The Big Diversion With the putative Nobel Peace Prize winning President, and domestic enemy of the

United States, beating the drums of WW3, and fanning the flames with propaganda befitting his station as the greatest liar ever, patriots wonder aloud how they can remove this domestic enemy from the White House. Although the Constitution has been apparently suspended, since the executor of the laws is an illegal entity, it is our duty, and our obligation to our posterity to restore it. In the fog of war Hussein Obama will try to hide all of the crimes he and his fellow traveler Oligarchs have manifested, and the full court propaganda press aided by a complicit media aiding and abetting the Usurper will eventually lead to war. Obama will be fed softball questions by journalists with serious faces on Monday 9/8 and will not provide one shred of proof that the government of Syria perpetrated any chemical attack, and the journalists wont even notice that there is no proof to that allegation. We will see YouTube videos of the purported attack which we have already seen, but supposedly members of Congress havent, showing dying children with the symptoms of a chemical poisoning, but that provide no proof as to the perpetrators. We will hear out of context phone snippets of low level Syrian government employees doctored to sound like they knew of the attack, much like the media itself doctored the Zimmerman 911 call with the out of context Hes black. So invested are they in the lie of the great statesman Barack Obama, the media will do all it can to help him create the smokescreen of all smokescreens so that he and his Cloward Piven practicing fellow travelers can exit the side door. I have been pressing the battle against the Usurper since filing a contest of election suit in Leon Co. Circuit Court in February 14, 2012, using Florida contest of election statute 102.168 (1)(3)(b), which gives standing and a legal cause of action to any elector (voter) to challenge the nomination or election of any person to office, based on the eligibility for the office sought of that person. The Florida Statutes most certainly give me standing and a legal cause of action to ask the question of the Florida Courts as to whether Barack Obama is a natural born Citizen, eligible for the office of President. The Florida Supreme Court has also held that eligibility for office is a judicial determination, made upon the

presentation of a proper challenge (Shevin v. Stone 1972). My challenge was proper in every way, as I, a Democratic Party voter (eligible to vote in the primary), filed my case in the correct venue (Leon Co. Circuit), within the proper time frame (within 15 days after the election), adjoined the proper indispensible party (Florida Elections Canvassing Commission), and used a correct cause of action (eligibility of the candidate for office sought). With my own eyes I witnessed the lies of the Florida judiciary as they attempted to rationalize the lie that they did not have to make a legal determination as to Barack Obamas eligibility since he was not nominated or elected, which of course is thoroughly defeated by the Florida statutes themselves. Florida statute 101.252 (1) states that if a party candidate is unopposed, then that candidate shall be nominated for the office, which is why the Florida statutes say that an elector eligible to vote in an election (it must be a member of the candidates own party since the Presidential Primary is closed in Florida) is able to challenge the nomination or election of any person. When faced with that statute Judge Lewis simply lied and ruled that I had no standing because those statutes do not apply to Presidential elections. He presented no case law or anything else to support that allegation. That was the huge lie which is presented to the Florida Supreme Court as I write this. In fact Al Gore used the very same contest of election statute when contesting the Florida vote in 2000, and the Supreme Court of Florida explicitly held that ALL of the Florida election statutes apply to Presidential elections (Palm Beach County Canvassing Commission v. Harris, footnote 20). My case sat in the Appeals Court from July 2012 until February 8, 2013, when the First District ruled moot, and violated Federal 3 US Code S. 5, which states that any contest of election must be finally adjudicated by 6 days prior to the meeting of electors (December 17 minus 6 days is December 11, 2012). In the meantime I filed another election contest after the General election. The judge in that case did not even afford me a hearing, as required by the election contest statute, and in a ruling dripping with sarcasm, and hinting that he should get a promotion for repelling me, he said that Obama is eligible because the government says he is eligible, and cited the movie Miracle On 47 St., where a man was judged to be Santa Clause because people believed he was Santa Clause. Orwellian indeed.

A Writ of Mandamus, which would require a state elections officer to perform a ministerial duty demanded by statute, was filed in the Florida Supreme Court on April 29, 2013. The basis of the Secretary of States duty is found in Fl. Statute 97.012: Secretary of State as chief election officer.The Secretary of State is the chief election officer of the state, and it is his or her responsibility to: (14) Bring and maintain such actions at law or in equity by mandamus or injunction to enforce the performance of any duties of a county supervisor of elections or any official performing duties with respect to chapters 97-102 and chapter 105 or to enforce compliance with a rule of the Department of State adopted to interpret or implement any of those chapters. Fl. ss. 97.012(14). Not only did the Appeals Court fail to comply with the Federal Statute 3 US Code S. 5, but the Secretary of State, Ken Detzner, failed to do his duty to comply with that statute and his duty under Fl ss. 97.012(14) . Instead of making its ruling of moot within the safe harbor of December 11, 2012, in compliance with Federal statute, the First District Court of Appeal waited over 2 months outside of the statute, and Detzner did not do his duty to force a final determination by December 11, 2012, and in fact allowed the case, in which he is a respondent, to languish for over 6 months. The Writ of Mandamus seeks to force Detzner to make the Appeals court make a decision as to the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama. The Florida Supreme Court now has a big hairy elephant in the room, in a circuit judge who failed to follow state statute and lied about it, an Appeals Court which has broken Federal statute, and a Secretary of State, who, as the chief elections officer, let it all happen. The state of Florida has violated my due process and equal protection rights, and no matter what happens next I plan on appealing to the Supreme Court of the United States, suing the State of Florida for violating due process and equal protection, and violating its own and Federal election statutes, a case in which the Supreme Court will have original jurisdiction. Obama and Detzners lawyers attempted to also make the claim that vetting candidates for eligibility for office of President is a political question, that is, it is already designated to a political body (Congress). They claim that the joint session of Congress to count the electoral vote is the correct body of government charged with determining eligibility (Amendment 20 and 3 US Code 15). However, a true

