Professional Documents
Culture Documents
POLLUTION
AND ENERGYINTENSIVE
PRODUCTION
VANDANA SHIVA
a bout th e author
Vandana Shiva is a world-renowned environmental leader and thinker. Director of the Research Foundation on
Science, Technology, and Ecology, she is the author of many books, including Stolen Harvest: The Hijacking of the
Global Food Supply (2000) and Soil Not Oil: Environmental Justice in an Age of Climate Crisis (2008). She is the founder
of Navdanya, a movement promoting diversity and use of native seeds, and a recipient of the Right Livelihood
Award. She holds a masters degree in the philosophy of science and a PhD in particle physics.
Outsourcing Pollution and Energy Intensive Production by Vandana Shiva includes material that has appeared
elsewhere; used by permission of the author.
This publication is an excerpted chapter from The Energy Reader: Overdevelopment and
the Delusion of Endless Growth, Tom Butler, Daniel Lerch, and George Wuerthner,
eds. (Healdsburg, CA: Watershed Media, 2012). The Energy Reader is copyright
2012 by the Foundation for Deep Ecology, and published in collaboration with
Watershed Media and Post Carbon Institute.
For other excerpts, permission to reprint, and purchasing visit energy-reality.org or
contact Post Carbon Institute.
Photo: Reuters. Rampant air pollution is one of the high costs of Chinas rapid economic growth.
Post Ca r bon I nst i t u t e | 613 4t h St r e et, Su i t e 208 | Sa n ta Rosa, Ca li for n i a 95404 USA
Shiva
company that is profiting, not the country that is bearing the burden of pollution.
This inequity is not limited to U.S. companies. As
a recent report by Christian Aid states, While only
2.13percent of the worlds CO2 emissions emanate
from the U.K.s domestic economy, through the process of globalization CO2 is emitted around the world
on the U.K.s behalf in China, India, Africa and elsewhere.4 While the exact global footprint of U.K.
companies is not known, our estimate suggests that
emissions associated with the worldwide consumption of the top 100U.K. company products amounts to
12 to 15 percent of the global total.
In fact, the rural poor in China and India are losing their lands and livelihood for an energy-intensive
industrialization. To count them as polluters would be
doubly criminal. Moreover, when global corporations
outsource to China or India, they need to be responsible
for the pollution they carry overseas. Corporations are
the more appropriate unit for regulating atmospheric
pollution in a globalized economy.
So far, emissions trading schemes have rewarded the
polluters by giving them quotas for pollution. And these
quotas have allowed them to increase their emissions
rather than decrease them. What is needed is a carbon tax
on corporationsboth for their production systems, no
matter where their facilities are located, as well as for
transport. The global economy as currently organized
is destroying local production and promoting longdistance supply on the smallest items of everyday use.
Long-distance transport is subsidized while local, low
carbon emissions production and distribution is penalized. And the high emissions of long-distance transport
have been totally excluded in the Kyoto Protocol. Thus,
while the policies of the World Trade Organization
(WTO) have led to a huge increase in carbon dioxide
emissions due to global transportation, this increase is
not even accounted for in emission reduction targets.
We need not concern ourselves with the inevitable corporate cry that regulations destroy markets. After all,
even the market instrument of carbon trading requires
Outsourcing Pollution
Shiva
gasoline and diesel with ethanol and biodiesel, respectively, by 2020 has to be met, the industry would be
subsidized with 13.7 billion Euros ($18.9 billion) per
year. This subsidy pulls food away from the hungry. At
least 30 percent of the global food price rise in 2008
was due to biofuels; by 2020 food prices could rise by
an additional 76 percent because of such diversion.5
According to FAO in 20082009, 125 million metric tons of cereals were diverted to produce biofuels.
Around 40 percent of the corn produced in the United
States is being converted into ethanol.6
Former World Bank president Paul Wolfowitz said in
2006 that biofuels present an opportunity to add to
the worlds supply of energy to meet [an] enormous,
growing demand and hopefully to mitigate some of the
price effects. Its an opportunity to do so in an environmentally friendly way, in a way that is carbon neutral. 7
In contrast, in 2008 then World Bank president Robert
Zoellick stated, While many worry about filling their
gas tanks, many others around the world are struggling
to fill their stomachs. And its getting more and more
difficult every day.
Even when food is not used to produce biofuelor
when non-food crops such as jatropha are usedfoodgrowing land is diverted to biofuel production. Our
study Food vs. Fuel8 shows how pastures and common lands in Rajasthan, and rice-growing land in the
tribal areas of Chhattisgarh, have been appropriated for
jatropha cultivation for biodiesel.
There is now discussion about second generation
biofuels, which use cellulosic biomass rather than food
for biofuel. Second generation biofuels use forestry and
agricultural by-products, such as wheat straw and corn
straw, or crops, such as switchgrass, that can be grown
where food crops cannot. However, these biofuels are
not expected to fully reach the market before 2018. The
challenge is to separate the cellulose from the lignin,
and then reduce it to simpler sugars by applying intense
heat or strong chemicals.
Outsourcing Pollution
2008/
2009
%
change
Change
2007/08
2008/09
Total production
2,132
2,287
+1.3%
+155 mmt
Total utilization*
2,120
2,202
1,013
1,029
+1.5%
+16 mmt
To animal feed
748
773
+3.3%
+25 mmt
To other uses
(incl. biofuel)
359
401
+11.7%
+42 mmt
To food
*Utilization is a combination of production and the use of stocks from the previous
year; stocks of cereals went up from 2007/08 to 2008/09 by about 80 million
metric tons.
Shiva
Outsourcing Pollution
en dnotes
1 Charles Fishman, The Wal-Mart Effect
(New York: Penguin, 2006), 102103.
2 Ibid., 103.
3 New Economics Foundation, Chinadependence:
The Second UK Interdependence Report (London:
2007), http://www.neweconomics.org/
publications/chinadependence.
4 Christian Aid, Coming Clean: Revealing the U.K.s
True Carbon Footprint (London: February, 2007), 6,
http://www.christianaid.org.uk/Images/comingclean-uk-carbon-footprint.pdf.
ENERGY