Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aaron
Palm
|
07565887
|
Supervisor
-
Dr
Wim
Dekkers
Bachelor
of
Mechanical
Engineering
EN40
Faculty
of
Science
and
Engineering
2013
Statement
of
Authorship
The
work
contained
in
this
project
report
has
not
been
previously
submitted
for
a
degree
or
diploma
at
any
other
tertiary
educational
institution.
To
the
best
of
my
knowledge
and
belief,
the
project
report
contains
no
material
previously
published
or
written
by
another
person
except
where
due
reference
is
made.
Signed
__________
Name
Aaron
J.
Palm
Date
31/5/2013
Abstract
This
study
will
focus
on
the
integration
of
a
positive
displacement
supercharger
to
a
naturally
aspirated
engine.
The
positive
displacement
supercharger
increases
the
charge
density
of
the
working
medium
(air
or
air-fuel
mixture)
(Hiereth
&
Prenninger,
2007),
by
displacing
a
greater
volume
of
the
working
medium
into
the
work
cylinder
in
comparison
with
a
naturally
aspirated
engine.
Furthermore,
there
are
several
elements
that
can
have
an
adverse
effect
on
the
volumetric
efficiency
of
an
internal
combustion
engine.
Such
factors
include
the
intake
port
geometry
of
the
cylinder
head,
where
the
working
medium
is
transferred
from
the
end
of
the
intake
manifold
to
the
work
cylinder.
The
ports
of
a
cylinder
head
are
often
tailored
to
increase
the
fluids
mass
within
the
working
cylinder,
while
maintaining
a
satisfactory
flow
velocity
through
the
port
by
manipulating
the
radii
of
the
curves
within
the
port
and
other
geometric
factors
to
overcome
restrictions
and
optimise
the
volumetric
efficiency
of
the
cylinder
head,
while
retaining
specific
geometries
to
promote
the
mixture
of
the
working
fluid.
Table
of
Contents
Statement
of
Authorship
.............................................................................................................
2
Abstract
.............................................................................................................................................
3
Table
of
Figures
..............................................................................................................................
5
List
of
Tables
....................................................................................................................................
5
Introduction
.....................................................................................................................................
6
1.
Literature
Review
..................................................................................................................
6
1.1.
Working
fluid
mass
effects
on
IMEP
.......................................................................................
6
1.2.
Charging
the
intake
flow
............................................................................................................
7
1.3.
Effects
of
intake
duct
geometry
on
cylinder
outflow
........................................................
8
1.3.1.
Gas
Flow
......................................................................................................................................................
8
1.3.2.
Discharge
Coefficient
.............................................................................................................................
9
1.3.3.
Port
Geometry
........................................................................................................................................
11
2.
Experimentations
................................................................................................................
13
2.1.
Flow
Bench
Experiment
...........................................................................................................
13
2.1.1.
Background
.............................................................................................................................................
13
2.1.2.
Boundary
Conditions
..........................................................................................................................
17
2.1.3.
Method
.......................................................................................................................................................
19
2.1.4.
Results
.......................................................................................................................................................
21
2.1.5.
Discussion
................................................................................................................................................
21
3.
Review
......................................................................................................................................
22
References
......................................................................................................................................
23
Bibliography
..................................................................................................................................
23
Appendices
One
............................................................................................................................
24
Table
of
Figures
Figure
1
Particle
Flow
Regimes
at
a
Restricted
Area
Change
(Blair,
1999)
..................................................................
8
Figure
2
Outflow
from
a
cylinder
or
plenum
to
a
pipe
(Blair,
1999)
.................................................................................
9
Figure
3
Definitions
of
Basic
Parameters
(Son,
Lee,
Han,
&
Kim,
2004)
............................................................................
11
Figure
4
Measuring
the
discharge
coefficients
of
orifices,
bell
mouths
and
plain
pipe
ends.
(Blair,
1999)
......
13
Figure
5
Exploded
isometric
view
of
dummy
cylinder
adapter
.............................................................................................
14
Figure
6
Isometric
drawing
of
dummy
cylinder
and
manufacturing
image
of
dummy
cylinder
comparison
.
14
Figure
7
Drilling
bolt
pattern
into
cylinder
head
mount
plate
.............................................................................................
15
Figure
8
Completed
dummy
cylinder
adapter
..............................................................................................................................
15
Figure
9
Spring
comparison
..................................................................................................................................................................
16
Figure
10
Cylinder
head
assembly
......................................................................................................................................................
