, and other voluminous documents, as appendices. 5. References/Acknowledgements

vendor

Teams are encouraged to use a checklist to ensure all necessary documents are included in the design notebooks. Failure to ensure all documents are accounted for may result in a team penalty. The Sub-Committee will not be able to review any submittal prior to submission.

CONDUCT OF THE CONTEST The same individuals will judge throughout the contest. Ideally, the judging panel will be comprised of members of the sponsoring company/industry. Competing student chapters may be allowed to watch another student chapters presentation. The scoring sheet has been developed for the convenience of the judges in evaluating both the design notebooks and presentations and will be used by the judges as the basis for judging all the student teams (see Scoring Sheet - Attachment C).

JUDGING CRITERIA WEF is a multi-disciplined environmental professional organization dedicated to quality in practice of the profession. Accordingly, judging will be based on the elements outlined below and in the scoring sheets provided in Attachment C. 1. PRESENTATION: a. Content. Was technical subject matter relevant to design? To what extent was subject of interest to a technical audience? Was credit given for source of material or contribution by others? How much knowledge of subject was exhibited? Was work independent and original? Was subject technical or general in nature? b. Organization. Was there any novel approach to the subject? Was there sufficient background information provided in order to introduce the audience to the subject? Were facts developed in logical and continuous sequence? Was there a definite conclusion and was it adequately based on the facts or data presented? c. Delivery and Effectiveness. Were the words distinctly pronounced and was proper volume used to be heard by all? Did the contestant use proper English and was the vocabulary sufficient? Was personal appearance appropriate? Were there any distracting mannerisms? Was the manner of delivery (conversation, memorized, read from manuscript) satisfactory? If visual aids were used, how effectively were they used? Was the presentation completed within the time limit of 20 minutes? d. Discussion. Did the presentation evoke spontaneous questions from the panel? Did questions indicate the need for clarification of facts presented or were they merely of the type seeking additional information? How readily and with what self-assurance did the speaker answer questions? Did the answers indicate knowledge of subject beyond that disclosed in the original presentation?

2. DESIGN NOTEBOOK: a. Technical. Was the notebook organized effectively with Introduction, Statement of Problem, Background information, etc? Was a continuous, logical sequence of steps taken to solve the design problem? Was the solution feasible & logical for problem statement? Was creativity and innovative approach shown? Was knowledge of subject demonstrated? Was the solution analyzed for economic feasibility; was this analysis presented? Bibliography, credit to resources & help presented? b. Presentation. Were visual aides (graphs, supporting info, pictures, etc.), presented clearly? Correct grammar, spelling & technical writing? Logical formatting, organization of report, table of contents? The judges will have the opportunity to comment on the design notebooks and presentations during the judging process. Judging scoring sheets and comments for each submittal will be made available to the corresponding team after the competition at the request of the team. Teams will not be allowed to view the scoring of any other team within the competition. PENALTIES Teams failure to comply with the above requirements may result in penalties to their final score. Penalties are at the discretion of the Sub-Committee but may include the following: Failure to submit an abstract within the guidelines set forth herein 1 point; Failure to submit a design notebook within the guidelines set forth herein 1 point; and Failure to submit entries on-time 1 point per day, up to a maximum of 3 points for late entries.

The maximum penalties a team can incur are five points. Teams will be notified of the penalties they have received prior to the competition at WEFTEC. AWARDS The following are possible awards that can be awarded, and are subject to change at the discretion of the Sub-Committee: PLACE First Place AWARD Recognition Plaque Monetary Award Recognition Plaque Monetary Award

Second Place

Prizes for the winner at WEFTEC will vary depending on sponsorship opportunities. Each team participating will receive a recognition plaque. Suggested monetary awards for the top two teams are: 1st place: $2,500, and 2nd place: $1,500. Remaining monetary awards are at the discretion of the Sub-Committee. First place teams may also be recognized at the Award Ceremony held at WEFTEC, at the discretion of the WEF staff. Teams are encouraged to check the WEFTEC schedule and make necessary travel arrangements. The Awards Ceremony is typically held Tuesday afternoon, but is subject to change.

It should be noted that these are suggested awards for the MA level competition as well. Every opportunity should be made by the MA to assist the student chapter in competing at WEFTEC, and serious consideration should be made for awarding money toward travel expenses to attend WEFTEC. Similarly, each MA might seek out sponsorships from local industries, municipalities, and consulting firms in order to help the winner attend WEFTEC. QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS Please review the entire package and contact the WEF Student Design Competition SubCommittee for any clarification on any of the rules or guidelines of the competition.

