Professional Documents
Culture Documents
e-Thesys(94 )
(EP)
(
)
EVA2001-2004
WACCCY
EVAEVA
EVA
EVAEVMEP
ii
e-Thesys(94 )
.. i
. ii
.. 1
1.1
1.2
. 1
. 3
2.1
2.2
2.3
.. 4
. 4
. 7
.....
10
2.3.1
..
10
2.3.2
13
2.4
... 22
25
3.1
... 25
3.2
... 26
3.2.1
....
3.2.2
Harsco
3.2.3
31
4.1
26
. 28
32
...
32
4.1.1
33
4.1.2
39
4.1.3
47
4.2
...
60
4.2.1
60
4.2.2
64
4.3
iii
...
66
e-Thesys(94 )
4.3.1
....
66
4.3.2
....
67
4.3.3
....
69
4.4
EVA
. 70
4.4.1
EVA ..... 72
4.4.2
........
73
4.4.3
74
4.4.4
CH
......
79
4.4.5
CH
......
81
4.5
EVA
. 85
4.5.1
EVA .......
85
4.5.2
........
89
4.6
EVA
90
92
5.1
...
92
5.2
...
95
5.3
...
96
.... 97
iv
e-Thesys(94 )
2-1
.... 14
2-2
SMART .....
2-3
2-4
2-5
EFQM ....... 19
2-6
.... 20
2-8
3-1
4-1
CH
4-2
CH
4-3
EVA .. 70
15
.... 16
.... 17
... 23
....
25
40
.. 60
e-Thesys(94 )
2-1 7
3-1 .. 27
4-1
CH 2001~2004
4-2
CH 2001~2004
.. 33
.. 37
4-3 .. 39
4-4 .. 41
4-5
CH 2001~2004 KS . 42
4-6
CH 2001~2004
. 43
4-7
CH
2001~2004 .. 44
4-8
CH 2001~2004
. 45
4-9
CH
2001~2004 .. 46
4-10
CH 2001~2004
.. 46
.. 55
4-16
CY 2001~2004
.. 56
4-17
CY 2001~2004
.. 57
4-18
CY 2001~2004 . 58
4-19
CH
CY EVA
... 58
4-20
CH . 61
4-21
CH . 63
4-22
CH . 66
4-23
CH . 75
4-24
CH . 76
4-25
CH . 77
ii
e-Thesys(94 )
4-26
CH . 78
4-27
CH . 81
4-28
CH
.. 82
4-29
CH . 83
4-30
CH EVA
. 86
4-31
CH EVA
5-1
CH
CY EVA
. 88
. 93
iii
e-Thesys(94 )
1.1
economic profitEP
backward looking
forward looking
e-Thesys(94 )
EVMeconomic profitEP
EP
1990
e-Thesys(94 )
1.2
CHCH
80%
EVM EVM
EVM
CH
e-Thesys(94 )
2.1
2
3
weighted average cost of capitalWACC
2003
marginal cost of
capitalMCC
Sharp 1964
CAPMCapital Asset Pricing Model
CAPM
Ross1976 APT
Arbitrage Pricing Theory
CAPM CAPM
APT CAPM
e-Thesys(94 )
CAPM CAPM
CAPM
CAPM APT
unconditional
Black, Jensen and Scholes1972
CAPM
CAPM 1
23
,2003
e-Thesys(94 )
,2003
weighted average
cost of capitalWACC Sharp 1964 CAPMCapital Asset Pricing
Model EVA
2000 1990 EVA
1998
Weighted
Average Cost of Capital ; WACC
e-Thesys(94 )
2.2
,2003
Stern1993
Stern Stewart & Co
1.
2.
()
LIFO LIFO
FIFO
e-Thesys(94 )
ROICEVA
Hamilton1777
Residual
Income
Stern Stewart EVA 1994 Roundtable General Motors 1920s
General Electric1950s
(EVA)
(Chamberlain and
Campbell, 1995)EVA EVA
(the Total Cost of the Operations Capital)(Tully, 1999)
(Mayfeld, 1997)
OByren1996Market Value = a * Capital + b * (EVA/c) c
EVA
Capital Multiples
1997Economic Value
EVA
e-Thesys(94 )
(2000)
EVA
(2000)
EVA
EPS, Earnings Per Share
EVA
EVA
(2000)
EVAEVA
EVA
ROIC WACC
EVA
EVA
(2001)
EVA
EVA
EVA
EVA (2001)
2001EVAnet operating income after taxes
cost of capital of both equity and debt
EVA=
Biddle(1999)Stern Stewart & Co.
