NMDC LIMITED 3.

0 MTPA INTEGRATED STEEL PLANT

AT NAGARNAR, CHHATTISGARH
Agency : M/s Siemens VAI Metals Technologies Gmb., Linz LABORATORY BUILDING: DESIGN OF ISOLATED FOOTING "F1" fck Characteristic compressive strength of concrete, = fy Characteristic compressive strength of steel, = Unit weight of concrete Unit weight of soil (dry condition) Unit weight of soil (fully submerged condition) Unit weight of ground water
Depth of column footing below the F.F.L

25 415 25 18 8.19 9.81 1.5 1.5 1.20 200 0.2 0.25 1300 25 200 5 1 6 8 8 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.5 30

N/mm N/mm kN/m kN/m

2 2

p1

Foundation Plan p2 Z

Critical Section for Moment 1

lx

Critical Section for 2 One-way shear

Critical Section for Two-way shear 3

gc gsoil g' gwater h h1 h2 t1 D 0.25 L1 Cmin

w1

= = = = = = = = = mm (a) x = = = = = = = = = = = = =

kN/m3
3

B X

Fx 1
lz

d/2

1
d d/2

kN/m3 m m m mm m mm (b) mm mm kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m mm mm D A

Section along X-X direction
2

2 p3 Fz A P1 Fx F.G.L. F.F.L. h2 p4 1 Fig. 1 2 Fig. 2

SIGN CONVENTION:
* Vertical load P1: downwards positive

2 Fig. 3
KEY NOTES:

Height of overburden soil, prior to excavation Height between top of concrete and F.G.L.
Thickness of grade slab

P1 Fx Fz P2

= Unfactored axial load acting on column = Lateral force acting in X-X direction = Lateral force acting in Z-Z direction = Dead load due to column supporting pedestals = a * b * L1 * g c = Self-weight of backfill, stored above footing slab = ((A * B) - (a * b)) * (L1 - t1) * gsoil = Force due to surcharge acting on foundation slab = ((A * B) - (a * b)) * w = Self-weight of the footing slab = A * B * D * gc = Total vertical force acting on foundation = P1 + P2 + P3 + P4 + P5 = Total design moment acting about x-x axis = Total design moment acting about z-z axis = Max. and Min. of gross soil pressures (upward) among p1, p2, p3 & p4
= Downward press. due to selfweight of (footing +

Foundation slab thickness @ the face of column R.C.C Pedestal size (a x b) = Unsupported length of pedestal, above the footing, Concrete cover for footing main reinforcement Permissible Net SBC considered for design
Surcharge pressure due to self-weight of grade slab,

* Fx : left to right: +ve x-direction * Fz : top to bottom: +ve z-direction * Mx: anti-clock wise positive * Mz: clock wise positive P p1 = 6Mx AB L1 h1 h p2 = P AB p3 = P AB p4 = P AB
FOOTING DETAILS

AB2 6Mx AB2 6Mx AB2 6Mx AB2 +

6Mz A2B 6Mz A2B 6Mz A2B 6Mz A2B

P3 P4 P5

Surcharge pressure considered due to floor live load, Diameter of footing bottom reinforcement Diameter of footing top reinforcement Factor of Safety against overturning Factor of Safety against sliding Factor of Safety against buoyancy Partial load factor considered for design Angle of internal friction Permissible Gross SBC considered (for loads without WL/EQ) Permissible Gross SBC considered (for loads with WL/EQ) Node: Critical #REF! Load Support Reactions P1 Fx Fz (in kN) 234.99 234.99 234.99 234.99 234.99 234.99 (in kN) 9.03 9.03 9.03 9.03 9.03 9.03 (in kN) 11.89 11.89 11.89 11.89 11.89 11.89

w2 b t

Total surcharge load acting on foundation slab,w = w1 + w2

kN/m2

F.O.Soverturning F.O.Ssliding F.O.Suplift gf = = = =

P
Mx

Mz pupward pdown

CALCULATION OF GROSS SAFE BEARING CAPACITY OF SOIL: SBC + Overburden soil

227

kN/m2

Foundation Size Foundation Identity

1.10 (A) = =

m x F1 4

1.10 (B) Nos.

backfill + surcharge) = w + D * gc + (L1 - t1) * gsoil pnet

= Net soil pressure for foundation design

= = pupward - pdown

2 30.8 kN/m

SBC * 1.25 + Overburden soil

277

kN/m2

No. of found. belongs to the group Foundation Force/Moment P Mx Mz

FOR THE DESIGN OF BOTTOM STEEL

FOR THE DESIGN OF TOP STEEL

P2 (in kN) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Other dead-weights P3 P4 (in kN) 23.96 23.96 23.96 23.96 23.96 23.96 (in kN) 7.26 7.26 7.26 7.26 7.26 7.26

