Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(1)
VIN is the average solar-panel voltage between Points 1 and 2
in Figure 1, and is the power-supply efficiency at the given
output power. Notice that the typical efficiency of the power
supply at a VIN of about 7.8 V and an output power of 825 mW
is around 87%. Using these numbers, IIN = 122 mA. This is
much greater than what Figure 1 shows the solar panel to be
capable of providing, so C3 must store enough energy to provide
the remaining current for 15 ms. Equation 2 determines the
required C3 value based on the load requirements and solar-panel
characteristics:
( )
( )
1 2
3
IN ON Panel Avg
P P
I I t
C
V V
>
(2)
VP1 and VP2 are the voltages at Points 1 and 2, which are
respectively about 9 V and 6.5 V for this panel, and correspond
to the voltage change across C3 as it discharges. The required
load operating time, given by tON, is 15 ms. Finally, IPanel(Avg)
is the average current from the solar panel when the panel is
operated within 90% of its MPP. As seen in Figure 1, this current
is about 19 mA. From Equation 2, it is determined that C3 should
be greater than 618 F. A 680-F capacitor is used to provide
some margin in the operating time.
R1, R2, and R3 form a fully configurable voltage divider with
hysteresis for the enable (EN) pin. Equations 3 and 4 are used to
set the resistor values:
1
1
2
1.20 1
P
R
V V
R
| |
= +
|
\ .
(3)
1
2
2 3
1.15 1
P
R
V V
R R
| |
= +
|
+
\ .
(4)
R1 is chosen first, and 1 M is a good starting value. With this,
R2 is calculated to be 153.8 k. The closest standard value of
154 k is chosen. R3 should be 60.9 k, and
60.4 k is the nearest standard value.
Voltage Sensor-
To measure the voltage which is provided by the solar panel
two resistorsR1 and R2 act as as voltage devider when employed
in parallel with the solar panel. The voltage across R2 is fed in to
a ADC converter and in the voltage follower configuration that is
fed to the low pass filter before fedding to the ADCINA0 which
is a channel of MPPT controller. If we take R1 1.07 M and R2
165 k respectively than the maximum amount of current from
the load is 12. The voltage range is 0-3 Vdc for MPPT controller.
Ayushi Vaishy, et al International Journal of Research in Electronics & Communication Engineering [Volume 1, Issue 1, April 2013]
Webpage: http://ijrece.org Page 8
Fig. 5: Sensing circuit of voltage sensor
Fig: 6: Sensing circuit of Current Sensor
To measure current which is provided by the solar panel a
resistor is placed in between solar panel and DC-DC converter in
series. Current sensors are made by analog devices by which
output voltage is fed to the ADC. The voltage across resistor is
fed to the ADCINA1. OP-AMP is in voltage follower
configuration that pass through a low pass filter before feding to
ADCINA1 channel of of MPPT controler. By choosing the value
of resistor 51 m maximum voltage drop across the resistor
occurs. The voltage range of ADC channel of MPPT controller
0-3 Vdc so the output voltage of AD8215 current sensor which
is voltage representation of solar panels current should not
exceed to 3 Vdc.
III. SIMULATION RESULTS & ANALYSIS
Figure 3 shows the MPPT circuit in operation. The panel
voltage, VIN, remains between 9 V and 6.5 V (VP1 and VP2,
respectively). Once VOUT enters regulation, the load enables
and draws 250 mA. When the panels voltage drops to 6.5 V,
VOUT is disabled and thereby disables the load current. The
solar panel provides an average of 19 mA at all times. The load
has a run time of around 18 ms in Figure 3, meeting the 15-ms
requirement. This run time roughly matches the calculations,
since the value of C3 increased above the result of those
calculations. Figure 4 replaces the output-voltage trace in Figure
3 with the trace for ICap, the current from C3. As VIN decreases,
the current leaving the capacitor is positivethe capacitor
provides its stored energy to the power supply, which then
supplies that energy to the load. Once the load turns off, due to
the panel voltage decreasing to 6.5 V and the power supply
disabling, the current from C3 goes negativethe capacitor
recharges from the panel and stores energy for the next cycle.