EVA
EVA =ROICWACC
=ROIC WACC
= NOPATWACC
e-Thesys(94 )
2.3
2.3.1
PerformanceEfficiencyEffectiveness
hierarchical
structure
performance
,1979
1986
Walker and Ruekert1987effectiveness
efficiency
adaptability
Kaufman1988
Bolobna
1988quantitativequalitative
Robbins1990approach1
goal-attainment
2input/output
3strategic constituency
4competing-value1994Robbins
business-opportunityqualitative
R&D
10
e-Thesys(94 )
R&D
1
3
4
5
6
7
1financial perspective
2internal business
process perspective3customer satisfaction perspective4
innovation and learning perspectiveKaplan & Norton1996
(Performance Management)
Hartel1994
2002
1995
goal congruence
2002
11
e-Thesys(94 )
EVA
EVM
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
12
e-Thesys(94 )
2.3.2
4Balanced Scorecard
13
e-Thesys(94 )
1Keegan1989
Non-Cost 3-2-2
Distribution Cost
14
e-Thesys(94 )
2SMART
Corporate
Business Units
Market
FinancialBusiness Operating Unit
Customer SatisfactionFlexibilityProductivity
Departments and Work Center
Quality
Delivery
Process TimeCost
shop
floor
15
e-Thesys(94 )
12
34
5
6
Dimensions
Types of measure
Competitiveness
Sales growth
R
Measures of the customer base
E
S Financial Performance
Profitability, liquidity
U
Capital Structure
L
Market ratios
T
S
Reliability
Responsiveness
Quality of Service
Aesthetics/appearance
Cleanliness/tidiness
Comfort
Friendliness
Communication
Courtesy
D
Competence
E
T
Access
Availability
E
Security
R
M
Volume flexibility
I Flexibility
Delivery flexibility
N
A
Specification flexibility
N
T Resource Utilization
Productivity
S
Efficiency
Innovation
Performance: innovation
process
Performance: specific
innovations
2-3 (Fitzgerald et al, 1991 )
16
e-Thesys(94 )
4KaplanNorton 1992
Harvard Business Review 1980 Analogy
Devises (Schneiderman, 1999)
1Financial Perspective2
Customer Perspective
3Business Process
Perspective
3Innovation
and Learning Perspective
17
e-Thesys(94 )
Look Forward
operational managers
cross-functional
society
regulators
18
e-Thesys(94 )
Enablers
hard issuessofter issues
results
&
&
19
e-Thesys(94 )
6needsrequirements
strategy
processescapabilities
dimensions
requirements
multi-stakeholdermulti-level approach
2-6
20
e-Thesys(94 )
CH
EVA 1995
1995 1997 324% 500
110%Stern Stewart www.sternstewart.com
21
e-Thesys(94 )
2.4
(1998)
1999
1.2.3.
4.5.6.1999
1998
Schuler1998
Vroom1964
x =
Valence
Expectancy
Kanter(1987)
Kanter 90%
Kanter
(1999)
1995
Lawler 49
22
e-Thesys(94 )
27%
Quimn,R,P 33
Allace Fay(1988)
(Process Equity)1.
2.3.
4.
(2001564-565)(2-8 )
2-8
(2001)Susan EJackson & Randall SSchuler
564
1994
23
e-Thesys(94 )
1995
1998
1996
EVA
1.
2.
3.
4.
24
e-Thesys(94 )
3.1
EVA
CH
3-1
25
e-Thesys(94 )
3.2
3.2.1
2000
Exploratory ResearchDescriptive Research
Casual Research
1989Case Study
2001
1994
exploratorydescriptive
explanatorywhat
whowhere
howwhy1998
Eisenhardt(1989)
Leonard-Barton (1990)
Yin1994
()
()
()
()
()
26
e-Thesys(94 )
Yin1994
3-2-1
3-1
2
3
Yin1994CH
1
2
3CH
27
e-Thesys(94 )
3.2.2 Harsco
HarscoEVAStern Stewart M
1. measurementeconomic
reality
2. management
3. motivation
4. mindsetbusiness literacy
HarscoEVAcapital allocation process
Harsco
value-based management
EVAHarsco22.7%
500 35.8%
10.9%
EVAHarsco
HarscoEVAStern Stewart M
1. MeasurementM1EVAEVA
EVA
behavioral impactmaterialitycomplexity
HarscoEVAEVA
EVA
hurdle rates
HarscoHarsco
2. ManagementM2EVA
28
e-Thesys(94 )
EVAEVAHarsco
Stern Stewart
Harsco
quick hitsEVA
Terms Evaluator
NOPATCapital trade-off
repair and replace
sovereignHarsco
3. MotivationM3Stern Stewart
alignmentEVA
EVAEVA
HarscoEVAa
sense of ownership
Harscointended
purposebudgeting process
drawn-outacceptable
Harsco
4. MindsetM4HarscoTraining
EVAEVA Experts Training
Managers TrainingCapital Budgeting Training
EVA
HarscoEVA
EVA
EVAEVAreal-life
EVAEVA Game
EVA
29
e-Thesys(94 )
EVA
Stern Stewart
Training Tutor TMbrowser-based
HarscoEVA
300
EVA
EVAHarsco
Intranet-based siteEVA
EVA
Harsco EVA Lean
ManufacturingHarscoEVAone-time event
30
e-Thesys(94 )
3.2.3
Harsco
EVA EVA
EVA
EVA 2001-2004
WACC
EVA
EVA
Harsco
31
e-Thesys(94 )
4.1
1998
CH 1980
CH2001 CH
CH20012004 4-1
4-2 TEJ WACC
NOPATROIC
Stern Stewart
EVA EVA
CY EVA
32
e-Thesys(94 )
4.1.1
4-1 CH 2001~2004
2004 12 31
45,701
1.64
42,894
1.53
66,152
2.24
86,686
2.08
28,975
0.98
2,352
0.05
133,210
4.79
115,734
4.13
142,026
4.81
179,455
4.31
268,487
9.65
423,181
15.11
499,715
16.93
677,624
16.29
15,107
0.54
34,266
1.22
14,295
0.48
51,611
1.85
24,036
0.85
45,425
1.53
80,063
1.92
28,000
497,399
17.76
657,633
22.29
1,652,158
39.74
642,862 23.12
6,341
0.22
6,325
0.22
10,417
0.35
15,775
0.37
