982075117

75

76

2003

21

Trelease2001

2002

(Programme for

International Student Assessment, PISA)

2001b19782000

107

2003

50%

2001b

2001

2007

20002000

2007

IndrisanoChall(1995)

2001b1981

2001b

Head Start

200120012003

1.

Aaron & Joshi, 1992

77

2.

Nicholson

1999

2003

1.

2.

2006

20031999

2000

Fry2002

2000

word

78

2.

75

2002

3.

2.0

1999b.45

1002006

5070

100

1.

100

2.

3.

10

2003

OECD
PISA
15

2003

1.

79

2007

12

2001a

Di rk i n1966

1999a

2004

1.

1991

-Grapheme-

phoneme Conversion

2004Indrisano & Chall, 1995

1991

1995

2001

(PIRLS)9

2007

80

3.

1999a

2.

Gagn1998

2001

2002

20041998

1999a1994

2005
1literal comprehens-

ion

Siok(2004)

2006

lexical

accessparsing

2inferential compre-

hension

integration

The National Reading

su m ma r ization

Panel (NRP)

elaboration

Therrien

& Kubu i na, 2006Ku h n & St a h l

(2003)

2007

3comprehension
monitoring

2005a

metacognition

81

2006

2005

200019962003

2007

20032004

Henry & Simpson, 2001

2006

1.

(Fuchs, Fuchs

& Hosp, 2001)

2.

Scheinkman(2004)

2006

picture

b o okspict u re

story books

2000

1995

82

2000

Fry2002

20062006

Rea d abil it y

levelingFry

2002

1.

2000

45

20032000

2004Huck, Hepler, Hickman, & Kiefer,

1997

Fry2002

2.

2001a

2003

20061991

Peterson1991

20002004

2001a

RogBurton2002

83

20052007

2006

3.

20052006

20052006

2007

2005

2007

2005

200820032006

2006

20062008

20072006

2006

200620042005

2001b

2007

200520052006

84

2001

1981

1996

wo r d

1987

1981

(morpheme)

(character)

word

1.

1987

3.

1998

Thorndike1973

.66.75

2000

Aaron & Joshi, 1992Singer

Crouse1981

3%

51%
2000

2001

.7

2.

2002

1886Cattell

.63

Word Superiority

40%

Effe ct s

2003

1981

wo r d

superiority effect

1989

85

2.

(Nichols, Rupley, &

Mergen, 1998Rupley & Nichols,

2005)

1.

1999

2005

1978

Brom ley(2007)

2003

Rupley &

Nichols(2005)

1978

Vacca2000

2001

86

2.

12

2-1

1.

1.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

2005

2.

6.

3.

7.

4.

9.

8.

10.

2004

11.

12.

2-1

2005

2007

87

2-1

2-1

2-2
2-12-2

1.

2.

3.

4.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

1.

2.

3.

2-2

88

learning disabilities

Lerner,
2000

Lyon & Moats, 1997

Williams, 1998

2006

2000

Stanovich(1986)

Masterson Evans1993

2006

MacInnis Hemming (1995)

12

2002

2005

Aaron & Joshi1992

89

2.

multiple probe

across subjects design

1994

3.

70%

80%

2006

101

100

4.

1.

90

2002

2.0
3.

1999b

.45

1.

75

2.

3-1

3-1

77

86

76

82

91

74

78

85

83

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.39

0.29

0.22

.93
.89.96

1.

22

29Fry(2002)