reading of the Constitution, and knowledge of the Electoral Count Act 1887 (now US Code 3 S. 5), reveals that thought to be totally false. Article 1 section 5 of the Constitution states that Congress is responsible for the qualifications and elections of its own members. Certainly if Congress was responsible for the qualifications of the President it would say so there. In fact the Constitution is very clear that no member of the government should elect the President (but no Senator or Representative, or person holding an office of trust or profit under the United States, shall be appointed an elector. A2S1C2). The President of the Senate simply performs a ministerial duty of counting the votes, and no discretion is prescribed. (The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted Amendment 12). The only discretion of the Joint session would occur if an objection, sponsored by a member of Congress and a Senator, is put forth in writing during the counting of the votes (See 3 US Code S. 15). 3 US Code S. 5 is titled Determination of controversy as to appointment of electors, and that title belies the very purpose of US Code 3 S. 5--- to finally determine all controversies at the state level BEFORE the Joint session meets to count the votes. The Supreme Court has held that it is the duty of the courts to reign in a Congress that attempts to step outside of its constitutional bounds: Congress is supreme and beyond the control of the courts; but if it steps outside of its constitutional limitations and attempts that which is beyond its reach, the courts are authorized to, and when called upon in due course of legal proceedings must annul its encroachments upon the reserved power of the states and the people. US v. Reese, 92 US 214, 221 (1876) It is we the people that elect the President, and Congress has no say but to count the votes. It is not, and never has been Congress discretion that determines if a candidate is eligible or not. As Federalist 68 says, the Executive should be independent for his continuance in office on all but the people themselves. So what to do? The De facto Officer Doctrine holds that one illegitimately elected should be deemed as legally performing his duties. However there is an

exception, which can turn back all appointments, bills and orders signed by a usurper, and make them all null and void. If the de facto officer acts in bad faith, and if many are aware of the usurpation then the acts of a usurper are void. Hussein Obama has certainly acted in bad faith by refusing to put forth an ORIGINAL birth certificate, and by employing legions of lawyers to deny standing to those that are attempting to have the question of his eligibility answered. Millions are aware that Obama is a domestic enemy of the United States, is a Usurper, and has little allegiance and attachment, yet he commands the military, and is trying to get the United states into a perilous war. This is a matter of great public importance. Now lets look at how the domestic enemy can be removed. Part of the original 12th Amendment was supplanted in parts by the 20th and 25th Amendments: And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President. (emphasis added) Original 12th Amendment The 20th Amendment describes what shall happen if the President ELECT AND VP ELECT shall have failed to qualify, which is the only place that Congress has discretion in choosing the President, as they would make the choice at that point. Shall have is past perfect tense, so the plain language implies that the determination of ineligibility is made PRIOR to the Joint session of Congress to count the electoral votes, and that determination is not made by Congress. Again, that is the very purpose of the Electoral Count Act 1887to keep controversies out of the Joint Congress, and to settle them in the States. The part of the original 12th Amendment supplanted by the 25th Amendment and made actionable by 3 US Code S.19 talks about the removal of the President and the line of succession. The 25th Amendment says that the President may be removed. So there are 2 ways in the Constitution to remove a sitting President. One is by impeachment:

The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. Article 2 S. 4 The other is removal due to inability: In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the Vice President shall become President. 25th Amendment s.1 3 US Code s. 19 is the Congressional statute written by Congress giving action to the 25th Amendment. a) (1) If, by reason of death, resignation, removal from office, inability, or failure to qualify, there is neither a President nor Vice President to discharge the powers and duties of the office of President, then the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, upon his resignation as Speaker and as Representative in Congress, act as President. (2) The same rule shall apply in the case of the death, resignation, removal from office, or inability of an individual acting as President under this subsection. 3 US Code s.19 (emphasis added) Inability can certainly be defined as either a physical or a Constitutional disability, especially since the part of the 12th Amendment that the 25th Amendment replaced talks about removal of the President due to Constitutional disability.

If any court of law presented with a correct cause of action makes the determination that Hussein Obama is ineligible, then he must step down until that decision is appealed to the Supreme Court. If the Supreme Court rules that he is ineligible then Hussein Obama would be permanently removed, and since his term would not be subject to the de facto officer doctrine, because he has acted in bad faith, and since millions are aware that he was born British of a British subject father, and is thus not an eligible natural born citizen. All of the Usurpers signatures would be void. My case is still active in the Supreme Court of Florida. If

that body rules against me then I certainly have a case that is appealable to the Supreme Court of the United States because of the actions of the election officials and judiciary of the state of Florida. This case is not moot, as it has been correctly filed, and the Florida statutes themselves give me standing. It is a question that has yet to be answered and that may be repeated. Just look at the landscape of the next election, where the Republicans are attempting to make Ted Cruz, born in Canada, of a Cuban Citizen father, an eligible natural born Citizen. Marco Rubio and Bobby Jindal were both born of non US Citizen parents, and are not eligible. If Barack Obama were indeed eligible then the judiciary of Florida would have gladly said so, and sent me on my way, but they have avoided making a ruling as to eligibility at all costs, including violating Federal statute. It seems that it is important to the enemies of the Republic that the chief executive is an illegal entity, in order to void US Citizen sovereignty. This is a matter of life and death of the Republic. Even if I am not successful, there will be public record of all of the liars who sold out the Republic. I will press on. Your faithful patriot, Mike