Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S cho o l District
August 28, 2012
Whatever it Takes!
Within the boundaries of Sanger Uni ed is the city of Sanger and the communities of Centerville, Del Rey, Fairmont, Lone Star, Tivy Valley and portions of the Sunnyside area of metropolitan Fresno. Attendance in the Districts schools currently numbers 10,500 students.
A C K N O W L E D G M E N T S
Acknowledgments
Sanger Unied School District would like to thank all of the district sta who oered their time, comments, and overall vision for this Facilities Master Plan. In addition, SUSD would like to thank the following consultants for their professional services conducted in this Facilities Master Plan process: School Business Consulting, for advising the District through the entire master plan process.
Darden Architects, for assisting the District in reviewing the existing school sites, developing needrelated improvements and improvement budgets, preparing this master plan report, and creating possible draft concept solutions for the issues identied at the existing school sites.
Odell Planning & Research, for studying the student enrollment growth and identifying new facility requirements.
School Facility Consultants, for analyzing the State School Facility Program (SFP) eligibility.
Keygent Advisors, for analyzing the prospective 2012 General Obligation Bond scenarios.
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
T A B L E
O F
SECTION 1 | Overview of the Facilities Master Plan Process .............4 SECTION 2 | Executive Summary.......................................................10 SECTION 3 | Existing School Facilities Needs ...................................18
Elementary Schools ..........................................................................................20 Secondary Schools ............................................................................................44 Charter Schools ..................................................................................................56
SECTION 4 | Enrollment Projections .................................................64 SECTION 5 | New School Facility Needs ............................................72 SECTION 6 | District Facilities Needs.................................................76
Site Plans | District Facilities ...........................................................................78
O V E R V I E W
O F
T H E
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
P R O C E S S
S E C T I O N
ne
eds
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
Prioriti
es
co
sts
Overview
The Sanger Unied School District Facilities Master Plan (FMP) is intended to establish a framework for the orderly development of facility improvements for the next 10 years or more. In the process of dening the parameters and needs for the FMP, the SUSD utilized the expertise and skill of specialty consultants and District sta. Of noteworthy importance, this FMP study is intended to be a dynamic planning document, not merely a printed report on the Districts facilities. This FMP process focuses on how existing and future buildings can best serve the students, sta and community of SUSD. That said, the FMP process is the Districts planning tool and strategy to look at and address facility improvements, their associated capital need, and a nancial plan to fund the improvements. An FMP is a data-driven process that provides the District with the ability to move master plan needs from the conceptual, need-oriented phase, toward a vision, and nally into the ultimate reality of completed projects. This report will present the data that has been collected, analyzed and synthesized into need-oriented improvements, with associated conceptual budgets. This FMP provides the SUSD leadership with a planning tool and road map for success. Using the FMP as a facilities planning tool, more specic details around the master plan improvements will unfold as the District denes its initial priorities for new and existing facility projects, based on available funds. The improvement needs will likely outweigh the available capital resources. As each need is coupled with a nancial budget, the District can then rene the initial priorities into a set of short-term, medium-term and long-term goals. Once these master plan priorities are set, this FMP will then be used as a planning tool to direct both the Districts human resources and capital resources. The SUSD FMP reects the needs and goals that were captured and identied through several meetings as well as an evaluation of the condition of existing schools and District administrative facilities. In an eort to align these activities with the District goals, the SUSDs Mission Statement was used by the committee as a standard for guiding the direction and purpose of this FMP. This FMP is not a static document and will require review and periodic updating. For example, the FMP will require updating as the rst round of prioritized improvements are being completed, and also as the assessment and impact of these improvements are understood. As the second round of prioritized improvements are being planned, the FMP should be updated to capture any additional improvement needs and/or changing needs that have arisen since the initial preparation of this FMP.
S E C T I O N
1
1.
Needs
2
2.
e.
Costs a. b. c. d. e. f. Dene funding budgets that respond to the existing facility needs. Dene funding budgets that respond to the new facility needs. Define funding budgets that respond to the District facilities needs. Determine funding sources. Determine the limit of the funding sources. Establish a nancial plan.
3 4
3. 4.
Once the Facility Master Plan is adopted and funding sources secured, priorities are identied. Furthermore, as needs change the FMP must be updated periodically. (Refer to steps 3 and 4 below.) Priorities a. b. Dene when the needs are required and when the capital funds are required. Sort the needs into a set of priorities, short term (2-4 years), medium term (5-7 years) and long term (8-10 years).
Update
Priorities
1. 2. 3. 4.
Update the FMP a. b. c. Execute the FMP. Review and assess the impact of the FMP. Update and reassess the FMP every 4 to 5 years.
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
E X E C U T I V E
S U M M A R Y
S E C T I O N
2 | Executive Summary
The needs represented have been derived from data from a number of sources and information, including but not limited to, individual school site input, District sta meetings, enrollment studies, school building analysis by qualied, licensed architects, and input from the Districts support services.
