Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Democracy "is government by the people in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system."The world celebrates the democracy on 15th of September as the date of democracy.
History
The beginning of wisdom in such disputes is to see that democracy, like all other human inventions, has a history. The first historical phase of democracy, which began in ancient Mesopotamia (in 2500 BC) & stretched through classical Greece and Rome to the rise and maturation of Islamic civilization around 950 CE, democracy was associated with the creation and diffusion of public assemblies. It is so difficult that who invented the term or exactly where and when the word democracy was used first. But in Greek word demos means people and kratein means rule. The Middle Ages was a period of European history from the fall of the Roman Empire (476 AD) until the fall of Constantinople in 1453 AD. It is also known as the Dark Ages.Although there was not a democracy directly in place during the Middle Ages, Christianity was widely followed and so many democratic ideas were understood and followed by many of the people. Christianity taught that all men were created equal.Another form of government, known as feudalism developed during this time. Feudalism stressed that all people had certain rights and developed a system of courts to defend these rights.
Demos
(People)
Kratein
(Rule)
DEMOCRACY
Therefor it can be imagine the democracy has been born in Greece. However it is, in eastern countries in the world such as India, they exists a huge history of democracy.
Definitions
DEMOCRACY IS A GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, AND FOR THE PEOPLE."
In our world, there are two kinds of democracy. One is Direct democracy. This is applicable in small states such as Switzerland, Norway, etc. Direct democracy refers to a situation in which citizens participate somewhat equally in the decision-making process. When the population becomes lager, the next best way is Representative democracy (Indirect democracy). Indirect democracy refers to a situation in which a subset of elected representatives makes most of the political decisions.
DEMOCRACY
DIRECT DEMOCRACY
REPRECENTATIVE DEMOCRACY
Direct democracy (also known as pure democracy) is a form of democracy in which people
decide (e.g. vote on, form consensus on, etc.) policy initiatives directly, as opposed to a representative democracy in which people vote for representatives who then decide policy initiatives. Depending on the particular system in use, it might entail passing executive decisions, the use of sortation, making laws, directly electing or dismissing officials and conducting trials. Two leading forms of direct democracy are participatory democracy and deliberative democracy.
Raises issues that others may want to hide Restores authority to the people, and makes them responsible, not the parties. Curbs the imbalance of power, makes politicians responsible to the people Gets the community involved Makes for better legislation Politicians are forced to act on petitions instead of throwing them out right away. Helps to gain control over Parliament and the direction of the country. Restores parliamentary government with representatives Makes politicians be accountable
Disadvantages
Cost The media and government may attempt to influence the decisions made by the people. Increase in referenda Some people may be more politically active than others
Direct democracy gives the steering wheel for government to the people. As we noticed above there are both many advantages and disadvantages to direct democracy. This form of government is already in effect in Switzerland and some states in the United States.
The power of representatives is usually curtailed by a constitution (as in a constitutional democracy or a constitutional monarchy) or other measures to balance representative power:
An independent judiciary, which may have the power to declare legislative acts unconstitutional (e.g. constitutional court, supreme court) It may also provide for some deliberative democracy (e.g., Royal Commissions) or direct popular measures (e.g., initiative, referendum,recall elections). However, these are not always binding and usually require some legislative action-legal power usually remains firmly with representatives. In some cases, a bicameral legislature may have an "upper house" that is not directly elected, such as the Canadian Senate, which was in turn modeled on the British House of Lords.