16,024
0.57
26,731
0.95
7,836
0.26
10,040
0.24
1,179,343 42.42
1,198,566
42.81
1,472,474
49.91
2,704,153
65.04
355,110 12.77
415,160
14.82
268,046
9.08
209,014
5.02
355,110 12.77
415,160
14.82
268,046
9.08
209,014
5.02
CH 20022004
33
e-Thesys(94 )
4-1 CH 2001~2004
2004 12 31
671,587 24.15
671,587 23.98
671,587
22.76
671,587
16.15
155,994
156,486
5.58
178,465
6.04
182,440
4.38
476,409 17.13
486,823 17.38
553,294
18.75
569,680
13.7
5.61
48,278
1.73
51,300
1.83
50,405
1.7
58,502
1.4
8,614
0.3
8,760
0.31
9,157
0.31
9,284
0.22
77,597
2.79
79,368
2.83
80,399
2.72
81,438
1.95
1,438,479 51.74
1,454,324 51.94
1,543,307
52.31
1,572,931
37.83
-290,663 -10.45
-338,202 -12.08
-392,540
-13.3
432,625
-10.4
0.68
6,045
0.2
35,381
0.85
1,135,242 40.54
1,156,812
39.21
1,175,687
28.27
80
1,147,896 41.29
19,120
34,688
1.24
29,673
1.05
29,147
0.98
21,722
0.52
34,688
1.24
29,673
1.05
29,147
0.98
21,722
0.52
467
0.01
505
0.01
1,830
0.06
2,154
0.05
7,431
0.26
6,358
0.22
6,250
0.21
5,387
0.12
54,882
1.97
14,142
0.5
15,562
0.52
16,383
0.39
22,890
0.55
62,780
2.25
21,005
0.75
23,642
0.8
46,814
1.12
2,779,817
100
2,799,646
100
2,950,121
100
4,157,390
100
CH 20022004
34
e-Thesys(94 )
4-1 CH 2001~2004
2001 12 31
2002 12 31 2003 12 31
2004 12 31
638,025 22.95
521,008
18.6
353,223
11.97
265,657
6.38
69,713
2.5
119,503
4.26
159,257
5.39
159,624
3.83
25,872
0.93
24,569
0.87
28,980
0.98
48,951
1.17
26,679
0.95
27,207
0.97
64,977
2.2
185,262
4.45
25,261
0.85
127,411
3.06
28,418
1.02
46,171
1.64
54,103
1.83
92,482
2.22
2,959
0.1
3,427
0.12
7,233
0.24
7,159
0.17
155
476
0.01
1,000
0.03
875
0.02
106,631
3.83
114,380
4.08
113,130
3.83
87,500
2.1
31,943
1.14
36,249
1.29
108,020
3.66
23,523
0.56
930,395 33.46
892,990
31.89
915,184
31.02
998,444
24.01
193,133
4.64
440,115 15.83
451,235
16.11
413,105
14
332,250
7.99
451,235
16.11
413,105
14
525,383
12.63
440,115 15.83
890
0.03
890
0.03
890
0.03
890
0.02
890
0.03
890
0.03
890
0.03
890
0.02
83,010
2.98
78,276
2.79
88,362
2.99
87,254
2.09
822
0.02
718
0.02
943
0.03
7,600
0.18
4,354
0.15
5,805
0.2
4,689
0.15
4,037
0.09
88,186
3.17
84,799
3.02
93,994
3.18
98,891
2.37
1,459,586
52.5
1,429,914
51.07
1,423,173
48.24
1,623,608
39.05
CH 20022004
35
e-Thesys(94 )
4-1 CH 2001~2004
2004 12 31
1,056,561
38
1,056,561
37.73
1,117,600
37.88
1,270,576
30.56
22,121
0.53
165,198
5.94
165,198
5.9
138,547
4.69
498,550
11.99
112
112
112
112
2,239
0.08
2,239
0.07
167,549
6.02
167,549
5.98
0
138,659
0
4.7
356
499,018
0
12
93,648
3.36
93,648
3.34
103,715
3.51
120,074
2.88
2,127
0.07
100,558
3.59
166,674
5.64
621,993
14.96
95,775
346
3.44
0.01
194,206
336
6.93
0.01
270,389
300
9.16
0.01
742,067
0
17.84
0
336
0.01
300
0.01
-48,920
-1.74
1,320,231 47.49
1,369,732
48.92
1,526,948
51.75
2,533,782
60.94
CH 20022004
36
e-Thesys(94 )
4-2 CH 2001~2004
2,804,504 100.6
3,063,128 100.5
4,403,896 100.4
7,859,971 100.3
14,877 0.53
13,040 0.42
15,425 0.35
16,750 0.21
2,493 0.08
1,569 0.05
3,800 0.08
2,787,134 100
3,048,519 100
4,384,671 100
7,834,940 100
2,787,134 100
3,048,519 100
4,384,671 100
7,834,940 100
2,635,975 94.57
2,717,914 89.15
3,966,053 90.45
6,960,332 88.83
2,635,975 94.57
2,717,914 89.15
3,966,053 90.45
6,960,332 88.83
151,159 5.42
330,605 10.84
418,618 9.54
874,608 11.16
317 0.01
1,768 0.05
652 0.01
118,409 4.24
130,466 4.27
162,620
3.7
50,162 1.79
47,231 1.54
61,563
1.4
168,571 6.04
177,697 5.82
224,183 5.11
285,302 3.64
()
(17,729) -0.63
151,457 4.96
195,551 4.45
589,958 7.52
1,002 0.03
893 0.02
991 0.02
()
8,281
0.1
222,508 2.83
62,794
0.8
369 0.01
7,362 0.26
27,516 0.98
163
5,409 0.12
20
4,766
183
1,121 0.03
0
3,030 0.09
27,724
0.9
3,679 0.13
7,342 0.24
39,928 1.43
40,293 1.32
0.1
10,175 0.23
161
56,300 0.71
587
56,887 0.72
27
4,034 0.05
20,144 0.25
34,564 0.78
4,564
114,828 1.46
0.1
9,128 0.11
50,321 1.14
205,182 2.61
CH 20022004
37
e-Thesys(94 )
4-2 CH 2001~2004
66,861 2.39
56,101 1.84
30,180 0.68
20,343 0.25
1,107 0.02
2,413 0.03
1,107 0.02
2,413 0.03
351 0.01
650 0.02
649 0.01
559
365 0.01
5,132 0.16
4,246 0.09
1,582 0.03
11,356 0.14
9,206 0.33
1,284 0.04
1,655 0.03
2,145 0.02
76,783 2.75
63,167 2.07
39,419 0.89
36,816 0.46
(54,584) -1.95
128,583 4.21
()
(47,373) -1.69
()
()
()
206,453
4.7
758,324 9.67
30,152 0.98
42,859 0.97
150,339 1.91
(7,211) -0.25
98,431 3.22
163,594 3.73
607,985 7.75
(7,211) -0.25
98,431 3.22
163,594 3.73
607,985 7.75
()
(0)
(0)
CH 20022004
38
e-Thesys(94 )
4.1.2
WACC
capital asset pricing model
CAPMBond Yield Plus Risk Premium Method
discounted cash flow method DCF
KS=Rf+Rm-Rf
KS
Rf
Rm
Rm-Rf
1.Rf
4-3
4-3
2001
4.09%
2002
2.38%
2003
1.48%
2004
1.17%
2.