P5 (in kN) 6.05 6.05 6.05 6.05 6.05 6.05

Bearing Pressures @ corners p1 p2 p3

2 2 2

X-X Direction pgross,up pgross,up p4

2

Z-Z Direction pgross,up pgross,up @ edge

2

X-X Direction pgross,up pgross,up @ edge

2

Z-Z Direction pgross,up pgross,up @ edge

2

Allowable
2

Check SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE SAFE

@ edge
2

@ face
2

@ face
2

@ face
2

@ face

Condition Comb Pmax 1 DL+LL Pmin 1 DL+LL Fxmax Fxmin Fzmax Fzmin Node: Critical Condition Pmax 1 DL+LL 1 DL+LL 1 DL+LL 1 DL+LL 0 Load Comb #N/A

(in kN) (in kN-m) (in kN-m) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) 272.26 4.49 -4.50 225.06 184.46 265.55 224.95 277.00 272.26 272.26 272.26 272.26 272.26 4.49 4.49 4.49 4.49 4.49 -4.50 -4.50 -4.50 -4.50 -4.50 225.06 225.06 225.06 225.06 225.06 184.46 184.46 184.46 184.46 184.46 265.55 265.55 265.55 265.55 265.55 224.95 224.95 224.95 224.95 224.95 277.00 277.00 277.00 277.00 277.00

(in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m2) 265.55 245.25 265.55 245.31 184.46 204.76 184.46 204.70 265.55 265.55 265.55 265.55 265.55 245.25 245.25 245.25 245.25 245.25 265.55 265.55 265.55 265.55 265.55 245.31 245.31 245.31 245.31 245.31 184.46 184.46 184.46 184.46 184.46 204.76 204.76 204.76 204.76 204.76 184.46 184.46 184.46 184.46 184.46 204.70 204.70 204.70 204.70 204.70

Support Reactions P1 Fx Fz (in kN) #N/A (in kN) #N/A (in kN) #N/A

P2 (in kN) 0.00

Other dead-weights P3 P4 (in kN) 23.96 (in kN) 7.26

P5 (in kN) 6.05

Foundation Force/Moment P Mx Mz (in kN) #N/A

Bearing Pressures @ corners p1 p2 p3

2 2 2

X-X Direction pgross,up pgross,up p4

2

Z-Z Direction pgross,up pgross,up @ edge

2

X-X Direction pgross,up pgross,up @ edge

2

Z-Z Direction pgross,up pgross,up @ edge

2

Allowable
2

Check #N/A

@ edge
2

@ face
2

@ face
2

@ face
2

@ face

(in kN-m) (in kN-m) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m2) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

NMDC LIMITED 3.0 MTPA INTEGRATED STEEL PLANT

AT NAGARNAR, CHHATTISGARH
Agency : M/s Siemens VAI Metals Technologies Gmb., Linz Pmin Fxmax Fxmin Fzmax Fzmin Node: Critical Condition Pmax Pmin Fxmax Fxmin Fzmax Fzmin Node: Critical Condition Pmax Pmin Fxmax Fxmin Fzmax Fzmin #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0 Load Comb #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0 Load Comb #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.96 23.96 23.96 23.96 23.96 7.26 7.26 7.26 7.26 7.26 6.05 6.05 6.05 6.05 6.05 #N/A #N/A Plan #N/A Foundation #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

Support Reactions P1 Fx Fz (in kN) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A (in kN) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A (in kN) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

P2 (in kN) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Other dead-weights P3 P4 (in kN) 23.96 23.96 23.96 23.96 23.96 23.96 (in kN) 7.26 7.26 7.26 7.26 7.26 7.26

P5 (in kN) 6.05 6.05 6.05 6.05 6.05 6.05

Foundation Force/Moment P Mx Mz (in kN) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

Bearing Pressures @ corners p1 p2 p3

2 2 2

X-X Direction pgross,up pgross,up p4 Allowable Check #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A @ edge
2

Z-Z Direction pgross,up pgross,up @ edge

2

X-X Direction pgross,up pgross,up @ edge

2

Z-Z Direction pgross,up pgross,up @ edge

2

@ face

@ face

@ face

@ face

(in kN-m) (in kN-m) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m2) (in kN/m2) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(in kN/m ) (in kN/m2) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m2) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m2) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m2) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