SAMPLE PROJECT Below is a sample information packet that would be given to each student team wishing to compete at the MA level. This was an actual problem description and packet given to a student team competing at the MA level. Note this is only given as a general idea of sample project description and information. This packet would vary with the amount of information provided and contact names. A copy of the Student Design Competition Guidelines should also be included. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT This years design project is a three-part project and includes the preliminary design of a sewer collection system, a wastewater treatment plant expansion, and a reuse irrigation distribution system for a large development in Jupiter, FL known as Abacoa. A contact at the WWTP should be provided if possible so that teams may arrange tours of the plant as part of the project. Part 1 Sewer Collection Based on Abacoas community master plan, design the back-bone sewer infrastructure that will collect sewage from the community and transport the sewage to the treatment plant location. Part 2 Sewage Treatment As a result of the growing community, the Loxahatchee River Districts (LRD) Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) will need to be expanded. With reuse being a favorable method of effluent disposal, LRD desires the expansion to contain nitrogen reduction processes that would drive the nitrogen under the existing ground water standards of 10 ppm. Part 3 Reuse Irrigation Based on the communitys irrigation needs, design a reuse irrigation system and backbone distribution system that will provide irrigation-quality water from the WWTP to the development. The following documents are attached to assist in the preparation of the recommended program developed by the student chapters: Exhibit A - Development master plan of Abacoa Exhibit B - Map of Jupiter Exhibit C - Loxahatchee River District Wastewater Treatment Plant Drawings Exhibit D - WWTP Monthly Operating Report (MOR) Exhibit E - WWTP Capacity Analysis Report Exhibit F - Abacoa Irrigation Master Plan Exhibit G - Scoring Sheet for Student Design Competition Exhibit H - Entry Form

10

ATTACHMENT A

ENTRY FORM

11

ENTRY FORM
WEFTEC 2011 STUDENT DESIGN COMPETITION

SUBMIT ENTRY FORM BY MAY 25, 2011

Name of University: ____________________________________________________________ Address: _____________________________________________________________________ City: State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Name of Individual to Contact: ____________________________________________________ Address (if different): ___________________________________________________________ City: State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: _______________________________________________________________________ Name of Faculty Advisor: ________________________________________________________ Address (if different): ___________________________________________________________ City: State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: _______________________________________________________________________ Project Name: ________________________________________________________________ Name(s) of Team Members: (use additional paper if necessary) ________________________________________________________ Level in School: _______ ________________________________________________________ Level in School:_______ ________________________________________________________ Level in School:_______ ________________________________________________________ Level in School:_______ Wastewater Design Competition Environmental Design Competition

Special requests or equipment needed for the presentation: ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ WEF COMPETITION TIMELINE:
DATE April 1, 2011 ACTION ITEM Notify appropriate Regional Liaison of intent to compete. Submit the completed Entry Form to the Sub-Committee Chair. Submit team abstract, including project, team, and members names. Submit hard-copy of design notebook and at least the required number of CDs, postmarked no later that this date. WEFTEC STUDENT DESIGN COMPETITION (Date to be Confirmed)

CONTACT PERSON See Attachment C WEF Student Design Competition Sub-Committee Chair: Lauren Zuravnsky Greeley and Hansen 9020 Stony Point Parkway, Suite 475 Richmond, VA 23235 Phone: (804) 204-2425 Email: lzuravnsky@greeleyhansen.com

May 25, 2011

August 3, 2011

September 1, 2011

October 16, 2011

12

ATTACHMENT B

ABSTRACT TEMPLATE

13

ABSTRACT
WEFTEC 2011 STUDENT DESIGN COMPETITION

SUBMIT ABSTRACT FORM BY AUGUST 3, 2011 University:___________________________________________________________________________ Project Name:_____________________________________________________________________ Team Members:_______________________________________________________________________ Faculty Advisor:_______________________________________________________________________ Abstract (not to exceed 200 words):

14

ATTACHMENT C

SCORING SHEETS

15

EXAMPLE SCORING TALLY SHEET 2011 STUDENT DESIGN COMPETITION

Team:

Title:

Notebook Score

Presentation Score

Total

Judge #1

Judge #2

Judge #3

Judge #4 SCORE (Average of Totals)

16

EXAMPLE SCORING SHEET 2011 STUDENT DESIGN COMPETITION PRESENTATION

Name of University: ____________________________________________________________ Title: ________________________________________________________________________ Judge: ______________________________________________________________________
Content - 45 pts 1. Technical subject matter relevant to design (20 pts) .............................................................. ________ 2. Personal contribution, library research, innovative project (15 pts) ........................................ ________ 3. Knowledge of subject & content (15 pts) ................................................................................ ________ TOTAL (45 pts) ...... ________

Organization - 20 pts 1. Introduction, background (eliciting audience interest), objectives, presentation outline (5 pts) ......... ________ 2. Continuity, essential facts developed in a logical sequence (10 pts) ..................................... ________ 3. Conclusion, definite & based on facts (5 pts).......................................................................... ________ TOTAL (20 pts) ...... ________

