Professional Documents
Culture Documents
May
5,
2010
Submitted
by:
Jeremy VanDerslice
Page
|2
Purpose
To
learn
the
fundamentals
of
null
ellipsometry
Introduction
Ellipsometry
is
an
extremely
sensitive
technique
used
to
analyze
the
properties
of
surfaces
or
thin
films.
Ellipsometry
can
be
used
to
find
the
index
of
refraction,
extinction
coefficient,
reflectivity,
or
thickness
of
a
surface
or
thin
film,
among
other
things.
In
basic
terms,
ellipsometry
measures
the
change
in
polarization
that
occurs
as
light
is
reflected
off
of
a
target
surface.
With
this
in
mind,
ellipsometry
could
very
well
be
called
polarimetry
except
that
a
differing
technique
not
related
to
ellipsometry
was
already
coined
polarimetry.
Although
it
can
be
disputed
who
actually
invented
ellipsometry,
Paul
Drude
derived
the
fundamental
equations
of
ellipsometry
in
the
early
1900s
and
based
on
his
work
Alexander
Rother
then
coined
the
term
ellipsometry
in
a
journal
article
in
1945.
The
name
stems
from
the
fact
that
the
most
basic
form
of
polarized
light
is
elliptic.
[1]
Figure
1.
Incident,
reflected,
and
transmitted
light
in
the
plane
of
incidence.
[1]
Introduction to Lasers and Modern Optics University of Nebraska Lincoln Jeremy VanDerslice
Page
|3
Snells
law
defines
how
light
interacts
with
a
medium
as
it
passes
through
it.
Snells
relates
the
complex
index
of
refraction
to
the
angles
of
incidence
of
the
medium.
The
index
of
refraction
is
a
complex
argument
defined
by:
=+
Where
n
relates
the
speed
of
light
in
the
medium
to
the
speed
of
light
in
a
vacuum,
=
.
The
extinction
coefficient,
k,
is
defined
through
the
absorption
coefficient
()
which
describes
how
quickly
the
amplitude
of
the
light
wave
decreases
as
it
travels
through
a
medium,
=,
,
=4
Thus,
Snells
law
can
be
properly
described
by
the
following
equation,
11=22
Where
1
is
the
angle
of
incidence
measured
from
the
boundary
unit
normal
and
2
is
the
angle
of
transmission
also
measured
from
the
unit
normal.
For
a
dielectric
material
in
which
no
light
is
absorbed
the
complex
portion
of
the
argument
is
zero,
thus,
for
this
simplified
case,
Snells
law
can
be
expressed
as,
11=22
However,
for
the
sake
of
this
deriving
the
general
ellipsometry
equations
only
the
most
general
case
will
be
considered.
Fresnels
Equations
Ellipsometry
investigates
the
phase
change
of
these
components
when
reflected
off
a
surface.
In
general
the
phase
change
is
not
the
same
for
both
components
and
the
result
is
elliptically
polarized
light.
The
elliptically
polarized
light
can
be
defined
by
two
components,
p-wave
and
s-wave.
The
p-waves
is
defined
as
the
polarized
wave
parallel
to
the
plane
of
incidence
while
s-wave
is
defined
as
plane
polarized
wave
perpendicular
to
the
plane
of
incidence.
Fresnel
reflection
coefficients
define
the
amplitude
change
between
the
incident
and
reflected
waves
at
an
interface.
They
are
defined
by
the
following
expression,
12=211221+12
12=112211+22
Where
1
and
2
are
shown
in
Figure
2.
Azzam
furthered
the
understanding
of
the
Fresnel
reflection
coefficients
by
defining
how
the
amplitude
between
the
incident
and
reflected
waves
change
when
thin
films
are
present.
He
defined
an
optical
thickness
as
the
distance
the
waves
travel
through
the
thin
film
and
then
integrated
these
findings
to
with
the
Fresnel
reflection
coefficients
as
follows,
Introduction to Lasers and Modern Optics University of Nebraska Lincoln Jeremy VanDerslice
Page
|4
=12+2321+12232 =12+2321+12232 , =222 Where is the optical thickness, d is the thickness of the thin film, and is the wavelength of the light source.
Figure
2.
Reflection
and
transmission
of
light
at
thin
film
boundary.