Support Reactions P1 Fx Fz (in kN) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A (in kN) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A (in kN) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

P2 (in kN) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Other dead-weights P3 P4 (in kN) 23.96 23.96 23.96 23.96 23.96 23.96 (in kN) 7.26 7.26 7.26 7.26 7.26 7.26

P5 (in kN) 6.05 6.05 6.05 6.05 6.05 6.05

Foundation Force/Moment P Mx Mz (in kN) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

Bearing Pressures @ corners p1 p2 p3

2 2 2

X-X Direction pgross,up pgross,up p4

2

Z-Z Direction pgross,up pgross,up @ edge

2

X-X Direction pgross,up pgross,up @ edge

2

Z-Z Direction pgross,up pgross,up @ edge

2

Allowable
2

Check #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

@ edge
2

@ face
2

@ face
2

@ face
2

@ face

(in kN-m) (in kN-m) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

(in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m2) #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

NMDC LIMITED 3.0 MTPA INTEGRATED STEEL PLANT

AT NAGARNAR, CHHATTISGARH
Agency : M/s Siemens VAI Metals Technologies Gmb., Linz Foundation Slab Design: Design Notes/Assumptions: 1. From the soil base pressure analysis, cases yielding maximum and minimum corner pressures is only considered for design. 2. Soil base pressure calculated in the prior procedure, is assumed acting uniformly; Also, maximum footing projection length is consider as the span for moment calculation. 3. Conservatively, reinforcement calculated against the maximum factored design moment is assigned both ways. 4. While designing foundation slab, cases where calculated net downward pressure is more than net upward pressure, top face reinforcement is provided to resist the corresponding net downward pressure. Otherwise nominal reinforcement only provided as per Clause 26.5.2.1 of IS 456: 2000. Step-by-step design procedure for foundation slab Step 1 Calculate bending moments and shears in foundation slab Critical sections for bending moments and shears are illustrated in the earlier sheet * Section 1 - design bending moment * Section 2 - One-way shear * Section 3 - Two-way shear Step 2 Calculate area of tension reinforcement and distribution Critical sections for bending moments and shears are illustrated in the earlier sheet M = pnet * (lx or ly)2 / 2 Mu = Factored bending moment = gf * M tc 1 1 4.6 * Mu fck * b * d2 = Find effective depth 'd' b = Width of section (Consider 1 m wide strip) Calculate Mu b * d2 ; and
FOOTING:

Step 3 Check for One-way shear @ distance 'd' from the face of column Shear at Section 2 Check shear stress: Actual shear stress, tv V Vu b d tc =

Step 6 Check for stability against over-turning F.O.S against overturning =

0.9 * Mr

>= 1.4 About Z-Z axis: = #N/A kN-m #N/A #N/A kN-m #N/A

Vu bd

< =

tc pnet * (lx or ly) = gf * V Mx =

M About X-X axis: #N/A kN-m (maximum) #N/A #N/A #N/A kN-m Mz

Total shear at Section 2 = Total factored shear at Section 2 = Total width of Section 2 = =

Load Combination: Mxr = P * B = F.O.Soverturning 2 =

Load Combination: Mzr = P * A = 2 =

Effective depth of Section 2 Permissible shear stress; The value of tc is obtained from Table 19 of IS 456: 2000, depending on 100As/bd where As is the total area of tensile reinforcement in the section 2

>= 1.4 F.O.Soverturning >= 1.4 P F = Fz #N/A >= 1.2 tan

#N/A Step 7 Check for stability against sliding F.O.S against sliding =

#N/A

Step 4 Check for Two-way shear @ distance 'd/2' from the face of column

Shear at Section 3 Check shear stress: Fx Actual shear stress, tv V = Vu bo d ks bc = = = = = = Vu bod Total shear over area enclosed by critical section perimeter (A * B) - ((a + d) * (b + d)) * pnet Periphery of the critical section 3 = Effective depth of Section 3 0.5 + bc (but not greater than 1) Short side of the column/pedestal Long side of the column/pedestal 0.25fck 2 * ((a + d) + (b + d)) < kstc

= Sliding co-efficient Along x-x direction: #N/A kN (maximum) #N/A P Fx >= 1.2 #N/A =