16
Figure
11
Valve
actuating
bridge
.......................................................................................................................................................
17
Figure
12
Cylinder
head
coupled
to
dummy
cylinder
adapter
...............................................................................................
17
Figure
13
Yamaha
YZF-R6
Cylinder
Head
setup
for
flow
bench
testing
(exhaust
side)
..............................................
19
Figure
14
Yamaha
YZF-R6
Cylinder
Head
setup
for
flow
bench
testing
(intake
side)
.................................................
20
Figure
15
Yamaha
YZF-R6
Cylinder
Head
with
valve
actuating
apparatus
attached
................................................
20
List
of
Tables
Table
1
Basic
Design
Parameters
(Son,
Lee,
Han,
&
Kim,
2004)
...........................................................................................
11
Introduction
A
naturally
aspirated
engine
works
on
the
principle
where
the
pressure
difference
between
the
intake
port
and
work
cylinder
draws
air
through
the
intake
where
the
ports
are
tailored
to
obtain
the
greatest
volumetric
efficiency
possible.
Once
the
induction
of
the
engine
becomes
forced
by
the
means
of
a
supercharger,
the
volumetric
efficiency
of
the
cylinder
head
decreases
for
the
same
port
geometry.
Therefore,
the
port
geometries,
once
tailored
to
suit
a
naturally
aspirated
engine
must
be
modified
to
suit
the
increase
in
flow
rate
and
pressure.
This
study
will
take
the
cylinder
head
from
a
naturally
aspirated
2003
Yamaha
YZF-R6
motorcycle
engine,
where
the
necessary
port
modifications
will
be
carried
out
to
suit
the
flow
characteristics
produced
by
an
S5-150
positive
displacement
twin-screw
blower.
1. Literature
Review
1.1. Working
fluid
mass
effects
on
IMEP
The
internal
combustion
engine
produces
a
power
output
by
transforming
the
chemical
energy
stored
within
fuel
to
heat
energy.
This
transformation
occurs
by
combusting
the
fuel,
in
conjunction
with
oxygen
extracted
from
the
air
mass
within
the
work
cylinder.
This
heat
energy
acts
on
a
piston
that
drives
a
slider-crank
linkage,
which
successively
transforms
the
heat
energy
into
mechanical
energy.
Furthermore,
the
power
output
of
the
engine
depends
on
the
amount
of
air
within
the
cylinder.
This
air
quantity
is
related
to
the
mass
of
air
within
the
work
cylinder
rather
than
the
cylinder
volume,
the
air
mass
will
depict
the
fuel
mass
introduced
to
the
work
cylinder.
Where
the
mass
of
the
air
is
quantified
by
the
following
relationship,
!"# = !"# !"#$%
Furthermore,
since
the
Vcyl
is
constant,
the
mass
of
the
air
can
be
used
to
approximate
the
charge
density
of
the
air
(Hiereth
&
Prenninger,
2007).
Furthermore,
the
heat
energy
added
to
the
work
cylinder
can
be
quantified
by
the
following,
!"" =
!!"# !!"#$% !!"# !!"#
Where Qlow is the calorific value of fuel, which quantifies the amount of potential chemical energy that can be transformed into heat energy with complete combustion. Furthermore, the minimum air requirement for combustion is numerically defined by the factor Amin, where is the density of the working fluid, Vcyl is the volume of the working cylinder. Furthermore, with the assumption that the calorific value of the fuel and the minimum air requirement remain constant, the heat energy acting on the piston is directly proportional to the air density (Hiereth & Prenninger, 2007), !"" ! ,!"# 6
Furthermore, the indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP) is the average pressure that acts across the surface area of top of the piston. Furthermore, this is quantified by the following equation. = ! !"" !"#
Therefore, by substituting this into the equation (1), !"# = !"# !"#$% !"# ! !"#
By sustaining the former assumptions, with the additional assumption that there are no losses in the combustion process, subsequently the indicated efficiency (i) is 100%, the following may be stated, ~ !"#$%
Therefore, the density of the air within the cylinder has a direct influence on the indicated mean effective pressure.
