You are on page 1of 6

Case 2:12-cv-00700-DSF-RZ Document 33 Filed 09/30/13 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:336

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Jessica Price (SBN 264053) jprice@aclu-sc.org Ahilan T. Arulanantham (SBN 237841) aarulanantham@aclu-sc.org ACLU FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1313 West Eighth Street Los Angeles, California 90017 T: (213) 977-9500 F: (213) 977-5297 Stephen S. Smith (SBN 166539) ssmith@GreenbergGlusker.com Rachel Valadez (SBN 252415) rvaladez@GreenbergGlusker.com GREENBERG GLUSKER FIELDS CLAMAN & MACHTINGER LLP 1900 Avenue of the Stars, 21st Floor Los Angeles, California 90067-4590 T: (310) 553-3610 F: (310) 553-0687 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) CASE NO.: 12-CV-700 DSF (RZx) ) ) ) STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

16 JOHN PAUL MORROW; et al., 17 Plaintiffs, 18 vs. 19 UNITED STATES PAROLE 20 COMMISSION; et al., Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Case 2:12-cv-00700-DSF-RZ Document 33 Filed 09/30/13 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:337

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The Parties have reached agreement on a settlement in this case. See Exhibit A (Agreement). Under the terms of the Agreement, Defendants agree not to reinstitute or otherwise conduct video conferencing of parole hearings for inmates who are incarcerated within the jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, absent a) a material change in the applicable language of 18 U.S.C. 4208(e), or b) a decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals or the United States Supreme Court holding that 18 U.S.C. 4208(e) permits the Parole Commission to conduct parole hearings by video conference. In light of that Agreement, Plaintiffs agree to dismiss this case with prejudice. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), subject to the Court retaining exclusive and continuing jurisdiction to enforce the Agreement attached as Exhibit A. Dated: September 30, 2013 Respectfully submitted,

By:

/s/ Jessica Price Jessica Price ACLU of Southern California Attorney for Plaintiffs

ANDRE BIROTTE JR. United States Attorney LEON W. WEIDMAN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Division By: /s/ Robert I. Lester Robert I. Lester Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Defendants

Case 2:12-cv-00700-DSF-RZ Document 33-1 Filed 09/30/13 Page 1 of 4 Page ID #:338

Case 2:12-cv-00700-DSF-RZ Document 33-1 Filed 09/30/13 Page 2 of 4 Page ID #:339

Case 2:12-cv-00700-DSF-RZ Document 33-1 Filed 09/30/13 Page 3 of 4 Page ID #:340

Case 2:12-cv-00700-DSF-RZ Document 33-1 Filed 09/30/13 Page 4 of 4 Page ID #:341

You might also like