Study Circles Post-Survey Data:

HORIZONS COM M UNITY: GRAND M OUND-ROCHESTER

CHANGES IN KNOWLEDGE OF P OVERTY BEFORE AND
NOW/ AFTER STUDY CIRCLES FROM P OSTSURVEYS 2.09

4. 0

Grand Mound-Rochester
3. 5
3.28 3.36
3 . 14 3 . 17 3.08 3 . 17
3. 0
2.92
2.78
2. 5

2 . 17 2 . 14 2.25 2 . 19
2. 0 1. 9 4
1. 8 3 1. 7 8 1. 6 7
1. 5

1. 0 B EF OR E a v e r a ge r a t i n g
0. 5 N OW/ A FT ER a v e r a g e r a t i ng

0. 0

P os si bl e D i f f er e nt R easons i t i s H ow pover t y St r a t e g i e s t o I ndi vi dual C o mmu n i t y P ol i ci es t hat

causes of ki nds of di f f i cul t t o a f f e c t s my r educe act i ons t o act i ons t o woul d r educe
pover t y pover t y get out of c o mmu n i t y pover t y r educe r educe pover t y
pover t y pover t y pover t y

Scale of 1 = Almost n ot hin g t o 4 = A gr eat deal

HORIZONS COM M UNITY: GRAND M OUND-ROCHESTER

STUDY CIRCLE P OSTSURVEY INFORM ATION 2.09 Community Progress:
100.0%
97.2%
Study Circles and
Leadershipplenty®
90.0% 77.8%
80.0% 69.4%
70.0% 58.3%

Survey Results
60.0%

50.0%
36.1%
40.0%

30.0%

20.0%

10.0%

0.0%
I ncr eased A l r eady t aken V er y likel y in V er y l ikel y in V er y li kely i n
knowl edge of act i on f ut ur e t o t ake f ut ur e t o j oi n f ut ur e t o suppor t
pover t y i n d i v i d u a l a c t i o n c o mmu n i t y a c t i o n p o l i c i e s t o r e d u c e
pover t y

Study Circles
34 Participated in Study Circles

LeadershipPlenty®
29 Participated in LeadershipPlenty
 LeadershipPlenty® Post-Survey Data:
LeadershipPlenty® Pre-Survey Data: GRAND MOUND/ROCHESTER COMPARED TO ALL WA HORIZONS COMMUNITIES:
HO R I Z ON S C O M M U N I T Y : GR A N D M OU N D - R OC HEST ER W
WAYS PROGRAM HAS HELPED TO ADDRESS/CHANGE POVERTY IN COMMUNITY
PO V ER T Y R A T ES C OM PA R ISON C EN SU S W I T H ST U D Y C I R C LE A D U LT
PA R T IC IPA N T S FR
ROM LEADERSHIPPLENTY POSTSURVEYS 6.09
Grand Mound/Rochester
19 . 0 % 19 . 0 %
20. 0%
14 .8 % All Washington Horizons
18. 0%
16. 0% communities
14. 0% 9 .5%
12. 0%
10. 0% 53 .8 %
M or
o e pe opl e a r e a wa r e of pov e r t y
8. 0% 59 .1%
i n t he c ommuni t y
6. 0%
4. 0%
We a r e di s c us s i ng pov e r t y a nd 6 6 .8 %
2. 0% 6 8 .2 %
wha t t o do a bout i t
0. 0%

C e ns us LP A dul t s 1 0 0 % FP G LP A dul t s 1 5 0 % FP G LP A dul t s 2 0 0 % FP G 4 4 .2 %

M or e pe opl e a r e s t e ppi ng up t o
a s s i s t t hos e i n pov e r t y
2 7.3 %