10
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
E X E C U T I V E
Budget $11,317,700 $9,032,600 $6,793,100 $10,772,100 $3,262,100 $2,460,200 $8,862,400 $8,054,300 $10,411,800 $464,600 $78,100 $8,945,800 $28,206,000 $2,961,000 $3,225,900 $1,366,600 $4,695,500 $ 14,016,800 $10,751,800 $13,437,000 $10,004,400 $13,471,000 $182,590,800
Jeerson Elementary School John S. Wash Elementary School Lincoln Elementary School Lone Star Elementary School Madison Elementary School Ronald W. Reagan Elementary School Sequoia Elementary School Wilson Elementary School Washington Academic Middle School Community Day School Kings River High (Cont)/Taft High School Child Welfare & Attendance Oce Adult School Sanger High School SUSD Agricultural Center Hallmark Charter School Quail Lake Environmental Charter School Sanger Academic Charter School TOTAL EXISTING SCHOOL FACILITIES NEEDS
Table 2.2 summarizes the total cost of existing school facility needs as identied in Section 3 | Existing School Facilities Needs of this report.
SE CONDA RY CH AR TE R
11
S E C T I O N
2 | Executive Summary
Enrollment Projections
Section 4| Enrollment Projections of the FMP is the result of an Enrollment Projections and Future School Needs report. It is projected that the total District enrollment will increase by 3,100 students during the next 10 years, with an average annual growth rate of 2.54 percent per year. Table 2.3 summarizes the projected enrollment growth in the District for the next 10 years by school type. Chart 2.1shows the projected enrollment growth in the Sanger Unified School District for the next 10 years.
*Other includes Independent Study, Continuation, Community Day and SDC **Includes all District students
12
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
E X E C U T I V E
13
S E C T I O N
2 | Executive Summary
Possible Voter-Approved General Obligation Bond $30 Tax Rate Increase $60 Tax Rate Increase Extend Existing Tax Rate TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS IF $24,460,000 BOND APPROVED TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS IF $50,000,000 BOND APPROVED TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS IF $30,000,000 BOND APPROVED $24,460,000** $50,000,000** $30,000,000 $98,976,116 $124,516,116 $104,516,116
** Tax rate increase is based on the amount listed above ($30 or $60) per $100,000 of assessed valuation.
14
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
E X E C U T I V E
15
E X I S T I N G
S C H O O L
F A C I L I T I E S
N E E D S
S E C T I O N
Academics:
Building Code:
Curb Appeal:
District Goals:
A B C D
These are need-oriented improvements that enhance and improve the academic teaching spaces. These improvements include teaching stations, such as new interior surfaces, lighting, mechanical and plumbing upgrades, technology system upgrades, window replacement projects and acoustical projects that all improve the sound quality within the classrooms. These are need-oriented improvements that respond to identiable building code concerns and must/should be addressed on any future project. These improvements may consist of Access Compliance governed by the Americans with Disabilities Act (parking lots, accessible path of travel, doors, gates, restrooms, signs, ramps and stairs), Fire and Life Safety (re alarms and re sprinklers), and Structural Safety. These are need-oriented improvements to improve the quality of the school sites and how the community perceives their schools. These may include such projects as entrance to the school and the parking lots, painting, roong, fencing, trash enclosures, vehicle drop-o zones, and the overall rst impression quality the school conveys to a visitor. These are need-oriented improvements that are important to the District as a whole. These may include improved and/or larger libraries and multi-use rooms, stadium improvements, safety and security, energy ecient retrot projects, and replacing portable classrooms with permanent classrooms.
18
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
The following graphic site plans illustrate the existing school sites and an accompanying draft conceptual vision. The draft conceptual vision is intended to identify in graphic form the list of improvements and their associated budgets. The draft concepts are not intended to be the nal design solution, but rather to illustrate the improvements that would be suitable for the school site. Each of the school sites will have a list of Proposed Improvements and an associated project budget in 2014 dollars. The Master Plan Improvement Total is the sum of the individual improvements. This gure then represents the nancial need necessary to fund the identied improvements. To oset these costs, the District is eligible for funds through the State of California via the School Facility Program (SFP). The listing of the Proposed State Funding identies the year and nancial amount of the potential modernization eligibility grants. The Available State Funds is the sum of potential State funded grants. The Local Funds Required is the dierence between the Master Plan Improvement Total and the Available State Funds, and represents the adjusted nancial need.
NOTE: The School Facility Program is subject to change, requires the District to match the State contribution, and it also requires the voters of the State to pass a future State school facility bond.