[2]
General
Ellipsometry
Equation
Incident
light
reflecting
off
a
surface
undergoes
a
change
in
phase.
Let
1
describe
the
phase
difference
between
the
s-
and
p-waves
for
the
incident
light
and
2
describe
the
phase
difference
between
the
s-
and
p-waves
for
the
reflected
light.
Now,
let
describe
the
change
in
phase
between
the
parallel
and
perpendicular
components
of
the
incident
light
that
occurs
when
it
is
reflected
from
a
surface,
=12
As
previously
discussed,
the
Fresnel
equations
define
amplitude
ratios
and
can
be
used
define
the
change
of
amplitude
of
the
light
waves
as
they
are
reflected,
=
A
new
term,
,
has
been
introduced
to
quantify
the
amplitude
change
that
occurs
upon
reflection.
Using
the
previous
definitions,
the
fundamental
equation
of
ellipsometry
can
now
defined
as,
=
Thus,
the
thickness
and
complex
refraction
of
a
thin
film
can
be
found
if
the
complex
refraction
of
the
substrate
and
the
outside
environment
(usually
air)
are
known.
[2]
Introduction to Lasers and Modern Optics University of Nebraska Lincoln Jeremy VanDerslice
Page
|5
Null
Ellipsometry
The
previous
derivation
of
the
fundamental
equations
of
ellipsometry
is
valid
for
all
types
of
ellipsometry.
However,
in
this
experiment
only
null
ellipsometry
will
be
investigated.
Null
ellipsometry
is
one
of
the
oldest
forms
of
ellipsometry
and
it
is
still
one
of
the
most
accurate,
even
when
done
manually.
However,
it
is
often
very
slow
and
the
calculations
required
to
extract
and
can
be
very
tedious
when
done
by
hand.
The
typical
setup
of
a
null
ellipsometer
is
shown
in
Figure
3.
It
is
known
as
the
PCSA
configuration
or
polarizer-compensator-sample-analyzer
configuration.
There
are
many
different
ways
to
setup
a
null
ellipsometer,
including
PSCA
and
PSA,
but
PCSA
is
the
most
common.
The
PCSA
configuration
can
be
used
fairly
simply
to
obtain
the
two
ellipsometric
parameters
for
the
sample.
The
basic
procedure
consists
of
finding
component
settings
that
extinguish
the
light
at
the
detector.
The
azimuths
of
the
polarizer
and
compensator
(Po
&
Co)
are
adjusted
to
make
the
elliptically
polarized
light
reflect
off
the
sample
as
linearly
polarized
light.
The
reflected
light
is
then
extinguished
by
a
suitable
analyzer
angle,
Ao.
Assuming
the
light
is
completely
extinguished,
the
complex
reflectance
ratio
can
be
defined
as
=ctanPoCo+tanCotanPoCotanCo1tanAo
=
Where
the
transmittance
ratio
of
the
compensator
is
denoted
by
c.
It
is
evident
that
this
is
a
fairly
complex
equation
but
in
this
investigation
a
simplification
will
be
used
in
which
the
compensator
will
be
held
constant
at
a
quarter-wave,
Co=/4.
With
this
simplification
it
is
known
that
the
reflected
light
can
be
extinguished
with
two
different
settings
P1
and
A1,
and
P2
and
A2.
These
settings
are
known
to
be
related
to
each
other
by
P2=P1
and
A2=-A1.
In
addition,
these
measurements
are
related
to
the
ellipsometric
angles
by,
=1
=21+32
10
(1)
=1
=21+2
1<0
(2)
This
form
of
ellipsometry
is
usually
done
at
various
angles
of
incidence.
The
location
in
which
the
minimum
polarizer
setting
occurs
will
be
used
to
calculate
the
ellipsometric
angles
for
this
investigation.
This
is
due
to
the
fact
that
the
minimum
is
usually
at
or
near
Brewsters
angle
and
it
is
at
this
location
that
the
most
pronounced
changes
in
polarization
will
occur,
thus
being
most
easily
measured.
This
location
is
called
the
principal
angle
of
incidence.
The
corresponding
analyzer
angle
is
called
the
principal
angle
of
azimuth.