1) Early 19th century 2) Year around-1920 3) Aftermath of World War 11 4) Early 1950 to the 1980
Democratization (or democratization) is the transition to a more democratic political regime. It may be the transition from an authoritarian regime to a full democracy, a transition from an authoritarian political system to a semi-democracy or transition from a semi-authoritarian political system to a democratic political system. The outcome may be consolidated (as it was for example in the United Kingdom) or democratization may face frequent reversals (as it has faced for example in Argentina). Different patterns of democratization are often used to explain other political phenomena, such as whether a country goes to a war or whether its economy grows. Democratization itself is influenced by various factors, including economic development, history, and civil society
Transition to Democracy
Dankwart Alexander Rustow (December 21, 1924 August 3, 1996) was a professor of political science and sociology. He is perhaps best known as the 'father of transit logy,' a school of thought in the field of democratization studies. In his seminal 1970 article 'Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model,' Rustow broke from the prevailing schools of thought on how countries became democratic. Disagreeing with the heavy focus on necessary social and economic pre-conditions for democracy, he argued that only national unity was a necessary precondition for democracy. Beyond that, the most important thing for a transition from authoritarian rule to democracy was consensus between elites on the new rules of the game. Lipset's title is true to his functional concern. He is careful to speak of "Some Social Requisites," not prerequisites, "of Democ-racy," and thus to acknowledge the difference between correlation and cause. But the subtlety has escaped many readers who unthinkingly translate "requisites" into "preconditions. Moreover, encourages the same substitution, for it repeatedly slips from the language of correlation into the language of causality. Significantly, on all those occasions economic and social conditions become the independent, and democracy the dependent, variable.
The claim that wealth sustains democracy has important implications for public policy and for attempts to promote both poverty alleviation and democracy by the international development community. Yet two alternative interpretations dominate the policy debate and it remains unclear which one is correct. The case of South Korea plausibly fits the Lipset theory but, as Singapore shows, many important outliers remain. The key question which remains is whether, even with this battery of controls, political institutions also play an important role in sustaining democracy.
Pillars of Democracy
In 2004, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution that lays out seven essential elements of democracy, including: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) Separation and balance of power Independence of the judiciary A pluralistic system of political parties and organizations Respect for the rule of law Accountability and transparency Free, independent and pluralistic media Respect for human and political rights; e.g., freedoms of association and expression; the right to vote and to stand in elections
01. THE SEPARATION AND BALANCE OF POWER The terms separation of power and balance of power mean that the power of the three branches of democratic government - the legislative, executive and judiciary should not be concentrated in one branch, but should be distributed such that each branch can independently carry out its own respective functions. The separation and balance of power rests on two main principles. First, the competencies of the three branches of governmental power must be clearly delimited and defined. Second, all branches of government are bound by the rule of law he idea of a separation and balance of powers emerged in an historical context as a protection against tyranny 02. INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY Article 14 of the ICCPR states that in the determinations of any criminal charges against him [or her], or of his rights and obligations in a suit of law, everybody shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial court established by law. There is, then, a hard international obligation to establish an independent judiciary. Moreover, the UN Human Rights Committee has made it clear that the ICCPR stipulates judicial
independence beyond the realm of criminal law such that it also comes to bear on administrative law and the organization of the state.
03. THE RULE OF LAW There are few definitions of the rule of law in the context of international instruments related to ensuring democratic practices within states Nonetheless, its core meaning is clear.
04. ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY As stated in both the 2005 UN General Assembly resolution and the 2003 declaration by the UN Human Rights Commission, transparency and accountability in public administration are essential to democracy. Without exception, this applies to all those with governmental and public authority (whether elected or not) and to all bodies of government and public authority. Elaborating this, the Inter-Parliamentary Unions Universal Declaration on Democracy explains, Accountability [and transparency] entails a public right of access to information about the activities of government, the right to petition government and to seek redress through impartial administrative and judicial mechanisms.
05. FREEDOM OF THE MEDIA Media freedom is vitally important for democracy. It contributes to creating plural, open societies and accountable, transparent systems of government, as well as safeguards human rights and fundamental freedoms. In particular, a free media sector plays an essential role in guaranteeing the freedom of expression and freedom of information, both of which are necessary for facilitating the effective participation of citizens in democratic processes.
06. RESPECT FOR POLITICAL RIGHTS The freedom of political debate, along with freedom of association and assembly, are at the centre of the concept of democracy. These essential political rights are well defined in legally binding treaties, such as the ICCPR.
Democratic Socialism
Its difficult to define also it is variant of socialism that reject centralized.Authoritation methods of transition from capitalism of socialism in favor of grass roots. level moments aiming for the immediate creation of decentralized economic democracy. In Russia Mihhail Grobuchew said perestroika as building a new human and democratic socialism. History of Democratic Socialism Prominent movement at the end of 19th centaury in German 1857 German social Democratic party another Australian Labor party moved forward.