Table of contents
School Centerville Elementary School Del Rey Elementary School Fairmont Elementary School Jackson Elementary School
E LE M E NTA RY
Page 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 51 52 54 56 58 60
Jeerson Elementary School John S. Wash Elementary School Lincoln Elementary School Lone Star Elementary School Madison Elementary School Ronald W. Reagan Elementary School Sequoia Elementary School Wilson Elementary School Washington Academic Middle School Community Day School Kings River High (Cont)/Taft High School Child Welfare & Attendance Oce Adult School Sanger High School SUSD Agricultural Center Hallmark Charter School Quail Lake Environmental Charter School Sanger Academic Charter School
C H AR TE R
S ECONDA RY
19
C E N T E R V I L L E EXISTING
E L E M E N T A R Y |
13.38 Acres
23,380 SF
LEGEND
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building New Site Concrete Restoom Site, Keynote Symbol Building, Keynote Symbol Site, Storm Drainage System
Master
A3 J L M Library/Computer Lab Multi-Purpose Classrooms Pre-School/After School
20
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
COST
Master Plan Improvement Total Proposed State Funding 2018 2019 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) State SFP Modernization Match (60%)
$10,459,730
21
D E L EXISTING
R E Y
E L E M E N T A R Y |
10.0 Acres
35,877 SF
LEGEND
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building New Site Concrete Restoom Site, Keynote Symbol Building, Keynote Symbol Site, Storm Drainage System
Master Plan
O Q Toilets Kindergarten
22
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
COST
MASTER PLAN
Master Plan Improvement Total Proposed State Funding 2015 State SFP Modernization Match (60%)
$776,000 $776,000
$8,256,600
23
F A I R M O N T EXISTING
E L E M E N T A R Y |
12.0 Acres
37,723 SF
LEGEND
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building New Site Concrete Restoom Site, Keynote Symbol Building, Keynote Symbol Site, Storm Drainage System
Master Plan
Q R S T Multi-Purpose Classrooms Classrooms Classrooms
24
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
COST
Master Plan Improvement Total Proposed State Funding 2014 2015 2016 2018 Current Available Funding (60%) State SFP Modernization Match (60%) State SFP Modernization Match (60%) State SFP Modernization Match (60%) State SFP Modernization Match (60%)
$4,694,514
25
J A C K S O N EXISTING
E L E M E N T A R Y |
9.0 Acres
31,296 SF
LEGEND
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building New Site Concrete Restoom Site, Keynote Symbol Building, Keynote Symbol Site, Storm Drainage System
Master Plan
E J K Classrooms Classrooms Multi-Purpose
26
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
E X I S T I N G S C H O O L F A C I L I T I E S N E E D S | JACKSON ELEMENTARY
FACILITY NEEDS:
Proposed Improvements BI-C2 ID-S1 S-WA2 S-FE3 ID-B2 P-DF3 BO-W2 BO-D2 BE-R3 S-SD2 MCP-E3 MB-E1 BN-MP BI-C4 BI-T2 LZ-B2 LZ-P3 PL-S3 PC-2 BN-K BN-C PF-B3 BE-F1 TE-C3 Building Interior, Classrooms: New Finishes $421,900 Identication Device, Site: School Marque $32,900 Site, Walkway Accessibility: Partial Replacement $113,400 Site, Fence Enclosure: New $109,400 Identication Device, Building: Signs $18,600 Plumbing, Drinking Fountains: New $19,800 Building Openings, Windows: Partial Replacement $138,700 Building Openings, Doors: Partial Replacement $54,800 Building Exterior, Roof: Replace $82,600 Site, Storm Drainage: Modify $49,000 Mechanical Central Plant, Equipment: Replace $65,900 Mechanical Building, Equipment: Replace $453,000 Building New, Multi-Purpose $4,201,700 Building Interiors, Classrooms: Recongure Spaces $348,800 Building Interiors, Toilets: New Finishes $49,800 Loading Zone, Bus: Remove & Replace $143,400 Loading Zone, Parent: New $143,400 Parking Lot, Sta : New $694,100 Play Courts: Remove & Replace $254,200 Building New, Kindergarten $682,000 Building New, Classrooms $2,373,200 Play Fields, Backstops: New $107,100 Building Exterior, Finishes: Clean & Paint $122,500 Technology Equipment, Classrooms: New $91,900 $10,772,100
COST
MASTER PLAN
Master Plan Improvement Total Proposed State Funding 2016 2018 2019 2022 Current Available Funding (60%) State SFP Modernization Match (60%) State SFP Modernization Match (60%) State SFP Modernization Match (60%) State SFP Modernization Match (60%)
$8,876,562
27
J E F F E R S O N EXISTING
E L E M E N T A R Y |
11.0 Acres
43,967 SF
LEGEND
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building New Site Concrete Restoom Site, Keynote Symbol Building, Keynote Symbol Site, Storm Drainage System
28
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
COST
Master Plan Improvement Total Proposed State Funding 2018 2019 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) State SFP Modernization Match (60%)
$3,262,100
$2,000,160
29
J O H N EXISTING
S .