1 0.5 0.5
Taiwan Economic Journal Data BankTEJ
2000/01/07 2000/12/30
52 0.474
39
e-Thesys(94 )
20
00 %
/1
20 /7
00
/1
/
20 28
00
/2
/
20 18
00
/3
/
20 10
00
/3
/
20 31
00
/4
/
20 21
00
/5
/1
20 2
00
/6
20 /2
00
/6
/
20 23
00
/7
/1
20 4
00
/8
20 /4
00
/8
/
20 25
00
/9
/
20 15
00
/1
0/
20
6
00
/1
0/
27
20
00
/1
1/
17
20
00
/1
2/
20
8
00
/1
2/
29
4-1CH
30
20
10
-10
-20
-30
40
CH
e-Thesys(94 )
3.Rm
Rm
Taiwan Economic Journal Data BankTEJ
1995 2004 10
AC
3.05% 4-4
4-4
1995
-20.11%
1996
25.75%
1997
28.92%
1998
-14.51%
1999
25.08%
2000
-24.47%
2001
8.25%
2002
-11.96%
2003
12.85%
2004
0.74%
3.05%
TEJ
41
e-Thesys(94 )
4.KS
CH2001~2004 KS
4-5
4-5CH 2001~2004 KS
2001
2002
2003
2004
Rf
4.09%
2.38%
1.48%
1.17%
0.474
0.474
0.474
0.474
Rm
3.05%
3.05%
3.05%
3.05%
Rm-Rf
-1.04%
0.67%
1.57%
1.88%
2.70%
2.22%
2.06%
KS 3.60%
42
e-Thesys(94 )
5.WACC
2001~2004
4-1
4-2 TEJ
4-6
WACC=S/F KS+L/FKL1-t
WACC
S
L
KL
t
FF=S+L
4-6CH 2001~2004
F
L
S
L/F
t
KL
S/F
KS
WACC
2001
2,779,817
1,459,586
1,320,231
0.53
0.00%
5.93%
0.47
3.60%
4.82%
2002
2,799,646
1,429,914
1,369,732
0.51
23.45%
5.03%
0.49
2.70%
3.29%
2003
2004
2,950,121 4,157,390
1,423,173 1,623,608
1,526,948 2,533,782
0.48
0.39
20.76%
19.83%
3.03%
1.94%
0.52
0.61
2.22%
2.06%
2.31%
1.86%
CH 20022004 TEJ
4-6
43
e-Thesys(94 )
NOPAT
EBIT
4-7
4-7CH 2001~2004
()
(NOPAT)
2001
(17,729)
2,743
3,186
0
0
0
(11,800)
2002
151,457
3,426
(6,172)
0
0
0
148,711
2003
2004
195,551 589,958
(3,116)
1,944
(327)
1,192
0
0
0
0
0
0
192,108 593,094
CH 200020022004 TEJ
44
e-Thesys(94 )
IC
Stewart RI
(Net-workng Capital)
EVA
(
)
Stern Stewart GAAP
EVA
4-8CH 2001~2004
1.
2.
3.1-2
4.
A.
B.
