Feminism & Psychology 2013 Lamb 163 83

Feminism & Psychology http://fap.sagepub.
com/
'Pole-arized' discourse: An analysis of responses to Miley Cyrus's Teen Choice Awards pole dance
Sharon Lamb, Kelly Graling and Emily E Wheeler Feminism & Psychology 2013 23: 163 originally published online 10 January 2013 DOI: 10.1177/0959353512472482 The online version of this article can be found at: http://fap.sagepub.com/content/23/2/163
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
Additional services and information for Feminism & Psychology can be found at: Email Alerts: http://fap.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://fap.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations: http://fap.sagepub.com/content/23/2/163.refs.html
>> Version of Record - Apr 25, 2013 OnlineFirst Version of Record - Jan 10, 2013 What is This?
Downloaded from fap.sagepub.com at CRAI-Universitat de Barcelona on August 29, 2013
Article
F eminism & Psychology

Feminism & Psychology 23(2) 163183 ! The Author(s) 2013 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0959353512472482 fap.sagepub.com
Pole-arized discourse: An analysis of responses to Miley Cyruss Teen Choice Awards pole dance
Sharon Lamb, Kelly Graling and Emily E Wheeler
University of Massachusetts, USA
Abstract Sexualization of girlhood is a current issue in the US and around the world. Concerns that girls are asked to self-sexualize at younger and younger ages have led to an examination of the influence of media on girls. The current study attempts to explore public views on the self-sexualization of a Disney pop star, Miley Cyrus, in what was called a pole dance by the media. This performance at the 2009 Teen Choice Awards stirred considerable debate in the news and on public websites. The current analysis examines website responses of 13 websites through a qualitative, thematic analysis of over 500 individual responses. Analysis of internet comments revealed themes of agency and innocence in adolescent female sexuality as well as the function of these themes in US culture. The dominant themes are discussed in light of the largely absent gendered analysis of the performance and its significance. Keywords Sexualization of adolescence, self-sexualization, media
This paper examines online responses to an event during the Teen Choice Awards of 2009 in which, during a live musical performance, Miley Cyrus performed a dance move that reporters likened to a strippers pole dance. We examined online responses to this event in order to explore public sentiments in light of celebrity culture, the sexualization of childhood and culture, and adolescent sexuality. In this paper, we review the context in which this act is controversial and also discuss relevant theories about sexualization. We present the themes that we found in a
Corresponding author: Sharon Lamb, Department of Counseling and School Psychology, University of Massachusetts, 100 Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA 02125, USA. Email: Sharon.lamb@umb.edu
164
Feminism & Psychology 23(2)
qualitative analysis and go on to analyze several ideological themes that ran through the online discussions in terms of how they relate to current constructions of adolescent sexuality. The rst theme is about agency and to what extent adolescents, celebrities, and girls have choice with regard to how they represent themselves sexually. The contributors to this thread also focus on who is to blame for the choices girls make. We also examine narratives of girlhood innocence that intersect with ideas about race, gender, and class. A second theme relating to female agency and choice is one that connects choice and power specically to Cyrus as an adolescent, and we explore public sentiment with regard to the morality of sexual acts in adolescence. We analyze these themes in terms of the interpretive repertoires available to the general public with regard to celebrities and sexualization, and explore a missing discourse that would recognize the performance as a performance aimed at boys and men. Finally, we make some suggestions with regard to why this discourse might be missing.
Context
In 2009, Miley Cyrus was a US superstar who was the center of a multi-million dollar enterprise that went far beyond her Disney television show, Hannah Montana, in which she portrayed a teen who is a normal high school girl during the day and a rock star at night. The popularity of this show enabled Cyrus to launch a concert career and sell CDs, t-shirts, posters, themed products like school supplies, and a variety of products bought by children and especially pre-adolescent girls. Cyrus gained notoriety in her mid-teens via highly publicized, sexually provocative photographs featured in Vanity Fair. These photographs were shot by noted photographer Annie Leibowitz, and were criticized for featuring Cyrus wrapped in a bed sheet (ostensibly nude underneath). It has been noted that for many child stars, a career move or rebranding occurs around the age of 17 or 18 and that this transition involves an attempt to gain an adult male audience through sexualizing the star (Lamb and Brown, 2006); these photos could be read as Cyruss own rebranding. The press responded and a public discussion ensued in newspapers, magazines, and online spaces regarding the question of whether she was too young to be/act sexy, whether she was being exploited by her father/manager, Billy-Ray Cyrus, a country western music celebrity in his own right, whether she was old enough to make her own choices in these matters, and whether she was acting as a poor role model for her young fans. The conversation that ensued loosely followed the lines of the moral panics around sexualization described by Lumby and Funnell (2011), a panic that reies girlhood innocence and suggests that sexuality for girls, in and of itself, is dangerous. The research presented in this paper is about another incident that attracted signicant media attention to Cyrus: her performance at the 2009 Teen Choice Awards. The Teen Choice Awards show, established in the USA in 1999, serves as a venue to promote the shows and stars that teens and younger consumers watch. The awards, antics, and jokes are aimed at both a pre-teen and teenaged audience. In the 2009 awards show, Cyrus performed her then new song, Party in
Lamb et al.
