Professional Documents
Culture Documents
中-印医药外包比较
外包比较
附两国前50强
国前 强公司介
公司介绍
July, 2009
About Author
Jim J. Zhang currently is president and managing director of JZMed, Inc., a US-based,
full scale pharmaceutical service company specializing in outsourcing to China. Before
founding the company, Jim worked for nine years with Albany Molecular Research, Inc.
(AMRI), a US-based and currently one of the world largest CROs. During his tenure at
AMRI Jim was responsible for managing and overseeing multiple drug R&D projects
that involved the international cooperation of AMRI’s multiple sites (USA, Singapore
and Hungary). He played key roles in helping numerous pharma and biotech companies
discover and develop a series of drug candidates that later entered preclinical and clinical
development including advanced clinical trials. He was also the key contributor to the
development of chemical production process for several developmental drugs. Prior to
pursuing his Ph.D. program in the US, Jim worked for six years in a China-based CMO
as process engineer and developed production process for a number of pharma products.
In nearly twenty years practice Jim developed his expertise in chemical process research
and development and in the therapeutic areas of viral infection, cancer, chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and cystic fibrosis. Currently he holds 18
patents. He is also the principal author of 12 peer-reviewed research articles.
Jim has authored a series of industry reports about China pharmaceutical outsourcing. He
was also invited by a number of market research firms to author/co-author industry
reports.
Jim received his master’s degree in Chemical Engineering from East China University of
Science & Technology (Shanghai), and his Ph.D. degree in Synthetic Organic Chemistry
from the University of Iowa. He also received additional trainings in Medicinal
Chemistry through working at Research Triangle Institute (Research Triangle Park, North
Carolina).
Report Description
It has been well recognized that the global pharmaceutical industry is facing a number of
challenges at present. The difficulties the industry is experiencing have forced all drug
companies to change their current operation models. They are now forced to pursue
more efficient, cost-effective and productive ways to conduct their operations, whether in
R&D or manufacturing. The keys for them to make a quick turnaround are to get drug
discovered quicker, developed faster, manufactured cheaper and marketed wider.
Outsourcing has been proven to be one of the effective solutions for drug companies to
quickly turn the situation around as it provides them with the desired efficiency,
flexibility and agility. Among all emerging countries for outsourcing, China and India
have risen rapidly and become stars in the global pharmaceutical outsourcing arena as
both countries possess the unique combination of low cost and quality service. The
current global financial crisis has also greatly enhanced the importance of these two
countries to many drug companies around the world who are vigorously seeking cost
reduction.
However, China and India each also possess their own, unique features and
characteristics, not only in the pharmaceutical-related industries but also in almost every
aspect of social structure. To many companies who are interested in conducting
outsourcing or investment in either country, it is always a challenge to decide which
country best fits their investment goals.
The report, “Comparison of Pharma Outsourcing between China and India”, has
conducted so far the most complete and comprehensive comparisons between China and
India. It first time revealed the similarities and differences between these two countries
in a broad rang of areas. It also revealed the advantages and disadvantages of each
country in pharmaceutical outsourcing and the strengths and shortcomings of their
service capabilities. Besides, the report also made in-depth comparisons of
pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries between China and India including their
R&D capabilities of innovative medicines.
The report provides a clear insight into the current development states of pharmaceutical
outsourcing industries in each country including their market sizes and service
capabilities in each technical area. In addition, it provides valuable advices to
pharmaceutical and biotech companies who are interested in outsourcing to either country
of how to appropriately evaluate each country and decide which one best fits their
development goals and outsourcing strategies.
In many aspects China and India are very similar. Both are located in Asia and the
most populated countries in the world. Both are still developing countries with low
wages for most workers in most industries. However, there are also significant
differences between these two countries in the areas related to pharmaceutical
industry. Each country possesses its own features and characteristics.
In professional outsourcing service, the two countries provide close service scopes
and possess close service capabilities. However, there are still differences in each
service sector between these two countries. In discovery service, Chinese companies
and Indian companies possess close skills and offer similar services and qualities.
However, in target identification and validation as well as those related areas such as
research in genomics and proteomics, Chinese companies possess stronger service
capabilities than Indian companies; whereas in small molecule drug R&D, Indian
companies are more capable than Chinese companies.
