You are on page 1of 40

D M A I C Measure

Measure
Six Sigma RoadMap

industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

Deliverables of the Measure Phase:

D M A I C Measure

Measurable CTQ(s) for the project Specifications for the project CTQ(s) Completed measurement system analysis (MSA) for the CTQ(s)
Data collected for the Analyze phase

industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

Basic Measurement Concepts


Observe first, then measure
Helps decide what to measure

D M A I C Measure

Know the difference between discrete and continuous measurements


Relative pros and cons

Measure for a reason


Quantify response, and measure possible Xs

Have a measurement process


Collect the right measurements with sufficient accuracy
industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

Two Components of Measure


Plan and measure performance against customer requirements
Select what to measure Develop operational definitions Identify data sources Prepare data collection and sample plan Implement and refine the measurement process

D M A I C Measure

Develop baseline defect measurements and identify improvement opportunities


industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

D CTQs M A I C Measure Measure There are various tools which can help the team translate the customer wants (CTQs) into measurable Ys for your project.
Quality Function Deployment (QFD)
Customer CTQs (WHATs) Project Deliverables (HOWs)

Process map

House of Quality

Failure Mode & Effects Analysis (FMEA)

Process/Product Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)


Process or Product Name: Responsible: REDUCTION IN NDT PREP TIME ON GT COMPRESSOR ROTORS STALEY EDW ARDS Prepared by: STALEY EDW ARDS FMEA Date (Orig) JUNE , 25, 1998 (Rev) ____

Process Step/Part Number PREP FOR BLAST

Pote ntial Fa ilure Mode Pote ntial Fa ilure Effects IMPROPER TAPING BLAST MEDIA GETS IN BETWEEN ROTOR W HEEL BLAST MEDIA GETS IN BETWEEN ROTOR W HEEL EXCESSIVE HOURS TO CLEAN FOR NDT

S E V 8

Pote ntial Cause s W ORKMANSHIP / MATERIAL

O C C 2

Current Controls PLANNING ROUTER AND VISUAL VISUAL INSPECTION DURING BLAST PROCESS NONE

D E T 2

R P N 32

**BLAST CLEAN TAPE COMES OFF

MATERIAL / OVERBLASTING 8 MATERIAL / OVERBLASTING 7 BLASTING , CLEANING AND MATERIAL 9 3

72

**PREP FOR NDT NDT

TAPE RESIDUE ON W HEELS

10 MANUAL CLEANING PRIOR TO NDT

630

10 industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

INSUFFICIENT CLEANING POSSIBLILTY OF NOT CAUSING SEEING RELATIVE QUESTIONABLE INDICATIONS DURING NDT

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
3 60

UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

D M A I C Measure

BASIC QFD Introduction


Functional Requirements (HOWs) Customer Requirements (WHATs) Functional Requirements (WHATs) House of Quality #1

(Quality Function Deployment)

Part Characteristics (HOWs) Manufacturing Processes (HOWs) Part Characteristics (WHATs)

House of Quality #2

Process Variables (HOWs) Manufacturing Processes (WHATs)

House of Quality #3

House of Quality #4

Critical-to-Quality Characteristics (CTQs)

X
Key Manufacturing Processes Key Process Variables

industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

D M A I C Measure

WHAT IS QFD ?
QFD - Quality Function Deployment
Method Methodfor forTranslating TranslatingCustomer CustomerRequirements Requirements Into IntoAn AnAppropriate AppropriateCompany CompanyProgram Programand and Technical TechnicalRequirements Requirementsat atEach EachPhase Phaseof ofthe the Product ProductRealization RealizationCycle. Cycle.

An orderly process for determining the Customers Critical To Quality needs (CTQs) Common sense approach BASIS - Ask your customer Listen --- REALLY LISTEN
industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

D M A I C Measure

BRIEF HISTORY OF QFD


Origin - Mitsubishi Kobe Shipyard 1972
Developed By Toyota and Its Suppliers Expanded To Other Japanese Manufacturers
Consumer Electronics, Home Appliances, Clothing, Integrated Circuits, Apartment Layout Planning

Adopted By Ford and GM in 1980s Digital Equipment, Hewlett-Packard, AT&T, ITT

Foundation Foundation--Belief BeliefThat ThatProducts ProductsShould ShouldBe Be

Designed DesignedTo ToReflect ReflectCustomer CustomerDesires Desiresand andTastes Tastes


TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

D M A I C Measure

WHY USE QFD?


1st 1stProduct Product Design Changes Using Using QFD QFD

No No QFD QFD

Time

QFD QFDCan CanReduce ReduceStartup StartupTime Timeand andCosts Costs


industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

* Typical Data From Automotive Industry

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

D M A I C Measure

WHAT DOES QFD DO?