5.A-B
3+4+5
2001
1,179,343
2,743
1,182,086
930,395
251,691
1,147,896
97,468
83,010
14,458
1,414,045
2002
1,198,566
3,426
1,201,992
892,990
309,002
1,135,242
50,678
78,276
(27,598)
1,416,646
2003
2004
1,472,474 2,704,153
(3,116)
1,944
1,469,358 2,706,097
915,184 998,444
554,174 1,707,653
1,156,812 1,175,687
52,789
68,536
88,362
87,254
(35,573) (18,718)
1,675,413 2,864,622
CH 200020022004 TEJ
45
e-Thesys(94 )
ROIC
ROICNOPAT
ICt-1
ICt
4-9CH 2001~2004
(NOPAT)
(IC)
ROIC=NOPAT/((ICt-1
2,001
2,002
2,003
2,004
(11,800) 148,711 192,108 593,094
1,414,045 1,416,646 1,675,413 2,864,622
+ICt)/2)
10.51% 12.43% 26.13%
CH 200020022004 TEJ
EVA
4-6 4-9 CHEVA
4-10
4-10CH 2001~2004
(IC)
(ROIC)
(WACC)
(ROIC-WACC)
EVA= IC*(ROIC-WACC)
2,001
1,414,045
2,002
1,416,646
10.51%
3.29%
7.22%
102,282
4.82%
2,003
2,004
1,675,413 2,864,622
12.43%
26.13%
2.31%
1.86%
10.12%
24.27%
169,552
695,244
CH 200020022004 TEJ
46
e-Thesys(94 )
4.1.3
CHCY
CHCY
TEJ CY
WACC
NOPAT
IC
ROIC
EVA
4-11 CY 2001~2004
59,619
2.3
116,279 4.31
367,329 10.72
184,552 3.68
10,896 0.42
12,473 0.46
5,628 0.16
149,684 2.98
76,014 2.94
69,866 2.59
79,137 2.31
70,937 1.41
196,411 7.59
247,275 9.16
319,812 9.33
399,967 7.98
30,031 1.16
23,916 0.88
55,386 1.61
107,222 2.14
24,531 0.48
26,532 0.77
134,660 2.68
785,757 30.4
696,380 25.8
872,068 25.46
1,981,199 39.56
37,877 1.46
80,132 2.97
54,350 1.58
34,119 0.68
1,196,605 46.29
1,246,321 46.2
1,780,242 51.97
3,086,871 61.65
109,578 4.23
103,403 3.83
134,726 3.93
315,397 6.29
109,578 4.23
103,403 3.83
134,726 3.93
315,397 6.29
109,578 4.23
103,403 3.83
134,726 3.93
315,397 6.29
CH 20022004
47
e-Thesys(94 )
4-11 CY 2001~2004
132,775 5.13
132,775 4.92
132,775 3.87
167,262 3.34
294,935 11.41
295,091 10.9
286,353 8.36
286,215 5.71
719,078 27.82
804,688 29.8
797,465 23.28
830,317 16.58
27,827 1.07
29,479 1.09
24,082
0.7
26,065 0.52
99,199 3.83
85,765 3.18
87,527 2.55
86,291 1.72
197,971 7.65
197,971 7.34
197,971 5.77
197,971 3.95
56,904
2.2
102,683 3.8
197,856 5.77
271,810 5.42
1,194,357 44.3
1,359,664 39.69
1,460,976 29.17
5.2
133,282 4.94
132,078 3.85
130,874 2.61
9,600 0.37
11,810 0.43
10,730 0.31
19,274 0.38
10,862 0.42
7,438 0.27
7,726 0.22
44,699 0.89
1,123,520 43.46
134,486
154,948 5.99
152,530 5.65
2,584,651 100
2,696,611 100
150,534 4.39
3,425,166
100
(51,056) (1.01)
143,791 2.87
5,007,035 100
CY 20022004
48
e-Thesys(94 )
4-11 CY 2001~2004
530,520
160,000
8,080
29,212
20.5
6.19
0.31
1.13
544,179
140,000
5,236
28,842
20.2
5.19
0.19
1.06
4,401 0.17
35,395 1.36
556 0.02
10,485 0.38
43,291 1.6
31,953 1.18
140,350 5.43
224,075 8.3
497,553
190,000
9,948
62,217
59,897
19,482
55,007
8,753
14.52
5.54
0.29
1.81
1.74
0.56
1.6
0.25
228,785 6.67
713,240
140,000
12,888
112,425
137,125
86,062
9,661
14.24
2.79
0.25
2.24
0
2.73
1.71
0.19
372,333 7.43
12,184 0.47
25,002 0.92
45,821 1.33
95,459 1.9
920,698 35.6 1,053,063 39.1 1,177,463 34.37 1,679,193 33.53
456,975 17.7
456,975 17.7
388,250 14.4
388,250 14.4
- 0
869,652 25.39
869,652 25.39
83,972 3.24
83,972 3.24
83,972 3.11
83,972 3.11
83,972 2.45
83,972 2.45
83,972 1.67
83,972 1.67
38,688 1.49
43,771 1.62
51,466
1.5
58,296 1.16
700 0.02
700 0.02
700
2,003
39,388 1.52
44,471 1.64
54,169
1,501,033 58.1 1,569,756 58.2 2,185,256
0.02
0.05
1.58
63.8
219,984 4.39
523,319 10.45
743,303 14.84
700
13,189
72,185
2,578,653
0.01
0.26
1.44
51.5
CY 20022004
49
e-Thesys(94 )
4-11 CY 2001~2004
803,592 31.1
803,592 29.8
345,830 6.9
113,999 4.41
113,999 4.22
113,999 3.32
113,999 2.27
1,178 0.04
115,177 4.45
0
113,999 4.22
113,999 3.32
459,829 9.18
69,579 2.69
87,231 3.37
156,810 6.06
72,384 2.68
129,504 4.8
201,888 7.48
78,880 2.3
198,347 5.79
277,227 8.09
92,273 1.84
483,300 9.65
575,573 11.49
8,039 0.31
7,376 0.27
8,039 0.31
7,376 0.27
CY 20022004
50
e-Thesys(94 )
4-12 CY 2001~2004
2,307,586 100.3
2,643,585 100.4
3,503,907 100.3
5,695,594 100.2
5,005
0.21