The current from C3 spikes briefly before the load is enabled, as
the power supply turns on when the panel voltage is sufficiently
high. Additional input current provided by C3 is needed during
start-up.
Fig: 7: Operation of MPPT circuit within 90% of MPP
Fig: 8: Bulk input capacitor (C3) supplying a circuit operating
within 90% of MPP
Fig: 9: RS vs Reciprocal of Irradiance
Ayushi Vaishy, et al International Journal of Research in Electronics & Communication Engineering [Volume 1, Issue 1, April 2013]
Webpage: http://ijrece.org Page 9
Fig: 10: Angle of Incidence vs Relative Output Current
Fig: 11: VOC vs ln(irradiance)
Fig: 12: VMP vs Illumination (Lux) for Low Irradiance
Fig: 13: PV Output Power at 1000W/m2 and 400W/m2
vs PV Voltage and Current
IV. CONCLUSIONS
When the battery in the off grid system are fully charged and
the PV production exceeds to the local load so the excess power
has no load to absorb it and MPPT no more operate at its
maximumum power point. So MPPT must shift its operating
point till production does not matches the demand. A well
engineered renewable remote energy system, utilizing the
principal of Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) can
improve cost effectiveness, has a higher reliability and can
improve the quality of life in remote areas. A high-efficient
power electronic converter, for converting the output voltage of a
solar panel, or wind generator, to the required DC battery bus
voltage has been realized.
The converter is controlled to track the maximum power point
of the input source under varying input and output parameters.
Maximum power point tracking for relative small systems is
achieved by maximization of the output current in a battery
charging regulator, using an optimized hill-climbing, inexpensive
microprocessor based algorithm. Through practical field
measurements it is shown that a minimum input source saving of
between 15 to 25% on 35 kWh/day systems are easily be
achieved. A total cost saving of at least 1015% on the capital
cost of these systems are achieveable for relative small rating
Remote Area Power Supply (RAPS) systems. The advantages at
large temperature variations and high power rated systems are
much higher. Other advantages include optimal sizing and system
monitor and control.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors are thankful to Mr. Aseem Chauhan (Additional
President, RBEF and Chancellor AUR, Jaipur), Maj. General K.
K. Ohri (AVSM, Retd.) Pro-VC, Amity University, Lucknow,
Prof. S. T. H. Abidi (Director ASET, Lucknow Campus), Brig.
U. K. Chopra (Director AIIT & Dy. Director ASET), Prof O. P.
Singh (HOD, Electrical & Electronics) and Prof. N. Ram (Dy.
Director ASET) for their motivation, kind cooperation, and
suggestions.
REFERENCES
[1] G Hsiao Y.T. e C.H. Chen C.H., Maximum Power Tracking
for Photovoltaic Power System in Proceedings of IEEE
Industry Applications Conference - 37th IAS Annual
Meeting, 2002.
[2] Sera D., Kerekes T., Teodorescu R., Blaabjerg F., Improved
MPPT Algorithms for Rapidly Changing Environmental
Conditions in the Proceedings of Power Electronics and
Motion Control Conference, EPEPEMC 06, 2006.
[3] T. Noguchi, S. Togashi, R. Nakamoto, Short-Current Pulse
Based Maximum Power Point Tracking Method for Multiple
Photovoltaic and Converter Module System, IEEE Trans.
Industrial Electronics, 2002.
[4] Ortiz R. E. I., A MPPT Method based on the
Approximation of a PVM Model using Fractional
Polynomials in Proceedings of IEEE Power Electronics
Specialists Conference, PESC2007.
[5] D. Casadei; G. Grande e C. Rossi.: Single-Phase Single-
Stage based Photovoltaic Generation System Based on a
Ayushi Vaishy, et al International Journal of Research in Electronics & Communication Engineering [Volume 1, Issue 1, April 2013]
Webpage: http://ijrece.org Page 10
Ripple Correlation Control Maximum Power Point
Tracking, IEEE Trans. Energy Conversion, 2006.