[3]
Introduction to Lasers and Modern Optics University of Nebraska Lincoln Jeremy VanDerslice
Page
|6
Figure 3. Polarizer-Compensator-Sample-Analyzer configuration of a null ellipsometer. [3] Once the ellipsometric angles are known, the extinction coefficient, index of refraction and reflectivity of the sample can be calculated from Drudes approximation equations [4] =tan2 (3) =2212 (4) =(1)2+22(+1)2+22 (5)
Experimental
Procedures
Equipment
The
following
equipment
will
be
used
for
this
experiment:
High
pressure
mercury
lamp,
5461
green
line
filter,
Gaertner
spectrometer,
rails,
adjustable
sample
mount,
polarizer,
analyzer,
Soliel-Babinet
compensator,
Gaussian
eyepiece,
photomultiplier
tube,
picoammeter,
acetone,
methanol,
and
a
crystalline
silicon
wafer.
Setup
and
Calibration:
Fasten
sample
to
Gaertner
Spectrometer
table
using
optical
plate
mount,
rails,
and
adjustable
sample
mount.
Place
high
pressure
mercury
lamp
with
filter
at
the
collimator
slit.
Using
the
Gaussian
eyepiece,
adjust
the
telescope
on
the
Gaertner
Spectrometer
until
the
cross-hairs
are
centered
horizontally
and
vertically
on
the
illuminated
green
rectangle
produced
by
the
slit
on
the
collimator.
Adjust
the
vertical
tilt
on
the
telescope
if
needed.
Turn
the
lower
rotatable
table,
shown
in
Figure
4,
until
the
0o
line
matches
up
with
the
180o
line
of
the
telescope.
Place
the
sample
on
the
adjustable
sample
mount
that
Introduction to Lasers and Modern Optics University of Nebraska Lincoln Jeremy VanDerslice
Page
|7
was constructed. Carefully clean the sample surface with acetone and then methanol to remove organic buildup. Slowly slide the sample along the rail until it is centered between the collimator and telescope. Analyzer Compensator Polarizer Adjustable Slit
Collimator
Telescope
Photomultiplier Tube
Figure
4.
Essential
components
of
PCSA
null
ellipsometry
with
Gaertner
Spectrometer.
Place
the
polarizer
on
the
end
of
the
collimator
and
set
it
to
0o.
Adjust
the
telescope
to
silicons
Brewster
Angle
(angle
of
incidence
of
152.6o).Rotate
the
entire
polarizer
(while
keeping
the
polarizer
set
to
0o)
until
the
photomultiplier
tube
detects
a
minimum
amount
of
light.
The
polarizer
is
now
known
to
be
oriented
such
that
the
0o
setting
produces
light
polarized
vertically.
Now,
set
the
angle
of
incidence
to
0o
and
place
the
analyzer
on
the
end
of
the
telescope
and
set
it
orthogonal
to
the
polarizer.
Rotate
the
entire
analyzer
(while
keeping
it
orthogonal
to
the
polarizer)
until
maximum
extinction
is
found
and
tighten
it
down.
Attach
the
compensator
to
the
spectrometer.
With
the
polarizer
at
+45o
and
the
analyzer
at
-45o,
rotate
the
compensator
until
maximum
extinction
is
found.
Adjust
the
retardation
on
the
compensator
by
turning
the
knob
to
correspond
with
a
quarter
wave
phase
shift
(1.33
turns)
as
given
by
Table
1.
Introduction to Lasers and Modern Optics University of Nebraska Lincoln Jeremy VanDerslice
Page
|8
Table
1.
Soliel-Babinet
calibration
guide
to
set
the
retardance
of
the
compensator.
Note
k=0.987
[Appendix
B]
Procedure
Set
the
angle
of
incidence
to
170o
by
rotating
the
telescope.
Next,
rotate
the
polarizer
until
maximum
extinction
is
found.
Then,
adjust
the
analyzer
to
further
reduce
the
signal
produced
by
the
photomultiplier
tube.
Continue
to
adjust
the
analyzer
and
polarizer
until
the
maximum
extinction
is
found.
Record
the
polarizer
and
analyzer
azimuth
settings.
Next,
adjust
the
polarizer
and
analyzer
to
allow
for
maximum
transmission.