Democratic Liberalisms
It aims to reach a synthesis of democracy which is the participation of the people in the power and the rational liberalisms, which decline the emotional populism. Describe their ideology as giving power to the people they are against the concentration of power in uncountable Bodies.
Fascism :
Society there is no speech to voices of freedom & criticisms therefore from democracy
Maxisism:
In ultimate We hope equal society in ultimate how we expect democracy but it begin & develop. Its visible limitations.
Capitalism:
We also see democracy but capital society in all over we see rights and democracy gain minority hands.
Gradient Level of Regimes Full Democracies Flawed Democracies Hybrid Regimes Authoritarian Regimes
According to the Index most democratic Countries found in Scandinavia, This includes Norway, Swede, Iceland, Denmark and New Zealand. Norway was the first independent country ever to allow women to vote and candidate. Sweden Although Sweden has a unitary parliamentary democracy and a constitutional monarchy, now a days is considered one of the most democratic European countries. Denmark Its another unitary parliamentary democracy with constitutional monarchy but has a long history of democracy starting with the 1915 universal suffrage. Switzerland Since 1848 Switzerland is governed by representative direct democracy, the citizens having the power to overturn the parliaments decisions.
United Kingdom
We should first look at the British system as it is the longest established. At a basic level it is understood that Prime Minister and government ultimately run the country. Members of Parliament are elected by the general public,usually once every four years based on the policies of the three or four main political parties.Issues of particular interest could be employment,the state of the economy,health and defence.It is called democracy whereby the people get to vote on who they want to take the country farward.The Nuts and bolt of the British government are far more complicated and I will mention few of them The Constitution ,The Prime Minister,The Cabinet,The sovereign,The speaker,The House of Commons,Parliament,Civil servents,House of Lords like that The houses of Parliament have long been known as the mother of parliaments and historically from the basis for democratic government across the world.
Middle East
The highest scores of countries in democracy are generally held by Isrel, Kuwet Turkey, Morocco and Lebanon. Countries as partly democratic are Egypt, Tunisia and Iraq The Lowest scores held by Saudi Arabia and Yemen. The most significant changed in the Middle East from 2011 to 2012
Latin America
Latin America was identified as one of the success stories from the wave of democratic development that accompanied the waning years of the Cold war. Over the past decade, however the commitment of governments in the region to democratic standards has wavered in some cases considerably.
Regions largest and most economically powerful country Brazil has experienced a strengthening of free institutions even It has impressive Economic growth. Chile and Uruguay continue to rank among the worlds leading Democracies.and Colombia has registered gains for civil liberties as its violent wind down.
Asia
The Democracy has shallow roots in Asia, the most dynamic part of the world economy, is clearly evident from the Economist Intelligence Units Democracy Index 2011.Only Two Asian countries are estimated to be full democracies :Japan and South Korea. Although parts of the region from Myanmar and North Korea to Laos, Vietnam and China are still entrenched authoritarian regimes, the past couple of decades have seen the spread of democracy in the region overall. Over the past decade, 20 Asian Countries have held elections, and many have undergone peaceful transitions in government. Despite its problem, India remains the worlds most populous Democracy. Yet even the democratic countries , there are often significant problems in the political systems. Because Political culture in Asia are often underdevelopment and shallow, Such as in the cases of the following democracies Taiwan, India, Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines, Hongkong and Singapore are classed as having
hybrid regimes. Other hybrids from Asia are Bangladesh, Cambodia, Bhutan, Pakistan and Nepal Although Asians say they support democratic ideals, their commitment to limits on a leaders power is Far lower than in most other regions.