165
the USA. In the performance, she emerged from a metal trailer (caravan) in boots, short shorts, and a cowboy hat. She proceeded to sing, dance, and then step on to a passing ice cream cart tted with a barbershop-like striped pole. While singing and dancing atop the ice cream cart she dipped, spreading her legs apart as she descended. This was the money shot that appeared in news stories around the world announcing that Cyrus did a pole dance. (The performance can be viewed on YouTube.) A Salon magazine article noted that within 2 to 3 days there were over 2,750,000 Google entries for Miley Cyrus + pole and over 1300 articles written on the subject (Williams, 2009). The Los Angeles Times criticized her for going too far and too low and Fox News tellingly headlined, Miley Cyrus Gets Raunchy with a Pole at the Teen Choice Awards, Wins Six Trophies, insinuating perhaps that the second clause had something to do with the rst. Fox News wrote, It was goodbye Hannah Montana at Sundays Teen Choice Awards as the once squeaky clean star Miley Cyrus debuted a more adult image with a racy performance in hot pants on a stripper pole! (Fox News, 2010). Cyrus and her promoters responded by arguing that she was spoong her Tennessee roots. The day after the awards news stories quoted Cyrus saying that Miley explained with sincerity the following: Party in the USA is an allAmerican song, and so I come out tonight and Im literally in a trailer park. Its a blinged-out trailer park. She went on to say her father and others planned the number which has a deeper meaning to her: This is to represent where I am from. Im so proud of it (Vena, 2009). The pole dance took place in a context of increasing attention to celebrities as well as the sexualization of adolescent celebrities. Sexualization is a word that has recently replaced objectication in feminist discourse, and refers not only to making women into objects for male viewing and the valuing of women primarily for their attractiveness and sexuality, but also the tendency to sexualize aspects of a person or an event that are not inherently sexual and to represent children and adolescents in increasingly sexual ways (American Psychological Association, 2007). Gill (2007a: 151) describes sexualization as the extraordinary proliferation of discourses about sex and sexuality across all media forms . . . as well the increasingly frequent erotic presentation of girls, womens and (to a lesser extent) mens bodies in public spaces. In this paper, we are interested in the latter aspect of both of these denitions. This sexualization is purported to take place not only in the realm of everyday life of media viewing and consuming for girls, but also in celebrity culture, where female celebrities (and also athletes) are presented in heightened sexual form, having in many ways replaced fashion models in advertisements in all media due to their recognizability and preexisting narratives that can better sell products (Liaing, 2011; Shinkle, 2008; Shugart, 2003). McRobbie (2004: 258259) argues that the media has become a dominant force in dening sexual norms in a way that casts judgment and establishes the rules of play, and that frequently denigrates feminism. Girls are invited to participate in what researchers have termed raunch culture, pornographication, and striptease culture (Levy, 2005; McNair, 1996, 2002), with the concomitant invitation is to consume, buy, and use products
166
to harness a post-feminist, agentic sexuality (Attwood, 2005; Evans et al., 2010; Gill, 2007b). In general, these media representations of sexuality and the oshoots of these representations (e.g. products) are more explicit, more commonplace, and a greater part of the lives of adolescent girls than they have previously been (Attwood, 2006; Lamb, 2010a). Self-sexualization refers to the choice that girls and women make to conform to norms of sexiness in culture in order to get rewards (APA, 2007; Coy and Garner, 2010). Self-sexualization is a term that is coming to replace self-objectication (Fredrickson and Roberts, 1997; McKinley and Hyde, 1996) because it points more directly to the sexual aspects of objectication. Unlike self-objectication, which suggests a passivity that is connected to older versions of female sexuality, self-sexualization describes a neo-liberal subject who is a more active, condent and autoerotic (Evans et al., 2010: 115) sexual person in a presumed postfeminist world. Coy and Garner (2010) write about the discourse of empowerment via self-sexualization that is promoted through media and celebrity worship, a discourse that young female fans are exposed to and subsequently emulate. This discourse is associated with self-esteem and resembles a male heterosexual fantasy (Gill, 2007b). The role of agency in self-sexualization is a source of concern among some feminist scholars. In her analysis of media representations of female sexual agency, Gill (2008) argues that in one sense, the shift to representations of empowerment of young women is positive in so far as it represents them as agents, but that these representations must also be read and experienced by younger women as a new kind of tyranny, an obligation to be sexual in a highly specic kind of way (p. 53). Girls who mimic these kinds of performances that suggest empowerment may indeed feel more empowered (Lamb, 2010a, 2010b; Lamb and Peterson, 2011). And because of this, girls may buy into a discourse that describes them as reclaiming a femininity or sexuality that feminists have taken from them (McRobbie, 2008). However, as Gill (2007a, 2008) argues, there is an almost compulsory expectation that one sexualize oneself by embodying a fearless, empowered, sexuality that is generally limited to those who are White, heterosexual, auent, and able-bodied (Gill, 2007a, 2008). In response, Duits and van Zoonen (2007) argue that this interpretation represents girls as cultural dupes whose constricted choices are held in contrast to the presumed free choices of men. Within both postfeminist and some third-wave frameworks, empowerment derives from choosing to be sexy, no matter how stereotypical that sexiness might be, and performing that sexuality for either oneself or for males (Gill, 2007a). Pole-dancing is one method of self-sexualization that has been under scrutiny as part of todays sexual toolkit for young women. Initially a dance that was and still is performed by nude dancers and strippers, pole-dancing has gained popular appeal throughout the west, through classes oered at gyms as a way for women to get t, feel liberated, and to display ones body in a positive way (Bogle, 2008; Holland, 2010; Whitehead and Kurz, 2009). There was a controversy in 2006 in the UK about a Peekaboo Pole Dancing kit that appeared on the toy section of retailer Tescos website (Durham, 2008). Reference to Cyruss dance as a pole
Lamb et al.
167
dance contextualizes it not only in the traditional realm of exotic dancing, but also in its more recent, more apparently agentic form. Another concern about the sexualization of culture centers on the sexualization of childhood. Lumby and Albury (2008: 9) write that in public debate, child sexualization can mean that:
children are being depicted in ways that suggest they have an adult understanding of self and sexuality; that children are being encouraged to behave in an adult sexual manner; that popular images of children are fuelling child sexual abuse; and that children are being exposed to adult sexual material.
The argument around child sexualization is that the culture is becoming so sexualized, and commodication of sexuality so rampant, that it spills downwards to younger and younger children who are not only commodied and sexualized but given the tools to self-sexualize at too young an age (American Psychological Association, 2007; Durham, 2011; Levin and Kilbourne, 2008; Rush and La Nauze, 2006). Debates regarding the sexualization of children focus less on the agency of the child (because the younger the child, the greater the assumption that they exercise little choice) and more on the notion of childhood innocence. Giroux (2009) notes in his exploration of young girls in beauty pageants that they gain legitimacy due to the myth of innocence in which children are thought to live in a simple, pure world that is untainted by the cultural inuences of adults and broader society around them. However, the culture is much more unclear in its denition of when this childhood innocence ends and the presumed agency of self-sexualization of adulthood begins. This cultural tension is clearly captured in the dialogue surrounding Miley Cyrus at the Teen Choice Awards.
