Study Circles Post-Survey Data:

HORIZONS COMMUNITY: BIG RIVER - CHANGES IN KNOWLEDGE

OF POVERTY BEFORE AND NOW/AFTER STUDY CIRCLES FROM
POSTSURVEYS 2.09
4.0

3.5
3. 44
3. 56 3. 56
3. 39 3. 39 3. 33 3. 33
3. 17
Big River Tribal Community
3.0

2.5 2. 56 2. 56
2. 44 2. 44
2. 28 2. 28 2. 22
2. 12
2.0

1. 5
B EF O R E aver ag e
r at i ng
1. 0 N O W / A F T ER aver ag e
r at i ng
0.5

0.0

P o s s ib e
l c ause s D if f e r e n t R e a s o n s it s
i H ow pov e r t y S t r a t e g ie s t o I n dv
i id u a l C o m m u n ti y P o ic
l ie s t h a t

of pov e r t y k in d s o f d fi f c
i u tl t o g e t a f f e c t s my r e duc e pov e r t y a c t io n s t o a c t io n s t o w oud
l r e duc e
pov e r t y out of pov e r t y c o m m u n ti y r e duc e pov e r t y r e duc e pov e r t y pov e r t y

Community Progress:
Scale of 1 = Almost n ot hin g t o 4 = A gr eat deal

Study Circles and

HOR IZ ON S C OM M U N IT Y : B IG R IV ER
C O M POSI T E SC OR ES F R O M ST U D Y C IR C LE PO ST SU R V EY S 2 .0 9

9 4 .4 %
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
7 2 .2 %
Leadershipplenty®
Survey Results
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
I nc r e a se d k no wl e dg e o f Al r e a dy t a k e n a c t i on
pov e r t y

Per cen t of par t ci p

i an t s who n
i cr eased kn owledge based on compar n
i g composit e BEFORE an d NOW/ AFT ER self
r at n
i gs on kn owledge of pover t y.
Per cen t of par t ci p
i an t s who have alr eady t aken act o
i n si based on an y " Yes" an swer f or act o
i n s t o r educe pover t y.

Study Circles
38 Participated in Study Circles

LeadershipPlenty®
47 Participated in LeadershipPlenty
 LeadershipPlenty® Post-Survey Data:
LeadershipPlenty® Pre-Survey Data: BIG RIVER TRIBAL COM M UNITY COM P ARED TO ALL WASHINGTON
HORIZONS COM M UNITIES:WAYS P ROGRAM HAS HELP ED TO
H OR I Z ON S C OM M U N I TY: B I G R I VER TR I B A L C OM M U N I T Y
ADDRESS/ CHANGE P OVERTY IN COM M UNITY FROM
P OVER T Y R A T ES C OM P A R I S ON C EN S U S WI TH S T U D Y C I R C LE A D U LT P A R T I C I P A N T S
LEADERSHIP P LENTY P OSTSURVEYS 6.09 Big River Tribal Community

73.9%
80. 0% 65.2% All Washington Horizons
70. 0%
52.2%
communities
60. 0%

50. 0%
53 . 8 %
28.0% M or e pe opl e a r e a wa r e of
40. 0%
pov e r t y i n t he c ommuni t y 50 .0 %
30. 0%

20. 0% We a r e di s c us s i ng pov e r t y a nd
6 6 .8 %
10. 0% wha t t o do a bout i t 77. 8 %
0. 0%
4 4 .2 %
C e ns us LP A dul t s 1 0 0 % FP G LP A dul t s 1 5 0 % FP G LP A dul t s 2 0 0 % FP G M or e pe opl e a r e s t e ppi ng up t o
a s s i s t t hos e i n pov e r t y 6 1.1%

M or e l ow i nc ome pe opl e a r e
3 3 .6 %
i nv ol v e d i n t he c ommuni t y 6 1.1%
HORIZONS COM M UNITY: BIG RIVER TRIBAL COM M UNITY
AGE COM P ARISONS CENSUS WITH LEADERSHIP P LENTY We a r e wor k i ng t o c r e a t e c ha nge s
4 0 .9 %
P ARTICIP ANTS 4.09 i n publ i c pol i c y 55. 6 %

