George Berkeley

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For other people named George Berkeley, see George Berkeley (disambiguation).

George Berkeley

Born

12 March 1685 County Kilkenny, Ireland

Died

14 January 1753 (aged 67) Oxford, England

Era

18th century philosophy

Region

Western Philosophy

School

Idealism, Empiricism

Main interests Christianity, Metaphysics,Epistemology, Language,Mathematics, Perception

Notable ideas Subjective idealism, master argument

Influenced by[show]

Influenced[show]

George Berkeley (

/brkli/;[1] 12 March 1685 14 January 1753), also known as Bishop Berkeley (Bishop of Cloyne), was

an Anglo-Irishphilosopher whose primary achievement was the advancement of a theory he called "immaterialism" (later referred to as "subjective idealism" by others). This theory denies the existence of material substance and instead contends that familiar objects like tables and chairs are only ideas in theminds of perceivers, and as a result cannot exist without being perceived. Thus, as Berkeley famously put it, for physical objects "esse est percipi"("to be is to be perceived"). Berkeley is also known for his critique of abstraction, an important premise in his argument for immaterialism. In 1709, Berkeley published his first major work, An Essay towards a New Theory of Vision, in which he discussed the limitations of human vision and advanced the theory that the proper objects of sight are not material objects, but light and color. This foreshadowed his chief philosophical work A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge in 1710 which, after its poor reception, he rewrote in dialogue form and published under the title Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous in 1713.
[2]

In this book, Berkeley's views were represented by Philonous (Greek: 'lover of mind'), while Hylas (Greek: 'matter') embodies the Irish thinkers opponents, in particular John Locke. Berkeley argued aga inst Sir Isaac Newton's doctrine of absolute space, time and motion in De Motu[3] (on Motion), published 1721. His arguments were a precursor to the views of Mach and Einstein.[4] In 1732, he published Alciphron, a Christian apologeticagainst the free-thinkers, and in 1734, he published The Analyst, an empiricist critique of the foundations of infinitesimal calculus, which was influential in the development of mathematics. His last major philosophical work, Siris (1744), begins by advocating the medicinal use of tar water, and then continues to discuss a wide range of topics including science, philosophy, and theology. Interest in Berkeley's work increased after World War II, because he tackled many of the issues of paramount interest to philosophy in the 20th century such as the problems of perception, the difference between primary and secondary qualities, and the importance of language.[5]

Philosophy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For other uses, see Philosophy (disambiguation).

Philosophy

Plato Confucius Avicenna

Philosophers[show]

Traditions[show]

Periods[show]

Literature[show]

Branches[show]

Lists[show]

Portal

Philosophy is the study of general and fundamental problems, such as those connected with reality, existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language.[1][2] Philosophy is distinguished from other ways of addressing such problems by its critical, generally systematic approach and its reliance on rational argument.[3] The word "philosophy" comes from the Greek ( philosophia), which literally means "love of wisdom"

>>>Educational Philosophy
Rizal's concept of the importance of education is clearly enunciated in his work entitled Instruction wherein he sought improvements in the schools and in the methods of teaching. He maintained that the backwardness of his country during the Spanish ear was not due to the Filipinos' indifference, apathy or indolence as claimed by the rulers, but to the neglect of the Spanish authorities in the islands. For Rizal, the mission of education is to elevate the country to the highest seat of glory and to develop the people's mentality. Since education is the foundation of society and a prerequisite for social progress, Rizal claimed that only through education could the country be saved from domination. Rizal's philosophy of education, therefore, centers on the provision of proper motivation in order to bolster the great social forces that make education a success, to create in the youth an innate desire to cultivate his intelligence and give him life eternal.<<<

Educational Philosophy
Rizals concept of the importance of education is clearly enunciated in his work entitled Instruction wherein he sought improvements in the schools and in the methods of teaching. He maintained that the backwardness of his country during the Spanish ear was not due to the Filipinos indifference, apathy or indolence as claimed by the rulers, but to the neglect of the Spanish authorities in the islands. For Rizal, the mission of education is to elevate the country to the highest seat of glory and to develop the peoples mentality. Since education is the foundation of society and a prerequisite for social progress, Rizal claimed that only through education could the country be saved from domination.

Rizals philosophy of education, therefore, centers on the provision of proper motivation in order to bolster the great social forces that make education a success, to create in the youth an innate desire to cultivate his intelligence and give him life eternal.

Rizal was cynical of the Catholic practice of praying and offering up sacrifices (indulgences) for what the Catholic Church calls "Church Suffering" i.e. souls in purgatory. We here on earth are called "Church Pilgrim" while those in heaven are called "Church Triumphant." Rizal in the Noli scoffed at the dependence of the faithful departed (i.e. those who have passed away and whose souls have gone on to purgatory) on the "Church Pilgrim." I don't believe one needs to be a deeply close-minded Catholic to be offended by that manner of portrayal of the Catholic practice. I rather suspect that Teodora Alonzo and most if not all of Rizal's surviving sisters did indeed practice prayer for the souls in purgatory. Catholics believe such prayer will help shorten a souls purgation period in purgatory. They should have been offended by Rizal's work if they were practicing Catholics. We know that Teodora Alonzo encouraged Rizal even while in Dapitan (after the writing of the Noli/Fili) to not stray too far from the Catholic Faith.

Almost simultaneously with the introduction of Masonry in the Philippines, a civic society called La Propaganda (Junta de la Propaganda / Junta de Programa) was established by a group of patriots in Manila, headed by Deodato Arellano, brother-in-law of Marcelo H. del Pilar. Its members, composed mostly, if not exclusively, of the middle class, constituted the liason between the propagandists in Spain and Philippines, collected the subscriptions and contributions given by patriots in Manila and neighbouring provinces to carry the propaganda work and to defray the expenses of the Filipino reformers in Spain, disseminated propaganda materials and the issues of "La Solidaridad", which were smuggled into the city. At such times as they had occasion to visit the capital, well-to-do and educated persons from distant provinces also wanted to give their help. If the rich men of Manila contributed very little it was because they mistrusted the persons in charge of the funds, and feared for their own interests. The funds collected were forwarded to the Hispano-Filipino Association. In time, however, the funds of the organization were malversed, and the society passed out of existence.