CONCEPT PLAN DESIGN REDESIGN CUSTOMER MANUFACTURE

PLAN

DESIGN

REDESIGN

MANUFACTURE BENEFITS

QFD QFDIS ISA APRODUCTIVITY PRODUCTIVITYENHANCER ENHANCER


industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

D M A I C Measure

WHEN IS QFD APPROPRIATE?


Poor communications and expectations get lost in the complexity of product development. Lack of structure or logic to the allocation of product development resources. Lack of efficient and/or effective product/process development teamwork. Extended development time caused by excessive redesign, problem solving, or fire fighting.

industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

The QFD Building Block


Customer Customer Importance Importance
How How important important are arethe theCustomer Customer wants wantsto tothe the Customer? Customer?

D M A I C Measure

Conflict Conflict Resultion Resultion

HOW'S HOW'S
How How Do Do You You Satisfy Satisfy The The Wants Wants ? ?

Completeness Completeness Check Check

WHAT'S WHAT'S
What WhatDoes Does The TheCustomer Customer Want Want Voice Voice of ofthe the Customer Customer

L H M H L

L M H M L

M
Relationships Relationships H H Strong Strong 99 M M Medium Medium 33 LL Weak Weak 11

M L

M L

Target Target Values Values Of Of How's How's (units) (units)

The TheHouse Houseof ofQuality Quality


industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

Technical Technical Importance Importance

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

D M A I C Measure

ROLES
Typical Roles
Customer Wants (WHATs)

Sponsor Customer Facilitator

System Features (HOWs)

House of Quality

Optional Role
Scribe

industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

D M A I C Measure

Requirements Flowdown / QFD & CTQs


Conflict Resolution Design Features Manufacturing Processes Process Operations

Key Features: Features on a part or drawing that are critical to the customer or intended part or function

Product Requirements

1
Customer Expectations How well are wants satisfied?

Product Reqments

2
CTQs
Design Features

3
CTQs

Mfg. Processes

Measurements Measurements Measurements

Critical to Quality: The select few most challenging and/or highest risk Key Features for a specific part.

Measurements

Critical to Quality: Specific process characteristics requiring Special Process Controls to properly control CTQs

QFD QFDIs Isan anOrganized OrganizedProcess Processof ofRequirements RequirementsFlowdown Flowdown


industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

BASIC QFD PROCESS


Before) Before) Preparation Preparation
Sponsor Sponsor Meeting Meeting // Set Set Up Up

D M A I C Measure

Perform QFD) Team 2) 2) Customer Customer


5 5= = High High 1 = 1 = Low Low

Importance Importance

3) 3) HOW'S HOW'S
Brainstorm Brainstorm

4) 4)Relationships Relationships H H Strong Strong 9 9 M M Medium Medium 3 3 L 1 L Weak Weak 1


Randomly Select Rows 4a) Rank Across Row 4b) Sanity Check Next Row in Reverse

1) 1) WHAT'S WHAT'S
Brainstorm Brainstorm

5) 5)Completeness Completeness
Check Check
RESULT) RESULT)Technical TechnicalImportance Importance (CI*Strength) Value Value= = column

column

After) After) Wrap Wrap UP UP


Next Next House House // Follow Follow Up Up
industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

COMMON QFD PITFALLS


QFD on everything Inadequate priorities Lack of teamwork Wrong participant Lack of team skills Lack of support Lack of commitment Too much chart focus Hurry up and get done Failure to integrate and implement QFD

D M A I C Measure

industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

D M A I C Measure

POINTS TO REMEMBER
The process looks simple, but requires EFFORT. If there are NO tough spots the first time: It probably isnt being done right! Many entries look obviousafter theyre written down. Focus on the end-user customer. Charts are not the objective. They are the means for achieving the objective. Find reasons to succeed, not excuses for failure.

industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

M A I C MeasureD - Overview Measure

Deliverables of the Measure Phase:

1) Measurable CTQ(s) for the project 2) Specifications for the project CTQ(s) - Performance Standard is defined 3) Completed measurement system analysis (MSA) for the CTQ(s) 4) Data collected for the Analyze phase

industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

D M A I Std C Measure Performance Measure

The goal of a performance standard is to translate the customer need into a measurable characteristic.
Develop an Operational Definition An operational definition is a precise description that tells how to get a value for the characteristic (CTQ) you are trying to measure. It includes What Something Is and How to Measure It
Identifies what to measure Identifies how to measure it Makes sure that no matter who does the measuring, the results are essentially the same Must be useful to both you and the customer

Determine the Target & Specification Limits (max, min or both) Define defect for your CTQ (Y)
industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

D M A I Std C Measure Performance Measure On-Time Departures

In-class exercise: Write operational definitions for these examples.

