Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GO!Program Agenda
Your expectations and my goals Freemark Abby Winery Why isnt critical thinking easy? Improving critical thinking
I2 process and informal processes for formulation Elements of inquiry Four categories of intellectual standards Disposition
Professors Argyres and Dunkin will continue with the rest of the course.
I dare you to take full responsibility to transform your thinking and change your life for ever.
Freemark Abbey
What is the situation? What decision does Mr. Jaeger have to make? How would you advise him? Vote! How do you know that you did a good job advising him? Take a few moments to talk with a partner next to you discover and evaluate their thinking process.
At the Olin Business School we believe that critical thinking underpins great decision-making.
Great critical thinking is sufficiently rare that you can differentiate yourselves IF you invest in continuously improving your thinking.
President Obamas Council of Economic Advisors concluded the top worker need is
critical thinking and problem solving.
Olin Business School advanced from the middle to top of the pack in employment statistics 90-days after graduation for the top 50 MBA programs.
Simple
(few moving parts)
Easy
Moderate
(need creativity)
Moderate
(need management)
Hard
Knowledge traps
Framing bias Accepting and using a narrow approach or description of the situation or issue narrows alternatives Drawing conclusions based on how data or questions are presented limits alternatives Anchoring Relying heavily on a past reference or on one trait or piece of information when making decisions narrows alternatives
Propensity to jump to solutions Framing bias Anchoring bias Confirmation bias Self-serving bias Self-justification bias
Code with: None, Some, Alot be prepared to explain your coding
I got into Olin. Isnt my critical thinking good enough? I thought all I needed to know was the content of Olin courses to get a good job. I thought all I needed for a good job is good grades. How will employers know that I am good at critical thinking? How will faculty improve my critical thinking?
Critical Thinking@Olin
Diving into the specifics
Intelligent thinkers
Sternberg et al. (1981) synthesized research characterizing people who are believed to be intelligent thinkers. Intelligent thinkers:
Reason systematically Solve problems well Think in a logical way Deploy a good vocabulary Make use of a rich stock of information Remain focused on their goals Display intelligence in practical as well as academic ways
In contrast
Perkins (1995) summarized research on individuals who are not considered to be intelligent thinkers. These attributes are:
Hasty impulsive, little deep processing in examining alternatives Narrow assumptions not challenged, points of view not examined Fuzzy careless, imprecise, full of complications Sprawling general disorganization, fail to advance or conclude
10
11
Einstein once noted with respect to science, although it is likely true for business endeavors as well, that,
the formulation of a problem is often more essential than its solution
12
Reec6on
Forestall
thinking
of
or
mentally
commi3ng
to
a
decision
or
solu6on
13
A few definitions
Inquiry is a process of (hopefully critical) thinking. Finding is the search for, discovery of, awareness of, or choosing of something to be addressed. Framing is the set of indicators, symptoms, data, etc. that indicate or are considered part of a problem. Formulation is the set of root causes or the core issue to be addressed. Divergent thinking expands alternatives, perspectives, and possibilities. Convergent thinking reduces alternatives, perspectives, and possibilities often with respect to criteria.
14
Divergent thinking
Informal ways to expand framing
What data, indicators, symptoms etc. are relevant or correlated to the symptom that launched the inquiry? What else is happening at the same time/situation?
You
All symptoms All causes
15
Launch Inquiry
Divergent Thinking
Reec6on
Forestall
thinking
of
or
mentally
commi3ng
to
a
decision
or
solu6on
16
What more formal approaches to problem formulation (and critical thinking more generally) are available?
17
Points of view
Point of view describes how people perceives a situation based on their information and knowledge. Seek out and identify all relevant and significant points of view for the situation being considered.
Be comprehensive in identifying all points of view. Seek other points of view and identify their, as well as your own, strengths as well as weaknesses. Clearly and precisely identify your own point of view and how it differs from others. Strive to be evenhanded in evaluating all points of view.