This study
Guided by feminist and sexualization theories, we examined public online sentiment about Cyruss dance for the purpose of looking at how the discourse captures concerns about adolescents. Feminist theory guided our application of discourse analysis to naturally occurring conversations in online sites (Hepburn and Wiggins, 2005). We also used Wetherell and Potters (1988) conception of interpretive repertoires as culturally-situated, limited units of language that are available for use across individuals and provided for them by history (p. 190, Wetherell et al., 2001). We examine these discourses in a way that acknowledges the paradox that people are both products and producers of discourse (Billig, 1991) and that discursive strategies position subjects within a conversation and a historical context. We sought to identify the interpretive repertoires used by commenters in online conversations. We also explored the various subject positions undertaken by fans and detractors with the understanding that subject positions are not exclusively drawn from discourses, although inuenced by them, but that they are themselves constructed (Wetherell, 1998). From a feminist perspective, we use theories about
168
sexualization to explore the relationship of power and agency to womens positions as sexual beings that enact certain discourses, and we focus on discourses of innocence that are set against those of power and agency. Gill (2009) also advises an examination of the intersectionality of sexualization, which means understanding social positions such as gender, race, class, intrapsychic, and economic positions in relation to one another. Thus we read the fan texts about the pole dance (or dip) in ways that understand not only that Cyrus is young and female, but that she is white, a millionaire, famous, and a real person with some agency in the world. Although some comments reected the position that this performance was not an attempt at pole-dancing, for the purposes of our research we wished to interrogate responses that likened her dance to a strippers as well as those that argued against this reading. We begin from a feminist perspective that would argue that Cyruss dance move did in fact resemble a pole dance; however, we also acknowledge that this is a discursive position that inuences our reading and analysis of the comments about Cyrus online. We do not claim that this is the one true interpretation of this act and in the analysis that follows explore many repertoires that work to construct agency or innocence independent of whether Cyruss act was indeed a pole dance. From a feminist and discourse analytic perspective, there is no one true interpretation, but those who conduct the research and analyses must also own the positions from which they enter the analysis (Willig, 2008). In keeping with Wetherells (1998) conceptualization of subject positions as they relate to interpretive repertoires, we suggest that the responses analyzed below capture the myriad subject positions found within dierent discourses, the meanings of which are continually negotiated and are thus often contradictory. As Gill (2009) notes, the media are locations where both the representations of female sexuality can exist alongside analyses and criticisms of them. If we take seriously the analysis of commenters, we can see a variety of broad themes and anxieties about adolescent sexuality that move beyond simple negative responses to the dance to explore concepts of agency and innocence within the contexts of celebrity culture, Disney culture, and Southern US white trash culture. Tyler (2008: 18) writes that at dierent historical and cultural moments specic bodies become over determined and are publicly imagined (are gured) in excessive, distorted, and caricatured ways that are expressive of an underlying crisis or anxiety. With adolescent celebrities, the commodication of innocence meets the sexualization of culture. Adolescents are in a liminal space between childhood and adulthood, and presumably between innocence and sexuality. The dichotomization of these constructs leaves little space for transition and creates tension due to the lack of any shared understanding of who should be what when. We sought to explore how the public response to Cyruss dance captures this tension, using her persona as a platform.
Method
Website pages that contained reader comments were identied through Google.com searches (performed Feb 13, 2011). Specically, we sought website
Lamb et al.
169
articles and blog posts that reported on Cyruss Teen Choice Awards performance within three weeks of the event. We also restricted the search to articles and posts that focused on this event and the public reaction to it in particular. The search terms Miley Cyrus, pole dance, and comment were entered. Additional search terms were added to identify sites for the following categories: mainstream news (news), entertainment news (entertainment), parent-oriented (parent), and teenoriented (fansite). For each search, the three highest-rated sites that met our criteria were selected. We attempted to target sites with dierent readerships in order to gather a more rounded representation of the potentially varied opinions of these groups. In particular, we felt that the content and reader experience of the site may have inuenced commentary in some ways and that particular discourses may appear more readily on some sites rather than others. While we acknowledge that targeting websites rather than other sources does limit the sample to those who have access to and interest in the internet, we also believe that websites oer a kind of freedom of expression that may be inhibited in other forums. That said, Internet research entails some unique ethical concerns (see e.g. Heilferty, 2011), particularly around boundaries of public and private space. The comments included in this analysis were taken from open-access sites where commenter pseudonyms were used; commenters are further de-identied by not using their pseudonyms in this paper. Sites used were categorized according to their intended purpose and readership, identied though advertisements and content. Twelve total sites were identied, three from each category. The highest ranked results were chosen if inclusion criteria were met. Site pages were excluded if there was no forum for readers to leave comments. Opinion pieces and blogs were also excluded from the mainstream news category. In addition, the website Youtube.com was searched for videos of the performance using the search terms Miley Cyrus and pole dance. The comments from the three videos with the highest number of views were included in the analysis. A total of 13 websites were surveyed (Table 1). Once site pages were identied, up to 50 comments from each site were included, beginning from the rst comment posted. The authors agreed by consensus that the 50 comment limit allowed enough space for a potential dialogue and diversity of commenters without so much temporal distance from the event that the commentary strayed from the event itself. We wanted to focus on more immediate reactions to the event. Comments were excluded from analysis if they were spam or uncodeable (i.e. could not be read by the coders due to being non-English or comments that do not provide enough content to be interpreted and categorized). Analysis followed two paths. First inductive thematic analysis guided development of themes and subthemes (Braun and Clarke, 2006). Two authors independently developed a list of themes that they decided were representative of important features in the 439 comments, informed by feminist theory on sexualization as well as the literature on celebrities and sexualization and the issues of age and agency therein. The authors then merged these two sets of themes into dominant themes by consensus and categorized the comments accordingly. Initially 15 separate thematic
Table 1. Description of comment sources.
170
Source website
Source code Article title Article date Description of perceived readership
Number of comments used
Entertainment News www.eonline.com 08/10/09 08/11/09 08/10/09 50 50 50
E1
www.starpulse.com
E2
www.popwatch.ew.com
E3
Miley Cyrus pole dances at the Teen Choice Awards Miley Cyruss pole dance at Teen Choice Awards too much? Miley Cyrus pole dancing at the Teen Choice Awards: Rather unfortunate, yes? 08/12/09 08/11/09 08/11/09 Predominantly female adults with children. Predominantly female adults with children. Predominantly female adults with children. 30 8 10
Predominantly female; mixed adolescents, emerging adults, and adults. Predominantly female; mixed adolescents, emerging adults, and adults. Predominantly female; mixed adolescents, emerging adults, and adults.
