You are on page 1of 1

Aquaculture Research, 2012, 1–14 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2012.03196.

The development of size variation in Dover sole,


Solea solea and turbot, Scophthalmus maximus:
genetic variability between different geographical
and among year class farmed strains

Athanasios Exadactylos1, Emmanouil E Malandrakis1, Panagiota Panagiotaki1


& Audrey J Geffen2
1
Department of Ichthyology and Aquatic Environment, School of Agricultural Sciences, University of Thessaly, Volos,
Greece
2
Department of Fisheries and Marine Biology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

Correspondence: A Exadactylos, Department of Ichthyology and Aquatic Environment, School of Agricultural Sciences, University
of Thessaly, Fytokou str., 384 46, Volos, Greece. E-mail: exadact@uth.gr

trends were discerned in turbot. A positive Hetero-


Abstract
zygosity Fitness (growth rate) Correlation (HFC)
Growth and variation in size of turbot and sole lar- suggests that heterozygotes reported enhanced
vae originating from different genetic sources were growth rates compared with homozygous ones in
compared at different stocking densities, including flatfish larvae, thus special precautions should be
genetically based information that might lead to a taken into account whenever different genetic
better knowledge of heterogeneity in cultivated structure patterns emerge, because of various flat-
populations. There was no effect of density on fish broodstock geographical origin and year class
growth rate in either species. However, between samples.
the two sole batches there was an earlier meta-
morphosis of faster growing fish from Norway. In Keywords: flatfish, size variation, genetic diver-
sole groups after metamorphosis, variation was sity, hatchery stocks
stable and therefore no development of size varia-
tion was observed. There was no density effect on
Introduction
size variation within turbot batches before, or after
metamorphosis. Spreading rate and growth rate The first and foremost task for any aquacultural
were positively correlated in sole larvae indicating industry is to develop the founder stock of the eco-
that growth of the smaller fish was not equal to nomically important aquaculture species that will
the larger ones, but size variation followed a differ- have the genetic ability to use feed and resources
ent pattern in turbot. No evidence for either over- efficiently. Quantitative genetics and applied selec-
all significant heterozygosity excess, or deficiency tive breeding theory have been the key to the
was evidenced in the farmed strains of either spe- impressive increase in production efficiency in live-
cies. However, significant differences between stock over the last few decades (Pickering 1993).
farmed populations in terms of genetic variability In spite of its long history, the current aquacul-
(h) were reported, which was rather attributed to tural production is mainly based on the use of
within differentiation than between strains. One undomesticated fish from natural populations to
could safely argue that different strains of Dover regularly refresh the cultivated stocks. Such proto-
sole originated from different genetic sources (fac- cols cannot possibly generate any significant
torial analysis). Moreover, when the analysis was genetic improvement over time. Despite the
extended to individual loci to assess whether spe- growth in aquaculture production, only a propor-
cific loci had any consistently larger, or smaller tion of the current world production tends to focus
effect on heterozygosity, locus specific significant on genetically improved marine stocks in the light

© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1

You might also like