Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Use of name in report: The Commission wou!4 agree, if you want, that the Commission
will not use your name or your personal information without prior consultation with
DHS/CBP about the information we seek to use; Unless we really feel the need, we
won't use your name. However, we will not ma|ee the flat promise that we will not under
any circumstances use your name. (Circumstanc.es when would use name: probably only
in making policy recommendations or factual information that requires a quote.)
rr , .
Telephone .\ . *date:
interview nsrintnA
05/19/04 .-79/11 Law Enforcement Privacy J
Who else has interviewed you: DOJ OIG, FBI, DHS, CBP. No.
Do you recollect the inspection of this pair Moharid al Shahri on May 28, 2001? No.
Were vou assigned nol bn that date? Yes. \h of service at INS. | ~\- always at Miami; mostly pr
pre9/ll. i
FLETC. 1
When did you train? How long? 1 T- 3 months. 1 month Officer
Academy at Glynco; immigration law/police tactics.
Document fraud? Don't recall. Visa/passport fraud. Don't recall travel stamp
fraud.
Normal primary.
• Please describe the standard operating procedures you employ in primary
screening, including questions asked, documents reviewed, and databases
checked. Greet. Request documents: 1-94, customs declaration. Passport and
photo valid. Visa valid. Scan MRV passport/visa. I
• Length of stay for Bis: was there a standard length of stay given pre 9/11?
Was that apart decision, or national operating policy? If you gave less than
the standard time, were there professional repercussions? 1 month was port
policy; national policy - up to a year; anything over 1 month, ask supervisor.
• Length of stay for B2s\s there any discretion in length of stay granted B2s
pre 9/11 ? No. Over 6 months; ask supervisor; or tell them to file for
extension.
Was there a port policy about referrals to secondary; a certain criteria that had
to be met to refer to secondary? Didn't answer question.
Return ticket/ flight itinerary. Did you always ask for flight itinerary for
unusual travel? For a return ticket?
• How did inspectors view Saudis pre 9/11? Ever considered a threat to
national security? No.
• At Miami, did you ever notice that any particular nationalities were treated
any differently than others? No.
• If you could not communicate with an Arab speaker, what would you do?
Refer to secondary for translator; depending on circumstances.
• Were there any Arabic speakers in INS inspections at Newark? Did you
always have to rely on the airlines? Probably spoke English.
Profiling.
• What unusual characteristics about an alien applying for admission would
cause you concern and result in a referral to secondary? | |-
I '
• Please describe how you conducted the inspection and what transpired, to the best
of your recollection.
Changes at DHS.
• What changes do you see on the front line with the new CBP? Facilitation no a
priority; NSEERS - not yet phased out and departure control.
• Are you familiar with National Targeting Center? Yes - hits on a subject, verify
identity - arm twisting. No - can't always get record - need to get answer
approved.
• What effect has US VISIT had on entry and the inspection process? Await exit
kiosks! US Visit runs quick and doesn't hinder inspection time and people
cooperated. Feel more confident. TECS hit, not biometric.
• Use and value of SEVIS. Yes used. Problem is to get password. Other inspectors
are catching unenrolled students.
• Adequate access to DOS visa via the Consular Consolidated Database. A great
tool!
• If you had a message for Commissioner Bonner what would it be? We're doing
best we can - we're hard in the field.
• What if you had technology that could detect fraud in travel documents? Yes.
Jlnspector No.\
Primary inspector for Mohand al Shahri at Miami
Miami International Airport on May 28, 2001
Use 6f name in report: The Commission would agree, if you want, that the
Commission will not use your name or your personal information without prior
consultation with DHS/CBP about the information we seek to use. Unless we really
feel the.need, we won't use your name. However, we will not make the fiat promise
that we \yill not under any circumstances use your name. (Circumstances when
would use name; probably only in making policy recommendations or factual
information; .that requires a quote.)
Do you recollect the inspection of this pair Mohand al Shahri on May 28, 2001? (sjo
FLETC.
/ • When did you train? How long?
• Training in CT?
Databases?
secondary inspections?
Cultural training? U
-k.
• Language training? 4
• Firearms training?
CA(«.(Uj I.
2.
.1 Law Enforcement Privacy
• Length of stay for B1 s: was there a standard length of stay given pre 9/1
Was that a port decision, or national operating policy? If you gave less
than the standard time, \vere there professional repercussions?
rv-O
Length of stay for B2s: was there any discretion in length of stay granted
B2spre9/ll? N O . ~7
J Any professional
if did not meet that processing time?
• Return ticket/ flight itinerary. Did you always ask for flight itinerary for
unusual travel? For a return ticket?