Parenting Sites http://blog.timesunion.com/parenting/
P1
http://www.nj.com/parenting/kate_krier/
P2
http://stayathomemoms.about.com
P3
Parents upset over Miley Cyrus pole dancing Miley Cyrus pole dance at Teen Choice Awards: This mom isnt happy Miley Cyruss pole dancing a my roots tribute Miley Cyrus party in the USA pole dance Miley Cyrus provokes more controversy Billy Ray Cyrus defends Miley Cyruss pole dancing Miley Cyruss Teen Choice pole dance 08/10/09 08/13/09 08/10/09 08/21/09 08/13/09 08/30/09
Teen Sites www.hannahmontanazone.com
T1
15 2 21
www.lastgonemovie.net
T2
www.disneydreaming.com
T3
Predominantly female preteens and early adolescents. Predominantly female preteens and early adolescents. Predominantly female preteens and early adolescents.
Mainstream News Sites www.huffingtonpost.com
N1
50 10 17
www.washingtonpost.com
N2
www.nydailynews.com
N3
Miley Cyrus, poles apart from her tween self What would Mickey say? Miley Cyrus pole dances during performance at Teen Choice Awards Miley Cyrus Party in the USA Miley Cyrus Teen Choice Awards 2009 Miley Cyrus pole dancing CNN news
Mixed male and female, predominantly adults. Mixed male and female, predominantly adults. Mixed male and female, predominantly adults.
YouTube Videos www.youtube.com
Y1
08/10/09 08/11/09 08/11/09
50 50 50
www.youtube.com
Y2
www.youtube.com
Y3
Mixed male and female, predominantly adolescents and young adults. Mixed male and female, predominantly adolescents and young adults. Mixed male and female, predominantly adolescents and young adults.
Note: Sites are listed by their ranking from the Google search.
Lamb et al.
171
categories were agreed upon and dened; categorized comments were re-read and discussed by the three authors in order to rene the categories into three major themes: childhood innocence and adult agency; agency, society, and sex; and contextualization of the performance. Discourse analytic procedures as outlined in Willig (2008) and suggested in Potter and Wetherell (1994) were then used as the basis for an attempt to understand the coded texts as competing discourses and interpretive repertoires available with an eye towards contradictions and context. With the understanding that every social action and every cultural product or text has to be treated as a source or as an opportunity for creating multiple meanings (Durrheim, 1997: 181), and that discourse works to construct social practice within specic contexts (Potter and Wetherell, 1994), the three authors proposed to each other and then agreed upon available overarching positions that represented interpretive repertoires used by commenters to explain and reect on the event.
Analysis Childhood innocence and adult agency

Agency was an overarching theme we found in a variety of responses. With regard to agency, comments positioned Cyrus in ways that conferred varying degrees of it, often using her age a gauge for measurement. When positioning her with less agency, comments reected Cyrus as a child, as handled by Disney, as handled by her father, and as a product of a growingly sexualized culture. In contrast, other comments positioned her as an independent agent, responsible for choices that could either be empowering or problematic. These subject positions suggested more and less agency and linked blame for the act accordingly. Below we take a closer look at these positions in turn. Before analyzing the comments of others, we wanted to note that the theme of childhood innocence runs through most discussions about the sexualization of girls and that Cyruss handlers may have been well aware that she, as an adolescent, represented a position between childhood and adult sexuality. The use of the ice cream cart might have been a way to contextualize the pole dance in a set that positioned her as a kid just having fun rather than a sexual woman dancing to attract male attention. In this way, the ice cream cart references the innocence of childhood, therefore disqualifying Cyruss act as truly sexual. Shugart et al. (2001) write of the use of juxtaposed images to recontextualize acts, and the placement of the ice cream cart in a dance set that involved arguably pornographic moves is an example of such a juxtaposition. This decontextualization may in fact be motivated by what Giroux (2009) characterizes as adults desire to simplify childhood via the refusal to acknowledge the existence of something as complicated as sexuality within its innocence, such that they may avoid responsibility for it. This discourse of innocence, Giroux writes, allows the cultural valuing of protecting childrens innocence to exist alongside their sexualization and commodication. Comments that grapple with Cyruss sexualization hint at this uneasy coexistence.
172
The rst repertoire identied in the analysis positioned Cyrus as na ve, innocent, and dependent and depicted her performance as the machination of adults who are greedy and crass rather than looking out for her interests as a child. Comments that reected this interpretive repertoire remarked that her dance move was most likely a decision based on business and made by her father as manager, her handlers, and Disney, thus positioning Cyrus as not an agent and therefore not a contributor to her own sexualization:
You guys are all dumb she doesnt do her own choreography so she was told to use that pole she wasnt pole dancing just for the hell of it. and she probably had that wardrobe chosen for her 2. Idiots. (Y1) So the 150 adults that put on the show had nothing to do with what she did. The director didnt know they needed a portable pole to be wheeled out. You guys really need to grow up. Yes she is young and all the adults around her are pushing the sex. (E1) Her parents have let her get out of hand. Truly sad. (E1) She dosent wanna dress like this im sure they just lay out the outt for her and if she dosent do it they get mad. being a star isnt that good im pretty sure if miley could go back she would have lived a normal life. (E1)
These comments and others like them reference the orchestration and marketing involved in the creation and maintenance of a star and brand like Cyrus. The discourse positions her as a pawn and places her performance in a larger context of capitalist economic forces of Disney into which her parents buy as a result of greed. Specically, some comments referenced the exploitation of her sexuality by others for material gain. Another set of comments revealed a discourse that avoided analysis of sexuality in the act, or that Cyruss sexuality was not an inherent aspect of the performance. These comments invoked a repertoire of Cyruss innocence:
Even though i havent met miley i know she would never do such a thing (E3) It is just dancing and nothing more. (N1) I think that labeling this as a pole dance is an exaggeration and an attempt at getting people more worked up then they really should be. (N1) Miley you are awesome and you rock forget about all the haters. you were doing a job which was not pole dancing. (E1)
These comments were largely protective of Cyrus and reected a criticism of a culture that is not inherently sexualized but one that intentionally sexualizes
Lamb et al.