0.58

Along z-z direction: = #N/A kN #N/A P Fz >= 1.2

Load Combination: F.O.Ssliding =

Load Combination: F.O.Ssliding = = #N/A #N/A

= gf * V

Step 8 Check for buoyancy due to ground water table

F.O.S against uplift =

0.9 * Downward pressure Uplift pressure

>= 1.2 1.50 m 2 kN/m 14.715 =

Height of ground water level from the founding level, h1 = Total uplift pressure acting at the base = Total downward pressure of sub structure kN/m2 = 24.80 F.O.Suplift = 1.52 >= 1.2 HENCE SAFE ONE-WAY SHEAR CHECK tv = tc Vu Vu/bd
2

gwater * h1 =

pt Ast

= =

50 * fck fy bd * pt 100

Step 5 Check minimum reinforcement for tension Minimum tensile reinforcement = 0.0012bD in both directions (fy = 415 N/mm2) Provide this minimum reinforcement also at the top of the foundation where top reinforcement is required for tension and Mu b*d
2

P2 + P3 + P5 (A * B) =

Bottom Reinforcement: 10 @ 200 mm C/C (parallel to X-X direction) Max. gross Max. gross Max. net Max. net Cantilever B.Moment Factored Rebar Effective @ edge
2

F1

@ face
2

@ edge
2

@ face
2

length,

Mu

diameter depth 'd'

pt,reqd (in %)

10 @ 200 mm C/C (parallel to Z-Z direction) and Spacing Spacing Ast,reqd Ast,min Max. Ast required provided pt,prov (in mm ) (in mm ) (in mm ) (in mm)
2 2 2

TWO-WAY SHEAR CHECK

kstc

(for M25)
2

Vu Check (in kN)

bo

Vu / bod
2

(for M25) Check

(in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m )

(in m)

(in kN-m) (in kN-m) (in mm)

(in mm)

(in mm)

(in %)

(in kN) (in N/mm ) (in N/mm )

(in mm) (in N/mm ) (in N/mm2)

Design for Bottom Steel along X-X Direction #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.54988 #N/A #N/A 10 171 #N/A #N/A #N/A 120 #N/A #N/A 200 0.230 #N/A #N/A 0.35 #N/A #N/A 685 #N/A 1.25 #N/A

Design for Bottom Steel along Z-Z Direction #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.54988 #N/A #N/A 10 163 #N/A #N/A #N/A 120 #N/A #N/A 200 0.241 #N/A #N/A 0.35 #N/A #N/A 685 #N/A 1.25 #N/A

NMDC LIMITED 3.0 MTPA INTEGRATED STEEL PLANT

AT NAGARNAR, CHHATTISGARH
Agency : M/s Siemens VAI Metals Technologies Gmb., Linz Top Reinforcement: 8 @ 250 mm C/C (parallel to X-X direction)
Min. gross Min. gross Min. net Min. net

and

8 @ 250 mm C/C (parallel to Z-Z direction)

Cantilever B.Moment Factored Mu length, M

@ edge
2

@ face
2

@ edge
2

@ face
2

Rebar Effective diameter depth 'd'

Mu b*d
2

pt,reqd (in %)

Ast,reqd (in mm )
2

Ast,min (in mm )
2

Max. Ast
2

Spacing Spacing required provided (in mm)

pt,prov (in %)

(in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m ) (in kN/m )

Check for the requirement of design steel

(in m)

(in kN-m) (in kN-m) (in mm)

(in mm)

(in mm ) (in mm)

Design for Top Steel along X-X Direction #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.54988 #N/A #N/A 8 171 #N/A #N/A #N/A 120 #N/A 418.88 250 0.118

Design for Top Steel along Z-Z Direction #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 0.54988 #N/A #N/A 8 163 #N/A #N/A #N/A 120 #N/A 418.88 250 0.123

Reinforcement detail parallel to the longer dimension

8 @ 250 mm C/C

8 @ 250 mm C/C

10 @ 200 mm C/C B

10 @ 200 mm C/C

NMDC LIMITED 3.0 MTPA INTEGRATED STEEL PLANT

AT NAGARNAR, CHHATTISGARH
Agency : M/s Siemens VAI Metals Technologies Gmb., Linz Reference Detailed Calculation CHECK FOR CRACK WIDTH OF FOUNDATION SLAB "F1": Basic Design Data: Characteristic compressive strength of concrete, Characteristic compressive strength of steel, Typical foundation slab strip size (1 m wide strip) Concrete cover for footing main reinforcement
Clause 35.3.2 of IS 456: 2000 Table 21 of IS 456: 2000

Out put

fck fy

= = =

25 415 1000 (b) 50 0.2 2 8.5

N/mm2 N/mm2 mm x mm mm x 105 N/mm2 N/mm2 350 mm (D)