Hope2007

2003Fry, 2002Rog

& Burton, 2002

1-5001-1000

1-5001-1000

29

150400

91

400500

70%80

40%2218

80%90%

10%1-500

3-2

3-2

1-1000

1-500

1-1000

1-500

183 44.81% 64.48% 0

80.87%

1 63.41% 0 80.49% 1

190 44.21% 80.00% 2

91.58%

2 71.43% 1 88.10% 1

199 33.67% 71.36% 1

79.90%

0 76.12% 1 88.06% 1

202 40.10% 79.70% 1

82.67%

1 81.48% 2 87.65% 1

210 45.24% 71.43% 1

86.19%

1 68.42% 0 86.32% 1

211 45.02% 67.77% 0

75.36%

0 71.58% 1 82.11% 1

227 44.49% 65.20% 0

76.65%

0 70.30% 1 84.16% 1

238 50.42% 76.47% 1

85.71%

1 64.17% 0 80.00% 1

257 49.81% 81.71% 2

87.94%

1 67.97% 0 80.47% 1

264 46.59% 83.71% 2

90.15%

2 70.73% 1 82.11% 1

337 43.03% 71.51% 1

83.38%

1 65.52% 0 78.62% 0

341 38.71% 73.02% 1

85.63%

1 60.61% 0 75.76% 0

381 45.43% 80.94% 2

91.64%

2 71.84% 1 83.33% 1

385 40.00% 70.91% 1

80.00%

1 71.43% 1 84.42% 1

395 46.08% 73.42% 1

92.66%

2 70.33% 1 89.01% 1

418 35.41% 84.21% 2

94.02%

2 79.05% 1 92.57% 2

420 43.81% 80.71% 2

87.86%

1 73.91% 1 86.41% 1

439 34.85% 87.24% 2

96.81%

2 78.43% 1 92.16% 2

469 36.25% 80.81% 2

96.59%

2 72.35% 1 91.76% 2

501 32.73% 84.43% 2

89.62%

1 76.83% 1 86.59% 1

594 34.34% 64.48% 0

71.72%

0 69.61% 0 83.33% 1

711 31.22% 76.09% 1

87.06%

1 67.12% 0 83.78% 1

92

2.

120

2007

2007

2007

15

10

120

3-3

3-3

10

10

10

1.

2.

93

A4

3.

ITEMAN

1.

.2

.2

2.

.2

.2.8

.2

160
24960

3.

.7.810

.71.839

4.

.95.92.95

94

.94

4.

0%30%

0%4-1

5.

100%

90%100%

0%C
.05

92.5%

80%

A
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
% 0

B
100 100 100 100 100

100
90
80

30

0
1

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

100 100

100

100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
% 0

100

90

4-1

90

90
80 80

90
80
70

20
10
0 0
1

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

1.

100
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
% 0

90 90

90 90
80

10
0

0
1

90
70 70 70

0 0
8

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

4-1

95

4-1

80%100%

80%

90%0%C

75%

.01

80%100%

75%

25%

2.

4-1

0%20%

100%

80%100%

70%90C

90%

0%C.01

80%

75%

70%90%C

25%

70%90%C

3.

0%10%

96

4-1

()

+ +

()

+ +

()

()

0%

100%

75%

25% 83.33% 100%

80%

100%

75%

0~30 90~100 80~100

0~20 80~100 70~90

0-10

10% 98.33% 92.5%

7.5% 93.33% 80%

2%

90%

75%

0%

83.33% 75%

83.33% 50%

0%

0-0

100-100 100-100 20-10 100-100 70-90

0-0

90-90

70-90

()

()

()

(+20)

()

BA

()
CB

() ( + ) ( + ) ( + )

0%

80~100 70~90

(-10)

()

(+20)

BA

CB

() ( + ) ( + ) ( + )

66.67% 75%

BA

CB

() () () ( + )

0-100

100-100

10-100

100-70

0-90

90-70

(+100)

()

(+90)

(-30)

(+90)

(-20)

0%

75%

0%

75%

0%

25%

0.6084

0.0566

0.71702

0.00628

0.77525

0.30279

2.0567*

0.19912

2.52234**

0.02208

2.83082**

1.06515

*p<.05 **p<.01

1.

10%20%

4-2

4-2

70%

100%

100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
% 0

100

2.

80

70

20 20
10

10%40%20%
4

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

100

100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
% 0

80

80 80

100 100 100

100

97

100

100

4-2

100

80

80 80

80

70%100%

70

70
40

10

20

60%
0%C

10

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

.01

100

100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
% 0

80

100 100 100

100

80

80

80%
80

70

30

30

30
20
10

80%70%

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

4-2

70%0%

70%100%

.05

100%C

70%

3.