173
otherwise innocent acts such as Cyruss performance. Here, Cyrus was positioned at times as innocent of the intention to portray herself as sexual or of being sexual herself. At other times she was positioned as a sexual agent who was just dancing and not intending to be provocative. Another discourse emerged that granted Cyrus more agency with regards to the performance. Within this discourse, important adults in her life held some responsibility for it, but Cyrus was ultimately the one who chose this act and is old enough to know better:
Id understand if she was 20 or older for that to be okay, but its not at her age. I feel that she made a very bad choice here. (N1) With all the poor decisions shes been making, clearly the parents gained a spot on her payroll and lost all parental objectivity and authority. (E2) Shes only 16 and for her father to be ok with her parading around that way is such a shame. They are both just after headlines and money. (P3)
Rather than blaming adults around her alone, these comments also blame Cyrus for self-sexualizing at too young of an age and in some cases for using her sexuality for secondary gains. The position here is not that the self-sexualization is in itself the problem but rather Cyruss choice to do so at the wrong age or for the wrong reasons. Within this same discourse, Cyrus was alternatively positioned as an independent agent with regard to the dance and portrayed it in a positive light:
Miley is living her life. She is living her life of stardom. She has a sense of style. She can shake her hips when she wants. (E2) she needs to have a new adult image to be successful in life. so . . . RIGHT ON MILEY! (E3)
These comments draw on a discourse of empowerment about Cyrus as an adolescent and as a celebrity, giving Cyrus credit for her choice to grow up and be successful, and also constructing growing up not only as making ones own choices but as showing ones sexuality. As one, commenter puts it, i think shes just growing up and wants to be seen like one (T3). In this comment, being seen as a grownup means being seen as sexual. Prevailing discourse about adolescence is that it is both a time of transition and a time of rebellion. If Cyrus is rebelling, then she is in need of parents to rein her in, and give her good boundaries. Thus Cyrus, like many adolescents, was positioned as in need of parents to protect her from herself. This discourse constructs adolescence as a period of transition that gives adolescents time to make mistakes and develop autonomy as well as responsibility; however, it also constructs adolescents as neo-liberal, choosing subjects decontextualized from the industries and mainstream media that shape their choices and undermines their autonomy.
174
To summarize, this set of discourses focused on the power of those around Cyrus who packaged her as a commodity, including her parents, Disney, and her handlers, and how they relate to her own agency. Importantly, these discourses tended to appear in the context of a discussion or conversation between commmenters that in many ways reected the three interpretations of sexualization identied by Gill (2009) as they related to Cyruss performance: (a) that it reects a culture that is morally corrupt and over-sexualized, (b) that is reects a culture that is progressive, and (c) that it reects sexual objectication as empowerment. These three interpretations often appeared in alternation, and the interpretive repertoires and subject positions invoked within the comments must be understood within the context of the other repertoires and positions found in other comments. Some of the comments describe these inuences in a way that points to Cyruss innocence as a child, some point to her as a celebrity who colludes with these marketing strategies, and some draw on discourses of adolescence and rebellion. There was another set of responses that seemed to depend less on guring out to what extent Cyrus was to blame and more on what has become of society lately. These responses, discussed below, do include comments on Cyruss agency and responsibility, but these occur in the context of a broader discussion regarding US society and its attitudes towards sex, sexuality, and teens. In this way, these comments reect a generalized representation of the interpretations of sexualization identied by Gill (2009) and described above.
Agency, society, and sex

A range of comments focused on Cyrus as a symbol of broader cultural trends, not specically on Cyrus and her status as a child, adolescent, or adult, but on society at large. In one discourse, Cyruss dance reected a repressed society while in another the dance represented a culture of sexualization. These comments were positioned at a greater distance from the event, focusing on us rather than Cyrus and her handlers, and the reaction to the performance rather than the performance itself. First, comments reected a discourse of liberality and sex positivity and also criticism of the competing discourse of conservatism:
I read these comments and begin to think there are a lot of repressed preachers on the loose that think everyone should think the way they do. (N1) Cmon, are we all so innocent ourselves that were commenting on this . . . Yeah if I squint my eyes really good I think I can see her provocative gyrations . . . everyones a critic from behind the keyboard! (P1)
In the reverse scenario, some comments evoked a discourse that portrayed Cyruss self-sexualization or her handlerssexualization of her as a sad outcome
Lamb et al.
175
of the culture of sexualization, with celebrity self-sexualization representing a heightened version of such:
We live in a culture where Madonna long ago made it acceptable to equate growing up with tarting up. (N2) They are trying to sexualize girls younger and younger in this country... Its all about making money they dont care about your kids or the kids on Nick/ Disney. (P1)
The aective tone of these comments ranges from sadness the world is going to hell in a hand basket to outrage. While few provide examples of how growing up too fast is harmful, the underlying message is that this country has a problem and it is harming girls. These comments represent a kind of conversation between two positions that reect a pervasive dichotomy with regard to sexuality. This dichotomy appears in politically or socially conservative versus liberal positions, the agency pendulum that Gill (2007a, 2007b) has identied, and even the pro-sex/ anti-sex debate within feminism as well as more recent debates about adolescent agency (Bay-Cheng, 2011; Duits and van Zoonen, 2007; Gavey, 2011; Gill, 2007a, 2012: Lamb, 2010a; Lamb and Peterson, 2011; Peterson and Lamb, 2012). The continued conversation revolves around to what extent adolescents who believe they are empowered in their so-called self-sexualization are actually empowered, to what extent they are agents making choices or dupes of the media and marketers, and to what extent researchers need to trust the perspectives of girls on this subject. Within this second discourse, Cyrus was positioned as a representation, or a discursive subject, of an inappropriate sexuality that is omnipresent:
Pre-pubescent girls shouldnt be getting ideas about exploiting their sexuality and putting it on display before theyve even discovered it for themselves. (N3) People today wonder why young teenage girls want to dress like strippers and sluts. The thanks for that desire goes to girls like Miley Cyrus. (N1)
This discourse also positioned her as having a social responsibility to other girls. The problem is girls today, and Cyrus contributes to it. Thus, Cyruss responsibility for the performance was viewed less in terms of its consequences for her career and more about how the performance contributes to cultural discourses of sexuality, and represents the societal tensions between agency and sexualization. While Cyrus was criticized for enacting a position that is irresponsible because of the sexuality it perpetuates or encourages in other girls or adolescents, the focus of this discourse is on the problem of adolescent female sexuality. By positioning Cyrus as having such power over girls, the discourse at the same time demoted girls to dupes whose celebrity worship leads them down problematic pathways to sexuality. Thus, even when Cyrus was given agency, the lack of agency in adolescent girls in general is supported through these comments.