speed of sound where the flow becomes sonic at the throat of the pipe (Blair, 1999). Furthermore, Therefore, the maximum Mach number possible is 1, ! ! = = 1 !" ! ! = !" ! Furthermore, such a phenomenon is known as sonic choking where the Mach number reaches 1 and shock waves develop caused by the pressure differential between the cylinder and pipe thus impeding the further development of flow velocity. 8
coefficients, in conjunction with the discharge coefficients of the remaining engine junctures are required for a complete engine simulation however, since this study is focused locally around the intake port, only the intake port discharge coefficient is required. Furthermore, the purpose of the discharge coefficient is to obtain the effective throat diameter of the receiving pipe, denoted by ! !"" , The effective throat diameter quantifies the boundary layer where the flow is continuous and is numerically defined by; ! !"" = ! ! Where CD is the local discharge coefficient for the given junction. Furthermore, it can be seen that by increasing the effective flow coefficient, the effective throat diameter will increase and converge on the geometric throat diameter, thus increasing the volumetric flow rate of the port. There are three ways to calculate the discharge coefficient, all three ways have been acknowledged by reputable engineers where each of the three values can be used to draw several conclusions. One of the methods determines the complete thermodynamic solution for the outflow from the atmosphere to the pipe (Blair, 1999), or intake port in this application. The result produced from such analysis is formerly recognised as the isentropic discharge coefficient, which is numerically defined by, 9
! !"#$%&'(!) = !"#$%&'(!) !"##$% !"## !"#$ !"#$
(Blair,
1999)
Thus
providing
a
ratio
between
the
maximum
flow
rate
achievable
and
the
actual
flow
rate.
Furthermore,
analysing
the
first
law
of
thermodynamics
and
performing
several
algebraic
calculations
the
isentropic
nozzle
mass
flow
rate
is
re-arranged
into
the
form
of
the
ports
effective
throat
diameter,
!" =
!!"#!$%&!'()* !" !!
! ! ! ! !! ! ! !! !!!
!!
! !! !!! !!
(Blair, 1999)
Where
the
discharge
coefficient
becomes,
!""!#$%&! !!!"#$ !"#! !!" ! !"#$%&'(!) = !"#$"%&'()* !!!"#$ !"#! = !"
(Blair,
1999)
The
second
method
is
the
ideal
discharge
coefficient,
numerically
defined
by,
! !"#$% =
!"#$%&"' !"## !"#$ !"#$ !"#$% !"#! !"#$ !"#$
(Blair, 1999)
In
this
approach
the
temperature
and
pressure
of
the
cylinder
(atmosphere)
are
kept
at
constant
measured
values.
Additionally,
the
throat
area
that
governs
the
ideal
mass
flow
rate
is
also
kept
constant,
and
is
replaced
by
the
geometrical
throat
area.
This
is
based
from
the
assumption
that
the
flow
is
not
isentropic
where
there
are
no
losses
in
flow
as
the
fluid
enters
the
port/pipe.
In
conclusion,
the
pressure
ratio,
!"#$%&'( !"#$$%"# ! = !"!# !"#$$%"# = !!
(Blair,
1999)
is
varied
until
the
value
of
the
pipe
pressure
matches
the
measured
pipe
pressure
value,
thus
producing
a
finite
value
for
the
ideal
mass
flow
rate
which
is
used
in
determining
the
ideal
discharge
coefficient.
The
final
approach
is
the
actual
discharge
coefficient,
which
is
quantified
by,
!""!#$%&! !!!"#$ !"#! !!" ! !"#$!% = !"#$"%&'()* !!!"#$ !"#! = !"
(Blair,
1999)
!
This method is very similar to the approach used to determine the ideal discharge coefficient. However in this case both the pressure ratio and the effective throat area are altered. Where the pressure ratio is altered in the same manner as the ideal discharge coefficient method and the effective throat diameter is altered until the mass flow rate directly corresponds with the experimental mass flow rate. Where the value effective throat diameter is used to determine the actual discharge coefficient.
10
Figure 3 Definitions of Basic Parameters (Son, Lee, Han, & Kim, 2004)
Table 1 Basic Design Parameters (Son, Lee, Han, & Kim, 2004)
11
Additionally it is noted that all of these parameters affect the discharge coefficient, however the Port Height is has the greatest influence on the discharge coefficient, due to the affect the port height has on the flow distribution on the valve. Additionally, if the port height is increased, the distribution across the back of the port becomes increasingly balanced, in result also reducing the amount of tumble.
12
2. Experimentations
2.1. Flow
Bench
Experiment
2.1.1. Background
To
yield
valid
flow
results
to
determine
the
actual
discharge
coefficient
an
intake
port,
a
flow-bench
is
required.
The
flow
bench
apparatus
draws
fluid
from
the
atmosphere
through
the
engine
ducting
being
examined
i.e.
ports,
intake
manifolds,
butted
joint
and
throttle
bodies.
