Study Circles Post-Survey Data:

HORIZONS COM M UNITY: ONALASKA - CHANGES IN

KNOWLEDGE OF P OVERTY BEFORE AND NOW/ AFTER STUDY
CIRCLES FROM P OSTSURVEYS 2.09

4.0

Onalaska
3.5
3.31 3.39
3 . 12 3.24 3.24 3.20
3.0 3 . 10
2.95
2.5
2.64 2.70 2.58
2.43
2.0 2 . 10 2.05 2 . 13 2.08
B EFOR E a v e r a g e r a t i ng
1. 5

1. 0 N OW/ A FTER a v e r a ge
0.5
r a t i ng

0.0

P os s i bl e D i f f er ent R easons i t i s H ow pover t y St r a t e g i e s t o I ndi vi dual C o mmu n i t y P ol i ci es t hat

causes of ki nds of di f f i cul t t o a f f e c t s my r educe act i ons t o act i ons t o woul d r educe
pover t y pover t y get out of c o mmu n i t y pover t y r e duc e r educe pover t y
pover t y pover t y pover t y

Scale of 1 = Almost n ot hin g t o 4 = A gr eat deal

HORIZONS COM M UNITY: ONALASKA

STUDY CIRCLE P OSTSURVEY INFORM ATION 2.09
Community Progress:
100.0%
90.0% 7 8 .7 %
7 4 .5 %
Study Circles and
Leadershipplenty®
80.0%
70.0%
5 1.1%
60.0%

Survey Results
50.0% 3 8 .3 %
40.0% 2 7 .7 %
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
I ncr eased A l r eady t aken V er y li kely i n V er y l ikely i n V er y li kely in
knowl edge of act i on f ut ur e t o t ake f ut ur e t o j oi n f ut ur e t o suppor t
pover t y i n d i v i d u a l a c t i o n c o mmu n i t y a c t i o n pol i ci es t o
r educe pover t y

Study Circles
66 Participated in Study Circles

LeadershipPlenty®
36 Participated in LeadershipPlenty
 LeadershipPlenty® Post-Survey Data:
O N A LA S KA C O M P A R E D T O A LL WA H O R IZ O N S C O M M UN IT IE S : Onalaska BEFORE
LeadershipPlenty® Pre-Survey Data: B E F O R E A N D A F T E R S E LF R A T IN G S LE A D E R S H IP S KILLS F R O M
LE A D E R S H IP P LE N T Y P O S T S UR V E Y S 6 .0 9 Onalaska AFTER

H OR I ZON S C OM M U N I T Y: ON A LA S K A All Washington BEFORE

P OVER T Y R A T ES C OM P A R I S ON C EN S U S WI T H S TU D Y C I R C LE A D U L T
P A R TI C I P A N T S
5.0 All Washington AFTER
4.42
4.5 4.58 4.69
4.38 4.35 4.31 4.27 4.31 4.28
47.6% 4.13 4.10 4.12 4.15 4.23 4.27 4.09 4.15
50.0% 4.0 4.05 3.96 3.92 4.04 3.80 3.95 3.75
33.3% 4.02
3.73 3.73 3.81 3.72 3.74
3.61 3.69
40.0%
3.5
30.0% 19 . 0 % 3.27 3.23 3.35 3.27
3.19
20.0%
13 . 6 %
3.0 3.00 2.96 2.96 3.08
2.85
2.72 2.73 2.48 2.68
10 . 0 %
2.5 2.58 2.62 2.54 2.54 2.57 2.62 2.45 2.54 2.39
0.0% 2.23 2.33 2.41 2.35 2.35
2.23 2.13 2.29
C e ns us LP A dul t s 1 0 0 % LP A dul t s 1 5 0 % LP A dul t s 2 0 0 % 2.0 2.11
FP G FP G FP G

1.5

1.0
H O R IZ O N S C O M M UN IT Y : O N A LA S KA I am
m abl e t o I am abl e t o I am abl e t o I am abl e t o I am abl e t o I know how t o I now how t o I know t he
A G E C O M P A R IS O N S C E N S US WIT H LE A D E R S H IP P LE N T Y r eccogni ze wor k wi t h t he i dent i f y t he l ead manage pl an and assess t he val ue of
l ea der shi p l eader shi p i n st ages of pr oduct i ve conf l i ct i n i mpl ement val ue of br i ngi ng
P A R T IC IP A N T S 4 .0 9
skki l l s i n my gr oup meet i ngs. gr oup wor k. communi t y gr oup ci t i zens
o her s
ot or gani zat i on devel opment . change pr obl em- t oget her t o
and/ or pr oj ect s. sol vi ng t al k about
Census gr eat er ef f or t s. i ssues.
60
51 communi t y.
LP Participants
50 Scale of 1=St rongly Disagree t o 5 =St rongly Agree

40
2 6 .6
30
O N A LA S KA C O M P A R E D T O A LL WA S H IN G T O N H O R IZ O N S C O M M UN IT IE S :
W Y S P R O G R A M H A S H E LP E D T O A D D R E S S / C H A N G E P O V E R T Y IN
WA
12 .4
20
C O M M UN IT Y F R O M LE A D E R S H IP P LE N T Y P O S T S UR V E Y S 6 .0 9 Onalaska
10
17 .9 % 7 5 .0 % 0 .0 %
All Washington Horizons
0
communities
Under 18 years 18 to 64 years 65 years and over 
53 . 8 %
M or e p e opl e a r e a wa r e of pov e r t y i n
t he c ommuni t y 3 4 .6 %

HOR I Z ON S C OM M U N I T Y : ON A LA SKA We a r e di s c us s i ng pov e r t y a nd wha t 6 6 .8 %

PR IO R EX PER IEN C E A N D C OM M U N I T Y R O LES OF LEA D ER SHI PPLEN T Y t o do a bout i t 73 . 1%
PA R T I C I PA N T S 4 . 0 9
4 4 .2 %
M or e pe opl e a r e s t e ppi ng up t o
a s s i s t t hos e i n pov e r t y 2 3 . 1%
50.0% 4 6 .4 %
45.0%
4 2 .9 % 3 3 .6 %
M or e l ow i nc ome pe opl e a r e
40.0% 2 6 .9 %
35.0%
3 2 .1% i nv ol v e d i n t he c ommuni t y
30.0%
25.0% We a r e wor k i ng t o c r e a t e c ha nge s i n 4 0 .9 %
20.0% publ i c pol i c y 4 2 .3 %
15 . 0 %
7. 1%
10 . 0 %
3 .6 % M or e pe opl e a r e ge t t i ng he l p t o ge t
2 5. 6 %
5.0% 0 .0 % 19 .2 %
0.0%
out of pov e r t y

E ver P er son who A ct i ve but Just an N ot r eal l y N or or ever 2 3 .6 %

i nvol ved ma k e s not a or di nar y par t of t he an el ected We
e a r e t a k i ng c onc r e t e s t e ps t o
a ddr e s s pov e r t y
3 0 .8 %
l eader shi p c o mmu n i t y deci si on per son c o mmu n i t y of f i ci al
p r o g r a m? deci si ons ma k e r
0. 0% 10. 0% 20. 0% 30. 0% 40. 0% 50. 0% 60. 0% 70. 0% 80. 0%