Sri Lanka
According to the Article 1 of Sri Lankan Constitution country is known as Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka. Article 1 states that Sri Lanka (Ceylon) is a Free, Sovereign, Independent and Democratic Socialist Republic. There are several Articles in the constitution which are directly related to the concepts of Democracy Article 3- In the Republic of Sri Lanka sovereignty is in the People and is inalienable. Sovereignty includes the powers of government, fundamental rights and the franchise. Article 4- The Sovereignty of the People shall be exercised and enjoyed in the following manner : (a) the legislative power of the People shall be exercised by Parliament, consisting of elected representatives of the People and by the People at a Referendum ; (b) the executive power of the People, including the defence of Sri Lanka, shall be exercised by the President of the Republic elected by the People ; (c) the judicial power of the People shall be exercised by Parliament through courts, tribunals and institutions created and established, or recognized, by the Constitution, or created and established by law, except in regard to matters relating to the privileges, immunities and powers of Parliament and of its Members, wherein the judicial power of the People may be exercised directly by Parliament according to law ; (d) the fundamental rights which are by the Constitution declared and recognized shall be respected, secured and advanced by all the organs of government and shall not be abridged, restricted or denied, save in the manner and to the extent hereinafter provided; and (e) the franchise shall be exercisable at the election of the President of the Republic and of the Members of Parliament and at every Referendum by every citizen who has attained the age of eighteen years and who, being qualified to be an elector as hereinafter provided, has his name entered in the register of electors.
Human Rights are one of the basic elements in democracy Articles 10- 14 includes the Fundamental Rights of the people
Article 10- Freedom of thought, conscience and religion. Article 11- Freedom from torture. Article 12- Right to equality Article 13- Freedom from arbitrary arrest, detention and punishment and prohibition of retrospective penal legislation. Article 14- Freedom of speech, assembly, association, occupation, movement
Constitution A articles which deals with the Referendum or the use of Direct
Democracy
Article 83- Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the provisions of Article 82 (a) a Bill for the amendment or for the repeal and replacement of or which is inconsistent with any of the provisions of Articles 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 or of this Article ; and (b) a Bill for the amendment or for the repeal and replacement of or which is inconsistent with the provisions of paragraph (2) of Article 30 or of, paragraph (2) of Article 62 which would extend the term of office of the President, or the duration of Parliament, as the case may be, to over six years, shall become law if the number of votes cast in favour thereof amounts to not less than two-thirds of the whole number of Members (including those not present), is approved by the People at a Referendum and a certificate is endorsed thereon by the President in accordance with Article 80.
Article 85- Submission of Bills to People by Referendum. Article 86- Submission of matters of national importance to People by Referendum. Article 87- Parliament to provide for procedure.
But like most of the countries in the world Sri Lanka also face so many difficulties and problems in making Democracy a practice. But when comparing to the other South Asian and Developing countries Sri Lanka possesses a better level in Democracy.
3. Fact that democratization takes place in often still authoritarian environments that resist change, in countries with weak states that provide insufficient security to their citizens, in countries with incomplete processes of nation-building, and in countries with poorly developed or skewed economies. 4. Inadequate and inappropriate international supporting democratic development.
approaches
in
The delivery of international support is not always compatible with the intrinsic values of democracy itself. Whether the ultimate outcome of the process through which international support is delivered is democracy? Whether the instruments used and procedures followed in this process is democratic?
When they are not, democracy support is likely to become problematic Confusing democracy promotion -with regime change -with the use of military force to remove a regime -with foreign intrusion in violation of the sovereignty of the countries Are counter-productive and often inconsistent with the values of democracy e:g- Western interventions in Libya, Iraqi, Afghanistan It also is often accompanied by double standards since only unfriendly regimes are targeted while friendly tyrants are treated much more leniently. This gives democracy and democracy support a bad name. Actually in todays world Democracy and its core values such as Human Rights has become a weapon in controlling unfriendly regimes according to the aims and goals of powerful countries such as America
By imposing tight control over civil society under the pretexts of ensuring security, political stability and non-interference in the countrys internal affairs these governments place unlawful restrictions on NGO activities.
Supporting to democratic movements, including religious groups that can challenge extremists who misuse whatever religion to promote anti-democratic political agendas Must be strengthened.
Responding to religious and other forms of extremism The competition for scarce energy resources The globalizing market economy, The forces of technology and capitalism Pose threats to the advancement of democracy in the present context
11. Terrorism
One of the major challenges that Democracy faces in todays world Terrorism challenges the fundamental aspects of democracy like liberty and equality It creates a great danger to the human rights as they use of violence in order to achieve political aims
Legitimacy of the democratic states and violations of this legitimacy in relation to preventing terrorism will be highlighted. So It is important for a democratic government to stay within the boundary of laws when it is implementing its policies concerning the prevention and combating of terrorism.