M or e l ow i nc ome pe opl e a r e 3 3 .6 %
HORIZONS COM M UNITY: GRAND M OUND-ROCHESTER i nv ol v e d i n t he c ommuni t y 2 2 . 7%
AGE COM P ARISONS CENSUS WITH LEADERSHIP P LENTY 4 0 .9 %
We
e a r e wor k i ng t o c r e a t e c ha nge s
P ARTICIP ANTS 4.09 i n publ i c pol i c y 50 .0 %

2 5. 6 %
M or e pe opl e a r e ge t t i ng he l p t o
0 .0 %
Census ge t out of pov e r t y

70 61.3 2 3 .6 %
LP Participants W a r e t a k i ng c onc r e t e s t e ps t o
We
9 .1%
a ddr e s s pov e r t y
60
0. 0% 10. 0% 20. 0% 30. 0% 40. 0% 50. 0% 60. 0% 70. 0%

50

40
29.5

30
G R A N D M OU N D - R OC HEST ER C OM PA R ED T O A LL W A HOR IZ ON S
C OM M U N IT IES:B EF OR E A N D A F T ER SELF R A T IN GS LEA D ER SHIP GM - R B EF OR E
20 9.2 KILLS F R OM LEA D ER SHIPPLEN T Y POST SU R V EY S 6 .0 9
SK GM - R A F T ER
10 8.0% 76.0% 12.0% A ll W ashing t o n B EF OR E
5.0
A ll W ashing t o n A F T ER
0
4.5
Under 18 years 18 to 64 years 65 years and over  44.2 7
.13
4 .2 8
44.14 44.2 3
.10 44.2
.039 4 .2 3 3 .8 6
4.0 .0 5
34.9
.012 3 .8 0 3 .7 5
3 .7 3 3 .8 1 33.7 3 .8 2 3 .9 5
HOR IZ O N S C O M M U N IT Y : G R A N D M OU N D - R O C HEST ER 3 .7 3 3 .6 4 3 .6 4 3
3 .7
.5 92 .734 3 .6 8
PR I OR EX PER I EN C E A N D C OM M U N I T Y R O LES OF LEA D ER SHIPPLEN T Y 3.5 3 .4 5 3 .5 5 .601 33.4
33.5 .6 9
5
PA R T I C I PA N T S 4 . 0 9
3 .3 2 3 .3 6 3 .2 7 3 .3 2
3 .14
3.0 2 .9 5 3 .0 0
2 .7 3 2 .8 2 2 .7 3 2 .7 7
56 . 0 % 2 .7 2 2 .4 5 2 .4 8 2 .6 8
60. 0%
2.5 2 .5 8 2 .6 2 2 .5 5 2 .5 5 2 .5 7 2 .3 9
2 .4 1 2 .4 1
50. 0% 4 4 .0 % 2 .2 3 2 .3 3 2 .4 1 2 .3 5
2 .2 9
3 6 .0 % 2 .2 3 2 .13
40. 0% 2.0 2 .11
30. 0%

1.5
20. 0% 12 . 0 %
8 .0 %
10. 0%
0 .0 % 1.0
0. 0% I am abl e t o I am abl e t o I am abl e t o I am abl e t o I am abl e t o I know how t o I now how t o I know t he
E ver P er son who A ct i ve but Just an N ot r eal l y N or or ever r ecogni ze wor k wi t h t he i dent i f y t he l ead manage pl an and assess t he val ue of
i nvol ved ma k e s not a or di nar y par t of t he an el ected
l eader shi p l eader shi p i n st ages of pr oduct i ve conf l i ct i n i mpl ement val ue of br i ngi ng
l eader shi p c o mmu n i t y deci si on per son c o mmu n i t y of f i ci al
ski l l s i n my gr oup meet i ngs. gr oup wor k. communi t y gr oup ci t i zens
p r o g r a m? deci si ons ma k e r
ot her s or gani zat i on devel opment . change pr obl em- t oget her t o
and/ or pr oj ect s. sol vi ng t al k about
gr eat er ef f or t s. i ssues.
communi t y.
Scale of 1=St rongly Disagree t o 5 =St rongly Agree