W A S H
E L E M E N T A R Y |
13.0 Acres
35,837 SF
LEGEND
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building New Site Concrete Restoom Site, Keynote Symbol Building, Keynote Symbol Site, Storm Drainage System
Master Plan
G H Kindergarten Pre-School (Future)
30
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
COST
Master Plan Improvement Total Proposed State Funding Current Available Funding (60%) Available State Funds
$1,210,000 $1,210,000
$1,250,200
31
L I N C O L N EXISTING
E L E M E N T A R Y |
12.0 Acres
42,218 SF
LEGEND
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building New Site Concrete Restroom Site, Keynote Symbol Building, Keynote Symbol Site, Storm Drainage System
Master Plan
A1 A3 D F G H J Administration Special Programs Kindergarten Classrooms Special Education Pals/NRC Pre-School
32
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
COST
Master Plan Improvement Total Proposed State Funding 2013 2016 2018 2019 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) State SFP Modernization Match (60%) State SFP Modernization Match (60%) State SFP Modernization Match (60%)
$7,272,374
* Any costs associated with District reacquiring use of City Park are not included. 33
L O N E EXISTING
S T A R
E L E M E N T A R Y |
16.0 Acres
37,129 SF
LEGEND
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building New Site Concrete Restoom Site, Keynote Symbol Building, Keynote Symbol Site, Storm Drainage System
Master Plan
A2 B3 E Library / Administration Kindergarten Multi-Purpose
34
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
COST
Master Plan Improvement Total Proposed State Funding 2015 State SFP Modernization Match (60%)
$950,000 $950,000
$7,104,300
35
M A D I S O N EXISTING
E L E M E N T A R Y |
14.53 Acres
35,404 SF
LEGEND
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building New Site Concrete Restoom Site, Keynote Symbol Building, Keynote Symbol Site, Storm Drainage System
Master Plan
C G H Special Education Multi-Purpose Classrooms
36
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
COST
Master Plan Improvement Total Proposed State Funding 2018 2019 Current Available Funding State SFP Modernization Match (60%) State SFP Modernization Match (60%)
$8,473,250
37
R O N A L D EXISTING
W .
R E A G A N
E L E M E N T A R Y |
LEGEND
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building New Site Concrete Restoom Site, Keynote Symbol Building, Keynote Symbol Site, Storm Drainage System
38
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
COST
Master Plan Improvement Total Proposed State Funding Not yet eligible Available State Funds
N/A
$464,600
39
S E Q U O I A EXISTING
E L E M E N T A R Y |
12.10 Acres
46,463 SF
LEGEND
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building New Site Concrete Restoom Site, Keynote Symbol Building, Keynote Symbol Site, Storm Drainage System
40
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
COST
Master Plan Improvement Total Proposed State Funding Not yet eligible Available State Funds
N/A
$78,100
41
W I L S O N EXISTING
E L E M E N T A R Y |
10.72 Acres
42,092 SF
LEGEND
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building New Site Concrete Restoom Site, Keynote Symbol Building, Keynote Symbol Site, Storm Drainage System
Master Plan
B1 P Kindergarten Portable Classrooms
42
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
COST
Master Plan Improvement Total Proposed State Funding 2018 Current Available Funding State SFP Modernization Match (60%)
$7,330,800
43
W A S H I N G T O N EXISTING
A C A D E M I C
M I D D L E |
22.0 Acres
168,319 SF
LEGEND
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building New Site Concrete Restroom Site, Keynote Symbol Building, Keynote Symbol Site, Storm Drainage System
44
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
COST
Master Plan Improvement Total Proposed State Funding Current Available Funding 2014 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) 2016 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) 2017 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) 2023 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) Available State Funds
$21,054,569
45
C O M M U N I T Y EXISTING
D A Y |
LEGEND
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building New Site Concrete Restoom Site, Keynote Symbol Building, Keynote Symbol Site, Storm Drainage System
Master Plan
Restroom Classrooms Classroom Classroom Classroom Classroom
Administration Multi-Purpose
46
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
COST
Master Plan Improvement Total Proposed State Funding Need more data to determine Available State Funds
N/A
$2,961,000
47
R I K EN EG D SL E RY I VH E R I GH HI G SH C H ( C OO ON L T |) / Kings T ACanyon F T Unied H I G School H | Existing District School Facilities Needs EXISTING
KINGS RIVER HIGH CONT/TAFT HIGH 1905 7th St. | Relocate to 2207 1/2 9th Ave.