Promotion of democracy throughout the world has always been touted as a core American value, but following the terrorist attacks on 9/11, USA elevated democracy promotion from its traditional status and their national security became main goal of their foreign policy for in the post-9/11 world. This policy change affected the world democracy at large.
(ii) Based on the principle of equality: All members of the State are equal in the eyes of law. All enjoy equal social, political and economic rights and state cannot discriminate among citizens on the basis of caste, religion, sex, or property. All have equal right to choose their government.
(ii) Stability and responsibility in administration: Forms a stable government because it is based on public support. The administration is conducted with a sense of responsibility
(iv) Political education to the people: Democracy serves as a training school for citizens. People get impetus to take part in the affairs of the state. It creates political consciousness among the people
(v) Little chance of revolution: Since democracy is based on public will, there is no chance of public revolt.
(vi) Stable government: Democracy is based on public will. It conducts state business with public support. It is, therefore, more stable than other forms of Government.
(vii) Helps in making people good citizens: Success of democracy lies on its good citizens. Democracy creates proper environment for the development of personality and cultivating good habits. (viii) Based on public opinion:
Disadvantages
Following arguments have been given against Democracy: (i) More emphasis on quantity than on quality: Majority party holds the control of government.
(ii) Rule of the incompetent: In the democratic system every citizen is allowed to take part, whereas everybody is not fit for it. Locke calls it the act of running administration by the ignorant
(iii) Based on unnatural equality: The concept of equality is enshrined in democracy. It is against the law of nature. Nature has not endowed every individual with intelligence and wisdom. Men's talents differ. Critics are of opinion that "it is against the law of nature to grant equal status to everybody
(iv) Voters do not take interest in election: Voters do not cast their vote in a spirit of duty as democracy requires them to do. Contestants of election persuade them. (v) Lowers the moral standard: The only aim of the candidates becomes to win election. -They often employ under-hand practices -Foul means to get elected -Character assassination is openly practiced, -Unethical ways are generally adopted.
-Muscle power and money power work hand-in-hand to ensure success to him. Thus, morality is the first casualty in election. It is a big loss for 'when character is lost, everything is lost' becomes explicit in due course. (vi) Democracy is a government of the rich: Modern democracy is, in fact, capitalistic. It is rule of the capitalists. The result is that we get plutocracy under the garb of democracy-democracy in name and form, plutocracy in reality. The rich candidates purchase votes. The rich hold the media and use it for their own benefit Influence of moneyed people over politics is probably clear in England, America and India. (vii) Misuse of public funds and time: Democracy is a huge waste of time and resources. It takes much time in the formulation of laws. A lot of money is spent during the elections. Ministers are proving white elephants. They are a heavy burden on public as they waste public money on their tours and recreations.
(viii) No stable government: When no party gets absolute majority, coalition governments are formed. The coalition of political parties with a view of sharing power is only a marriage of convenience. Whenever there occurs clash of interests, the coalition is lost and governments crumble down.
(ix) Dictatorship of majority: Democracy is criticised because it establishes dictatorship of majority. The majority is required to safeguard the interests of minority but in actual practice it does not.
(x) Bad influence of political parties: Political parties are the basis of democracy. A political party aims at capturing power. Its members are to safeguard the interests of the party. Sometimes, they overlook the overall interest of the state for the sake of their party.
They try to win election by hook or by crook. Practising the immoral methods, empty ideals, inciting hatred, spreading caste feelings, communalism has become a common practice. It lowers the national character.
Criticisms on democracy
Economic criticism
Irrational voters - voters are irrational as they are not adequately educated to be able to foresee the betterment of the community they belong to, and therefore are unable to cast a vote to that effect
Inefficiency of the system -It has been argued democracy is efficient based on the premise of rational voters, competitive elections, and relatively low political transactions costs.
Wealth disparity -The will of the democratic majority may not always be in the best interest of all citizens within the country or beneficial to the future of the country itself.