This
negative
pressure
charge
(suction)
is
developed
by
a
vacuum
pump
located
downstream
from
the
test
subjects
as
seen
in
the
following
figure,
Figure 4 Measuring the discharge coefficients of orifices, bell mouths and plain pipe ends. (Blair, 1999)
Furthermore, the valve within the port of interest is actuated manually. This actuation is commonly induced by the means of a modified dial indicator, allowing the plunger to be set at several positions or valve lift increments. Furthermore, as the valve is opened the airflow created by the pump downstream is pulled through the cylinder head ducting and through a dummy cylinder. It is common practice, to place a bell mouth at the intake of the port to allow flow to develop and increase the effective throat diameter of the port, allowing the results to relate directly to the port geometry. Furthermore, once the fluid passes through the dummy cylinder it enters an air receiver, this allows the air to settle as the velocity decreases allowing the flow to leave the chamber in a laminar form. Additionally, the negative pressure magnitude that is induced onto the test subject is measured. A choked pipe leading to a metering element, which is an orifice plate meters, venturi meter or a pitot/static tube meter, follows the former elements. This meter measures the velocity of the air passing through the element, where the volumetric flow rate through the test subject can be determined.
13
2.1.1.1.
To accurately simulate the flow within the engine, the dummy cylinder must replicate the actual engine bore, thus yielding specific flow results. The dummy cylinder is made up of the cylinder that replicates the engines bore and two mounting plates to couple the head to the flow-bench.
Furthermore, the cylinder was simulated by using a 72 x 5 mm steel tube, where the inside diameter of the tube was machined to suit the bore of the YZF-R6 engine of 65.5 mm, which was then later honed. To mate the mounting plates to the cylinder, external steps at either end were machined to a press fit tolerance.
Figure 6 Isometric drawing of dummy cylinder and manufacturing image of dummy cylinder comparison
Additionally, studs are used to mate the cylinder head to the mounting plate to emulate the cylinder head being torqued down onto the cylinder. Therefore, the major diameter and hole centre dimensions of the YZF-R6 cylinder head studs were 14
required. Furthermore, the head gasket from the engine was therefore used to determine said dimensions, which were then drilled and tapped into a 12 mm thick steel plate along with the drilling of cylinders minor step diameter.
This step was also repeated for the flow-bench mounting plate, where 4 holes with 160 mm centres were drilled. Once machined, the plates were pressed onto the cylinder, with a support welded in between the plates at the opposing end to the cylinder. Once together, each mounting face was sanded back and the leading edges de-burred.
15
2.1.1.2.
To actuate the valves in the flow test, the modified dial indicator must be able to deliver the same degree of lift that the camshaft would provide in the running engine. Furthermore, the high compression valve springs that are used to return the valves to their closed position after actuation in a working engine are far to stiff, and will not yield to the modified dial indicator, thus justifying the need for springs with a lower spring rate. Furthermore, checking springs often used in cylinder head rebuilds to retain the valve assembly within the head were used, as these springs have a smaller wire diameter and lower spring rate. Although ideal, the free length of the spring needed to match that of the standard YZF-R6 Valve springs free length of 40.3 mm. Therefore, the springs were cut and hot worked to attain the required free length, later being ground to obtain the same end profile as the standard valve spring.
Once manufactured, the modified checking springs were installed into the cylinder head,
16
To actuate both intake valves simultaneously, a bridge between both valves was required. Furthermore, a section of 5 mm aluminium plate and 2 x M6x0.8 metric bolts, were used.
Once prepared, the cylinder head was mated to the dummy cylinder by 4 x M10 socket-head cap screws, sealed by a cork gasket.
The naturally aspirated volumetric flow rate is given by the following equation, ! = 2 60 17
assuming the volumetric efficiency is 100 %, along with the RPM being safely limited to 12,000 RPM, the equation becomes, !" = 600 ! !" = (0.0006) 12,000 1 ! 2 60 !" = 0.06 !" !"#! !"#$ = !
0.06 ! = 0.015 4
2.1.2.2.
