Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
With respect to the gap on the study of users intention of re-visiting the e-government websites in the most of previous
researches which put emphasis on the aspects of convenience, authenticity and aesthetics, this paper explores the users intention
of re-visiting the e-government website by means of the sample analysis of the website of Industrial Development Bureau in
Ministry of Economic (MOE) in Taiwan. Research findings of this study are: 1) on the construct of functional service quality,
users agree that they can get authentic and sufficient project related information about law and policy of government from the
website; 2) on the construct of operational system quality, users hope that they can access the MOE website successfully at
anytime, anywhere, and never encounter the situation that the website is unavailable for any reason; 3) overall, the users feel that
the MOE website is usefulness and easy to use; 4) users have high intention of re-visiting the website of MOE when they need
project information of government.
Keywords: Electronic Government; Website Users Satisfaction; Intention of Re-visiting; Information Quality
1 2 1
1. 24205
2. 33306
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
- 11 www.sjae.org
Davis[1]
1.1
1997
10
70.8%[2]
4,231 1,252
227
1.2
2005
(1) (2) (3)
(4) (5) (6)
Davis[1]
(beliefs)(attitudes)(intentions)
[1]
[3]
DeLone and McLean[4]
[6]
- 12 www.sjae.org
[7]
(factors)
[10]
[11]
1.3
Davis [12](Motivational Model)
(extrinsic)(intrinsic)
[13][14]
(e-commerce website)
[15]
[16]
[21]
1
- 13 www.sjae.org
H1
H6
H3
H2
H4
H5
H7
H1
H2
H3
H4
H5
H6
H7
2012/4/01 2012/4/30 60
5 300
259 (Likert Scale)
SPSS 12.0 for Windows
Cronbachs
3.1
57.14%30~40 42.85%
96.13% 24.71%
23.55 %
- 14 www.sjae.org
ISQ1.
4.02
0.819
ISQ2
3.52
0.993
ISQ3.
4.17
0.764
ISQ4.
4.05
0.766
ISQ5.
4.05
0.788
ISQ6.
3.87
0.834
ISQ7.
3.92
0.789
CSQ1.
4.01
0.923
CSQ2.
4.13
0.900
CSQ3.
4.04
0.864
CSQ4.
4.05
0.836
CSQ5.
3.97
0.860
CSQ6.
3.97
0.849
CSQ7.
3.87
0.920
CSQ8.
3.95
0.892
PEU1.
- 15 www.sjae.org
3.79
0.888
PEU2.
4.04
0.809
PEU3.
3.92
0.781
PEU4.
3.95
0.838
PEU5.
3.88
0.849
PEU6.
4.04
0.813
PU1.
4.11
0.787
PU2.
4.04
0.818
PU3
4.05
0.868
PU4
4.09
0.787
PU5.
4.15
0.803
PU6.
4.16
0.790
BIU1.
4.00
0.828
BIU2.
4.04
0.774
BIU3.
4.04
0.784
BIU4.
4.12
0.823
BIU5.
4.11
0.838
3.2
(Principal Components Analysis)
(Orthogonal Rotation)(Varimax)
Cronbachs 7
57.556%KMO 0.854P-value 0.000 6
- 16 www.sjae.org
0.853
0.829
0.828
0.769
0.765
0.709
0.500
4.029
57.556
57.556
Bartletts Test of Sphericity =906.996
KMO=0.854
Sig=0.000
8
73.434%KMO 0.867P-value 0.000 7
7
0.834
-0.042
0.827
-0.297
0.808
0.040
0.805
-0.408
0.741
-0.364
0.837
0.117
0.720
0.516
0.638
0.592
4.854
1.021
60.677
12.757
60.677
73.434
KMO=0.867
Sig=0.000
6 77.13%KMO
0.916P-value 0.000 8
- 17 www.sjae.org
0.913
0.854
0.865
0.895
0.896
0.872
4.628
77.130
77.130
Bartletts Test of Sphericity=1338.259
KMO=0.916
Sig=0.000
6 77.918%KMO
0.896P-value 0.000 9
9
0.913
0.896
0.895
0.872
0.865
0.854
4.675
77.918
77.918
KMO=0.896
Bartletts Test of
Sphericity=1384.911
Sig=0.000
5 57.556%KMO
0.854P-value 0.000 10
10
0.896
0.895
0.872
- 18 www.sjae.org
10
0.865
0.854
4.628
77.130
77.130
Bartletts Test of Sphericity=1338.259
KMO=0.916
Sig=0.000
Cronbach's
11
Cronbach's
0.6
11
Cronbach`s
ISQ1ISQ7ISQ5ISQ6ISQ3
ISQ4ISQ2
0.863
CSQ5CSQ3CSQ4CSQ2CSQ1
CSQ6CSQ8CSQ7
0.906
PEU6PEU3PEU4PEU5PEU2PEU1
0.935
PU6.PU2PU5PU1PU4PU3
0.943
BIU2BIU5BIU1BIU4BIU3
0.936
3.3
12 2 H1
0.192(0.853*0.247*0.913) 0.187(0.829*0.247*0.913)
H2
0.234(0.853*0.301*0.913)
0.228(0.829*0.301*0.913)
12
H1
0.247
1.162
0.000**
H2
0.301
5.682
0.000**
H3
0.798
17.518
0.000**
- 19 www.sjae.org
12
H4
0.701
7.001
0.000**
H5
0.683
2.897
0.000**
H6
0.752
9.916
0.000**
H7
0.794
8.951
0.000**
H3