100%

10%

30%4-2

100%C

70%100%

98

4-2

()

()

+ +

()

()

()

66.67% 50%

75%

25%

50%

25%

60%

50%

75%

10~20 70~100 80~100 10~40 70~100 70~100

10-30 70~100 80~100

16.67% 86.67% 95%

20%

85%

87.5%

24%

85%

95%

0%

50%

75%

25%

50%

25%

0%

50%

75%

20-10 80-100 80-100

(-10)

(+20)

BA

(+20)
CB

() () () ( + )

10-10 70-100 100-70

()

(+30)

BA

(-30)
CB

( + ) ( + ) ( + ) ()

30-30

70-80 100-80

(=)

(+10)

BA

(-20)
CB

() ( + ) ( + ) ()

10-80

100-80

10-70

100-100

30-70

80-100

(+70)

(-20)

(+60)

()

(+40)

(+20)

0%

100%

0%

100%

0%

100%

0.61047

-0.01121

0.67887

-0.2669

0.81779

-0.0339

2.06375*

-0.3942

2.38812**

-0.9389

2.98613 **

-0.1193

*p<.05 **p<.01
0%C

.01

80%

85%

70%

80%100%

80

100%C

99

2003

2004

80%100%

4-3

70%100%

1114

20072008

100

4875

32

0%C

.01

100

1.

19204-3

65.25

A
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0

83
75
52

51

58

64

62

75%C
56 58

48

19 19 20

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0

61

56

54 54
44

51 55 52

2.

57

39

14
11 12

12

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

1114

100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0

4-3

87
64

68

58 55
53 50 52
47

12

51

56
3961

42

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

0%C

4-3

.01

100

101

4-3

+ + +

+ + +

()

()

()

100% 66.67% 75%

100% 66.67% 100%

60% 83.33% 25%

19~20 48~75 56~83

11~14 39~61 51~57

6-12

19.33 57.67 65.25 12.25% 51.33 53.75

8.2% 57.83 63.25

100%

50%

25%

50% 33.33% 100%

40%

50%

25%

19-20

52-75

64-83

12-14

56-61

51-57

7-6

65-52

47-51

(+1)

(+23)

(+19)

(+2)

(+5)

(+6)

(-1)

(-13)

(+4)

BA

CB

(+) (+) (+) (+)

52~65 47~87

BA

CB

(+) (+) (+) (+)

BA

CB

() () () ()

20-52

75-64

14-56

61-51

6-64

52-47

(+32)

(-11)

(+42)

(-10)

(+59)

(-5)

0%

75%

0%

100%

0%

25%

0.74546

0.08261

0.67127

0.15288

0.70415

0.04398

2.52012**

0.2906

2.36141**

0.53781

2.57118**

0.1547

*p<.05 **p<.01

3.

51

57

612

4-3

100%C

6452

65

59

102

0%C

.01

100

1.

53%63%

4-44-4

478763.25

95%

47

84%97%

8768

32%0%C

.01

100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
% 20
10
0

25%C

97
90 93 94

95

93 92 93

98

84
63

56
53

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
% 20
10

94

90 90

90

94

88 89 89 91

82
47

44
39
34

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

97

100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
% 20
10

95 92

88 88

91

98 95
88

91

54
38
41

35

28

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

4-4

103

2.

92%98%

34%47%

75%

82%94%

47%0%C

.01

4-4

+ + +

+ + +

()

()

66.67% 100%

100%

50%

100%

100%

60%

100%

100%

34~47 82~94 88~91

28-54

90~97 88~98

53~63 84~97 92~98

57.33% 92.17% 94%

66.67% 83.33% 100%

41%

90%

89%

39.2% 93.17% 93%

50% 83.33% 100%

40%

100%

100%

56-63

95-97

93-98

34-47

94-94

88-91

41-28

97-91

88-91

(+7)

(+2)

(+5)

(+13)

()

(+3)

(-13)

(-6)

(+3)

BA

CB

(+) (+) (+) (+)

BA

CB

(+) (+) (+) (+)

BA

CB

( + ) () () ()

63-95

97-93

47-94

94-88

28-97

91-88

(+32)

(-4)

(+47)

(-6)

(+69)

(-3)

0%

75%

0%

100%

0%

75%

0.71738

0.01253

0.76312

-0.0009

0.61265

0.31967

2.42518**

0.0441

2.68453**

-0.0032

2.23707*

1.12455

*p<.05 **p<.01

104

88%91%

6%100%C

3.

2006

2007

28%54%

39.2%

97%90%97%

69%0%C

100

.05

88%98%

75%

4-5

90%

75%

105

80%

1.

40%60%

80%100%

4-5

100%C

70%100%

0%

C
.05

2.