The supercharger in this application is a Sprintex S5-150, which displaces 590 ccs per revolution of the supercharger, with a 1:1 pulley ratio. Furthermore, according to the specifications provided by Sprintex, the S5-150 twin-screw blower has a critical drive speed of 16,000 RPM (Sprintex Limited, -). Therefore since the engine will be limited to 12,000 rpm the supercharger can be overdriven. Furthermore, to limit fatigue and sustain reliability, the supercharger will be limited to 14,000, 14,000 = = 1.167 12,000 Furthermore, the supercharger displaces 590 cubic centimetres per revolution, in conjunction with the increased pulley ratio, the ideal volumetric flow rate with a supercharger and intake ducting volumetric efficiency of 100% becomes, !!!"#$% = 1.167 2 590 = 1377.06 ! (0.00137706) 12,000 1 ! !!!"#$% = 2 60 ! !!!"#$% = 0.137706 0.137706 ! !!!"#$!!"#! !"#$ = = 0.0344265 4
18
1. Torque dummy cylinder to the flow bench using flow bench mounted studs and bolts 2. Torque the Cylinder Head to the dummy cylinder using 4 socket head cap screws 3. Torque bell mouth adapter to the inlet port being tested 4. Attach valve actuator mounts to cylinder head 5. Attach valve actuator bar and modified dial indicator 6. Position valve actuating bridge with valves being actuated and the dial indicator plunger 7. Calibrate dial indicator
Figure 13 Yamaha YZF-R6 Cylinder Head setup for flow bench testing (exhaust side)
19
Figure 14 Yamaha YZF-R6 Cylinder Head setup for flow bench testing (intake side)
Figure 15 Yamaha YZF-R6 Cylinder Head with valve actuating apparatus attached
2.1.3.2.
Test Procedure
1. Set the Flow rate range of the air pump to within a close proximity of the maximum flow rate estimated 2. Turn the air pump on 3. Ensure valves are closed and check for leaks in the system !" 4. If no leaks proceed to open the valve to !""" inches 5. Allow flow to become stable 6. Record data !" 7. Proceed to open the valve another !""" inches 8. Repeat steps 5 to 7 until maximum valve lift is achieved 9. Iterate steps 1 to 8 until flow rate range approaches the maximum flow rate 20
2.1.4. Results
The initial test, the range was set at 319 CFM however, it can be seen the peak flow rate only reaches a maximum of around 160 CFM. Therefore the range was decreased to the closest CFM range to the peak flow rate, which happened to be 215 CFM. The graph above illustrates the slight increase in accuracy between the two tests.
2.1.5. Discussion
By
analysing
the
relationship
between
the
degrees
of
valve
lift
to
flow
rate,
it
can
be
noticed
that
the
flow
does
not
encounter
severe
turbulence,
as
the
transient
portion
of
the
curve
remains
quite
linear.
However,
the
gradient
of
the
curve
plateaus,
as
the
flow
is
restricted
to
a
maximum
value
of
161.3
CFM
(0.076125 that
the
velocity
of
the
fluid
reaches
the
local
acoustic
velocity.
!! !
), suggesting
21
3. Review
The
progress
of
the
project
is
coming
along
at
a
reasonable
pace,
although
behind
schedule
due
to
testing
lead
times,
the
project
is
still
on
track.
An
informed
revision
to
the
initial
time
plan
can
now
be
applied,
as
greater
knowledge
of
what
is
required
to
complete
the
project
is
clear
and
the
testing
timeframe
is
converging
on
a
conclusive
date.
13
- Submit
Progress
Report
14
- Final
preparations
for
flow
bench
test
-
15
- Perform
initial
flow
bench
test
-
16
- Review
flow
bench
test
-
END
OF
BEB801/BEGINNING
OF
BREAK
-
Perform
additional
flow
bench
testing
if
required.
END
OF
BREAK
BEGINNING
OF
BEB802
1
- Perform
Cylinder
Head
Port
Scanning
2
- Replicate
intake
port
geometry
using
point
cloud
sourced
from
cylinder
head
port
scan
- Debug
computational
model
3
- Define
CFD
Analysis
Boundary
Conditions
- Setup
CFD
Model
4
- Perform
CFD
Analysis
- Modify
Model
- Perform
further
CFD
Analysis
- Continue
until
CFD
Analysis
results
match
experimental
results
5
- Modify
Intake
Port
Geometry
(Optimise)
- Perform
CFD
Analysis
6
- Compare
both
models
- Optimise
second
model
further
if
required
7
-
8
- Begin
data
analysis
- Begin
Final
Report
Write-up
9
- Continue
Report
Write-up
- Draw
conclusions
from
analysis
10
- Finalise
conclusions
- Continue
Report
Write-up
MID-SEMESTER
BREAK
11
- Define
Implications
- Finalise
Report
Draft
- Proof
Read
Report
- Refine
Report
- Begin
dissemination
of
project
12
-
13
- Finalise
dissemination
of
project
- Proof
Read
Report
and
refine
report
- Finalise
Report
- Submit
Report
22
References
Blair,
G.