Delivery & Effectiveness - 25 pts 1. Vocal delivery, conversation vs. memorized, proper volume, distinct pronunciation, timing (10 pts) ....... ________ 2. Body Language, eye contact with audience, distracting mannerisms (5 pts) ......................... ________ 3. Visual aides legibility & effectiveness (5 pts) .......................................................................... ________ TOTAL (25 pts) ...... ________

Discussion - 10 pts 1. Questions & Answers, Clarification & spontaneous (10 pts) .................................................. ________

Penalties ________

GRAND TOTAL (100 pts) ..... _______

COMMENTS: ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________

17

EXAMPLE SCORING SHEET 2011 STUDENT DESIGN COMPETITION DESIGN NOTEBOOK

Name of University: ____________________________________________________________ Title: ________________________________________________________________________ Judge: ______________________________________________________________________
Technical - 70 pts 1. Introduction, statement of problem, background information (5 pts) ...................................... ________ 2. Continuity, logical sequence of steps to solution (10 pts) ....................................................... ________ 3. Conclusion, definite based on logical steps to solution (10 pts) ............................................. ________ 4. Solution feasible & logical for problem statement (15 pts)...................................................... ________ 5. Creativity, innovative approach, applicability (5 pts) ............................................................... ________ 6. Knowledge of subject & content (10 pts) ................................................................................ ________ 7. Economic analysis, feasibility, presentation of economics (10 pts) ........................................ ________ 8. Bibliography, credit to resources & help (5 pts) ...................................................................... ________ TOTAL (70 pts) ...... ________

Notebook Presentation - 30 pts 1. Visual aides (graphs, supporting info, pictures, etc.), presented clearly (10 pts) ................... ________ 2. Grammar, spelling & technical writing (10 pts) ....................................................................... ________ 3. Formatting, logical organization of report, table of contents (10 pts) ...................................... ________ TOTAL (30 pts) ...... ________

Penalties ________

GRAND TOTAL (100 pts) ..... _______

COMMENTS: ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________

18

ATTACHMENT D

REGIONAL LIAISON DIRECTORY

19

20

Regional Liaison Contact Information Updated January 2010

Region MA Name New England WEA States Connecticut Maine Massachusetts New Hampshire Rhode Island 1 New Jersey WEA New York WEA Chesapeake WEA Vermont New Jersey New York Delaware D.C. Maryland Pennsylvania WEA Central States WEA Pennsylvania Illinois Minnesota Wisconsin 2 Illinois WEA Ohio WEA Indiana WEA Michigan WEA Kentucky-Tennessee WEA North Carolina WEA WEA of South Carolina Virginia WEA West Virginia WEA Alabama's WEA Florida WEA 4 Georgia AWP Louisiana WEA Mississippi WEA Puerto Rico WEA Iowa WPCA Kansas WEA 5 Missouri WEA Nebraska WEA North Dakota WEA South Dakota WEA Arkansas WEA 6 Oklahoma WEA WEA of Texas Illinois Ohio Indiana Michigan Kentucky Tennessee 3 North Carolina South Carolina Virginia West Virginia Alabama Florida Georgia Louisiana Mississippi Puerto Rico Iowa Kansas Missouri Nebraska North Dakota South Dakota Arkansas Oklahoma Texas ** Contact Jennifer Shore Jennifer.Shore@hdrinc.com or Tania Datta- Tania.Datta@CH2M.com Eric Dodds Eric.Dodds@AE2S.com Ph. 218/299-5610 ** Contact Jennifer Shore Jennifer.Shore@hdrinc.com or Tania Datta Tania.Datta@CH2M.com Tom Johnson and Dave Riedel david.riedel@hdrinc.com Ph. 571/327-5815 Tom.Johnson@ch2m.com Ph. 704/329-0073 and Anil Tangirala atangirala@fmsm.com Ph. 614/844-4016 Louis Storino Louis.Storino@mwrdgc.dst.il.us Ph. 312/751-3167 ** Contact Jennifer Shore Jennifer.Shore@hdrinc.com or Tania Datta Tania.Datta@CH2M.com Liaison Name Liaison Contact Info.

21

Regional Liaison Contact Information Updated January 2010

Region MA Name Rocky Mountain WEA 7 Montana WEA WEA of Utah Arizona WPCA 8 California WEA Nevada WEA Hawaii WEA Alaska WWMA 9 Pacific Northwest CWA States Colorado New Mexico Wyoming Montana Utah Arizona California Nevada Hawaii Alaska Idaho Oregon Washington Atlantic Canada WWA British Columbia WWA 10 RESEAU environnement WEA of Ontario Western Canada WEA Vanessa Chau vchau2007@gmail.com Ph. 905/895-1200 Timothy Lum Yee timothy.lumyee@hdrinc.com Ph. 808/697-6231 Hannah Wilner Hannah.Wilner@ch2m.com Ph. 702/953-1213 Tania Datta Tania.Datta@CH2M.com Liaison Name Liaison Contact Info.

22