18
Purposes
A purpose reflects goals, objectives, and preferences (i.e., motivations) of individuals and organizations. For each point of view understand what you and others want to accomplish.
What are the various actors purposes and objectives in addressing the situation? Can you state their purposes clearly and precisely? Are some purposes significant and primary while others are secondary? How do purposes and objectives shape both point of view and their formulation of the challenge? Are you evenhanded and ethical as you consider the full range of purposes?
Problems
A problem is the formulation of a challenge to be solved. Formulate the challenge comprehensively.
How can you develop multiple formulations by considering the issue from multiple points of view? express issue in several ways to clarify meaning and scope? distinguish questions with definitive answers from those that require opinion? Have you formulated the question with the appropriate relevance, depth, breadth, and significance? Try formulating more broadly as well as more narrowly. Seek a deeper formulation. Seek significant and relevant aspects not yet formulated.
19
POV P
POV P
POV P
Guidelines:
Restrict formulations/solutions to those supported by evidence. Search for information that supports and opposes your position. Make sure you have gathered necessary/sufficient information.
Evaluation:
Do you cite relevant evidence, experiences, and/or information essential to the issue? Is the information accurate and precise? Do you address the complexities of the issue?
20
Guidelines:
Identify key concepts and explain them clearly. Consider alternative concepts or alternative definitions of concepts. Make sure you are using concepts with care and precision.
Evaluation:
Do you clearly identify the key concepts? Are you presenting and using these concepts precisely? Is the main concept relevant? Are other concepts relevant?
Assumptions
Definition:
What are you taking for granted? What assumptions have led you to your conclusion?
Guidelines:
Clearly identify assumptions and justify them. Consider how your assumptions are shaping the various points of view.
Evaluation:
Do you show a sensitivity to what you are taking for granted or assuming? Do you use questionable assumptions without addressing problems which might be inherent in those assumptions?
21
Conclusions
Definition:
What decision or answer did you reach? Is your answer sufficiently deep, broad, and comprehensive?
Guidelines:
Infer only what the evidence implies. Check inferences for their consistency with each other. Identify assumptions that lead you to your inferences. Insure that your conclusions are robust.
Evaluation:
Do you develop a line of reasoning explaining well how you arrived at your main conclusions?
Consequences
Definition:
What are the potential long-run implications of your decision? What are the implications if you take your answer to its logical conclusion?
Guidelines:
Trace the implications and consequences that follow from your reasoning. Search for negative as well as positive implications. Consider all possible consequences.
Evaluation:
Do you show a sensitivity to the implications and consequences of the position you are taking?
22
Points of view
Purposes
Problem
Information
Concept
Assumption
Conclusions
Consequences
23
Comp.
Retailers Wholesalers
P P P
P P P
Suppliers
Jaegher Max short-run profitability? Max long-term profits? Maximize long term growth? Get botrytis every year Position brand as distinctive, differentiated, and high prestige? Insure availability? Insure quality?
Wine Maker
You
All symptoms All causes Rule of Three
24
Assump6ons
Launch Inquiry
Choose Problem
Conclusions
Concepts
set of questions chosen to be addressed Consequences
Informa6on
Decision
Reec6on
Forestall
thinking
of
or
mentally
commi3ng
to
a
decision
or
solu6on
25
Homework reminder
Due tomorrow morning at the BEGINNING of class.
Write a consulting letter to William Jaeger offering advice. 300 words or less (no more than 300) Keep your write-up anonymous. You will electronically submit and assess your write-ups tomorrow in class. Bring an electronic copy of your write-up to class.
Bring your COMPUTER TO CLASS ON Thursday and be sure you can connect wirelessly to the Blackboard.
Note, Blackboard supports only a few browsers.
Use your Collaborative Case Preparation Time to discuss what you learned about I2.
Summary
Why critical thinking? What is critical thinking? What are the central traps and biases that limit and narrow thinking? What is the basic process for Critical Thinking@Olin? What are the elements of critical thinking and why are they useful? What are the main resources for teaching Critical Thinking@Olin?
26
27