• How did inspectors view Saudis pre 9/11? Ever considered a threat to
national security?
At Miami, did you ever notice that any particular nationalities were
treated any differently than others?
• If you could not communicate with a-Saudi; what would you do?
T**~ T
t."-f4v*~-ir
Profiling.
• What unusual characteristics about an alien applying for admission
would cause you concern and result in a referral to secondar?
• Please describe how you conducted the inspection and what transpired, to
the best of your recollection.
Changes at DHS.
• What changes do you see on the front Jme with the new CBP?
.-
Are you familiar with National Targeting Center?
What effect has US VISIT had on entry and the inspection process?
0
ust
ewow POB eMPiiSffaENT w THE us BMi^^seooesteberYdu o8*w BEWLF7
D iw (tj CLftg^ D %*
f, US pematttntntsHSo^UJS
59«NOWIPE ..... . ,
.MER/MOTHER
/_
..,,./... . .
FSlAKCSWANCEE
X
BRQTHEffiSJSTER
-i-
31 PLEAS6 LIST tt-fcGOUWTRieS WHBRP YOU KAVEUVeo'fBR 6oflg THAU SMOOTHS OUWN& THE PAST SVEW&.
BEGIN WiTW VOUft PHESENT-ftHSlDettiE -«
Catmt'Jfcs pittas..
A v&« may noi be Issued to persons wtroare MfWft speclflc colegortes Oeftrt6d by liwis majJmteilWa loiht Ortirod SWIM
(except Wten * *aiv»r b otKaitnKl m sdvahiej. An <ny of B* toffijwfng appilcatjlo lo you?
- Have you evw Men afniclea wiUi a <x»nmunleat>UF ajsoaM of public health tlgniftetnc* 4
dangeioiB physical or rnetital tJlK»t!er. or been a arujjabusororaadlct? ,.. , , D Y«*
_ Nave you swercagn wraswcf or convnaed tor anyoRenwcv aims, even though cubjfld of t
pardon, ifmncity. or oinar sttchtegalaction'? . . . D Vfe*
~ Wtfre you aafjorTsa from ttic US A. wftdin Ihe iaa 6 yea . . , ; . . . . O Vos jH-*io
- -!Sg:you sMlt ta:enisn llie Unite StatBite ongags'in axport tHwiifoi vfolaflons. subvet»N w
any unlawful purpose?, . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . O/
.
son because o( race, i«H9(ao, nanorwH^rfgirt. ttrpoffllasl opinion imderfhs
ma ol .
wnh.ttw Nazi Oowemmefft: of Germany, or O
.
fl%'qit65!«n In inif t«g4KJ.;|Wfsonal ippoaTjfx^e a! mK.oSlce is mcommenaiSJ It appearance It n.-y. possible •! tnte time.
certlly thai I nsw wad and undcretooa:*! i*W gue^ilwit Ml forth In Ihfe applleatidn and the answarvf f>av« tum!sh&cl on
I underctand that porse«lan of a visa does not
.listtefeswr.loonier the Uhtf«d>Statesp;Ameripa uptih artivai * poll ot entry II hawshe K found
APPLICANT S?
(Tihisapptican; anomer fxsfson on your.twhSK. ihe agen! sivoKia InrlicsKe name'and
acj£3r«sy;(?f agency Of le sfghaiure of irKllvtijtj^ pfeD^ring fcufn:
AUilnVFliQM No. w V
v/'/' Kg
7. (a) CounliyWCi
CourUryWCitUarohip
£ #q 91
s.faJU.S.AddresifSfrt**
B
B10. Tha purpon of my (our) trip is or wait
(Cft«e*on» or totfl 6ox«s, J
Admission Number
32S4-20118 08
Immigration and
Naturalization Service
ADMITTED'*-'
1-94
Arrival Record
•' 2 8 2001
g TOTAL t>
Overwork R«kjc«on Act HoOco: The Information coleclM on inli farm H needed b carry out ih> Customs. Ag-
ftjltuni, and Currency lawi ol the Untied Sales. We need II to Insure that travelers are complying with Ihesg
pup and to allow ua to figure and collect lha right amount of duty and taxes. Your response Is mandatory.
me estimated average burden associated with this collection ol Information Is 3 mlnules per respondent or
m«brdKeep«r depandhg on Individual circumstances. Commenb concerning ihe accuracy or this burden estl-
(KJe and suggraUons lor reducing this burden should be directed D U.S. Customs Service. InlormaUon Services
ip, Washington. D.C. 20229. DO NOT send completed form(s) lo Inls ofUce._ _
Government Printing Office: 2000 — 646-620 Customs Form 6059B (012T99)(Back)