Now,
adjust
analyzer
for
maximum
extinction
and
then
sequentially
adjust
the
polarizer
and
analyzer
for
maximum
extinction.
If
the
azimuths
of
the
analyzer
and
polarizer
are
different
than
the
first
measurement,
record
the
values.
If
they
are
the
same,
adjust
the
polarizer
to
a
new
location
and
begin
again
by
adjusting
the
analyzer
for
maximum
extinction.
Once
both
null
positions
are
found,
reduce
the
angle
of
incidence
by
10o
and
repeat
measurements
for
angles
of
incidence
between
170o
and
60o
at
10o
increments.
Sort
the
data
into
two
consistent
data
sets
and
plot
the
polarizer
and
analyzer
angles
as
a
function
of
angle
of
incidence.
References
and
Additional
Reading
[1
]
Santer,
S.
(2004,
July
20).
Ellipsometry.
Retrieved
from
http://www.imtek.de/cpi/images/images/vl- ofa/OFA-elli.pdf
[2]
Tompkins,
Harland,
&
McGahan,
William.
(1999).
Spectroscopic
ellipsometry
and
reflectometry.
New
York:
Wiley-Interscience
[3]
Tompkins,
Harland,
&
Irene,
Eugene.
(2005).
Handbook
of
ellipsometry.
William
Andrew.
[4]
Monk,
G.S.
.
(1963).
Light:
principles
and
experiments.
New
York:
Dover
Publications.
[5]
Azzam,
R.,
&
Bashara,
N.
(1987).
Ellipsometry
and
polarized
light.
North
Holland.
*See
Appendix
for
critical
information
about
Gaertner
Null
Ellipsometer
Equipment
Introduction to Lasers and Modern Optics University of Nebraska Lincoln Jeremy VanDerslice
Page
|9
Comments for Dr. Ducharme Following the procedure that was previously outlined, raw data was collected as shown in Table 2. The data can be compared to the expected results remembering that the two null positions for each angle of incidence should have the following relationship, P2=P1 and A2=-A1. It is quickly evident that the raw data collected doesnt directly follow the guideline. 2 Null 1 Null 2
170 85 62 41 66 51 165 82.5 75 54 160 80 74 31 82 60 155 77.5 80 22 88 79 152 76 79 3 88 90 150 75 78 7 88 79 145 72.5 74 24 88 73 140 70 72 32 82 61 130 65 67 37 74 51 Table 2. Raw data collected from analyzer and polarizer azimuth measurements The raw data shows that 1!2 and 2!901. The analyzer azimuth measurement is the complementary angle to the one that is desired thus, 1=901. After making the adjustment, 2=901 and 2=901 so the relationship between the two null sets of the measured data is slightly different than that given by H. Tompkins. This discrepancy is still under consideration, but it is thought that the difference has something to do with the scale on the polarizers. Although the adjustments are simple, the changes are made and shown in Table 3 for clarity. 2 Null 1 Null 2
Introduction to Lasers and Modern Optics University of Nebraska Lincoln Jeremy VanDerslice
Page
| 10
170 85 28 41 -66 -51 165 82.5 -75 -54 160 80 16 31 -82 -60 155 77.5 10 22 -88 -79 152 76 11 3 -88 -90 150 75 12 7 -88 -79 145 72.5 16 24 -88 -73 140 70 18 32 -82 -61 130 65 23 37 -74 -51 Table 3. Data after modifications are made to prepare them for use in ellipsometric equations The analyzer and polarizer azimuth measurements are plotted as a function of angle of incidence in Figure 5. Notice that the principal angle of incidence is located at the dip in the curves. The azimuth measurement of the analyzer at this location is the principal angle of azimuth. This is the location and measurement that will be used later in calculations.
50 Polarizer , Analyzer [deg] 30 10 -10 -30 -50 -70 -90 65 Angle of Incidence [deg] 70 75 80 85 Null 1 - A Null 1 - P Null 2 - A Null 2 - P
Figure 5. Analyzer and polarizer adjusted azimuth measurements as a function of the angle of incidence. Now, the extinction coefficient, index of refraction, and reflectivity can be extracted from the data using equations (3), (4) & (5). Although it seems that any angle of incidence could be used to extract these properties, the angle of incidence nearest to Brewsters angle is chosen because it provides the greatest change in polarization so the measurement can be found with less error. The calculated extinction coefficient, index of refraction, and Reflectivity are compared to values given by the SOPRA N&K Database in Table 4.