100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
% 0

100
90 90

90

90

30%40%4-5

80
80

60

80

80

70

50
40

70%100%
0%C

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

.05

100

100

100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
% 0

100
90

90

90
80

80 80
60

70

80%90%

40 40

30

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
% 0

100 100 100 100

100
90

100%

70

70
60

70
60

40
30
30
20

90%80
C

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

4-5

3.

106

4-5

()

+ +

()

()

()

()

33.33% 83.33% 75%

50%

50%

100%

0%

40~60 70~90 80~100 30~60 70~100 80~100

83.33% 100%

20-60 60~100 100~100

50% 83.33% 87.5%

42.5% 86.67% 90%

38% 76.67% 100%

33.33% 83.33% 75%

50%

50%

50%

0%

50%

100%

60-40

80-90 80-100

60-30 70-100 90-80

60-30

70-90 100-100

(-20)

(+10)

(-30)

(-30)

(+20)

BA

(+20)
CB

() ( + ) ( + ) ( + )

(+30)

(-10)

BA

CB

() ( + ) ( + ) ()

BA

()
CB

() ( + ) ( + ) ()

40-80

90-80

30-70

100-90

30-70

90-100

(+40)

(-10)

(+40)

(-10)

(+40)

(+10)

0%

100%

0%

100%

0%

100%

0.4876

-0.6471

0.63481

-0.0603

0.50462

0.44296

1.64839*

-2.2762

2.23316*

-0.212

1.84259*

1.55825

*p<.05 **p<.01

20%60%38%

100%C

4-5

70%

60%100%

0%C
.05

100%

107

4-6

2005

2006

20052008

12

2007

345

3.67 4 4.33

3.67 3.33 3.67 3.56

4.5 3.5 4.5 4.17 3.5

3.5

3.67

3.83

3.5

4.5

4.5

4.5 3.83

4-6

10

4-6

4-6

108

36
52

4-6

4-6

2547

37

35

109

1.

2.

1.

2.

1.

110

2.

3.

3.

4.

4.

2007

2007127

htt p://residence.educities.edu.tw/

1.

wei3128/download/articlepgwei.htm

2007PIRLS 2006

2007

1215

ht t p://www.ch i nese e du.h k u.h k/

ChineseTeachingMethod/PIRLS/P06/

Background/index.htm

2.

Hope

2007

20071210

http://edu.nttu.edu.tw/NFL/contents/

111

analy/analy_list.asp?menuID=369

20072008
11
http://ckipsvr.iis.sinica.edu.tw/

2000

2007

18207-235

2007

2005

1216

http://elearning.ling.sinica.edu.tw/

CWordfreq.html

2001

2003FUN

2001a

1991
43
229-36
200712

38620071215

http://reading.cw.com.tw/pages/

public/fourm/20071205.htm

2005

2001b

11

4331-344

2004

2005a/

36195-124
2006

2005

2007

2003

1984

3137-52

2001

1994Tawney, J. W., &

112

Gast, D. L.

1996
729-31

2002

1999a

Trelease, J.

81-119

2001

1993

1999b

4077-99

1998Gagne, E. D. &

Yekovich, C. W.

2000

1993

4711-25

2002

1989
31133-39

1995

29-76

1999

2000

2006

2007
2008113
htt p://163.22.168.15/profile/
prole01.asp
2006

2006

2006

2004

2005

2003

113

2000

1999

2005

91-113

2002

2003

2006

2179-103

2005

2008

1987

2005

29

145-50

2002

191-26
2006

2006

1991

2006

2007

29-57

2002

540-582

2003

114

1991

2006

404-448

2006

1981
232137-153
1994

2006

2003

2005

261-265
2005

2003

2001

1978

20

29-37

(NSC89-2413-H-

1987

29151-61
1995

2003

2003

024-015-)
2004

1998

1999

1996

38111-30

Aa ron, P. G., & Joshi, R. M. (1992).