In preclinical research service, Chinese CROs possess better service capabilities than
Indian CROs; whereas in clinical research service, it is just opposite. In process R&D
and scale-up synthesis, both countries possess similar capabilities. However, Indian
companies possess better skills and capabilities than Chinese companies in
formulation, manufacturing and marketing of generic drugs.
Major pharma and biotech companies play different strategies in these two countries.
In India, they more tend to form close collaborations such as risk-sharing outsourcing
with an Indian company to co-develop drug candidates, but very few of them are
willing to permanently set up a decent size of R&D center or manufacturing facility
in the country. In stark contrast, almost all major pharma and biotech companies
have invested hundreds of millions of dollars in China to establish their wholly-
owned R&D centers and large scale manufacturing and marketing facilities. Many of
their China R&D centers have already reached decent sizes and gained strong
capabilities. They are ready to conduct full-scale research independently.
The outsourcing models between the Western companies and the Asian companies
are also not limited to just straight outsourcing. Rather, it has extended to including
all types of activities such as product marketing and drug candidate licensing. Also,
the interesting outsourcing service providers are not just limited to those professional
ones. Any pharma or biotech companies in any of these two countries could become
outsourcing partners as long as they possess the desired capabilities.
The pharma outsourcing industries in both countries have grown rapidly in the recent
few years. They are currently valued at about $1.42 B in China and $1.77 B in India,
respectively; each occupying only about 2% share in the global pharma outsourcing
market. On the other hand, both markets are posed to still grow rapidly in the future
as they are driven by a number of positive factors. However, China appears to have
higher future growth potential than India as it has fewer growth resistors. It will very
likely catch and even surpass India after 2010.
At present, India is better than China in small molecule drug R&D and
manufacturing. But China is superior over India in biotechnologies including the
R&D and manufacturing of macro compounds. India offers better product quality but
China has more cost reduction advantage. In terms of investment opportunities,
China seems to present more attractions than India as its industry infrastructure and
biotechnologies are more advanced.
The report is written based on the in-depth investigations and studies of pharmaceutical
outsourcing industries in both China and India. It first carefully selected, among a large
pool of companies, top 50 best outsourcing service providers in each country. It then
conducted detailed comparisons among these selected companies in more than twenty
different areas.
The report provides detailed answers to a variety of questions every outsourcing and
investment company is concerned about:
What are the most concerned issues when drug companies choose an outsourcing
destination? How to compare one country with another in pharma outsourcing?
What advantages and disadvantages do China and India each possess? What are
India’s strengths in pharma-related industries? Does China have its own features?
Why China not India is better suitable for some projects? Why India not China better
fits other projects? What are the most popular outsourcing models in each country?
What types of services do China and India each provide? Which country is better in
what areas? How about the differences in service capabilities both in general and in
each specific technical area?
Who are those top players in each country? What are their current service
capabilities? Who are the best players in each service sector of each country?
What are the cost structures in each country? Which country provides more cost-
reduction?
What are the current market sizes of pharma outsourcing industries in China and
India? How about the market sizes of each service sector? Where do they stand in
the same sector of the global industry?
Which country will have more potential for future growth? What are drivers and
resistors of their future growths?