SCHOOL t Grade Level Existing District Oce SITE t Existing Site Acreage t New Site Acreage 9-12
LEGEND
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building New Site Concrete Restoom Site, Keynote Symbol Building, Keynote Symbol Site, Storm Drainage System
Master Plan
48
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
COST
MASTER PLAN
Master Plan Improvement Total Proposed State Funding Current Available Funding Available State Funds
$3,225,900
$1,032,765 $1,032,765
$2,193,135
49
FACILITY NEEDS:
Proposed Improvements S-DI OS-W3 S-EW S-UC PL-S3 ID-S1 S-FS3 S-FO3 S-W3 S-LI4 BP-A3 OS-UC Site, Demolition: Improvements O Site, Walkways: New Site, Earthwork Site, Utilities: Service Parking Lot, Sta : New Identication Devices, Site: Facility Sign Site, Fencing Security: New Site, Fencing Ornamental: New Site, Walkways: New Site, Landscape Irrigation: New Building Portables, Administration: New O-site Utility Connection
COST
LEGEND
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building
$94,100 $36,200 $77,100 $177,900 $222,400 $19,800 $22,000 $60,400 $28,500 36,400 $538,600 $53,200 $1,366,600
New Site Concrete Restroom Site, Keynote Symbol Building, Keynote Symbol Site, Storm Drainage System
N/A
$1,366,600
50
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
A D U L T
S C H O O L |
0.7 Acres
9,120 SF
FACILITY NEEDS:
Proposed Improvements S-DI S-EW S-UC PL-S3 ID-S2 S-FS3 S-W3 BP-A3 BP-C3 BP-T BP-PS3 PG-3 PG-E3 S-SS3 Site, Demolition: Improvements Site, Earthwork Site, Utilities: Connections Parking Lot, Sta/Students: New Identication Devices, Site: School Sign Site, Fencing Security: New Site, Walkways: New Building Portable, Administration: New Building Portable, Classrooms: New Building Portable, Toilets: New Building Portable, Pre-School: New Play Ground: New Play Ground, Equipment: New Site, Shade Structure: New
COST
$58,200 $321,000 $177,900 $1,388,900 $19,800 $48,000 $142,600 $538,600 $1,146,500 $408,400 $299,300 $46,400 $28,400 $71,500 $4,695,500
LEGEND
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building
$4,695,500
51
S A N G E R EXISTING
H I G H
S C H O O L |
60.0 Acres
234,050 SF
LEGEND
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building New Site Concrete Restroom Site, Keynote Symbol Building, Keynote Symbol Site, Storm Drainage System
Master Plan
W
52
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
COST
$14,016,800
53
A G R I C U L T U R A L EXISTING
C E N T E R |
AGRICULTURAL CENTER 1045 Bethel Ave. | Relocate to Del Rey Ave. & North Ave.
SCHOOL t Grade Level SITE t Existing Site Acreage t AG Farm Acreage K-12
LEGEND
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building New Site Concrete Restoom Site, Keynote Symbol Building, Keynote Symbol Site, Storm Drainage System
54
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
COST
Master Plan Improvement Total Proposed State Funding Not yet eligible Available State Funds
N/A
$10,751,800
55
H A L L M A R K EXISTING
C H A R T E R |
HALLMARK CHARTER 2207 1/2 9th Ave. | Relocate to Del Rey Ave. & North Ave.
SCHOOL t Grade Level SITE t Existing Site Acreage t New Hallmark Site Acreage BUILDING t Total Building Area K-12
LEGEND
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building New Site Concrete Restoom Site, Keynote Symbol Building, Keynote Symbol Site, Storm Drainage System
Master Plan
56
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
COST
$13,437,000
57
Q U A I L EXISTING
L A K E
E N V I R O N M E N T A L
C H A R T E R |
7.0 Acres
41,900 SF
LEGEND
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building New Site Concrete Restoom Site, Keynote Symbol Building, Keynote Symbol Site, Storm Drainage System
Master Plan
58
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
COST
Master Plan Improvement Total Proposed State Funding Not yet eligible Available State Funds
N/A
$10,004,400
59
R A S E N E G D E L R E YA C H AI D GE HM S Y C CH HOAOR LT E | R Kings | Existing Canyon School Unied Facilities School District Needs EXISTING
SANGER ACADEMY CHARTER 2207 9th Street
SCHOOL t Grade Level SITE t Site Acreage BUILDING t Total Building Area K-8
16.44 Acres
31,211 SF
LEGEND
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building New Site Concrete Restoom Site, Keynote Symbol Building, Keynote Symbol Site, Storm Drainage System
Master Plan
60
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
COST
MASTER PLAN
Master Plan Improvement Total Proposed State Funding Current Available Funding 2014 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) 2016 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) 2018 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) 2019 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) Available State Funds
$10,940,260
61
E N R O L L M E N T
P R O J E C T I O N S
S E C T I O N
4 | Enrollment Projections
Enrollment Projections
Table 4.1 summarizes the projected enrollment growth in the District for the next 10 years by school type. Chart 4.1 shows the projected enrollment growth in the Sanger Unied School District for the next 10 years. Sanger Unied K-12 enrollment is projected to increase from 10,873 in 2011-12 to 13,973 in 2021-22. This is an increase of 3,100 students and an average growth rate of 2.54 percent per year.