176
Contextualizing the dance

One set of comments appeared to situate Cyrus in discourses about gender, race, and class as well as in controversies about such. One commenter suggested bias: Certain celebs get villied for suggestive lyrics or dancing, while others are given a free pass (P1). Another quite explicitly named her sexualized performance as ghetto: You can take Miley out of the ghetto, but you cannot take the ghetto out of Miley (N3). Others called it trashy: I knew the performance would be trash the minute she stepped out of a trailer in the beginning (P2). The use of a word like ghetto suggests she demeaned herself by acting lower class and black; the use of trashy suggests lower class, southern and white, conveying a dierent set of stereotypes. Similarly, comments about the South position her as a representative of Southern culture which is situated as lower class in much of this discourse and more generally in the US. Other discourses about the South (MacPherson, 2003) could have privileged her as a White Southern belle or as a lady. Her roots, conceptualized in this set of remarks in the Southern lower classes, were not only used to demean her as trashy, but were also discussed as a source of resilience against the Hollywood sexuality she was purportedly displaying: Im a fan but how do i even defend her on this she just needs a break from the famous life and go back to her roots cause she keeps falling (Y2). The word falling evokes the Christian religious language of the South. It seems important to also note that the phrase white trash is typically used to describe girls, often Southern girls, but perhaps not boys, who might be called rednecks instead (Bettie, 2000). Within white American culture, this may work similarly to the word slut, which is used to police girls in high schools and middle schools into a presumed more innocent and less sexual behavior (Brown, 2004; Tanenbaum, 1999), although slut a does not typically intersect with race and class. A discourse of caution gave ample warnings to Cyrus with regard to walking the line between sexy and slutty:
A self-respecting girl knows the dierence between looking good and looking like a slut (and they dont want to look the latter, because they might begin carrying the reputation as one). . . . Sex appeal is ne, but when you hold on to a pole, get down low so a quarter of the audience can see up your skirt, thats not right, not if you are trying to put yourself out as a real performer (over a performer in a strip club). (E3)
Cyrus herself, in news reports after the performance (which of course may not be from Cyrus herself at all), attempted to position herself as a Southern lower class girl who owns these identities. The news story reports her saying Im like,This is to represent where I am from. Im so proud of it. . . . Its about my roots (Carroll, 2009), and thereby creates a Cyrus who is proud of where she came from, even patriotic. Rather than seeing her as a rebellious sexualized teen, she is a rebellious representative of working or lower class Southern girls who will not be put down by snobbish Northerners. Cyrus is proud of her success as a Southerner. Her embrace of her Southern roots can be read as her legitimization of her social
Lamb et al.
177
position as a rich white girl who is thus protected from being condemned as trailer trash (Attwood, 2006; Hartigan, 1997). This turn also undermined the focus on Disney or her parents promoting her sexualized image, in that down home contrasts to Hollywood and returns ownership to Cyrus herself. If she is just a Southern girl, audiences are thrown o the track of her Hollywood-earned millions. She is not rich and privileged, but one of the people. However, not everyone can reclaim slut or evoke white trash and not be damaged by such performances. As pole dancing in gyms permits middle class white women to perform a sexual dance for tnesss sake (Whitehead and Kurz, 2009), Cyruss whiteness and richness (and, although not included in the discourses, her, able-bodiedness) permit her to perform white trash without risk of damage to her reputation. Her trailer performance was met with critique by some commenters:
Its kind of demeaning the way shes acting like coming out of a trailer is soo radical and shes making some kind of statement. A lot of the United States population actually live in trailers and she needs to stop exoticizing it and putting it on display as if its something wierd. (E2)
Others seemed to buy into the idea that she was proud of her roots:
Miley stated that she thought her performance was funny and it was showing she was proud of where she came from. Nothing wrong with that, Im proud of my Louisiana roots, but it seems insulting and degrading when she comes out of a trailer, acting like trailer trash. (E2).
This commenter positions herself as a defender of the South and still critical of Cyrus, thus opening up the possibility for other commenters that one is not disloyal if one critiques the sexualizing aspect of the dance. The slut (in some comments rewritten as trash) discussion deserves further mention. One of the feminist issues with regard to the debate on sexualization is how and in what manner adolescent girls can express their sexuality without it being dubbed sexualization or self-sexualization (Lamb, 2010a; Lamb and Peterson, 2011). To this end, many commenters did not buy into characterizing Cyrus as slutty and remarked that Cyrus is an adolescent and that adolescents are supposed to be developing sexually. They framed Cyruss act as an example of developing sexuality rather than promiscuity, thus reinforcing the idea that an adolescent can get too slutty, but that this wasnt the case with Cyruss dance:
So you people are saying that ANYONE that does pole dancing is a slut. You all are wrong . . . Relax and focus on things that matter. (Y2) People who think this is stripping should actually go to a strip club. Ive never seen a dancer do that! It also needs to be said that being 16 years old makes Miley older than a little girl and legally capable of actually *gasp* having sex in most states. (N1)
178
You people r over doin it. Come on at least shes not a 13 year old pregnant girl. (E2)
Many of these comments reect a get with it attitude and convey the message that if commenters think Cyrus is pushing a boundary, they should gain perspective by comparing her to others. Others countered by questioning the appropriate level of sexual expression for developing teenagers and, as noted earlier in the last section, decried the sexualization of society:
Shes really fucking up her reputation she knows girls look up to her. Shes humped thing, kissed things, and even had sex already. this isnt rite of her. (Y3) Why is she in such a hurry to be an adult. She should be a normal 17 year old and not putting on an image for the teen-agers of a girl going downhill at a rapid pace. (E2)
This is indeed a confusing concern in current sexualization research, including the American Psychological Association Task Force Report on the Sexualization of Girls (American Psychological Association, 2007). Some argued that there does exist a positive sexuality for adolescence that is less of a performance of sexiness and more about experiencing oneself as an embodied sexual person in relation to another (Tolman, 2002, 2012). Others posited that a performance of being sexy is not always regressive: that presenting ones body for viewing is part of wanting to look sexy and is not only objectifying (Peterson, 2010). The discourse around Cyruss exhibition of her sexuality is similar to this conict within feminism, exemplied by these two comments:
Empowering women, which is a goal of true feminism, is about allowing every women to choose the life she wants, and to not be told what to do by a man or group of men in power. Want to be a stripper? President? doctor? etc? You have the right to do so. . . . I think its ne for Miley to dress that way, too. Shes putting on a show, shes onstage. (E2) Mileys performance only proves one thing, as woman we havent come as far as we think we have. Theres a dierence between being secure in our sexuality as a woman and just being trashy and sleezy. As per usual, Miley, along with the majority of famous female stars, are proving that a woman cant be successful unless shes hanging out of her clothes, or dancing on a pole. (E2)
Within this discourse of teens growing up is the acknowledgement that in US culture, late adolescence is a time when adolescents are permitted or even encouraged to be sexual and that this is normative:
Shes turning 17 this year and shes not a child anymore. (E1) what miley does is not being a slut, but its called being a teenager. (Y2)
Lamb et al.
