Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
The early detection of the corrosion of reinforced concrete structure is very important to
prevent a severe damage of failure such as the collapse of buildings and bridges. The
diagnosing of reinforced concrete corrosion structure using conventional technique such
as potential mapping technique has been extensively used in the field. However, the
method still has limitation that is less accuracy, laborious and time-consuming. This
study is conducted on inverse analysis boundary element method to detect the corrosion
location of the steels in concrete structure from some potential data, which are measured
on the concrete surface. In this method, the potential in the concrete domain was
modeled by Laplace’s equation. The inverse problem is carried out by means of
minimizing a cost function. The cost function is a function of difference between the
calculated and measured potentials on the concrete surface. The calculated values of
potential are obtained by solving the Laplace’s equation using boundary element method
(BEM). Several potential values on concrete surface were applied to detect corrosion
location by using 3D boundary element inverse analysis.
INTRODUCTION
Corrosion of the reinforcement steel used in concrete leads to formation of rust. As the
steel corrodes, the volume of the rust also increases and at one stage the force induced
by the corrosion products may exceed the tensile strength of the concrete and because of
this, cracking of concrete will occur. These corrosion products would exert enormous
stress on the surrounding concrete promoting the deterioration of concrete structures.
Hence, it is important to detect corrosion of the steels in concrete structure since the
corrosion of steels in concrete is a major cause of premature deteriorations and failures
of the reinforced concrete structures. Also it is important to maintain a long life of the
structures and reduce the cost of maintenances 1-2).
Corrosion of steel in concrete reduces the life and durability of concrete structures. It
is a worldwide problem, which causes heavy losses to the economy and industry. The
corrosion of steel is inevitable. The durability of concrete structures primarily depends
on the condition of the embedded steel in concrete, apart from any deterioration that the
concrete may undergo. To determine the condition of the embedded steel, potential
surveys are carried out on concrete structures and this is one of the most important
monitoring techniques. The potential on the concrete surface is usually used to predict or
evaluate the corrosion on the steel surface in concrete structure, such as haft-cell
potential mapping technique 3-4). The half-cell potential mapping has been used widely
for evaluating and monitoring the reinforced concrete corrosion. Most of these
measurements in the field are manually carried out and the data obtained are analyzed.
Automation is the best solution where repeated measurements have to be made. This
eliminates the human errors in the measurement and improves the accuracy of the data
measured from humanly inaccessible regions of a structure 5).
The purpose of this study is to apply the boundary element inverse analysis for
identification corrosion location of steel in concrete structure. The inverse problem is
carried out by means of minimizing a cost function. The cost function is a function of
difference between the calculated and measured potentials on the concrete surface.
BASIC THEORIES
Fe → Fe 2+ + 2e (1)
At the cathode, these electrons combine with oxygen and moisture to form hydroxide
ions.
1
O 2 + H 2 O + 2e → 2OH − (2)
2
An electric current flow occurs due to the above reactions. The rate of corrosion is
determined by the current flowing between anodic and cathodic areas on steel surface 6).
Workshop, Seminar & exhibition: Indonesia’s Anti-Corrosion Days 2008
INDOCOR, 4 December 2008
The total corrosion rate is the self-corrosion rate plus the galvanic corrosion rate. The
self-corrosion rate can be neglected since it is generally much lower than the galvanic
corrosion rate.
The corrosion rate is proportional to the density of current across the surface of an
anode, so the analysis of corrosion problem can be reduced to computing the electro-
galvanic field due to multiple anodic/cathodic interactions.
MATHEMATICAL MODEL
∂ 2φ ∂ 2φ ∂ 2φ
∇ 2φ = + + =0 in Ω (3)
∂x 2 ∂y 2 ∂z 2
1
φ* = for 3D case (4)
4πr
where φ is unknown potential at any point and φ* is known fundamental solution at any
point.
The density of current across the boundaries, which will be denoted by i, is given by
∂φ
i = −κ (5)
∂n
where κ is the conductivity of the concrete, i is the current density across the boundary,
and ∂φ is the outward normal derivative. The boundary conditions associated with
∂n
Equation (3) are written as;
φ = φ0 on Γ1 (6)
i = io on Γ2 (7)
φ = − f a (i ) on Γ3a (8)
φ = − f c (i ) on Γ3c (9)
The well-known ‘Greens Second Identity’, Equation (10), is used to move the
problem from within the domain to its boundary.
