Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Understand the concept of Research Design Identify the characteristics of some common
quantitative research designs Dene and discuss research control, and internal and external validity as these terms relate to research design Critique a written research report in terms of design appropriateness and accuracy of design implementation
questions and achieve the stated purpose of a research project. (Powers & Knapp, 2011).
the overall method of the research study. Should ow from the stated purpose Should provide a plan to answer the research questions and test the stated hypothesis (Schmidt & Brown, 2012).
Independent (IV) The variable that is thought to be the cause In experimental research, the researcher manipulates this variable to see how that eects the results Dependent (DV) The outcome that is being studied. This is the variable that is of principle interest in the study
More
on
Variables
Other
variable
types
Intervening
A
variable
that
is
between
an
IV
and
a
DV
in
a
causal
sequence
and
so
eects
the
causal
relationship
confuse or confound the relationship between the independent and dependent variable
Failure to control extraneous variables leads to bias which results in invalid results
Experimental
Designs
Examine
causality
Does
X
cause
Y?
phenomenon Explain relationships among variables Describe dierences among variables Predicting relationships and dierences among variables
Probability
The
likelihood
or
chance
that
exists
between
a
cause
and
its
eect
(Schmidt
&
Brown
2012).
3
conditions
for
establishing
causality:
There
must
be
a
temporal
relationship
variables must be strong No other variables or conditions can account for the relationship between X & Y
causality is never completely certain Idea of probability or likelihood of a cause eect relationship is more common in nursing research
Eect Relationship:
Manipulation
Control/intervention
of
the
clarify
the
relationship
between
an
independent
and
a
dependent
variable
by
eliminating
other
things
(variables)
that
might
aect
the
relationship
Eliminating
outside
inuences by close control of conditions Using statistics to eliminate the eects of other variables
independent
variable
by
the
researcher
Dening
characteristic
of
an
experimental
study
Done
by
creating
dierent
experimental
conditions
Examples
of
elements
by
chance
in
an
attempt
to
eliminate
or
ameliorate
the
eects
of
extraneous
Two
major
methods
Methods
of
Randomiza&on
Random
Sampling
Methods
that
assure
that
Random
Assignment
Methods
that
assure
that
every person in the population has an equal chance of being in the sample
every
subject
in
the
study
has
an
equal
chance
to
be
in
either
the
experimental
or
the
control
group
Increases
the
likelihood
that
extraneous variable are evenly distributed between the two groups and do not disproportionately aect one of the groups
Within
Groups
Compares
a
group
with
itself
on
Experimental studies Studies comparing two pre- existing groups on a certain variable
some
variable(s)
at
more
than
one
point
in
time.
Often
the
group
is
measured
pre
and
post
intervention
Examples:
BMI of persons with Type 2 Diabetes versus persons without Diabetes Incidence of lung cancer among smokers versus non- smokers
Hemoglobin A1C of individuals with Type 2 Diabetes before and after 3 months of Metformin Self-esteem of teen girls before and after participating in a targeted after-school intervention
Study
Validity
Validity:
The
extent
to
which
the
results
of
the
study
Accuracy
of
the
study
ndings
Validity
is
ensured
by
the
researcher
through
careful
are
true,
logical,
reasonable
&
justiable
based
on
the
evidence
presented
in
the
study
methods
which
control
for
extraneous
variables
Careful selection of subjects Meticulous attention to study procedures/protocols Accurate measurement of study variables Correct statistical methods Accurate interpretation of results
Threats
to
Validity
A
threat
(to
validity)
is
anything
that
weakens
the
determine if the results are true. (no or minimal threats to study validity)
Repeated
testing
causes
familiarity
with
test
Use
of
pretest
aects
post-test
results
16
Timing of measurements How the variable is measured (type of instrument) Change in data collectors
Subject
mortality
Loss
of
subjects
due
to
any
factor
related
to
the
dependent
variable
Selection
bias
Subjects
in
experimental
and
control
groups
are
not
similar
enough
This
problem
aects
studies
without
random
selection
the
most
17
Statistical Conclusion Validity Type II errors: Researchers conclude that there is no dierence or relationship, when there truly is one
Subjects behavior dierently because they know they are in a study This is usually unconscious on their part
Experimenter
Eect
Some
characteristic
of
the
researcher
or
data
collector
aects
the
results
Example:
The
person
administering
the
intervention
is
pretty
and
nice
so
the
subjects
try
to
please
her
Double-blind
study
can
help
ameliorate
this
eect
19
Novelty
Eect
(not
in
your
book)
Subjects
respond
dierently
because
they
know
the
intervention
or
treatment
is
new
or
dierent
It
is
the
novelty
not
the
actual
intervention
that
is
causing
change
20
This is minimized by the researcher selecting an appropriate sample for the target population, using random selection of subjects and random assignment to groups
The IV may not aect all individuals in the way it does in the study. This may be due to dierences between the study sample and other groups The results of the study may be related to the specic setting and may not be applicable to other settings The results of the study may be aected by events occurring at the same time as the study but outside of the study
Validity
Paradox
Internal Validity Internal Validity External Validity External Validity
22
Sample/sampling Data collection and management Planned statistical analysis Measures taken to maintain rigor and control threats to validity
25
More
Review
The
research
design
must
t
the
study
purpose,
26
Quasi-Experimental
By Function The research design must t the study purpose, question and/or hypothesis
Longitudinal/Prospective
Designs
Data collected at more than one point in time beginning at the start of the study Repeated Measures same instruments used to collect data a all measurement points allowing for comparison over time. Allows researcher to examine things in real time Data collected all at one point in time Cannot be experimental Theory important to the interpretation of these studies Whats happening NOW!