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
♦ China and India: The two most favored places for pharma outsourcing
♦ Advantages and disadvantages of China and India in pharma outsourcing:
Head-to-head comparison of two countries
♦ Strengths and shortcomings of China and India in pharma outsourcing:
Head-to-head comparison of top 50 best service providers of each country
♦ Which country best fits your outsourcing investment? – A series of case studies
Chapter 1. China and India: The Two Most Favored Places for Pharma
Outsourcing
Summary
1.1 Introduction
1.1.1 World pharmaceutical industry is currently experiencing downturn
and outsourcing is one of the effective solutions to quickly turn it around
1.1.2 Center of pharma outsourcing industry has shifted to the East
1.1.3 Emerging of China and India as favored places for outsourcing
1. Emerging of Chinese pharma outsourcing industry
2. Emerging of Indian pharma outsourcing industry
1.2 Fast development of pharma outsourcing industries in China and India
1.2.1 Development patterns of pharma outsourcing industry in China and India
1. Development pattern of Chinese pharma outsourcing industry
2. Development pattern of Indian pharma outsourcing industry
1.2.2 Market development of pharma outsourcing in China and India
1. Market development of pharma outsourcing in China
a. Market development history and current market sizes of Chinese
pharma outsourcing
b. Current market sizes of each service sector
2. Market development of pharma outsourcing in India
a. Market development history and current market sizes of Indian
pharma outsourcing
b. Current market sizes of each service sector
3. How to compare with global pharma outsourcing markets
a. Current total market sizes of global pharma outsourcing industry
b. Current global market sizes of each service sector and their
distributions
1.3 Growing importance of China and India to world pharma industry
1.4 Summary of current development trend of global pharma outsourcing industry
Chapter 2. Advantages and Disadvantages of China and India in Pharma
Outsourcing: Head-to-Head Comparison of Two Countries
Summary
2.1 Introduction
2.2 General comparisons between China and India
2.2.1 Comparison of higher education systems between China and India
2.2.2 Comparison of workforce structure in pharmaceutical industry
2.2.3 Comparison of labor and raw material costs in pharmaceutical industry
2.2.4 Comparison of general industry infrastructure
2.2.5 Comparison of business philosophy
2.3 Comparison of intellectual property (IP) protection environment between
China and India
2.4 Comparison of pharmaceutical industries between China and India
2.4.1 Comparison of development history of pharmaceutical industries in China
and India
2.4.2 Comparison of pharmaceutical markets between China and India
1. Chinese pharmaceutical market sizes
2. Indian pharmaceutical market sizes
2.4.3 Comparison of general capabilities of pharmaceutical industry between
China and India
1. Chinese pharmaceutical industry
2. Indian pharmaceutical industry
2.4.4 Comparison of drug R&D capabilities between China and India
2.5 Comparison of biotech industries between China and India
2.5.1 Chinese biotech industry
2.5.2 Indian biotech industry
2.6 Conclusions
Summary
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Comparison of overall service capabilities of pharma outsourcing in
China and India
3.2.1 Overall service capability of Chinese pharma outsourcing industry
3.2.2 Overall service capability of Indian pharma outsourcing industry
3.3 Head-to-head comparison of top 50 best outsourcing service providers in
each country
3.3.1 Selection of top 50 best service providers in each country
3.3.2 Criteria for selection of top 50 best service providers in each country
1. Selection criteria
2. Classification and definition of CRO/CMO service capabilities
3. Classification of players and their ratings
4. Selection
3.3.3 Head-to-head comparisons of selected top 50 best players in each country
1. Comparison of service provider distributions
2. Comparison of professional service providers in each service sector
3. Comparison of service capabilities between Chinese companies and
Indian companies
4. Comparison of current states of internal drug R&D programs and
capabilities between Chinese companies and Indian companies
5. Comparison of service capabilities in biopharmaceutical
manufacturing
6. Comparison of global presences of Chinese companies and Indian
companies
7. Summary of head-to-head comparisons
3.4 Case studies: Head-to-head comparisons of typical Chinese companies with typical
Indian companies
3.4.1 Comparison between a Chinese CRO and an Indian CRO
3.4.2 Comparison between a major Chinese pharma company and a major Indian
pharma company
3.4.3 Comparison between a major Chinese biotech company and a major Indian
biotech company
3.5 How financial crisis will affect the growths of pharma outsourcing industries in both
countries: Comparison of future growth potentials of pharma outsourcing industries
between China and India
3.5.1 Future growth potential of pharma outsourcing in China
1. Major short-term growth resistor: Financial crisis
2. Long term growth drivers and resistors
1) Growth drivers
a. Internal drivers
b. External drivers
c. Three outsourcing waves
2) Growth resistors: Challenges Chinese companies are going to
face
3.5.2 Future growth potential of pharma outsourcing in India
1. Major short-term growth resistors: Impacts of terror attack and
financial crisis
2. Long term growth drivers and resistors
1) Growth drivers
2) Growth resistors
Summary
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Analysis of real motivations behind different outsourcing strategies played by major
pharma/biotech companies in China and India
4.2.1 Different importance of China vs. India to major pharma/biotech companies
for long term investment
4.2.2 Different outsourcing strategies played in China and India by major
pharma/biotech companies
4.3 Case studies: Examples of drug companies around the world closely collaborating
with Chinese and Indian companies
4.3.1 Collaboration between a major Western company and an Indian company
4.3.2 Collaboration between a major Western company and a Chinese company
4.3.3 Collaborations of a major Western company simultaneously with a Chinese
company and an Indian company in similar therapeutic areas
4.4 Summaries of more outsourcing collaborations happened in recent two years
between Western companies and Chinese or Indian companies
4.5 Where to choose your outsourcing destination: In-depth analyses of pharma
outsourcing features of both China and India
Classifications of Top 100 Best Outsourcing Service Providers in China and India
Appendix
Appendix I. Research Methodology
Appendix II. About JZMed, Inc.