*Other includes Independent Study, Continuation, Community Day and SDC **Includes all District students
64
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
Charter Schools
The three charter schools Hallmark, Sanger Academy, and Quail Lake each have unique features and facilities issues. Hallmark Charter operates as an independent study program and a significant portion of the students reside outside the District. As such, Hallmark Charter has no traditional school facilities needs. Sanger Academy Charter has no defined attendance area, primarily serves students that reside in the District, and is projected to be above operational capacity beginning in 2014. However, as a charter school, Sanger Academy has the option of limiting its enrollment to space available. Any students denied admission because of insufficient capacity can be accommodated in the projected excess capacity in the Sanger area K-5 schools. Quail Lake Environmental Charter has no defined attendance area except that residents of the Quail Lake development are given preferential status for admission. Quail Lake Charter is currently operating above District-defined operational capacity and will continue to be above operational capacity for the ten-year projection period. However, the school has the option of limiting enrollment to space available; and District resident students denied admission can be accommodated in other District elementary schools with the closest school being Fairmont Elementary.
65
S E C T I O N
4 | Enrollment Projections
66
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
67
S E C T I O N
4 | Enrollment Projections
Middle School
Washington Academic Middle School (WAMS) is the only middle school in the District. Projected enrollment for WAMS is shown on Chart 4.4. WAMS is projected to exceed its District-dened operational capacity in 2013 and be approximately 500 students above operational capacity by the end of the ten-year projection period. The timing for a new middle school is dependent on several factors: 1) grade level conguration; 2) shared facilities use and program integration with a future high school; 3) and timing of high school facilities needs. For example, if the school is planned to operate as a grades 6-8 school and serves the grade 6 students that now attend the southeast Fresno area K-6 schools, a future middle school in the southeast Fresno area could have an enrollment of between 700 and 800 in 2016. Under this scenario, a new middle school should be constructed in southeast Fresno by the 2016-17 school year, if not earlier.
68
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
High School
Sanger High School (WAMS) is the only comprehensive high school in the District. Projected enrollment for Sanger High is shown on Chart 4.5. Sanger High School is currently operating above its District-defined operational capacity and is projected to be 969 above operational capacity by the end of the ten-year projection period. The District is in the process of acquiring a future high school/middle school site in the southeast area of the District to meet the needs of existing and future southeast Fresno and southern Clovis area growth. In part, the timing for a new southeast Fresno area high school is dependent on factors relating to the timing for a future middle school discussed previously and the extent to which the middle and high school programs share facilities and have program integration. It is probable that some type of phased construction will be required to make the construction of the high school and middle school feasible, as initially there will be insufficient enrollment for a full school of either configuration. Nonetheless, by 2016 it is probable that the combined grades 6-8 middle school and high school potential enrollment for a southeast Fresno area campus would be 1,400 or greater. Therefore, 2016 is a reasonable target date for the addition of some type of middle/high school capacity to relieve both WAMS and Sanger High.
69
N E W
S C H O O L
F A C I L I T Y
N E E D S
S E C T I O N
72
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
Note: The capital needs for the new school facility projects are based upon the anticipated project costs for the forecasted year the facility is required. These costs include the construction costs (hard costs) and other non direct costs (soft costs). These projects were estimated in the value of 2016 dollars.
73
D I S T R I C T
F A C I L I T I E S
N E E D S
S E C T I O N
The capital needs for the District facilities needs are based upon the anticipated project costs for the forecasted year the facility is required. These costs include the construction costs (hard costs) and other non direct costs (soft costs). These improvements were estimated in the value of 2014 dollars.
76
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
DISTRICT
The following graphic site plans illustrate the existing District facility sites and an accompanying draft conceptual vision. The draft conceptual vision is intended to identify in graphic form the list of improvements and their associated budgets. The draft concepts are not intended to be the nal design solution, but rather to illustrate the improvements that would be suitable for the District facility. Each of the sites will have a list of Proposed Improvements and an associated project budget in 2014 dollars. The Master Plan Improvement Total is the sum of the individual improvements. This gure then represents the nancial need necessary to fund the identied improvements. The listing of the Proposed State Funding identies the year and nancial amount of the potential modernization eligibility grants. The Available State Funds is the sum of potential State funded grants. The Local Funds Required is the dierence between the Master Plan Improvement Total and the Available State Funds, and represents the adjusted nancial need.