Sociological criticisms
Lack of political education Some have argued that voters may not be educated enough to exercise their democratic right.
Influence of non-specialized society - As ordinary citizens are encouraged to take part in the political life the result is that government policies may be more influenced by non-specialist opinions.
Political criticisms
Uncontested good -If we base our critique on the definition of democracy as governance based on the will of the majority, there can be some foreseeable consequences to this form of rule.
Cyclical theory of government -Machiavelli put forth a cyclical theory of government where monarchies always decay into aristocracies, that then decay into democracies, which decay into anarchy, then tyranny, then monarchy
Political instability - Democracy is criticized for not offering enough political stability. -As governments are frequently elected on and off there tend to be frequent changes in the policies of democratic countries both domestically and internationally.
Oppression by the majority -The majority of a population and its elected legislature can often be the source of minority persecutions, such as with racial discrimination
Philosophical criticisms
Mob rule -Plato's the Republic presents a critical view of democracy through the narration of Socrates: "Democracy, which is a charming form of government, full of variety and disorder, and dispensing a sort of equality to equals and unequaled alike. Violation of Property Rights -Some Right-Libertarians criticize democracy because they claim it is impractical or immoral. -democracy is critizised for being immoral on the grounds that it coercively involves people, i.e. it violates voluntarism and property rights.
Timocracy and oligarchy. -In Democracy, the oligarchs or merchants are unable to use their power effectively and the people take over, electing someone who plays on their wishes, by throwing lavish festivals etc. - However, the government grants the people too much freedom, and the state degenerates into the fourth form, Tyranny/mob rule Role of republicanism -this criticism is addressed by combining democracy with republicanism. A constitution would limit the powers of what a simple majority can accomplish.
Moral decay -Some thinkers believe democracy will result in the people's distrust and disrespect of governments or religious sanctity.
Administrative criticisms
Short-termism -Democracy is also criticized for frequent elections due to the instability of coalition governments.
Corruption within democratic governments Unsustainability -The new establishment of democratic institutions in countries where the associated practices have as yet been uncommon or deemed culturally unacceptable, can result in institutions that are not sustainable in the long term.
Nepal The performance of social class tension and radical change has sprouted from this land, carrying Nepal into the international spotlight. Mass campaigns in opposition to King Gyanendra, the dismissal of the monarchy, and the founding of an acting government in 2006 have emphasized the renovation that has cultivated in this nation
Pakistan June 5th Nawaz Sharif was sworn in as the Prime Minister of Pakistan. .The elected civilian government and parliament completed a full five-year term in office (2008-13) the first time in the 66 years since the country was born in 1947. The peaceful transfer of power from one democratic civilian government to another is injecting hope and trust into the countrys fragile democratic process. It signifies that despite various challenges, the countrys parliamentary system has finally arrived.
Bangladesh A government put in place by de facto military coup oversaw a return to free and fair elections at the end of 2008
Bhutan Series of reforms driven by the monarchy have resulted in the first open election in their history and the adoption of a formal constitution
Paraguay Held pivotal election that ended the 61 year reign of the Colorado Party and ushered in a reformist government
Arab Spring
Arab Spring refers to the democratic uprisings that arose independently and spread across the Arab world in 2011. The movement originated in Tunisia with the Tunisian Revolution, or Jasmine Revolution, began on Dec. 17, 2010 after Mohammed Bouazizi, a 26-year-old Tunisian man, set himself on fire in front of a local municipal office. The term was previously used beginning in March 2005 by numerous media commentators to suggest that a spin-off benefit of the invasion of Iraq would be the flowering of Western-friendly Middle East democracies. This movement quickly took hold in Egypt, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan and several other countries in the region. The protests led to political changes in several countries, including regime change in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, a new head of state in Yemen, while there is still an ongoing civil war in Syria. A main force behind the uprisings was the call for a formative political change, with freedom, democracy and justice, and the attack on corruption and nepotism. The Arab Spring has brought down regimes in several Arab countries, sparked mass violence in others, while some governments managed to delay the trouble with a mix of repression, promise of reform, and state largesse.
Conclution
The goals of democratization and respect for human rights are still far from being fulfilled.