Introduction to Lasers and Modern Optics University of Nebraska Lincoln Jeremy VanDerslice
Page
| 11
k n
R .392
Table
4.
Extinction
coefficient
(k),
Index
of
Refraction
(n)
and
Reflectivity
(R)
as
given
by
the
SOPRA
N&K
database
in
comparison
to
values
calculated
from
measurements.
The
relative
error
in
the
calculated
extinction
coefficients
immediately
draws
concern.
However,
it
was
found
that
the
extinction
coefficient
is
extremely
sensitive
to
the
azimuth
of
the
analyzer.
For
instance,
the
Null
2
analyzer
azimuth
reading
at
the
principal
angle
of
incidence
is
-88o,
which
leads
to
an
error
of
68%.
If
the
reading
would
have
been
only
1o
different
(-89o)
the
error
would
have
only
been
15%.
Even
though
the
index
of
refraction
and
reflectivity
are
function
of
the
extinction
coefficient,
the
dependence
is
weak.
The
huge
reduction
of
error
(concerning
the
hypothetical
case
that
=-89o
rather
than
-88o)
in
the
extinction
coefficient
only
improves
the
error
in
the
index
of
refraction
by
0.2%
and
the
error
in
the
reflectivity
by
1.4%.
This
explains
how
the
index
of
refraction
and
reflectivity
for
the
Null
1
data
set
are
reasonably
close
to
accepted
values
even
though
the
extinction
coefficient
is
off
by
1000%.
Throughout
the
experiment
it
was
found
that
obtaining
precise
measurements
with
the
polarizer
and
analyzer
is
fairly
difficult
leading
to
much
less
precision
in
the
null
ellipsometry
experiment
than
advertised
in
literature.
When
reading
through
some
literature
on
null
ellipsometry,
it
was
found
that
a
manual
null
ellipsometer
typically
use
polarizers
that
are
accurate
within
0.01o.
The
polarizers
used
in
this
experiment
were
accurate
to
0.5o
while
actually
achieving
this
accuracy
was
often
difficult.
With
patience
it
was
found
that
the
tolerance
on
the
azimuth
measurements
was
no
less
than
2.5o.
Even
with
this
lack
of
precision,
values
were
obtained
that
compared
reasonably
well
to
accepted
values.
Introduction to Lasers and Modern Optics University of Nebraska Lincoln Jeremy VanDerslice
Page
| 12
Conclusion (Personal Notes): My method for finding both null positions for each angle of incidence is not an exact science; however, it seemed that the order in which the polarizer and analyzer were adjusted could influence the null position that was found. This is the procedure I outlined, but I admit that it didnt always work well for me. Im slightly perplexed by a few things in the raw data, namely, the relationship between the two null sets. I found the theoretical relationship given by Tompkins doesnt directly match what I have. I often saw in the literature that people use an analyzer that has a range of -180o to 180o and a polarizer that has a range from 0o to 360o. The polarizer and analyzer that I used ranged from 0o to 90o. I think this difference in scale camouflages my data to look different than what Tompkins predicts while it is actually the same. Overall, this was a fairly comprehensive experiment covering a range of things that were learned during the lab but it really helped to solidify the concepts we learned during the polarization experiment. Assuming that Ive explained my procedure well enough to reproduce, I think this entire experiment could be easily duplicated in a 2-week lab, the first week probably being setup and calibration and the second week data collection. Comments on the Class The class was both interesting and challenging. I really appreciated the fact that it is taught by a professor rather than a TA, which is so often seen in the engineering college. You brought a lot of enthusiasm about the subject to the class and that made working a little harder to learn things a lot easier. Thanks for the extra time you spent helping me get this extra experiment going as well as all the rest. Have a good summer. Regards, Jeremy
Introduction to Lasers and Modern Optics University of Nebraska Lincoln Jeremy VanDerslice
Page
| 13
Appendix
Introduction to Lasers and Modern Optics University of Nebraska Lincoln Jeremy VanDerslice