8,726 0.33
8,133 0.23
10,221 0.17
1,426
0.06
1,527 0.05
690 0.01
2,041 0.03
2,301,155
100
2,633,332 100
3,495,084 100
5,683,332 100
2,301,155
100
2,633,332 100
3,495,084 100
5,683,332 100
1,970,294 85.62
2,253,756 85.58
2,964,879 84.82
4,576,410 80.52
1,970,294 85.62
2,253,756 85.58
2,964,879 84.82
4,576,410 80.52
330,861 14.37
379,576 14.41
530,205 15.17
1,106,922 19.47
2,003 0.05
13,189 0.23
()
()
(487.00) (0.01)
2,003 0.03
177,850
7.72
189,112 7.18
241,191 6.9
373,361 6.56
59,875
2.6
64,204 2.43
77,532 2.21
122,901 2.16
253,316 9.61
318,723 9.11
496,262 8.73
208,992 5.97
599,474 10.54
237,725 10.33
93,136
4.04
126,260 4.79
2,198
0.09
1,056 0.04
1,053 0.01
1,246 0.03
38,102 0.67
1,246 0.03
38,102 0.67
2,812 0.08
2,242 0.03
2,035 0.05
12,357 0.21
8,689 0.32
10,016
0.43
4,033
0.17
3,914 0.14
3,388 0.09
3,666 0.06
11,035
0.47
9,291 0.35
16,395 0.46
43,330 0.76
13,856 0.52
608 0.01
1,452
0.06
500 0.01
15,598
0.67
3,722 0.14
4,475 0.12
10,513 0.18
44,332
1.92
41,028 1.55
30,959 0.88
111,263 1.95
CY 20022004
51
e-Thesys(94 )
4-12 CY 2001~2004
84,772
3.68
67,267 2.55
18,076
2,307
50,732 1.45
66,118 1.16
9,658 0.16
9,658 0.16
0.78
5,512 0.2
27,175 0.77
10,381 0.18
0.1
0
0
915 0.02
1,240 0.02
28,149 1.06
3,816 0.14
1,249 0.03
6,081 0.1
()
()
(
)
()
(
)
51,056 0.89
105,155
4.56
104,744 3.97
80,071 2.29
144,534 2.54
32,313
1.4
62,544 2.37
159,880 4.57
566,203 9.96
5,437
0.23
(2,414) (0.09)
25,952 0.74
136,470 2.4
26,876
1.16
64,958 2.46
75600 5.47
155330 10.07
26,876
1.16
64,958 2.46
75600 5.47
155330 10.07
0.9
1.02
0.9
1.02
0.9
1.01
CY 20022004
52
e-Thesys(94 )
WACC
1.KS
Rf 4-3
Taiwan Economic Journal Data BankTEJ
CY
2000/01/07 2000/12/30
52 0.495Rm
Taiwan Economic Journal Data BankTEJ 1995 2004 10
4-4 3.05%
(Ks) 4-13
4-13CY 2001~2004 KS
2001
2002
2003
2004
Rf
4.09%
2.38%
1.48%
1.17%
0.495
0.495
0.495
0.495
Rm
3.05%
3.05%
3.05%
3.05%
Rm-Rf
-1.04%
0.67%
1.57%
1.88%
2.71%
2.26%
2.10%
KS 3.58%
53
e-Thesys(94 )
2. WACC
CY 2001~2004 4-11
4-12
TEJ
4-13CY
WACC
4-14
4-14CY 2001~2004
2001
2002
2003
2004
2,584,651
2,696,611
3,425,166
5,007,035
1,501,033
1,569,756
2,185,256
2,578,653
1,083,618
1,126,855
1,239,910
2,428,382
0.58
0.58
0.64
16.83%
0.00%
16.23%
24.10%
6.48%
5.61%
3.94%
3.30%
0.42
0.42
0.36
0.48
KS
3.58%
2.71%
2.26%
2.10%
(WACC)
4.63%
4.40%
2.92%
2.31%
L/F
t
KL
S/F
0.52
CY 200020022004 TEJ
54
e-Thesys(94 )
NOPAT
CY
CY 4-15
4-15CY 2001~2004
()
2001
2002
2003
2004
93,136
126,260
208,992
599,474
1500
10500
2381
23
105
150
385
93,159
127,865
219,642
602,240
(NOPAT)
CY 200020022004 TEJ
55
e-Thesys(94 )
IC
CY
CY 4-16
4-16CY 2001~2004
2001
2002
2003
2004
1,196,605
1,246,321
1,780,242
3,086,871
1,500
10,500
2,381
1.
1,196,605
1,247,821
1,790,742
3,089,252
2.
920,698
1,053,063
1,177,463
1,679,193
3.1-2
275,907
194,758
613,279
1,410,059
1,123,520
1,194,357
1,359,664
1,460,976
A.
154,948
152,530
150,534
143,791
B.
39,388
44,471
54,169
72,185
5.A-B
115,560
108,059
96,365
71,606
3+4+5
1,514,987
1,497,174
2,069,308
2,942,641
4.
CY 200020022004 TEJ
56
e-Thesys(94 )
ROIC
4-154-16 CYROIC
4-17
ROICNOPAT
ICt-1ICt
4-17CY 2001~2004
2001
2002
(NOPAT)
93,159 127,865
1,514,987 1,497,174
(ROIC=NOPAT/((ICt-1+ICt)/2)
8.49%
2003
2004
219,642 602,240
2,069,308 2,942,641
12.32% 24.03%
CY 200020022004 TEJ
57
e-Thesys(94 )
EVA
2001
(ROIC)
WACC
ROIC-WACC
EVA=IC*(ROIC-WACC)
2003
2004
2,069,308 2,942,641
12.32%
24.03%
2.92%
2.31%
9.40%
21.72%
194,515 639,144
1,514,987
4.63%
CY 200020022004 TEJ
CH
CYEVA 4-19
EVACH
CY
4-19CH
CY EVA
2002
CH
2003
CY
CH
2004
CY
CH
CY
ROIC
10.51%
8.49%
12.43%
12.32%
26.13%
24.03%
WACC
3.29%
4.40%
2.31%
2.92%
1.86%
2.31%
ROIC-WACC
7.22%
4.09%
10.12%
9.40%
24.27%
21.72%
IC
EVA
61,234
169,552
58
194,515
695,244
639,142
e-Thesys(94 )
CHEVACY
EVA
CH 2002 2004 CY
CHCY
EVA 2002~2004 CH
CY
2001 CH(NOPAT)
2002 2001 27.87
CY 23.01
5.42% 14.37% 2001 CH
CY
9%
2001 85%15%
60%40% 2002
35%
1.