Cross-Sectional
Use
data
on
patients
with
a
condition
that
is
collected
by
patient
history
to
determine
a
cause
HIV/AIDS,
Smoking,
Type
2
Diabetes,
Hypertension
Longitudinal/Prospective
Cohort
Studies
follows
group(s)
forward
over
time
and
learns
what
conditions
develop
in
the
groups
Women who take HRT vs women who dont Persons with diabetes whose sugar is tightly controlled versus those whose sugar is not
Cross-Sectional
Designs
Cohort
Comparison
Studies
look
at
more
than
one
group
of
subjects
at
the
same
point
in
time
Sexual behavior in teens who go to public school versus religious schools Depression in women who had a TOP versus those who have not Weight in students who eat in the dining halls versus those who cook for themselves
29
Classica&on
by
Type
Nonexperimental
(Descriptive)
Studies
as
is
No
manipulation
of
variables
Can
be
qualitative
or
quantitative
Experimental
&
Quasi-experimental
Study
what
would
happen
if
Involves
manipulation
of
variable(s)
Always
quantitative
Control
important
Always
prospective/longitudinal
30
Nonexperimental
Designs
Function
is
description
Help
us
understand
things
as
they
are
currently
Describe
phenomenon
Explain
relationships
and
dierences
Predict
relationships
and
dierences
Do
not
claim
to
indicate
cause
and
eect
No
manipulation
of
independent
variable
Research
control
still
important
Can
be
quantitative
or
qualitative
31
Nonexperimental
Designs
Descriptive
Designs
Correlational
Designs
Qualitative
or
quantitative
Cross-sectional,
retrospective
Descriptive
Correlational
describe
or longitudinal/prospective Explorative when little is know Comparative compares 2 or more group Survey Data obtained by self-report, such as by phone or in-person survey
variables
in
2
groups
or
relationships
among
2
variables
Predictive
Correlational
tests
relationships
between
one
or
more
variables
Very
theory
based
Non-directional
or
directional
hypotheses
used
Variables
referred
to
as
research
variables
or
predictor
and
outcome
variables
rather
than
IV
and
DV
Relationships
among
multiple
variables
in the model are tested all at once or in pairs Resulting diagram shows relationships and is called a Path Model.
32
Epping-Jordan, J. et al. (1999). Psychological adjustment to breast Cancer: Process of emotional distress. Health Psychology, 18(4), 315-326.
34
Experimental
Designs
3
Essential
Elements
of
True
Experimental
Design
1. Randomization
2.
Control
Extraneous
variables
are
controlled
3.
Manipulation of the IV
35
to
decrease
variability
(change)
in
the
D.V.
that
is
caused
by
events
or
factors
independent
of
the
study
design
Extrinsic
Factors
Intrinsic Factors
36
Research
Conditions
Same
for
all
subjects
Data
Collection
Careful
choice
of
reliable
and
valid
instruments
Use
of
comparison
or
control
groups
Uniformity
of
data
collection
agents
and
conditions
Data
collectors
are
all
trained
to
do
the
same
things
Data
Management
4/4/13
37
Quasi-Experimental
Designs
Do
not
meet
all
the
essential
components
of
experimental design
Manipulation of the IV is always included May not include: Randomization Some elements of research control may be missing
3 Common Quasi-Experimental Designs Nonequivalent control group pretest-posttest Time series designs Preexperimental designs
43
4/4/13
44
4/4/13
46
sample and sampling methods Evaluate research for adequacy of sample size Utilize principles of evidence-based nursing to determine if the research ndings are applicable to a clinical problem based on sample composition
4/4/13
47
An entire set of
4/4/13
4/4/13
49
Study/Target
Popula&on
Dened
by
a
set
of
examples
of
populations
from
the
research
articles
you
have
read
for
this
class?
50
4/4/13
Accessible
Popula&on
Term
used
to
indicate
the
part
of
the
population
that
hypertension Accessible population: Men over age 50 with hypertension who attend a large clinic in a certain city
4/4/13
51
Studying
Popula&ons
A
researcher
wants
to
study
the
growth
and
development of very premature infants during their rst 5 years of life. 5,000 very premature infants are born in her state every year. What do you think she does?
