"We could have done things differently," says Defence Minister Bill Graham. "We would have preferred he'd gotten out earlier and I'm very sorry," he says. Communication breakdowns have emerged as the main theme of the inquiry.
"We could have done things differently," says Defence Minister Bill Graham. "We would have preferred he'd gotten out earlier and I'm very sorry," he says. Communication breakdowns have emerged as the main theme of the inquiry.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
"We could have done things differently," says Defence Minister Bill Graham. "We would have preferred he'd gotten out earlier and I'm very sorry," he says. Communication breakdowns have emerged as the main theme of the inquiry.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
>> > > Friday, June 3, 2005 Updated at 4:27 AM EDT >> > > From Friday's Globe and Mail >> >> >> >> >> > > Ottawa - Defence Minister Bill Graham expressed personal regret yesterday > > for the deportation and year-long imprisonment of Maher Arar, marking the > > first time any senior government minister has come close to apologizing for > > the affair. >> > > "We could have done things differently," Mr. Graham told the Arar inquiry in > > his second day of testimony. "Clearly, we would have preferred he'd gotten > > out earlier and I'm very sorry he was not, given the obvious reasons." >> > > Communication breakdowns have emerged as the main theme of the inquiry. >> > > Mr. Graham, who was foreign affairs minister at the time of the Arar affair, > > said he was never informed of his officials' suspicions that Mr. Arar had > > been tortured in captivity, and would have reacted more forcefully had he > > known. >> >> >> >> > > I would have said, 'Wayne, here's a guy being tortured; let's get moving on > > this," Mr. Graham said, referring to former solicitor-general Wayne Easter, > > who was in charge of CSIS and the RCMP at the time. >> > > Gar Pardy, who was head of consular services for Foreign Affairs at the time > > of Mr. Arar's detention and led the government's effort to secure his > > release, has testified that he was convinced within a month of Mr. Arar's > > deportation that he had been tortured. >> > > "What surprises me is that this was not conveyed to me," Mr. Graham said. "I > > was not told." While acknowledging that mistakes were made, Mr. Graham also > > strongly defended his former officials. "In the light of what we knew at the > > time, and the practices, the nature of what we were trying to achieve . . . > > I honestly believe that we did the best we could and for the best motives." >> > > Mr. Pardy testified yesterday that his views about Mr. Arar's situation were > > well known within the department, and that he shared them with officials in > > the minister's office. He did not name any official. >> > > The communication breakdown appears to have lasted throughout the affair. >> > > In a visit with Damascus consul Leo Martel in August, 2003, 11 months after > > his deportation, Mr. Arar said he had been "mentally destroyed" by his > > captivity. According to Mr. Martel's handwritten notes from the Aug. 14 > > visit, Mr. Arar also said he'd been jailed in a cell measuring three by six > > feet, and slept on the floor. >> > > But in the report that made its way up the chain of command within the > > government, Mr. Martel wrote only that "he confirmed he has not been beaten > > or tortured." Mr. Graham declared at a news conference later that day that > > Mr. Arar had denied he'd been tortured, and that this had been independently > > confirmed. >> > > "Maybe I went too far by saying 'independently,' " Mr. Graham said, adding > > that he would have been far more cautious in his remarks had he been > > informed of the true picture. >> > > In a tense afternoon exchange with Marlys Edwardh, Mr. Arar's lawyer, Mr. > > Pardy refused to shoulder any blame for the miscommunication. "I've said > > before that we were playing hockey on Saturday night, and I believe we > > played it successfully," Mr. Pardy said. >> > > Asked about Mr. Graham's remarks, Mr. Pardy said, "My ass was already > > burning on this case, I didn't need anybody to light a fire under me." >> > > Mr. Pardy neither confirmed nor denied Senator Pierre De Bané's contention a > > day earlier that Mr. Pardy had told him in a 2003 briefing that the United > > States offered to return Mr. Arar to Canada in October, 2002, on condition > > he be jailed. "Different people in the room could have interpreted my > > comments differently," Mr. Pardy said. >> > > Mr. Arar was arrested at New York's Kennedy Airport in September, 2002, > > while en route to Montreal from a family holiday in Tunisia. While in > > detention in the United States, the RCMP shared information about Mr. Arar > > with the Federal Bureau Investigation, which in turn shared it with the U.S. > > Immigration and Naturalization Service, which used it in deciding to deport > > him. >> > > The information, obtained in the course of an RCMP investigation of a > > possible al-Qaeda sleeper cell in Ottawa, consisted of allegations that Mr. > > Arar had contact with people who had contact with members of al-Qaeda. >> > > There was no evidence that Mr. Arar was involved in terrorism or any other > > crime. >> > > Following his deportation, the government response rapidly settled into two > > tracks. Foreign Affairs officials led by Mr. Pardy set about securing Mr. > > Arar's return. But their efforts were repeatedly undermined by unnamed > > officials at the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and the RCMP. >> > > Indeed, as late as June, 2003, Mr. Pardy testified yesterday, officials from > > both agencies were adamantly opposed to offering any assurances to the > > Syrians that Mr. Arar posed no threat and should be returned home. >> > > It was only after the intervention in July, 2003 by Jean Chrétien,