Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By Dag Friis Bob McGrath Christian Knapp Ocean Engineering Research Centre MUN Engineering
Scope:
Components of the Propulsion System Where engine power goes Propeller types
Propulsive efficiency
Cavitation Selection Guidelines
system
3
Indicated Power
Brake Power
Shaft Power
Delivered Power
Remaining 48%
Propeller Types:
Fixed Pitch Least Expensive in initial cost Efficient for wide range of operations
constant while pitch is varied for different loading conditions, or both simultaneously
Nozzles:
KORT RICE
Built Low Speed Efficiency Loses operational efficiency when majority of time spent steaming
Built for Steaming Efficiency Multiple options by going with either speed or towing nozzle
Depends on application and how much clearance you have if using a nozzle makes sense
Mewis Duct:
have to be matched to the best possible propeller characteristics for this application.
10
diameter the more efficient the propeller, i.e. choose the largest propeller that can be reasonably accommodated in the available propeller aperture.
Propeller clearances (inches) Prop diameter (inches) 60 minimum a b 4.8 4.8 maximum 12.0 15.0 minimum 5.8 5.8 72 maximum 14.4 18.0 minimum 8.0 8.0 100 maximum 20.0 25.0
c
d
9.0
1.8
18.0
3.6
10.8
2.2
21.6
4.3
15.0
3.0
30.0
6.0
Cavitation:
Cavitation occurs when the pressure in an area of the propeller falls below the vapour pressure. This results in bubbles or Cavities of steam forming The problem is that when the steam cavities collapse on the surface of the propeller it leads to erosion of the blade material Collapse also generates noise
12
Cavitation:
TIP CAVITATION
SHEET CAVITATION
13
propeller efficiency
The choice is made on the basis of choosing the smallest
ratio that will give satisfactory propeller performance from a Cavitation point of view.
14
Lowers likelihood of flow separation and eddy making Increases flow velocity through propeller Results in more uniform flow velocity through propeller
15
16
Nozzle can be detrimental for boats that spend a major portion of their time steaming to and from the grounds due to the increased drag at cruising speed
This is only likely to be the best alternative if the vessel spends most of its time towing gear Usually fitted with controllable pitch to optimize performance at both operating conditions
17
Reduce unnecessary hotel loads (extra deep freezes, clothes dryers, T.V.s, cabin
lights, etc)
18
Testimonials:
64'11" RPM VS Fuel Economy
35 30 25 20 GPH 15 10 5 0 0 50 100 150 200 RPM 250 300 350 400 60" Diameter 66" Diameter 86" Diameter
86 diameter propeller achieving best fuel econ. and highest speed at lowest rpm
19
Testimonials:
Identical 34'11" Vessels, Speed vs Prop Diameter at 660 RPM
10 9
8
7 6 Speed (kts) 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 5 10 15 Prop Diameter (in) 20 25 30
Simulations:
35 fixed gear vessel: Altered as-built prop from 25 to 30 diameter Achieved 12% fuel savings per hour 65 mobile gear vessel: Constrained in diameter due to as-built specs Achieved 2% fuel savings per hour by altering pitch Greater savings achievable by altering of gear ratio
21
Conclusions:
Have your propeller checked by a qualified professional for suitability of Diameter,
Pitch, RPM, and Blade Area Ratio and resulting efficiency for your operation possibly a nozzle propeller may be the best choice
If you are towing fishing gear a significant part of the time, a controllable pitch and If you are not towing gear a well designed fixed pitch propeller is your best option Check that changing propeller and/or gear ratio makes economic sense for the
Time and money spent in R&D can save and even make you money in the long term,
22
QUESTIONS?
VS
23
24
25
26
27
Nozzle Propeller:
If flow separation occurs around the
nozzle one will get a significant increase in drag, i.e. reducing the efficiency of the nozzle-propeller
Nozzle-Propeller diameter will be less
28
Propeller Types:
29
30
diameter the more efficient the propeller, i.e. choose the largest propeller that can be reasonably accommodated in the available propeller aperture.
This is done by allowing for
Propeller clearances (inches) Prop diameter (inches) 60 minimum a b c d 4.8 4.8 9.0 1.8 maximum 12.0 15.0 18.0 3.6 minimum 5.8 5.8 10.8 2.2 72 maximum 14.4 18.0 21.6 4.3 minimum 8.0 8.0 15.0 3.0 100 maximum 20.0 25.0 30.0 6.0
reasonable propeller clearances in order to reduce likelihood of pressure pulse vibrations being induced in the local hull structure.
31