Reading problems: Consultation and
remediation. New York: The Guilford
Press.
Bromley, K. (2007). Nine things every
teacher should know about words and
vocabulary instruction. Journal of
Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(7),
528-537.
F r y , E . ( 2 0 0 2 ) . R e a d a bi l it y ve r s u s
Leveling. Reading Teacher, 56(3),
286-291.
Henry, R. & Simpson, C. (2001). Picture
Books & Older Readers: A Match
Made in Heaven. Teacher Librarian,
28(3), pp.23-27.
Huck, C. S., Hepler, S., Hickman, J., &
Kiefer, B. (1997). Children's literature
in the elementary school (6th ed).
Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
Ind r isa no, R. & Cha l l, J. S. (1995).
Literacy development. Journal of
Education, 177(1), 63-83.
Kuh n, M. R., & St a hl, S. A. (2003).
Fluency: A review of developmental
and remedial practices. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 95(1), 3-21.
Lerner, J. W. (2000). Learning disabilities:
Theories, diagnosis and teaching
strategies (8th ed. ). Boston, MA:
Houghton Mif in Co.
Lyon, R., & Moats, L. C. (1997). Critical
concept ua l a nd met ho dologica l
considerations in reading intervention
r e s e a r ch . J ou r n a l o f L e a r n i ng

115

Disabilities, 30(6), 578-588.

MacInnis, C., & Hemming, H. (1995).
Lin king the needs of students of
students with learning disabilities to a
whole language curriculum. Journal
of Learning Disabilities, 28, 534-544.
Rog, L. J. & Burton, W. (2002). Matching
texts a nd readers: Leveling ea rly
reading materials for assessment and
instruction. The Reading Teacher,
55(4), 348-356.
Rupley, W. H., & Nichols, W. D. (2005).
Vo cabula r y i nst r uction for t he
struggling reader . Reading & Writing
Quarterly, 21(3), 239-260.
Scheinkman, N. (2004). Picturing a story.
Teaching pre k-8, 34(6), 58-59.
Siok, W. T., Perfetti, C. A., Jin, Z., & Tan,
L. H. (2004). Biological abnormality
of impaired reading is constrained by
culture. Nature, 431(2), 71-76.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects
i n rea di ng: Some conse quences
of i ndividua l dif ferences i n t he
a cqu isition of l it era cy. Rea ding
Research Quarterly, 21, 360-470.
Therrien, W. J. & Kubuina, R. M. (2006).
Developong reading f luency with
repeated reading. Inter vention in
School & Clinic, 41(3), 156-160.
Vacca, J. L., Vacca, R. T., & Gove, M.
K. (2000). Reading and learning to
read(4th ed). New York: Longman.
W i l l i a m s , J . P . ( 1 9 9 8 ) . I m p r ov i n g
comprehension of disabled readers.
Annals of Dyslexia, 48, 213-238.

116

The Effect of Vocabulary-Based Picture Book Instruction on

the Reading Performance for Elementary School Students with
Learning Disabilities
Hsiao-Fang Chiu

Shin-Yi Chan

Tainan Municipal Haidian Elementary School

Department of Special Education

National University of Tainan

ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study is to explore reading effects of vocabulary-based picture
book instruction on the elementary school students with learning disabilities. The
vocabulary-based picture book instruction promotes students reading performance by
reading picture books and understanding the meaning of vocabulary via teaching students
the meaning of vocabulary with the characteristic of picture books and context clues.
The multiple probes across subjects design of single-subject research is used in this
study. This study conducts the six-unit courses of picture book instruction for three second
grade students with learning disabilities. The study explores students progress on the
performance of vocabulary ability test, reading fluency test, and reading comprehension
test. The results of this study shows as the follows:
1. The vocabulary-based picture book instruction has immediate and maintaining
effects on the performance of vocabulary ability test.
(1) The vocabulary-based picture book instruction has immediate and maintaining
effects on the performance of word recognition test.
(2) The vocabulary-based picture book instruction has immediate and maintaining
effects on the performance of word meaning test.
2. The vocabulary-based picture book instruction has immediate and maintaining
effects on the performance of reading uency test.
(1) The vocabulary-based picture book instruction has immediate and maintaining
effects to improve the students performance of picture book reading on the rate
of correct words per minute.
(2) The vocabulary-based picture book instruction has immediate and maintaining
effects to improve the students performance of picture book reading on the
accuracy of word recognition.

117

3. The vocabulary-based picture book instruction has immediate and maintaining

effects on the performance of reading comprehension test.
4. Elementary school students with learning disabilities and their mentors conrmed
that vocabulary-based picture book instruction could improve the reading performance of
the students with learning disabilities.
According to the ndings, several suggestions for instruction and future research were
proposed.
Key words: vocabulary-based, picture book instruction, students with learning disabilities,
reading performance, reading uency, reading comprehension