4/4/13
52
4/4/13
53
What
is
a
sample?
A
subset
of
a
population
that
is
studied
to
learn
something
about
the
population
Ideally
the
sample
has
the
same
specic
characteristics
as
the
population
REPRESENTATIVE
In this illustration, which circle represents the population and which represents a of the population?
4/4/13
54
about a population
you got using a sample and generalize (accurately apply) them to the population?
4/4/13
55
1948 Election: Truman holding newspaper lauding his defeat after he won the election.
4/4/13
56
The poll only sampled rich white people with phones. Guess who voted for Truman?
4/4/13
57
(Review:
extraneous
variables
are
those
that
are
not
being
measured
in
the
study
but
that
might
aect
study
results).
Example:
A
researcher
wants
to
measure
the
eect
of
an
educational
program
related
to
sugar
intake
on
teens
BMI
and
blood
sugar
levels
Examples
of
extraneous
variables:
1. Unknown
to
her,
a
beverage
distributor
begins
giving
out
free
sweetened
iced
tea
during
after-school
activities.
2. Some
of
the
teens
have
family
members
with
Type
2
diabetes
and
she
does
not
know
this.
58
4/4/13
Goal
of
Sampling
Quantitative
Research
To
decrease
variability
among
the
subjects.
Subjects
should
be
as
alike
as
possible
to
avoid
pre- existing
dierences
that
might
aect
results
Qualitative
Research
Tries
to
increase
variability
among
the
subjects
to
learn
as
much
as
possible
about
a
topic.
Try
to
get
subjects
who
represent
as
many
dierent
aspects
of
the
subject
under
study
in
order
to
get
all
possible
views.
4/4/13
researcher
tries
to
choose
the
sample
that
is
best
for
the
study.
Most
like
or
representative
of
the
population
representative as possible
4/4/13
60
Inclusion
vs
Exclusion
Inclusion
Criteria
Characteristics
that
a
person
must
have
to
be
included
as
a
subject
Exclusion Criteria Characteristics that, if present, exclude the person from participation
4/4/13
61
Probability Sampling All individuals in the population have an equal chance of being included Uses some method of selecting subjects at random Non-Probability Sampling Not everyone has the same chance of being included Used when random sampling not possible May result in less than representative sample
4/4/13
62
Probability
Sampling
Random
sampling
should
result
in
a
sample
like
the
study population
4/4/13
63
Simple Random samples are computer-generated or table of random numbers or similar Stratied Random Subjects are divided by some characteristic (e.g. age, clinic, race) and then random sampling is done within the strata Cluster Sampling Random selection of subjects from within known clusters of individuals with the characteristic
Example: subjects with prostate cancer from 6 large cancer centers. Each clinic group is a cluster. The subjects are then randomized within each cluster.
Systematic
Sampling
Uses
a
list
of
all
members
of
an
accessible
population.
Population
size
divided
by
sample
size
and
then
every
Kth
individual
selected
from
the
list.
(Not
true
random
sample
as
not
all
have
equal
chance
of
inclusion)
4/4/13
64
non-probability sampling
Convenience
Sample
Uses
all
available
subjects
Example:
all
patients
who
attend
medical
clinic
on
a
certain
date
Quota
Sample
Similar
to
convenience
sampling
but
uses
a
strategy
to
make
sure
certain
subject
types
are
included
Example:
Make
sure
distribution
of
ages
or
genders
meets
a
criteria
4/4/13
65
4/4/13
66
Size Matters! Larger samples are more likely to be representative of (like) population of interest Larger samples are more likely to result in statistical signicance.
Power Analysis A statistical procedure that allows the researcher to compute the minimum # needed in sample to detect a real dierence or relationship
4/4/13
67
Sampling
Bias
Poor
sampling
can
skew
the
results
of
the
study.
Random
sampling
is
best
way
to
avoid
bias
3 potential sources of bias in sampling Researcher (or subject recruiter) chooses certain types of subjects
Mostly unconscious. May select people they feel comfortable approaching for example
Self-selection
by
individuals
in
the
population
People
who
are
interested
in
the
research,
or
who
want
to
support
research
Limited
response
rate
(survey
research)
Similar
to
self-selection
in
a
way.
People
who
are
more
interested
will
complete
and
mail
in
survey.
4/4/13
68
4/4/13
69
discuss attrition in reporting study and explain potential reasons for it.
survey or study
4/4/13
70
the
research
report/article?
2. Was
enough
information
given
to
understand
how
and
why
sample
chosen?
3. Is
there
enough
information
given
about
the
sample
to
tell
if
the
research
applies
to
your
clinical
population?
4. For
quantitative
research:
large
enough.
4/4/13
71