179
These sets of comments reect a discourse in feminism today, one that acknowledges that adolescents are sexual beings, but that appears to critique any form of expression of it (Lamb, 2010a; Lamb and Peterson, 2011). Because it has been so dicult for feminists to dene a healthy sexuality for adolescent girls, they unwittingly, in the ght against sexualization, may be supporting the age-old discourse that names sexualized adolescents as sluts.
Conclusion
The analysis of online comments regarding Cyruss performance yielded three dominant themes. Each theme, in turn, captured discourses commenters used that positioned Cyrus as more or less agentic, as a product of several varying cultures, and which described problems of sexualization in society at large. One extremely interesting aspect of these 400+ comments was the way very few claimed that her pole-dance might be seen as a sexualized dance for men. As even the discourse that positioned her as branding herself as an adult did not reference men, a gendered analysis was largely absent in the commentaries. What does it mean that the gender/power dimension of that act was left undebated? It speaks to Bartkys (1990) idea that while objectication must have begun with acts performed to please men, the internalization of the male gaze and the self-scrutiny that follows obscures who has the power and what kind of power that is. Women begin to see self-objectication as a form of pleasing themselves (Fredrickson and Roberts, 1997). If the world can judge Cyrus as slut or not slut without ever mentioning male viewers, then the male gaze is internalized. At the very least it is notable that this media restorm centered around gendered comments about a young woman. No male equivalent would have likely garnered as much attention. Whats also interesting is that without an examination of the sexism inherent in this view, the anti-sexualization arguments are more likely to sound like arguments about sex, and thus evoke counter-arguments about conservative sexuality. The original point about objectication, that it maintains and enhances an unequal status between men and women that correlates to other inequalities, is lost, and sexualization gets reduced to an argument about too sexy too soon rather than too sexy for whom. Clearly the comments are greatly inuenced by gender perceptions, and these comments are not about sexualization in a non-gendered sense. Miley Cyruss pole dance commenters reproduce a supercial public discourse about sex leaving aspects of male power, race, and class unexplored. The discourse produced centers on what sex is appropriate and what sex is shameful. Indeed, the words shame on you appeared frequently and were directed towards a myriad of people Cyrus, her father, Disney, and other commenters. When such discussions appear outside of discussions of inequalities and oppression, they reproduce an old debate about sexual freedom and one concerned with shaming. It has been several years since Cyruss dance at the awards ceremony and her career has certainly survived the controversy around this act if not ourished because of it. Some celebrities are able to move in and out of spaces that are controversial and, in this case, to walk the line between adolescence and adulthood,
180
innocence and sluttiness, and poor Southerner and rich Hollywood star. The discourse around adolescent female agency, empowerment, choice, and voice continue in the problematic ways Gill (2008) initially described. Still, it is heartening to hear an interpretive repertoire that focuses on the manufacturing of image and sexuality, even if at the same time very old positions regarding shame and female sexuality continue with no reference to patriarchy and male power. References
American Psychological Association, Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls (2007) Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. Washington, DC: Author, Retrieved from: www.apa.org/pi/wpo/sexualization.html. Attwood F (2005) Fashion and passion: Marketing sex to women. Sexualities 8(4): 392406. Attwood F (2006) Sexed up: Theorizing the sexualization of culture. Sexualities 9: 7794. Bartky SL (1990) Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. London, UK: Routledge. Bay-Cheng L (2011) Recovering empowerment: De-personalizing and re-politicizing adolescent female sexuality. Sex Roles. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1007/ s11199-011-0070-x. Bettie J (2000) Women without class: Chicas, cholas, trash, and the presence/absence of class identity. Signs 26(1): 135. Billig M (1996) Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Bogle K (2008) Hooking Up: Sex, Dating and Relationships on Campus. New York, NY: New York University Press. Braun V and Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. QualitativeResearch in Psychology 3: 77101. Brown L (2004) Raising Their Voices: The Politics of Girls Anger. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Coy M and Garner M (2010) Glamour modeling and the marketing of self-sexualization. International Journal of Cultural Studies 13(6): 657675. Carroll L (2009) Miley cyrus spoofs her Tennessee roots in Teen Choice Award Performance. MTV. Available at: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1617968/mileycyrus-spoofs-her-roots-tca-performance.jhtml (accessed 23 April 2012). Duits L and van Zoonen L (2007) Whos afraid of female agency?: A rejoinder to Gill. European Journal of Womens Studies 14: 161170. Durham MG (2008) The Lolita Effect: The Media Sexualization of Young Girls and What We Can Do About It. New York, NY: Overlook. Durham MG (2011) Body matters: Resuscitating the corporeal in a new media environment. Feminist Media Studies 11(1): 5360. Durrheim K (1997) Social constructionism, discourse and psychology. South African Journal of Psychology 27: 175182. Evans A, Riley S and Shankar A (2010) Technologies of sexiness: Theorizing womens engagement in the sexualization of culture. Feminism & Psychology 20(1): 114141. FoxNews (2009) Miley Cyrus gets raunchy with a pole at the Teen Choice Awards, wins six trophies. Available at: http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2009/08/10/miley-cyrusgets-raunchy-pole-teen-choice-awards-wins-trophies/ (accessed 1 April 2012). Fredrickson BL and Roberts TA (1997) Objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly 21: 173206.
Lamb et al.