M or e pe opl e a r e ge t t i ng he l p t o
2 5. 6 %
3 8 .9 %
Census ge t out of pov e r t y
70 62.5
LP Participants 2 3 .6 %
We a r e t a k i ng c onc r e t e s t e ps t o
a ddr e s s pov e r t y
16 .7%
60

0.0% 10 . 0 % 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60. 0% 70.0% 80. 0%

50
33
40

30

20 B IG
G R IV ER T R IB A L C OM M U N IT Y C OM PA R ED T O A LL W A HOR IZ ON S C OM M U N IT IES:
4.5 B EF
F OR E A N D A F T ER SELF R A T IN GS LEA D ER SHIP SKILLS F R OM LEA D ER SHIPPLEN T Y
10 11.1% 88.9% 0.0% POSST SU R V EY S 6 .0 9
B i g R i v e r B EFOR E
0 B i g R i v e r A F TER

Under 18 years 18 to 64 years 65 years and over  5.0

A l l Wa sh i ng t on B EF OR E
A l l Wa sh i ng t on A FT ER
4.5 4 .4 4 4 .5 0 4 .3 3 4 .2 8
4 .13 4 .10 4 .0 9 4 .2 2 4 .2 8
HOR IZ ON S C O M M U N I T Y : B IG R IV ER T R IB A L C O M M U N I T Y
4.0 4 .0 5 4 .0 6 3 .9 4 44.0 6 4 .0 0 4 .17 4 .0 0 4 .11 4 .0 6
PR I OR EX PER IEN C E A N D C O M M U N I T Y R OLES O F LEA D ER SHI PPLEN T Y .0 2 3 .8 3 3 .8 0 3 .9 5 33.6
.715
3 .7 3 3
3 .7
.723 3 .8 1 3 .7 2 3 .7 4
PA R T IC I PA N T S 4 .0 9 3.5 3 .6 1 3 .6 9
3 .2 2 3 .2 2
3.0 3 .0 0 3 .0 6 3 .17 3 .11 3 .11 3 .11 2 .9 4
3 .11 3 .0 6
4 8 .1% 2 .8 3 2 .7 2
50. 0% 4 4 .4 % 2 .7 2
2 .5 8 2 .6 2
2 .7 2 2 .7 2
2 .5 7 2 .4 5 2 .4 8 2 .6 8 22.3.798
45. 0% 2.5
40. 0%
2 .2 3 2 .3 3 2 .4 1 2 .3 5
2 .13 2 .2 9
35. 0%
3 3 .3 % 2.0 2 .2 3 2 .11
30. 0%
25. 0%
1.5
20. 0%
1.0
15. 0%
7. 4 % I am able t o I r ecogn zi e I am able t o I kn ow how t o I am able t o I am able t o I am able t o I kn ow how I am able t o I kn ow how I kn ow how t o I kn ow t he I n ow how t o I kn ow how t o I kn ow t he I kn ow how t o
10. 0% r ecogn zi e t he r elat o
i n ship wor k wit h t he appr oach d
i en t fi y t he guide e
l ad pr oduct vi e con f cil t an d man age par t n er ships plan an d commun ti y assess t he shar e value of discuss r ace
5. 0% 0 .0 % 0 .0 % e
l ader ship skisl bet ween e
l ader ship n
i my commun ti y st ages of discussion s meet n
i gs. t en sion con f cil t n
i n
i fu
l en ce m
i plemen t act o
i n pr ocess value of gr oup n
i f or mat o
in br n
i gin g r elat o
i nsn
i a

0. 0% n
i ot her s get t n
i g or gan zi at o
in developmen t gr oup amon g diver se n
i fu
l en ce gr oup wor k. commun ti y commun ti y pr oblem- solvn
i g wit h diver se cit zi en s n on -

E ver P er son who A ct i ve but Just an N ot r eal l y N or or ever n

i volved an d an d/ or pr oblems. developmen t . r oups of people gr oup wor k. pr oblem solvn
i g chan ge ef f or t s. audien ces. t oget her t o t hr eat en n
i g

i nv ol v e d ma k e s not a or di na r y par t of t he an el ected civci e

l ader ship. gr eat er pr oject s. t alk about way.

l e a de r s hi p c o mmu n i t y deci si on per son c o mmu n i t y of f i ci al commun ti y. si sues.

p r o g r a m? deci si ons ma k e r
Scal e of 1 = Str ongl y Disagr ee to 5 = Str ongly Agr ee