Computer Downtime

industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

D M A I Std C Measure Performance Measure Defect - Anything that results in customer dissatisfaction. Anything that results in a nonconformance. An estimate of the product/process defect rate will come from sample data. Considerations: Discrete vs. Continuous data? Distribution of the Y (CTQ) (e.g. Binomial, Poisson, Normal, Lognormal,..?)
Specification Limit
Within 5 Days

Specification Limit

5 or 14%
8

10

Problems Resolved Within 5 Days

Non-Defects (Y< 5 Days) 6 30 or 86%


5

Defects ( Y > 5 Days) Non-Defects


3

Defects (Y > 5 Days)

(Y 5 Days)
2
- +

1
Total = 35

1 2 3

5 6

7 Time to Resolve Problem

Days to Resolve Problem


industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

D M A I Std C Measure Performance Measure EXAMPLE Defining the Performance Std for Smart color matching

GE Pellets

GE QA molded color chips

Customer doors and fenders

Customer Requirement

Smart car

No visual difference in the adjacent car parts

Technical Approach
DOE to correlate customer visual assessment to internal measurements

Results
Developed internal specs and measurements TEKNIK INDUSTRI industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA to help achieve customer Six Sigma results

D M A I Std C Measure Performance Measure

Smart example (contd) DOE Response: DOE Factors:


% of Visually Acceptable color matches Measured color differences in Doors as judged by multiple consumers and Fenders: dL = | L of fender - L of door | da = | a of fender - a of door | db = | b of fender - b of door |

dL da

db
industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

M A I C MeasureD - Overview Measure

Deliverables of the Measure Phase:

1) Measurable CTQ(s) for the project 2) Specifications for the project CTQ(s) - Performance Standard is defined

3) Completed measurement system analysis (MSA) for the CTQ(s) 4) Data collected for the Analyze phase

industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

M A I C MeasureD - MSA Measure


Observations
Inputs Process Outputs Inputs Measurement Outputs Measurements Data Process

Observed Process Variation

Actual Process Variation

Measurement Variation Measurement Variation

Longterm Process Variation

Shortterm Process Variation

within within sample sample variation variation

Variation Variation due to due to gage gage

Variation Variation due to due to operator operator Reproducibility Reproducibility

Accurac Accurac y (Bias) y (Bias)

Precision Precision (Pure Error) (Pure Error)

Stability Stability (time (time dependent) dependent)

Linearity Linearity (value (value dependent) dependent)

To Toaddress addressactual actualprocess processvariability, variability,the thevariation variationdue dueto tothe the measurement system must first be identified and separated measurement system must firstRepeatability be identified and separated Repeatability from that of the TEKNIK INDUSTRI from and that of theprocess process industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering management blends

UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

M A I C MeasureD - MSA Measure

Measurement System Analysis (MSA) Establish the capability of the measurement system Gain consensus with the project team on any actions needed regarding the measurement system, for example. avg multiple measurements to increase precision increase precision by using a single instrument (eliminating instrument-to-instrument variability) increase precision by having the same person do all of the measurements (eliminating person-toperson variability) postpone AIC of current project and do a DMAIC on the measurement system.
industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

M A I C MeasureD - MSA Measure

Precision and Accuracy

Precise, but not accurate

Accurate, but not precise


industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

M A I C MeasureD - Accuracy Measure


Inputs Inputs Process Outputs Inputs Inputs
Measurement Process

Observations Outputs Measurements Data

Actual (Part) + Meas. System = Observed (Total)

True Avg

Bias

Obs. Avg

industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

M A I C MeasureD - Precision Measure


Inputs Process Outputs Inputs Observations Measurement Outputs Measurements Process Data

Product Variability
(Actual variability)

Measurement Variability

Total Variability
(Observed variability)

2Actual (Part) + 2Meas. System = 2Observed (Total)


Measurement System Variability - Investigated through R&R Study

industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

M A I C MeasureD - MSA Measure

Definitions
Accuracy the differences between observed average measurement and a standard Repeatability variation when one person repeatedly measures the same unit with the same measuring equipment Reproducibility variation when two or more people measure the same unit with the same measuring equipment Stability variation obtained when the same person measures the same unit with the same equipment over an extended period of time Linearity the consistency of the measurement system across the entire range of the measurement system
industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

M A I C MeasureD - GRR Measure

If the CTQ (Y) being measured is a continuous random variable, the repeatability, reproducibility and linearity are usually quantified through a Gage R&R study.