Table of contents
School District Oce Transportation Yard/Bus Maintenance Warehouse Maintenance and Operations Tom Flores Stadium Page 78 80 82 82 84
77
D I S T R I C T EXISTING
LEGEND
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building New Site Concrete Restoom Site, Keynote Symbol Building, Keynote Symbol Site, Storm Drainage System
Master Plan
78
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
COST
Master Plan Improvement Total Proposed State Funding Not eligible Available State Funds
$3,216,000
N/A
$3,216,000
79
T R A N S P O R TAT I O N EXISTING
YA R D / B U S
TRANSPORTATION YARD Major Cross Streets: Academy Ave. / Muscat Ave. TRANSPORTATION YARD
SITE t Site Acreage BUILDING t Total Building Area
2.9 Acres
1,600 SF
1.5 Acres
6,348 SF
LEGEND
BUS MAINTENANCE
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building New Site Concrete Restoom Site, Keynote Symbol Building, Keynote Symbol Site, Storm Drainage System
Master Plan
80
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
COST
$1,662,800 $1,134,400 $115,500 $115,900 $1,092,900 $583,500 $2,425,000 $925,700 $58,300 $90,300 $8,204,300
$8,204,300
81
WA R E H O U S E / M A I N T E N A N C E EXISTING
A N D
WAREHOUSE
0.53 Acres
10,118 SF
LEGEND
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building New Site Concrete Restoom Site, Keynote Symbol Building, Keynote Symbol Site, Storm Drainage System
Master Plan
200 Warehouse 300 Maintenance
82
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
COST
$1,009,600 $18,100 $58,600 $147,700 $302,800 $1,580,200 $32,900 $78,700 $21,900 $65,000 $27,700 $119,900 $3,463,100
Phase 3 - Proposed Improvements - Maintenance and Operations BN-MO Building New, Maintenance & Operations $2,309,500 S-EW Site, Earthwork $26,500 PL-B4 Parking Lot, Bus: New $288,300 PL-S4 Parking Lot, Sta : New $72,400 ID-B1 Identication Device, Building: ADA $5,300 S-FS3 Site, Fencing Security: New $37,500 S-LI4 Site, Landscape & Irrigation: New $10,000 P-SD Plumbing, Site Distribution $47,900 FS-D4 Fire Sprinklers, Distribution: New $20,400 E-SD4 Electrical, Site Distribution: New $88,500 Master Plan Improvement Phase 3 Total $2,906,300 Master Plan Improvement Phases 2 & 3 Total Proposed State Funding Not eligible Available State Funds N/A $6,369,400
$6,369,400
83
T O M EXISTING
F L O R E S
1.5 Acres
1,713 SF
LEGEND
Area to Remodel Existing Building New Building New Site Concrete Restoom Site, Keynote Symbol Building, Keynote Symbol Site, Storm Drainage System
84
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
COST
Master Plan Improvement Total Proposed State Funding Not eligible Available State Funds
N/A
$3,564,900
85
F I N A N C I N G
T H E
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
S E C T I O N
88
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
89
S e c t i o n
90
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
91
S e c t i o n
Modernization
SFP Modernization program funding is available for the renovation or replacement of existing buildings. This funding may not be used to increase the capacity at a site. Modernization eligibility is site-specic and is generated by permanent buildings over 25 years of age and portable buildings over 20 years of age. The District currently has modernization eligibility totaling approximately $7,293,016 in base grant State funding through 2011 and approximately $24,908,546 through 2023. This modernization eligibility includes a draw down for the projects approved by the SAB. The District will need to update its modernization eligibility annually for each school site in order to maximize its modernization funding during the life of this FMP. Table 7.2 provides a more detailed summary of the Districts 10 year modernization eligibility analysis.
Table 7.2 10 year Modernization Eligibility Summary Sheet | Updated to 2012 Pupil Grant Amounts
School Site
Centerville Elementary Del Rey Elementary Fairmont Elementary Jackson Elementary Jeerson Elementary Lincoln Elementary Lone Star Elementary Madison Elementary Ronald W. Reagan Elementary* Sequoia Elementary* John S. Wash Elementary Wilson Elementary Washington Academic MS (Old) Sanger High (Old) Sanger High (New)* Kings River High (Cont)/Taft High Community Day*** Hallmark Charter** Quail Lake Environmental Charter*
2012 Funding 2013 Funding 2014 Funding 2015 Funding 2016 Funding 2017 Funding 2018 Funding 2019 Funding 2020 Funding 2021 Funding 2022 Funding 2023 Funding
Total Funding
$344,258 $205,686 $776,000 $998,616 $91,254 $84,184 $121,474 $950,000 $270,000 $237,344 $227,274 $374,954 $137,748
$513,712
$1,268,204
$440,290
$158,700 $200,825
$418,066 $176,858
$1,774,036 $4,953,501
TOTAL
$0
$1,268,204
$565,211
$2,724,616
$891,836
$326,016
$2,811,218
$3,634,638
$0
$0
$440,290
$4,953,501
$857,970 $776,000 $2,098,586 $1,895,538 $1,261,940 $1,590,026 $950,000 $1,938,550 $0 $0 $1,210,000 $1,615,000 $2,530,740 $7,151,431 $0 $1,032,765 $0 $0 $0 $24,908,546
* **
These schools are newer and do not yet generate modernization eligibility Hallmark Charter consists of facilities that were moved to the site from other locations. Additional data needed to determine potential eligibility.