2.
3.
4. 3 15
CHCY
CHCY
CH 2002 2004 EVA 2002 2004
CY2002 2004 CY
CY
59
e-Thesys(94 )
4.2
4.2.1
CH 1980 1998
1991 2001
ISO-90012000
CH 3-8
4-2 CH
CH 1998
CH
Michael2004
1.
60
e-Thesys(94 )
2.3.formula bonus
4.
incentive
contractingdiscretionary bonuses
incentive contracts
1.
2.3.
override
threat of termination
Harsco EVA
CH
2004
4-20
4-20CH
1. 2. 3.
4. 5.
1. 2. 3.
4. 5. 6.
1. 2.
3. 4.
5.
1. 2.
1. 2.
1. 2.
61
e-Thesys(94 )
CH
1.
2.
100
100
3.
Vertical Analysis
100%
100%
1. 30 45
60
2. 4-21
90
80-89
70-79 69
62
e-Thesys(94 )
4-21CH
1.
30
2.
30
3.
20
4.
20
1.
20
2.
20
3.
20
4.
20
5.
20
1.
30
2.
30
3.
20
4.
20
63
e-Thesys(94 )
4.2.2
1.
ISO
2.
EPS
3.
4.
5.
80%~85%
80%
EVMBSC
64
e-Thesys(94 )
EVA
65
e-Thesys(94 )
4.3
4.3.1
4-22CH
,.
,.
,.
,.
,.
,.
,.
,.
,.
,.
66
e-Thesys(94 )
4.3.2
CH
1.
1 10
2.
10%
2.5 2.5
12
3.
67
e-Thesys(94 )
1.
2.
2%
3.
4.
68
e-Thesys(94 )
4.3.3
1.
2.
3.
4.
69
e-Thesys(94 )
4.4
EVA
EVAEconomic ProitEP
Residual IncomeEVA
EVAEVA
EVA
EVA
EVA
CH
Young & OByrne2001 EVA
4-3
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
EVA
4-3 EVA
Young, S. David and Stephen F. OByrne2001, EVA and Value-Based
ManagementNew YorkMcGraw Hill.P.74.
CH EVA
Harsco
70
e-Thesys(94 )
EVA M
71
e-Thesys(94 )
4.4.1
EVA
EVASpread
EVA
20022004
EVA
72
e-Thesys(94 )
4.4.2
CH
1.
2.
3.
73
e-Thesys(94 )
EVA
BSC
EVA
Balance Scorecard
EVA
EVABalance
Scorecard
Balance Scorecard
CH
74
e-Thesys(94 )
CH 4-23 4-23
CHISO
EVA
4-23CH
EVA
25%
EVA- EVA
EVA
7%
WACC
250,000
-
+
20%
180,000
27%
100%
33%
27%
100%
3,000
75
e-Thesys(94 )
4-24
4-24CH
75%
80
97%
95%
5%
97%
20%
76
e-Thesys(94 )
4-25
4-25CH
87%
100%
75%
100%
7
3
30
77
e-Thesys(94 )
4-26
4-26CH
12
5%
[
+2]
100%
10
60%
80%
78
e-Thesys(94 )
4.4.4 CH
CH
4
7 10 1 10 2
EVA
EVA
EVA
EVA
EVA
EVA EVA
25%
20% EVA
5% 25%
= EVA 25%
/
EVA 1,000,000
79
e-Thesys(94 )
=1,000,00025%90/90+88+85
=85,551
=1,000,00025%88/90+88+85
=83,650
=1,000,00025%85/90+88+85
=80,799
80
e-Thesys(94 )
4.4.5 CH
CH
4-27
4-26
4-27CH
CH 2004
01
02
96%
2004.12.31
40%
% 90%
2004.12.31
10%
1-300
03
04
05
06
81
e-Thesys(94 )
1.
4-28 EVA
4-28CH
CH 2004
01
- 8%
/
15%
02
- 5%
/
15%
1-003
03
04
05
82
e-Thesys(94 )
2.
4-29CH
CH 2004
10%
10%
100
90
80-89
70-79
69
83
e-Thesys(94 )
1. 4710 1 10
4-29
2. 2
3.
20%
80%
84
e-Thesys(94 )
4.5
EVA
EVA
EVA
EVA
EVA
CH
EVA
EVA
EVA
CH
4.5.1 EVA
EVA
EVA
EVA
EVA
EVA
EVA
EVA
EVA
EVA
EVA
85
e-Thesys(94 )
4-30
4-30CH EVA
2003
2004
2005
(1) EVA
15,000
20,000
5,000
(2) EVA-
15,000
5,000
-15,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
10,000
-10,000
2%
2%
2%
(6)
100
100
100
(7)[4(5)+(6)
300
100
-100
(8)
300
325
144
75
81
36
225
244
108
(3) EVA
(4) EVA[2-(3)
(5) EVA
(9)[825%]
(10)[8-(9)
EVA 2%CH
EVA
EVA
CH
EVA
25% 4.4.4 20%~25%75%
86
e-Thesys(94 )
=
0.6
0.4
= /
87
e-Thesys(94 )
4-31CH EVA
2002
2003
2004
(1) EVA
102,282
169,552
695,244
(2) EVA-
102,282
67,270
627,974
5,000
5,000
5,000
97,282
62,270
622,974
2%
2%
2%
(6)
40,913
67,821
278,098
(7)[4(5)+(6)
42,858
69,066
290,597
(8)
42,858
101,210
366,465
(9)[825%]
10,715
25,303
91,616
(10)[8-(9)
32,144
75,908
274,848
330,605
418,618
874,608
33,061
41,862
87,461
(3) EVA
(4) EVA[2-(3)
(5) EVA
(11)
(12) [1110%]
2004
88
e-Thesys(94 )
4.5.2
EVA
90%10% 70%30% 90%10%
80%20%
B
1. 4%A100%
2. 4%3%A80%
3. 3%2%A60%
4. 2%A40%
C
1. B 80%
2. B 20%
80:20
10% 10%
89
e-Thesys(94 )
4.6 EVA
EVA EVA
EVA
EVA
EVA
NOPAT
Rm EVA
EVA
EVA
EVA
EVA
EVA
CH
EPS
ROE...
