Study Circles Post-Survey Data:

H O R IZ O N S C O M M UN IT Y : V A LLE Y - C H A N G E S IN KN O WLE D G E
O F P O V E R T Y B E F O R E A N D N O W/ A F T E R S T UD Y C IR C LE S F R O M
P O S T S UR V E Y S 2 .0 9

4.0

3.5

Valley
3.26 3.32 3.32 3.36
3.0 3 . 14 3 . 14 3 . 18 3 . 18
2.71
2.5
2.46 2.54
2.38 2.33 2.38 2.38
2.21
2.0
B EF OR E a v e r a g e r a t i ng
1. 5

1. 0 N OW/ A F TER a v e r a ge
0.5 r a t i ng
0.0

P ossi bl e D i f f er ent R easons i t i s H ow pover t y St r a t e g i e s t o I ndi vi dual C o mmu n i t y P ol i ci es t hat

causes of ki nds of di f f i cul t t o a f f e c t s my r educe act i ons t o act i ons t o woul d r educe
pover t y pover t y get out of c o mmu n i t y pover t y r educe r educe pover t y
pove r t y pover t y pover t y

Scale of 1 = Almost n ot hin g t o 4 = A gr eat deal

Community Progress:
HORIZONS COM M UNITY: VALLEY
STUDY CIRCLE P OSTSURVEY INFORM ATION 2.09

100.0%

90.0%
80.0%
7 6 .0 %
7 2 .0 %
Study Circles and
70.0%
60.0%

50.0%
4 0 .0 %
5 6 .0 %
Leadershipplenty®
40.0%

30.0%
20.0%
2 8 .0 %
Survey Results
10.0%
0.0%
I ncr eased A l r eady t aken V er y li kely i n V er y l ikel y in V er y l ikel y in
knowl edge of act i on f ut ur e t o t ake f ut ur e t o j oi n f ut ur e t o suppor t
pover t y i n d i v i d u a l a c t i o n c o mmu n i t y a c t i o n pol i ci es t o
r educe pover t y

Study Circles
61 Participated in Study Circles

LeadershipPlenty®
35 Participated in LeadershipPlenty
 LeadershipPlenty® Post-Survey Data:
LeadershipPlenty® Pre-Survey Data: VALLEY COM P ARED TO ALL WA HORIZONS COM M UNITIES: WAYS
P ROGRAM HAS HELP ED TO ADDRESS/ CHANGE P OVERTY IN
HO R IZ O N S C O M M U N I T Y : V A LLEY
PO V ER T Y R A T ES C O M PA R ISO N C EN SU S W IT H ST U D Y C IR C LE A D U LT
COM M UNITY FROM LEADERSHIP P LENTY P OSTSURVEYS 6.09 Valley
PA R T I C IPA N T S

All Washington Horizons

6 9 .2 %
communities
70. 0%

60. 0%
4 2 .3 % M or e peopl e ar e awar e of
53 .8 %
50. 0% p o v e r t y i n t h e c o mmu n i t y 6 6 .7%
40. 0%
2 0 .6 % W e ar e di scuss i ng pover t y and 6 6 .8 %
30. 0% 15. 4 % what t o do about i t 70 . 4 %
20. 0%
4 4 .2 %
10. 0% M or e peopl e ar e st eppi ng up t o
assi s t t hose i n pover t y 4 0 . 7%
0. 0%

C e ns us LP A dul t s 1 0 0 % FP G LP A dul t s 1 5 0 % FP G LP A dul t s 2 0 0 % FP G

M o r e l o w i n c o me p e o p l e a r e 3 3 .6 %
i n v o l v e d i n t h e c o mmu n i t y 2 7.0 %

W e ar e wor ki ng t o cr eat e
4 0 .9 %
HORIZONS COM M UNITY: VALLEY changes i n publ i c pol i cy 2 9 .6 %
AGE COM P ARISONS CENSUS WITH LEADERSHIP P LENTY
P ARTICIP ANTS 4.09 M or e peopl e ar e get t i ng hel p t o
2 5.6 %
3 3 .3 %
get out of pover t y

2 3 .6 %
Census W e ar e t aki ng concr et e st eps t o

70 addr ess pover t y 2 5. 9 %

60.2
LP Participants
0.0% 10 . 0 % 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0%
60

50

40
29.9

30
V A LL
LEY C OM PA R ED T O A LL W A HOR IZ ON S C OM M U N IT IES:
B EF OR
O E A N D A F T ER SELF R A T IN GS LEA D ER SHIP SKILLS F R OM V alley B EF OR E
20 9.9
LEA D ER SHIPPLEN T Y POST SU R V EY S 6 .0 9
V alley A F T ER
10 10.3% 48.3% 41.4% A ll W ashing t o n B EF OR E
A ll W ashing t o n A F T ER
0 5.0
Under 18 years 18 to 64 years 65 years and over 
4.5
4.13 4.10 4.09 4.28
4.30
4.0
4.11 4.05 4.04 4.07 4.00 3.78
3.89 3.81 3.81 4.02 3.80 3.85
3.95 3.75
HOR IZ O N S C OM M U N I T Y : V A LLEY 3.59
3.73 3.73 3.81 3.72
3.59 3.67
3.74 3.63 3.67
PR IO R EX PER I EN C E A N D C OM M U N IT Y R OLES O F LEA D ER SHIPPLEN T Y
3.5 3.61 3.59
3.69
PA R T I C IPA N T S 4 .0 9 3.0 2.93 3.04
2.78
2.72 2.58 2.62 2.81 2.74 2.81 2.68
2.5 2.52 2.44 2.48 2.33 2.48 2.57 2.67 2.45 2.48 2.56 2.48 2.63
2.39
60. 0% 55.2 % 2.23 2.41 2.41 2.35 2.33
2.13 2.11 2.29
2.0 2.23
50. 0%

40. 0% 3 4 . 5% 1.5

30. 0% 2 4 . 1% 1.0
I am abl
a e to I am abl e t o I am abl e t o I am abl e t o I am abl e t o I know how t o I now how t o I know t he
20. 0%
r ecog
gni ze wor k wi t h t he i dent i f y t he l ead manage pl an and as sess t he val ue of
10. 0% 3 .4 % 3 .4 % 3 .4 % l eade
er shi p l eader shi p i n st ages of pr oduct i ve c onf l i ct i n i mpl ement v al ue of br i ngi ng
s ki l l s i n my gr oup meet i ngs. gr oup wor k. communi t y gr oup ci t i zens
0. 0%
ot her
h s or gani zat i on devel opment . change pr obl em- t oget her t o
E ver P er son who A ct i ve but Just an N ot r eal l y N or or ever
and/ or pr oj ec t s. sol vi ng t al k about
i nv ol v e d ma k e s not a or di nar y pa r t of t he an elected
l eader shi p c o mmu n i t y deci si on per son c o mmu n i t y of f i ci al gr eat er ef f or t s. i s sues.

p r o g r a m? deci si ons ma k e r communi t y.

Scale of 1 = Str ongl y Disagr ee to 5 = Str ongl y Agr ee