*** Community Day is housed in leased facilities, therefore no eligibility is generated. Notes: t All dollar amounts are listed as the State's share . t All dollar amounts are based on the current adjusted Modernization Grant Amounts passed by the SAB eective as of 1/1/2012. As future modernization grant amounts change, funding may change. t Future year eligibility estimates assume no increase in enrollment. Should enrollment increase, eligibility may increase.
92
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
Facility Hardship
This program is designed to provide funds to repair or replace facilities that have either an imminent health or safety threat, or for facilities that have been lost due to a natural disaster such as a ood, re, or earthquake. This program requires extensive agency-supported documentation and special approval from the SAB.
93
S e c t i o n
94
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
Federal Programs New Construction Additional Grant for District-Owned Site Acquisition Cost (AB 401)
This program allows districts to apply for additional new construction funding if the district is vacating non-school space that has been productively used for at least the past ve years, such as administration space, and placing students into the vacated facility. In a much more limited capacity than the State of California, the Federal government has provided some facility funding and nancing options for California school districts. A summary of some of these options are outlined below.
Williams Settlement
School Facilities Needs Assessment Grant Program: Funding for this program is available to schools ranked in deciles 1 through 3, as identied by performance on the 2003 Academic Performance Index (API). Under the School Facilities Needs Assessment Grant Program, eligible schools received funding to conduct a one time assessment of facilities. Each eligible school received $10 per pupil (based on October 2003 enrollment) to complete the review, with a minimum grant amount of $7,500. Emergency Repair Program: Funding for this program was available to schools ranked in deciles 1 through 3, as identied by performance on the 2006 Academic Performance Index (API). Funds are allocated for qualifying emergency repairs made to existing building systems or structural components that are broken and not functioning properly and that pose a health and safety threat to pupils and sta. Emergency Repair Program funds are made available through the Budget Act and the program will be active until the $800 million associated with this program is exhausted. Currently there are more projects included on the workload list than funds available for the program and the OPSC is no longer accepting applications.
95
S e c t i o n
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
Proposition 39
t t t Approved by voters in November 2000 Reduced bond measure passage vote from 2/3 (66.7%) majority to 55% majority Imposed several new controls on school districts
97
S e c t i o n
Maximum Annual Tax Per Bond Election Based on Projected Assessed Valuation and Interest Rate over Life of Bond - Actual Tax Rate Could Be Higher Accountability Requirements
Not Limited. Tax is Determined Annually Based on Bond Payment and Assessed Value
Unied Districts - $60 per $100,000 of Assessed Valuation High School/Elementary Districts - $30 per $100,000 of Assessed Valuation List of the specic projects to be funded from Bonds An annual Performance Audit An annual Financial Audit Independent committee appointed by Governing Board Review and report on the expenditure of Bond proceeds District to provide technical and administrative assistance Membership of at least seven members, representing business community, seniors, taxpayers, parents, and PTA Members limited to two consecutive two year terms No committee membership for school employees, ocials, vendors, contractors, or consultants to school district Public meetings subject to the Brown Act
None required
Charter School Funding Evaluate safety, class size reduction and Information Technology
None None
Make available facilities reasonably equivalent to district facilities for in-district students with/without bond measure Board must certify these issues were considered
98
F A C I L I T I E S
M A S T E R
P L A N
Proposition 39 Scenarios
Although the District could place a Proposition 46 bond measure on the election ballot, the following scenarios are based on following the requirements of Proposition 39 bond measures which limit the size of the bond measure but only require a 55 percent majority vote, compared to the 2/3 (66.7%) requirement under Proposition 46. The three scenarios that follow are based on annual tax rates ranging from no increase in the current tax rate to an increase of $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.
Issue Date February 2013 August 2015 August 2018 August 2021
Assumes interest rate ranging from 7.5% to 8.25% and assessed value growth rate of 0.0% annually though the scal year 2014, and 4.0% annually thereafter.
Issue Date February 2013 August 2015 August 2018 August 2021
Issuance schedule for illustrative purposes only. Actual amounts and dates will be tailored to the Districts facility needs. Assumes interest rate ranging from 6.5% to 7.5% and assessed value growth rate of 0.0% annually though the scal year 2014, and 4.0% annually thereafter.
99
Sanger Uni ed
S cho o l District
August 28, 2012