EVA
EVA
EPS
90
e-Thesys(94 )
CH
EVA EVA
1. EVA
EVA EVA
EVA
2.
EVA
...
EVA
EVA
EVA 4-31
EVA
91
e-Thesys(94 )
5.1
economic value
added,EVA
EVA 2001-2004
WACC
CY EVA EVA
EVA
CH EVM
1
CHEVACY
CHCY
EVA
5-1
1. CH 2002 2004 7.22% 24.27%
17.05%EVA 102,282 695,244
592,962
2. CY 2002 2004 4.09% 21.72% 17.63%
EVA 61,234 639,142 577,908
92
e-Thesys(94 )
CHCY
4. EVAROIC
WACC
EVA
5-1CH
CY EVA
2002
CH
2003
CY
CH
2004
CY
CH
CY
ROIC
10.51%
8.49%
12.43%
12.32%
26.13%
24.03%
WACC
3.29%
4.40%
2.31%
2.92%
1.86%
2.31%
ROIC-WACC
7.22%
4.09%
10.12%
9.40%
24.27%
21.72%
IC
EVA
61,234
169,552
194,515
695,244
639,142
2EVM
1.CHEVM
CH
BSC
2.
3.
EVM
93
e-Thesys(94 )
EVM
1 EVM
1. EVM
EVA
EVA
EVA
2. EVA
EVM
2 EVA
EVA
EVA
3
1.
2. EVMBSC
4 EVA
1. EVM
2. EVA
EVA
EVA
EVAEVA
EVA
94
e-Thesys(94 )
5.2
1.EVM EVA
EVA
EVA
2.EVA
EVM
3.2002-2004EVA
95
e-Thesys(94 )
5.3
1.
EVA
2.EVA
EVA
96
e-Thesys(94 )
1998
1994
1994
1995
1994
1998
1999
2000
2000DruckerPeter F.
1996
2002
ERP
1990
2000
1998()
2003
C
2002
1979,p.6
1996
1998
19991999 1
139~161
2001
2003
2004
EVA
97
e-Thesys(94 )
2002
:
2004AC
1998
1989
2004
1986
2001
98
e-Thesys(94 )
Biddle, G. C., R. M. Bowen, and J. S. Wallace, Summer 1999, Evidence on EVA Journal
of Applied Corporate Finance: pp.69-79.
Black, F., M. C. Jensen, and M. Scholes, 1972, The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some
Empirical Tests, Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets: pp.79-121.
Bolobna , G. J., 1988, Pitfalls in Measuring MIS Performance, Computer Security, 7 (2): pp.
137-138.
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989, Building Theories from Case Study Research, Academy of
Management Review, 14 (4): pp.532-550.
Fama, E. F. and J. MacBeth, 1973, Risk, Return and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests, Journal
of Political Economy,81, pp.607-636.
Fama , E. F. and G. W. Schwert, 1977, Asset Returns and Inflation, Journal of Financial
Economics,5: pp.115-146.
Gibbons, M. R., 1982, Multivariate Tests of Financial ModelsA New Approach, Journal
of Financial Economics,10: pp.3-27.
Gibbs, M; K. A. Merchant; W. A. Van der Stede, and M E. Vargus, Determinants and Effects
of Subjectivity In Incentives, The Accounting Review; 79(2): pp.406.
Hartel , F., 1994, Performance Management Where Is It Going, in Mitrani. A Dalziel, M. &
Fitt, D.eds., Competency Based Human Resource Management, Kogan Page, London.
Milkovich, G. T. and J. W. Boudreau, 1991, Human Resource Management, New York:
Richard D.Irwin, Inc.
Morin, R. A. and S. L. Jarrell 2001, Driving Shareholder Value Building Techniques for
Creating Shareholder Wealth, New York Mcgraw Hill Companies, Inc.
OByrne, F. 1996, EVA and Market Value, Bank of America Journal of Applied Corporate
Finance, 9 (Spring): pp.116-125.
Robbins, S. P., 1990, Organization TheoryStructure, Design and Application, 3rd ed, Prentice
Hall: pp.47-48.
Roger, K., 1988, Preparing Useful Performance Indicators, Training and Development,
Spring: pp.80.
Schuler, R. S., 1996, Human Resource ManagementPositioning for the 21st Century, 6th ed.,
St. Paul,Minneapolis: West Publishing Company.
Sharp, W., 1964,Capital Asset PricesA Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of
Risk, Journal of Finance 19: pp.425-442.
Vroom, V.H. 1964, Work and motivation, N.Y.: John Wiley
Wallace, M. J. Jr. & Fay, C. H. 1988, Compensation Theory and Practice, 2nd., Boston:
PWS-KENT Publishing Co.
Yin, R. K., 1994, Case Study Research Design and Methods, LondonSage Publication.
Young, S. D. and S. F. OByrne, 2001, EVA and Value-Based ManagementNew York
McGraw Hill.
99
e-Thesys(94 )