Cmin Est scbc

= = = =

Limited crack width Modulus of elasticity of steel Permissible stress in concrete due to bending CRACK WIDTH CALCULATION FOR R.C.C SLAB: Typical foundation slab strip size (1 m wide strip) Maximum bending moment (service condition) Diameter of tension reinforcement used Provided tensile rebar spacing Diameter of compression reinforcement used Provided tensile rebar spacing Provided effective thickness of slab Depth of compression reinforcement from the compressive face

= = = = = = d =

1000 11.70 10 250 10 250 295

mm x kN-m mm mm mm mm mm

350 mm

d' m

= = =

55 280 3scbc 10.98 314 314.2

mm

Clause B-2.1.2 of Modular ratio IS 456: 2000

Provided area of tensile reinforcement, Provided area of compression reinforcement,

Ast Asc

= =

mm2 mm2

DETERMINATION OF DEPTH OF NEUTRAL AXIS (N.A.): (1.5m - 1)Asc Asc d x N.A. Ast a) Slab Section mAst fst/Est b) Transformed Section c) Strain Diagram fc/Ec

printed: 9/26/2013

NMDC LIMITED 3.0 MTPA INTEGRATED STEEL PLANT

AT NAGARNAR, CHHATTISGARH
Agency : M/s Siemens VAI Metals Technologies Gmb., Linz Reference Detailed Calculation Position of N.A. can be found out by taking moment of transformed areas about N.A. bx2 2
2 500 x

Out put

+ (1.5m - 1) Asc (x - d') 8309.53 x -

mAst (d - x) = x = 517422 52.3 mm

1284898.692

From the above equation, depth of neutral axis, Calculation of modular inertia of section: Ixx = bx3 3

+ (1.5m - 1) Asc (x - d')2 Ixx = =

mAst (d - x)2

10 4 0.02509 x 10 mm

Stress in tension steel,

fst

m * M (d - x) Ixx

Stress in tension steel, Strain in tension steel,

fst est

= =

2 124.26 N/mm

fst Est

est
Clause 34.3.2 of SP 24: 1983

= =

0.000621 est * (D - x) (d - x)

The strain on the tension face of the slab,

e1

=
Clause 34.3.2 of SP 24: 1983

0.000762 e1 0.7* btD (a' - x) * 10-3 As (D - x) fs

The average strain at the level of cracks,

em

Clause 34.3.2 of SP 24: 1983

The stiffening effect of the concrete in tension zone, where, bt =

0.7* btD (a' - x) * 10-3 As (D - x) fs

The width of the section at the centroid of the tension steel = 1000 mm

a'

The distance from the compression face to the point of crack = = = 350 mm

fs

= Service stress in tension reinforcement

0.58fy * Ast,required Ast,provided

2 240.7 N/mm

printed: 9/26/2013

NMDC LIMITED 3.0 MTPA INTEGRATED STEEL PLANT

AT NAGARNAR, CHHATTISGARH
Agency : M/s Siemens VAI Metals Technologies Gmb., Linz Reference
Clause 34.3.2 of SP 24: 1983

Detailed Calculation The stiffening effect of the concrete in tension zone, = = The average strain at the level of cracks, em = = Hence em W cr = = 1+2 where, acr = Distance from the point considered to the surface of the nearest longitudinal bar Critical dimensions for crack width: From the diagram, Face of concrete Clear spacing between bars in tension s1 s3 Spacing acr1 acr2 Spacing Then s3 acr1 = = = Then acr2 = = Maximum (acr1 , acr2) Design surface crack width W cr acr = = 1+2 55 mm s2 = 250 mm s2 Spacing s1 = 55 mm = 240 mm 0.7* btD (a' - x) * 10-3 As (D - x) fs 0.00324 e1 -0.002478 0 3acrem acr - Cmin D-x

Out put

0.7* btD (a' - x) * 10-3 As (D - x) fs

Clause 34.3.2 of SP 24: 1983

Design surface crack width

(s

2 1

+ s32) mm
2

72.8

((s /2)
2

+ s32) mm mm

- 2

131.6 131.6

3acrem acr - Cmin D-x

= < Hence Safe

0.000

mm

0.2 mm

printed: 9/26/2013

Node

L/C 12 1 DL+LL

Force-X kN Force-Y kN Force-Z kN Moment-X kNm Moment-Y kNm -9.031 234.988 -11.889 -4.491 -0.698

Moment-Z kNm 4.503