P.
(1999).
Design
and
Simulation
of
Four-Stroke
Engines.
Warrendale,
PA,
USA:
Society
of
Automotive
Engineers.
Burgess,
P.,
&
Gollan,
D.
(2006).
How
to
build,
modify
&
power
tune
cylinder
heads.
Dorchester,
England:
Veloce.
Chapdelaine,
N.
(1998,
June
1).
From
Art
to
Port.
Manufacturing
Engineering
,
p.
120.
Hiereth,
H.,
&
Prenninger,
P.
(2007).
Charging
the
Internal
Combustion
Engine.
Wien:
SpringerWienNewYork.
Mahle.
Mahle
Valvetrain
Systems
Key
Visual
2.
-.
Mahle
Group,
-.
Son,
J.-W.,
Lee,
S.,
Han,
B.,
&
Kim,
W.
(2004).
A
Correlation
Between
Re-Defined
Design
Parameters
and
Flow
Coefficients
or
SI
Engine
Intake
Ports,
SAE
Technical
Paper
2004-01- 0998.
Hyandi
Motor
Company,
Power-train
R&D
Centre.
Detroit:
SAE
International.
Sprintex
Limited.
(-,
-
-).
Sprintex
S5-150.
[Brochure]
.
Malaga,
Western
Australia,
Australia:
- .
Bibliography
Smith,
E.
J.
(2008).
Let
it
flow:
A
look
at
cylinder
heads.
National
Dragster,
49(35),
74-76.
Retrieved
from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/198049852?accountid=13380
Selvaraj,
B.,
Sridhara,
S.,
Indraprakash,
G.,
Senthilkumar,
A.
(2011).
Effects
of
Intake
Port
Geometry
on
the
Performance
of
an
SI
Engine
Adomeit,
P.,
Jakob,
M.,
Pischinger,
S.,
Brunn,
A.
(January,
2011)
Effect
of
Intake
Port
Design
on
the
Flow
Field
Stability
of
a
Gasoline
DI
Engine,
SAE
Technical
Paper
2011-01-1284,
2011
Vizard,
D.
(1973).
Theory
and
Practice
of
Cylinder
Head
Modification.
Brentford,
Middx:
Interauto
Book
Company
23
Appendices
One
Flow
Bench
Experiment
One
Results
Valve
Test
Flow
Test
Tank
Corr
Lift
Full
CFM
Pressure
Pressure
Temp
Leak
CFM
Baro
Humidity
0.05
319
CFM
28.06
13.9
75
0
CFM
44.3
30.26
0
0.1
319
CFM
28.07
23.8
77
0
CFM
75.9
30.26
0
0.15
319
CFM
28.07
31.1
88
0
CFM
99.2
30.26
0
0.2
319
CFM
28.06
37
95
0
CFM
118
30.26
0
0.25
319
CFM
28.06
41.9
99
0
CFM
133.6
30.26
0
0.3
319
CFM
28.06
45.6
103
0
CFM
145.4
30.26
0
0.35
319
CFM
28.06
48
107
0
CFM
153.1
30.26
0
0.4
319
CFM
28.05
49.5
111
0
CFM
157.9
30.27
0
0.45
319
CFM
28.05
50.1
114
0
CFM
159.8
30.26
0
0.5
319
CFM
28.05
50.4
117
0
CFM
160.8
30.27
0
0.05
215
CFM
0.1
215
CFM
0.15
215
CFM
0.2
215
CFM
0.25
215
CFM
0.3
215
CFM
0.35
215
CFM
0.4
215
CFM
0.45
215
CFM
0.5
215
CFM
28.06
28.06
28.06
28.06
28.05
28.05
28.05
28.05
28.05
28.04
20.2
34.8
45.6
54.7
62.1
68.1
71.6
73.9
75.1
75.2
112
0
CFM
43.3
30.27
116
0
CFM
74.6
30.27
121
0
CFM
97.8
30.26
127
0
CFM
117.3
30.27
129
0
CFM
133.2
30.27
132
0
CFM
146.1
30.27
134
0
CFM
153.6
30.27
136
0
CFM
158.5
30.27
137
0
CFM
161.1
30.27
140
0
CFM
161.3
30.27
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
24