181
Gavey N (2011) Beyond empowerment?: Sexuality in a sexist world. Sex Roles. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-011-0069-3. Gill R (2007a) Critical respect: The difficulties and dilemmas of agency and choice for feminism: A reply to Duits and van Zoonen. European Journal of Womens Studies Journal 14: 6980. Gill R (2007b) Gender and the Media. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. Gill R (2008) Empowerment/sexism: Figuring female agency in contemporary advertising. Feminism & Psychology 18: 3560. Gill R (2009) Beyond the sexualisation of culture thesis: An interactional analysis of sixpacks, midriffs, and hot lesbians in advertising. Sexualities 12(2): 137160. Gill R (2012) Media, empowerment, and sexualization of culture debates. Sex Roles. Advanced online publication. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-011-0107-1. Giroux HA (2009) Child beauty pageants: A scene from the Other America [Web log post]. Available at: http://archive.truthout.org/051109A (accessed 1 April 2012). Hartigan J (1997) Unpopular culture: The case of white trash. Cultural Studies 11(2): 316343. Heilferty CM (2011) Ethical considerations in the study of online illness narratives: A qualitative review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 67(5): 945953. Hepburn A and Wiggins S (2005) Developments in discursive psychology. Discourse & Society 16(5): 595601. Holland S (2010) Pole Dancing, Empowerment and Embodiment. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Lamb S (2010a) Feminist ideals for a healthy female adolescent sexuality: A critique. Sex Roles 62: 294306. Lamb S (2010b) Porn as a pathway to empowerment? A response to Petersons commentary. Sex Roles 62: 314317. Lamb S and Brown LM (2006) Packaging Girlhood: Saving our Daughters from Marketers Schemes. New York, NY: St. Martins Press. Lamb S and Peterson ZD (2011) Adolescent girls sexual empowerment: Two feminists explore the concept. Sex Roles. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-0119995-3. Levin D and Kilbourne J (2008) So Sexy So Soon: The New Sexualized Childhood and What Parents Can Do to Protect Their Kids. New York, NY: Ballantine. Levy A (2005) Female Chauvinist Pigs: Women and the Rise of Raunch Culture. New York, NY: Free Press. Liaing E (2011) The medias sexualization of female athletes: A bad call for the modern game. Student Pulse: Online Student Academic Journal 3(10): 12. Lumby C and Albury K (2008) Inquiry into the sexualisation of children in the contemporary media environment. Submission no. 146, Senate Standing Committee on Environment, Communications, and the Arts: Department of the Senate [Online]. Available at: http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate?Committtee/eca-ctte/sexaulization-of-children/submissions/sub146.pdf (accessed 2 January 2012). Lumby C and Funnell N (2011) Between heat and light: The opportunity in moral panics. Crime Media Culture 7(3): 277291. MacPherson T (2003) Reconstructing Dixie: Race, Gender, and Nostalgia in the Imagined South. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. McKinley N and Hyde J (1996) Objectified body consciousness scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly 20(2): 181215.
182
McNair B (1996) Mediated Sex: Pornography and Postmodern Culture. London, UK/ New York, NY: Arnold. McNair B (2002) Striptease Culture: Sex, Media and the Democratization of Desire. London, UK: Routledge. McRobbie A (2004) Post-feminism and popular culture: Bridget Jones and the new gender regime. Feminist Media Studies 4(3): 255264. McRobbie A (2008) The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: Sage. Peterson ZD (2010) What is sexual empowerment? A multidimensional and process-oriented approach to adolescent girls sexual empowerment. Sex Roles 62(56): 307313. Peterson ZD and Lamb S (2012) The political context for personal empowerment: Continuing the conversation. Sex Roles. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1007/ s11199-012-0150-6O. Potter J and Wetherell M (1994) Analyzing discourse. In: Bryman A and Burgess RG (eds) Analyzing Qualitative Data. London, UK: Routledge, pp. 4766. Rush E and LaNauze A (2006) Corporate paedophilia: Sexualisation of children in Australia. Discussion Paper Number 90, The Australia Institute. Shinkle E (2008) Fashion as Photograph: Viewing and Reviewing Images of Fashion. London, UK: I. B. Tauris. Shugart HA, Wagoner CE and Hallstein DLO (2001) Mediating third-wave feminism: Appropriation as postmodern media practice. Critical Studies in Media Communication 18(2): 194210. Tanenbaum L (1999) Slut!: Growing Up Female with a Bad Reputation. New York, NY: Seven Stories Press. Tolman DL (2002) Dilemmas of Desire: Teenage Girls Talk about Sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Tolman DL (2012) Female adolescents, sexual empowerment, and desire: A missing discourse of gender inequity. Sex Roles. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1007/s11199012-0122-x. Tyler I (2008) Chav Mum Chav Scum: Class disgust in contemporary Britain. Feminist Media Studies 8(1): 1734. Vena J (2009) Disney distances itself from Miley Cyruss Teen Choice Performance. MTV. Available at: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1618490/disney-distances-itself-frommileys-performance.jhtml (accessed 1 April 2012). Wetherell M (1998) Positioning and interpretive repertoires: Conversation analysis and structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society 9(3): 387412. Wetherell M, Taylor S and Yates S (2001) Discourse as Data. Berkshire, UK/New York, NY: Open University Press. Wetherell M and Potter J (1988) Discourse analysis and the identification of interpretative repertoires. In: Antaki C (ed.) Analysing Everyday Explanation: A Casebook of Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 168183. Whitehead K and Kurz T (2009) Empowerment and the pole: A discursive investigation of the reinvention of pole dancing as a recreational activity. Feminism & Psychology 19: 224244. Williams ME (2009) The week in Miley Cyrus pole-dancing outrage: What makes the teen stars rump-shaking performance depressing isnt that its shocking; Its that its so familiar. Salon.com. Available at: http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/feature/2009/08/14/ miley_outrage (accessed 1 April 2012).
Lamb et al.
183
Willig C (2008) Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2nd ed. Berkshire, UK/New York, NY: Open University Press.
Author Biographies Sharon Lamb is a Professor and chair in the Department of Counseling and School Psychology at the University of Massachusetts, Boston. Her current work is in the areas of adolescent female sexuality, sexualization of girls, and sex education as moral education. Kelly Graling is a doctoral candidate in the Clinical Psychology Department at the University of Massachusetts, Boston. Emily E Wheeler is a doctoral candidate in Counseling Psychology at the University of Massachusetts, Boston.

Feminism &amp; Psychology 2013 Lamb 163 83

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Feminism &amp; Psychology 2013 Lamb 163 83

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Feminism & Psychology http://fap.sagepub.

Downloaded from fap.sagepub.com at CRAI-Universitat de Barcelona on August 29, 2013