⎛ ∂φ * * ∂φ ⎞
∫Ω (φ∇ φ − φ ∇ φ )dΩ = ∫Γ ⎜⎜⎝φ ∂n − φ ∂n ⎟⎟⎠dΓ
2 * * 2
(10)
∂
where n is unit outward normal and is derivative in the direction of normal.
∂n
Equation (10) shows the advantage of the boundary element method that reduction the
problem dimension by one.
The standard boundary element procedures lead to:
⎧φ s ⎫ ⎧ io ⎫
⎪ ⎪
κ [H ]⎨ − f (i a ) ⎬ − [G ]⎪⎨ i a ⎪
⎬ = 0 (11)
⎪ − f (i ) ⎪ ⎪i ⎪
⎩ c ⎭ ⎩ c ⎭
where the detail expression of matrices [H] and [G] are given in references 7), and the
subscripts s, a, c and m represent the quantities on Γ2, Γ3a and Γ3c, respectively. The
system of non-linear algebraic equation in Equation (11) can be solved by the iterative
procedures, e.g. the Newton-Raphson method. An experimental verification of the
boundary element solution is shown in reference 8). If the boundary conditions in
Equations (6) to (9) are known, than the potential φ and current density i on the overall
surface of the concrete and steel can be determined 8).
Workshop, Seminar & exhibition: Indonesia’s Anti-Corrosion Days 2008
INDOCOR, 4 December 2008
INVERSE ANALYSIS
Inverse analysis method could be used to solve the corrosion identification problem such
as corrosion of steel in concrete.
The inverse problem is carried out by minimizing the cost-function, ε in
Equation (12). The cost function is a residual between the calculated and measured
potential values at some locations on the concrete surface as given in the following
equation:
2
N ⎡⎛ φ − φˆl ⎞⎤
ε ( x) = ∑ ⎢⎜⎜ l ⎟⎥
⎟
(12)
⎢⎝ φˆMax
l =1 ⎣ ⎠⎦⎥
EXPERIMENT
For the purpose of carrying out the inverse analysis, an experiment using a prismatic
concrete block with embedded steel was performed. To study the corrosion location of
the embedded steel in concrete, a model of concrete specimen shown in Figure 1 (b) was
considered. The specimen size was 50x10x10 cm. An embedded steel, 1 cm in diameter
and 52 cm length, was cast in concrete. A single corroded area (2 cm in length) was exist
on the reinforcing steel and located at x=13 cm from the left-end of the concrete
specimen.
By using half-cell potential technique, eight potential data were measured on the
concrete surface along with the reinforced concrete direction. Table 1 shows the
measured potentials data on the concrete surface.
The inverse analysis was carried out for determining the corrosion location of the
concrete by using only eight potential data which measured on the concrete surface
given in Table 1.
In boundary element calculation, the surfaces of the concrete and steel were
discretized into 192 elements. For carrying out the inverse analysis, at first one location
of the corrosion location should be initialized. First, a single corroded area (2 cm in
length) was estimated exist at x=11 cm from the left-end of the concrete specimen.
Then, the cost function was calculated. It was repeated for estimated corrosion location
at x=13, 15 and 17 cm. Table 2 shows the cost function for each estimated location of
corrosion.
Workshop, Seminar & exhibition: Indonesia’s Anti-Corrosion Days 2008
INDOCOR, 4 December 2008
The cost function for each predicted location of corrosion was plotted in Figure 2.
The figure shows that the corrosion of reinforced concrete have been occurred at
location x=13 cm. It is the same with the prescribed corrosion location in the
experiment. Therefore, the location of corrosion in the concrete structure can be detected
precisely using the proposed method.
To evaluate the validity of the estimated result of the corrosion location of the
concrete, the obtained corrosion location was used in direct boundary element method
for recalculating the potential distribution at several locations on the surface of the
concrete specimen that the same with the measured potential location in experiment.
Table 3 gives the potential result from direct boundary element method. The potential
data distribution as a result from direct boundary element on the concrete surface is
shown in Figure 3(a). Meanwhile, Figure 3(b) plots the comparison of calculated and
measured potential data. The result indicates that the calculated potential distribution on
the concrete surface was in good agreement with the experimental data and the
percentage error was not more than 0.03 %.
CONCLUSIONS
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank ExxonMobil Malaysia that sponsored the project.
Workshop, Seminar & exhibition: Indonesia’s Anti-Corrosion Days 2008
INDOCOR, 4 December 2008
REFERENCES
Figure 3. (a) Calculated potential distribution on the concrete surface. (b) The
comparison of calculated and measured potentials on the concrete surface.