One measure to assess the capability of the measurement system:

5.15 m %Tolerance = usl lsl

(two sided spec)

2.575 m %Tolerance = Y sl
industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

(one sided spec)


TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

M A I C MeasureD - GRR Measure

Using Minitab (12.2) to do the GRR Analysis. (Data is from p. 231 of Breyfogle example.)

Step 1: Enter the data into a Minitab worksheet. Label the Part id and Appraiser id in separate columns.
industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

M A I C MeasureD - GRR Measure

Step 2: From the Stat menu, select Quality Tools, then Gage R&R Study.

industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

M A I C MeasureD - GRR Measure

Step 3: Specify the columns which identify the parts and operators (appraisers), as well as the Y column.

Take the default method of analysis, which is ANOVA.


industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

Minitab output (graphical analysis):

M A I C MeasureD - GRR Measure

industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

Minitab output (ANOVA and variance components):


Gage R&R Study - ANOVA Method Gage R&R for Y

M A I C MeasureD - GRR Measure

Two-Way ANOVA Table With Interaction Source Part Appraiser Appraiser*Part Repeatability Total Gage R&R Source Total Gage R&R Repeatability Reproducibility Appraiser Part-To-Part Total Variation VarComp StdDev 5.15*Sigma 2.5444 2.5333 0.0111 0.0111 4.9722 7.5167 1.59513 1.59164 0.10541 0.10541 2.22985 2.74165 8.2149 8.1970 0.5429 0.5429 11.4837 14.1195 DF 4 1 4 20 29 SS 129.467 2.700 9.467 51.333 192.967 MS F P 0.013 0.346 0.471

Two-Way ANOVA Table Without Interaction Source Part Appraiser Repeatability Total DF 4 1 24 29 SS 129.467 2.700 60.800 192.967 MS 32.3667 2.7000 2.5333 F P

32.3667 13.6761 2.7000 2.3667 2.5667 1.1408 0.9221

12.7763 0.000 1.0658 0.312

%Contribution %Study Var 33.85 33.70 0.15 0.15 66.15 100.00 58.18 58.05 3.84 3.84 81.33 100.00

industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

M A I C MeasureD - Overview Measure

Deliverables of the Measure Phase:

1) Measurable CTQ(s) for the project 2) Specifications for the project CTQ(s) - Performance Standard is defined

3) Completed measurement system analysis (MSA) for the CTQ(s) 4) Data collected for the Analyze phase

industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

M A I C MeasureD - ARR Measure

Attribute GRR (ARR)


Multiple Operators or Appraisers Several reps per operator
'T r u e ' Sam p le 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ans w e r N N N D D N D N N N D D D N D N N N N N D N N N N D N N N D D Op e r ato r 1 T r ial1 N N N D D N N N N N D N D N D D N N N N D N N N N D N N N N D T r ial2 N N N D D N D N N N D N D N D D N N N N D N N N N D N N N D D T r ial3 N N N D D N N N N N D N D N D D N N N N D N N N N D N N N N D Op e r ato r 2 T r ial1 N N N D D N D D N N D D D N D N N N D N D D D N N D N N N D D T r ial2 N N N D D N D N N N D D D N D N N N D N D D D N N D N N N D D T r ial3 N N N D D N D D N N D D D N D N N N D N D D D N N D N N N D D Op e r ato r 3 T r ial1 N N D D D N D N N D D D D N D N N N N D D N N D N D N N N D D T r ial2 N N N D N N D N N N D D D N D N N N N D D N N D N D N N N D D T r ial3 N N N D D N D N N D D D D N D N N N N N N N N D N D N N N D D

Multiple Samples or Parts

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

True condition of each sample (defective or nondefective)

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

M A I C MeasureD - ARR Measure


Sam ple 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Trial1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Trial2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Trial3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Num ber of Defects Trial1 Trial2 Trial3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Trial1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Trial2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Trial3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 2 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 2 1 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0

False False defects Non-defects 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Col Totals:

31

25

industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

M A I C MeasureD -ARR Measure

Input Operator Discrepencies No. of Samples No. of Repeats Total_opps error rate Oper 1 10 30 3 90 0.11 Oper 2 11 30 3 90 0.12 Oper 3 10 30 3 90 0.11 Total: 31 90 9 270 0.11

Output lcl 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.08 ucl 0.18 0.19 0.18 0.15

industrial engineering ui - where the science of engineering and management blends

TEKNIK INDUSTRI
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

You might also like