0.608(0.834*0.798*0.913) 0.603(0.827*0.798*0.913)H4
0.534(0.834*0.701*0.913) 0.529(0.827*0.701*0.913)H5
0.569(0.913*0.683*0.913) 0.559(0.896*0.683*0.913)H6
0.614(0.913*0.752*0.895) 0.575(0.854*0.752*0.895)H7
0.649(0.913*0.794*0.895) 0.637(0.896*0.794*0.895)
0.247*
0.752*
0.301*
0.798*
0.683*
0.794*
0.701*
(1)
(2)
(3)
- 20 www.sjae.org
(4)
[22]
REFERENCES
[1]
F. D. Davis. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly,
13(3), 319-339, 1989
[2]
, , , . (Plurks) .
Scientific Journal of E-Business, 1(2), 29-38, 2012
[3]
S. Pearson. Measurement of Computer User Satisfaction. Ph.D. Dissertation, Arizona State University, Temple, 1997
[4]
W. DeLone and E. McLean. The DeLone and McLean Model of Information System Success: A Ten Year Update. Journal of
Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30, 2003
[5]
P. Zhang and G. M. Dran. Websites that Satisfy Users: A Theoretical Framework for Web User Interface Design and Evaluation.
Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 32rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1999
[6]
. . , 2007
[7]
. .
, 2001
[8]
J. C. Lin and H. Lu. Towards an Understanding of the Behavioral Intention to Use a Web Site. International Journal of
Information Management, 20, 197208, 2000
[9]
. . , 2007
[10] D. Gehrke and E. Turban. Determinants of Successful Website Design: Relative Importance and Recommendations for
Effectiveness. Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1999
[11] K. L. Garlock and S. Piontek. Designing, Web Interfaces to Library Services and Resources, American Library Association Aurora,
IL, USA., 1996
[12] F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi and P. R.Warshaw. Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace. Journal of
Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132, 1992
[13] T. S. H. Teo, K. G. L. Vivien and Y. C. L. Raye. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Internet Usage. Omega, International
Journal of Management Science 27(2), 25-37, 1999
[14] M. Wolfinbarger and M. C. Gilly. Shopping Online for Freedom, Control, and Fun. California Management Review 43(2),
34-55, 2001
[15] J. A. Castaeda, M. A. Rodrguez and T. Luque. Identifying the hierarchy of effects operative in an internet attitude model
applied to e-loyalty. in Proceedings of the 33rd EMAC, European Marketing Academy Conference, New Technologies and
e-marketing VI, 18-21, 2004
[16] D. L. Hoffman, T. P. Novak and A. Duhachek. The Influence of Goal-Directed and Experiential Activities on On-line Flow
Experiences. Journal of Computer Psychology, 13(1/2), 3-16, 2003
[17] M. A. Atkinson and A. Kydd. Individual Characteristics Associated with World Wide Web use: An Empirical Study of Playfulness
and Motivation. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 28(2), 53-61, 1997
[18] Y. Malhotra and D. F. Galletta. Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to Account for Social Influence: Theoretical Base
and Empirical Validation. in: Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Science, 1-14, 1999
[19] M. J. Snchez and J. L. Rondn. Web acceptance and usage model: a comparison between goal-directed and experiential Web
users. Internet Research 15(10), 21-48, 2005
[20] A. Bandura. Self-efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency. American Psychologist 37, 122-147, 1982
- 21 www.sjae.org
[21] M. Solomon. Consumer Behavior, Buying, Having and Being. Prentice Hall, New York, 1998
[22] A. Bhattacherjee and G.. Premkumar. Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude Toward Information Technology Usage: a
Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 229-254, 2004
1961-
1952-
ERP
Email042833@mail.fju.edu.tw
Email im065@mail.lhu.edu.tw
1949-
Email004253@mail.fju.edu.tw
- 22 www.sjae.org