Study Circles Post-Survey Data:

H O R IZ O N S C O M M UN IT Y : D E E R P A R K - C H A N G E S IN
KN O WLE D G E O F P O V E R T Y B E F O R E A N D N O W/ A F T E R S T UD Y
C IR C LE S F R O M P O S T S UR V E Y S 2 .0 9

3.5

3.22

Deer Park
3.0 3.07 3.07 3.07
2.80 2.88 2.85
2.5
2.68
2.24 2.28 2.33
2.0 2.07
1. 9 0 1. 8 0 1. 8 3
1. 7 8
1. 5

B EF OR E a v e r a ge
1. 0
r a t i ng
0.5
N OW/ A F TER a v e r a g e
0.0 r a t i ng
P ossi bl e D i f f er ent R easons i t i s H ow pover t y St r a t e g i e s t o I ndi vi dual C o mmu n i t y P ol i ci es t hat
causes of ki nds of di f f i cul t t o a f f e c t s my r educe act i ons t o act i ons t o woul d r educe
pover t y pover t y get out of c o mmu n i t y pover t y r educe r educe pover t y
pover t y pover t y pover t y

Scale of 1 = Almost n ot hin g t o 4 = A gr eat deal

HORIZONS COM M UNITY: DEER P ARK

STUDY CIRCLE P OSTSURVEY INFORM ATION 2.09 Community Progress:
100.0%

90.0%
8 3 .7 % Study Circles and
80.0%

70.0%
60.0%
5 3 .5 %
Leadershipplenty®
Survey Results
4 4 .2 %
50.0%
3 2 .6 %
40.0%
2 3 .3 %
30.0%

20.0%

10.0%

0.0%
I ncr eased A l r eady t aken V er y li kely in V er y l ikel y in V er y li kely i n
knowl edge of act i on f ut ur e t o t ake f ut ur e t o j oi n f ut ur e t o suppor t
pover t y i n d i v i d u a l a c t i o n c o mmu n i t y a c t i o n pol i ci es t o
r educe pover t y

Study Circles
44 Participated in Study Circles

LeadershipPlenty®
31 Participated in LeadershipPlenty
 LeadershipPlenty® Post-Survey Data:
LeadershipPlenty® Pre-Survey Data:
HO R I Z ON S C OM M U N I T Y : D EER PA R K
DEER PARK COMPARED TO ALL WASHINGTON HORIZONS COMMUNITIES:
PO V ER T Y R A T ES C OM PA R ISO N C EN SU S W I T H ST U D Y C IR C LE A D U LT WAYS PROGRAM HAS HELPED TO ADDRESS/CHANGE POVERTY IN COMMUNITY FROM
PA R T I C I PA N T S
LEADERSHIPPLENTY POSTSURVEYS 6.09 Deer Park
54 .2 %
All Washington Horizons
60. 0%
4 1.7%
communities
50. 0%

40. 0% 2 9 .2 %
53 . 8 %
30. 0% M or
o e pe opl e a r e a wa r e of pov e r t y
15.1% 4 7.1%
i n t he c ommuni t y
20. 0%

10. 0% We a r e di s c us s i ng pov e r t y a nd
6 6 .8 %
wha t t o do a bout i t 70 .6 %
0. 0%

C e ns us LP A dul t s 1 0 0 % FP G LP A dul t s 1 5 0 % FP G LP A dul t s 2 0 0 % FP G 4 4 .2 %

M or e pe opl e a r e s t e ppi ng up t o
a s s i s t t hos e i n pov e r t y 3 5.3 %

M or e l ow i nc ome pe opl e a r e
3 3 .6 %
HORIZONS COM M UNITY: DEER P ARK i nv ol v e d i n t he c ommuni t y 17. 6 %
AGE COM P ARISONS CENSUS WITH LEADERSHIP P LENTY
P ARTICIP ANTS 4.09 4 0 .9 %
We
e a r e wor ki ng t o c r e a t e c ha nge s
i n publ i c pol i c y 4 1.2 %

Census 2 5.6 %
M or e pe opl e a r e ge t t i ng he l p t o
2 3 . 5%
60 5 2 .8 ge t out of pov e r t y
LP Participants
2 3 .6 %
W a r e t a k i ng c onc r e t e s t e ps t o
We
50 17. 6 %
a ddr e s s pov e r t y
3 2 .5
40 0. 0% 10. 0% 20. 0% 30. 0% 40. 0% 50. 0% 60. 0% 70. 0% 80. 0%

30

14 .7
20
D E E R P A R K C O M P A R E D T O A LL WA H O R IZ O N S C O M M UN IT IE S : Deer Park BEFORE
B E F O R E A N D A F T E R S E LF R A T IN G S LE A D E R S H IP S KILLS F R O M
10
7 .4 % 7 0 .4 % 18 .5 % LE A D E R S H IP P LE N T Y P O S T S UR V E Y S 6 .0 9 Deer Park AFTER
0 All Washington BEFORE
5.0
Under 18 years 18 to 64 years 65 years and over  All Washington AFTER
4.5 4.47 4.53
4.35
4.13 4.09 4.28
4.10
HOR I Z ON S C OM M U N IT Y : D EER PA R K 4.0 4.05 4.00 3.76
3.94 3.88 3.94 4.02 3.94 3.80 3.95 3.75
PR IO R EX PER IEN C E A N D C OM M U N IT Y R OLES O F LEA D ER SHIPPLEN T Y 3.82
3.73 3.82 3.76
3.65
3.73 3.81 3.72 3.74
PA R T I C I PA N T S 4 .0 9 3.5 3.53 3.53 3.61 3.69
3.35
3.18 3.12 3.12
4 8 .1% 3.0
50. 0%
45. 0% 2.72 2.71 2.71 2.45 2.48 2.682.65
2.58 2.62 2.57 2.59 2.59 2.39
40. 0%
3 3 .3 % 3 3 .3 % 2.5 2.47 2.41 2.41
2.33 2.41
2.29 2.29
2.35 2.29
35. 0%
2.23 2.24 2.13 2.24 2.29
30. 0%
2.0 2.23 2.11
25. 0%
20. 0%
15. 0% 1.5
7. 4 % 7.4 %
10. 0% 3 . 7%
5. 0%
1.0
0. 0%
I am abl
a e to I am abl e t o I am abl e t o I am abl e t o I am abl e t o I know how t o I now how t o I k now t he
E ver P er son who A ct i ve but Just an N ot r eal l y N or or ever
r eco gni z e wor k wi t h t he i dent i f y t he l ead manage pl an and ass es s t he v al ue of
i nvol ved ma k e s not a or di nar y par t of t he an elected
l eade
er shi p l eader shi p i n s t ages of pr oduct i v e c onf l i ct i n i mpl ement val ue of br i ngi ng
l eader shi p c o mmu n i t y deci si on per son c o mmu n i t y of f i ci al
s ki l l s i n my gr oup meet i ngs . gr oup wor k. communi t y gr oup c i t i z ens
p r o g r a m? deci si ons ma k e r
ot her
h s or gani z at i on devel opment . c hange pr obl em- t oget her t o
and/ or pr oj ec t s. s ol v i ng t al k about
gr eat er ef f or t s. i s sues .
c ommuni t y.
Scale of 1=St rongly Disagree t o 5 =St rongly Agr ee