[6] Markvart T.: Solar Electricity, John Wiley & Sons, 1994.
[7] Lorenzo E., Araujo G.L., Cuevas A., Egidio M.A., Miano
J.C., Ziles R.: Eletricidad Solar Ingenieria De Los Sistemas
Fotovoltaicos; PROGENSA, 1 edicin, 1994.
[8] CRESESBE/CEPEL: Energia solar Princpios e
Aplicaes. Centro de Referncia para Energia Solar e
Elica Sergio de Salvo Brito: Sistema Eletrobrs, Brasil,
2000.
[9] ALTENER/GREENPRO: Energia Fotovoltaica:Manual
sobre tecnologias projeto e instalao; Unio Europia,
2004.
[10] C. Cabal; C. Alonso; A. Cid-Pastor; B. Estibals; L. Seguier,
R. Leyva, G. Schweitz, J. Alzieu.: Adaptive digital MPPT
control for photovoltaic applications in Proceedings of
IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronic,
2007.
[11] Energy comparison of MPPT techniques for PV Systems,
ROBERTO FARANDA, SONIA LEVA
[12] ADVANCED ALGORITHM FOR MPPT CONTROL OF
PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS, C. Liu, B. Wu and R.
Cheung
[13] On the control of photovoltaic maximum power point tracker
via output parameters, D. Shmilovitz
[14] An investigation of new control method for MPPT in PV
array using DC DC buck boost converter, Dimosthenis
Peftitsis, Georgios Adamidis and Anastasios Balouktsis
AUTHORS BIBLIOGRAPHY
Dr. Ajita Pathak PhD (Lucknow University), M.Sc (
Electronics) from Jivaji University Gwalior is a member of
academic staff of Department of Electronics & Electrical
Engineering (ASET), Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow,
where she is serving in the capacity of Asstt. Professor in the
Department of Electronics Engineering (ASET).
Mr. Rajinder Tiwari, PhD (P), M.Tech, MIETE
is a member of academic staff of Department of
Electronics & Electrical Engineering (ASET),
Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow,
where he is serving in the capacity of Asstt.
Professor in the Department of Electronics
Engineering (ASET). He has done M.Tech
(I&CE) and M.Sc (Electronics) from NIT, Kurukshetra and
University of Jammu, respectively. Presently, he is pursuing
Ph.D. (ECE) from Department of Electronics Engineering,
Kumaon Engineering College, Dawarahat (Almora) under
Uttarakhand Technical University. Mr. Tiwari has given his
contribution to the area of Microelectronics (Modeling &
Simulation of the Analog CMOS Circuits for ASP Applications),
Embedded System Design, Digital System Design and Process
Industries Automation and Control System Design (using
Graphical Programming Language with dedicated Hardware). He
has published several research papers in International/National
Journals/Seminar/Conference. He is associated with several
technical institutions and bodies as a life member. Before taking
the assignment of Amity University, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, he
had worked in Electronics for Societal Group, CEERI, Pilani, as
a Project Scientist and a Multi National Company as a Sr.
Software Engineer (Bridge Instrumentation Division). He is also
associated with the successfully implementation of the Hardware
and Software for number of projects undertaken by him and in
organizing number of International/National Conferences and
Seminars.
Ms. Ayushi Vaishy, M.Tech (P) from Amity University Uttar
Pradesh, Lucknow in Electronics and
Communication Engineering and did B.Tech
from Saroj Institute of Technology and
Management, Lucknow in Electronics and
Communicationn engineering in the year
2010. Her area of intrest in research field is
Wireless Communication. She has published
research paper by the name An Innovative
Solution to Empower the WiMAX Grid Network for Smart
Applications: An Innovation in Intelligent Networks Approach
in a international journal.. Presentely working on project wireless
communications with MATLAB and Simulink : IEEE.802.16
(WiMax) Physical layer as the part of her M.Tech final
dissertation.