Writ of Habeas Corpus

and
NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
(from Arrest)

THIS WRIT SERVES as fair Notice and Warning that Douglas-Mac: Duff, a Christian Man of
the male gender, the Issuer hereof, hereinafter, Claimant, is immune and exempt from arrest by
any, and all, legal fictions, legal entities, fictional corporate entities, agents, officers, and other
actors of any government, and that, all agents, officers, clerks, and others serving under the de
facto corporate Legislative Branch and Executive Branch of the federal state government are, in
fact, time barred upon this NOTICE from the physical touching of the Body of the Man Claimant
and that said Actors suffer no immunity nor exemption from prosecution for any contrary,
malicious, or malevolent action, even if such action should appear benevolent in nature.

Charges of actual criminal action forwarded against Claimant in the form of a Warrant of the
Law, issued and signed by a real judge of the Article III Judicial Branch of the National
Government, do not apply to Claimant’s exemption from arrest where there is an actual Injured
Party by the hand of Claimant.

This Writ is actual and constructive NOTICE of a Claim of Right of Exemption (or, Immunity)
from arrest of Claimant and “Plea In Abatement,” where applicable for discharge through the
courts.

ALL ACTORS ARE HEREBY NOTICED that Claimant’s exemption from arrest is Claimant’s
Right under the Law and does not hinge upon any alleged “legislative exemption” designed for
those actors officiating on behalf of the fiction corporate body politic of the federal government,
U.S., United States, and others, as per the bolding and underline emphasis of the following
quote:
"The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private
business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no duty to the state or to his
neighbors to divulge his business, or to open his doors to an investigation, so far as it may tend to
criminate him. He owes no such duty to the state, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the
protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land long antecedent to
the organization of the state, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance
with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of
himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing
to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights." HALE v. HENKEL, 201 U.S. 43 (1906)
End of quote.

Time is of the essence. You have been NOTICED this sixth day of July, 2009.

By _______________________________
Christian Man and Claimant