List of Tables
Table 1. Comparison of labor costs in various locations of the world (FTE rates)
Table 2. Market distributions of each service sector in Chinese pharma outsourcing
industry (2007 and 2008)
Table 3. Market development history of Indian pharma outsourcing industry
Table 4. Market distributions of each service sector in Indian pharma outsourcing
industry (2006/2007 – 2007/2008)
Table 5. Market development of global pharma outsourcing industry in recent five years
Table 6. Market development history and future growth forecasts of each service sector
of global pharma outsourcing industry (2006 to 2010)
Table 7. Comparison of higher education between China and India
Table 8. Comparison of technical workforces between China and India in pharma-related
industries
Table 9. Comparison of labor and material costs in pharma outsourcing industries
between China and India
Table 10. Current market sizes and future growth forecasts of Chinese pharmaceutical
market
Table 11. Market development and future growth forecasts of Indian pharmaceutical
markets
Table 12. Drug product development pipelines of Indian pharma and biotech companies
Table 13. Drug product development pipelines of Chinese pharma and biotech companies
Table 14. Head-to-head comparisons of advantages and disadvantages between China
and India in pharma outsourcing-related industries
Table 15. Classification and definition of contract pharmaceutical research and
manufacturing service capability levels
Table 16. List of top 50 best service providers in each country (In alphabetic order of
company names)
Table 17. Comparison of distributions of service providers
Table 18. Comparison of professional service providers in each service sector
Table 19. Comparison of outsourcing service capabilities between Chinese companies
and Indian companies
Table 20. Comparison of internal R&D programs between Chinese companies and Indian
companies
Table 21. Comparison of companies providing service in biopharmaceutical
manufacturing
Table 22. Comparison of global presences of Chinese companies and Indian companies
Table 23. Summary of latest acquisitions of Western companies by Indian companies
Table 24. Summary of comparisons between Chinese companies and Indian companies in
pharma outsourcing-related industries
Table 25. Comparison of WuXi PharmaTech with GVK Biosciences
Table 26. Comparison of Harbin Pharmaceutical Group with Ranbaxy
Table 27. Comparison of Shanghai Sunway Biotech Co. with Intas Biopharmaceuticals
Ltd.
Table 28. Comparison of predicted future outsourcing market developments between
China and India (2009 and 2010)
Table 29. Head-to-head comparison of outsourcing collaborations of Ortho-McNeil
Jassen Pharmaceuticals with a Chinese and an Indian company
Table 30. Summary of outsourcing collaborations happened recently between Western
pharma/biotech companies and Chinese companies
Table 31. Summary of recent outsourcing collaborations between Western
pharma/biotech companies and Indian companies
Table 32. Summary of Western CROs/CMOs establishing presences in China or
forming partnerships with Chinese counterparts
Table 33. Summary of Western CROs/CMOs establishing presences in India or forming
partnerships with Indian counterparts
List of Figures
Report ordering can also be processed through Paypal, secured online payment, directly
at the website of JZMed, Inc. (www.jzmedi.com). All major credit cards are accepted.
Note:
An Appendix to the Report: “Top 100 Best Pharma Outsourcing Service Providers in
China and India”, is available at JZMed, Inc. and can be ordered separately.