You are on page 1of 6

ads not by this site

About the Centre for IP and IT (CIPIT) Join the CIPIT Blog Team

CIPIT Law Blog


~ Strathmore University's Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Technology Law
Search:
Search

Go

Of Death and Registration: Rethinking Corporate Authorship in Copyright In Light of Emerging Jurisprudence on Corporate Citizenship in Kenya

29

WednesdayMAY 2013

POSTED BY VNZOMO IN CIPIT INSIGHTS LEAVE A COMMENT

In an earlier post, this blogger asked the question: what is the duration of copyright where the owner of the copyright work is a juristic person? This question stemmed from an on-going discussion about a practice at the Copyright Office whereby corporate entities are permitted to register copyright works in their own names.

Two schools of thought emerged: on one hand, corporate authorship does not exist in Kenya therefore company-produced works are to be considered as pseudonymous works with the attendant consequences for expiration of copyright. on the other hand, corporate authorship can be presumed to exist and that the corporate entity will enjoy copyright protection in the same way as a natural person.

At the heart of this debate, is a fundamental question of statutory interpretation. What interpretation should be given to th e words author and person in sections 2(1) and 23(2) of the Copyright Act? Should such interpretation have the effect of excluding juristic persons from the Act?

Interestingly, this month the High Court of Kenya delivered a judgment in the matter of Petition No. 278 of 2011 Nairobi Law Monthly Vs. Kenya Electricity Generating Company & Others, which goes further in limiting the personhood of corporate entities in Kenya. This judgment sheds new light on citizens right to seek information under Article 35 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010. The case arose following a petition by Nairobi Law Monthly Limited, publisher of the Nairobi Law Monthly magazine, in which it contended that the refusal of Kenya Electricity Generation Company Limited (Kengen) to disclose some information it required constituted abridgment of the Publishers right to Information coupled with its freedom to publish information for the public.

The respondents in this matter argued, inter alia, that the use of the word citizen with regard the freedom to seek and obtain information under Article 35 of the Constitution meant that the right cannot be exercised by a natural person who is not a citizen or a company, which cannot be considered a citizen even if its shareholding and directorship is exclusively Kenyan.

The court, at paragraph 81 and 82 of the judgment, determined that the term citizen can only mean a natural person who is a citizen of Kenya and therefore the petitioner is not a citizen for the purposes of Article 35 of the Constitution. The court fully concurred with an earlier ruling of Majanja J in the Famy Care Limited case that a body corporate or a company is not a citizen for the purposes of Article 35(1) of the Constitution.

The court found that Nairobi Law Monthly cannot claim to have corporate Kenyan citizenship. This blogger believes that this judgment provides some ammunition for the opponents of corporate authorship under copyright law in Kenya. With the fate of corporate citizenship resting with the appellate court, some may extend the reasoning of this judgment to reject the notion of corporate authorship. Statutory interpretation that favours the extension of personality beyond human beings to cover non-natural persons must carefully interrogate the consequences of such action. Therefore, perhaps it is time we revisited some of the consequences of corporate authorship including the real possibility of copyright protection in perpetuity, since companies unlike humans enjoy perpetual succession and their death would onl y be occasioned by winding-up or liquidation.

About these ads

SHARE THIS:

Twitter2 Facebook2

LIKE THIS:

Like

About vnzomo
Member of the Kenyan Bar. Research Fellow at @StrathCIPIT. Lead Blogger at @IPKenya. General Counsel at @TheMCSK. Formerly at @KenyaCopyright and @WIPO. Follow him on twitter: @vcnzm View all posts by vnzomo

Post navigation
Previous post Next post

L E AV E A R E P L Y
0aa383a64f
Enter your comment here...

/2013/05/29/of-de guest

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:


(required)(Address never made public)(required)

( Log Out / Change )( Log Out / Change )( Log Out / Change )

1373914442

MAY 2013 M T W T Apr 1 6 7 8 2 3 F S S Jun 4 5

9 10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

@strathcipit on Twitter

Training Course: Drafting & Prosecution of Patent Applications by @kipikenya & @StrathCIPIT on 12-15 August | ow.ly/mXvTT #IP 12 hours ago NEW POST: Legal Protection of TV Formats: Another Sui-Generis Area of Intellectual Property Law? | ow.ly/mXrZW #IP #Copyright 13 hours ago POST: The Health Bill must empower the Cabinet Secretary for Health to utilise compulsory licensing | ow.ly/mXrPa #IP #TRIPS 13 hours ago RT @kipikenya: KIPI and @StrathCIPIT are organizing a workshop on Drafting and Prosecuting Patent Applications from 12-15 August. Details t 3 days ago

Blogroll

Afro-IP blog IP Kat IP Kenya IP Osgoode Blog Oxford JIPLP Blog Patently O Spicy IP blog Spicy IP blog (India) Stanford Law Blog Stellenbosch IP Chair Blog UCapeTown IP Unit Blog UChicago Law Blog

Recent Posts

Legal Protection of TV Formats: Another Sui-Generis Area of Intellectual Property Law? The Past 10 Years: Kenyas Copyright Office Turns One Decade Old This Month

Announcement: Patent Drafting Course from 12 15 August 2013 The Health Bill must empower the Cabinet Secretary for Health to utilise compulsory licensing

Strathmore Law CIPIT Blog by http://www.strathmore.edu/sls/cipit is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Meta

Register Log in Entries RSS Comments RSS Blog at WordPress.com.

Categories

Access to Essential Medicines CIPIT Insights CIPIT news Collective Management Organisations Copyright Counterfeits Creative Commons Kenya Database Rights Fashion Genetic Resources Guest Post Information Technology Intellectual Property M-Pesa openAIR Patent Plant Breeders' Rights Public Interest Science Technology & Innovation Software Patents Sui-Generis Protection Technovation Trademark Traditional Cultural Expressions

Traditional Knowledge TRIPS

Blog at WordPress.com. The Chateau Theme. <div style="display: none;"><img src="//pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-18mFEk4J448M.gif?labels=%2Clanguage.en%2Ctype.wpcom%2Cas" height="1" width="1" alt="" /></div>
Follow

Follow CIPIT Law Blog


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Enter your email addr

subscribe

39325207

http://cipitlaw stra

loggedout-follow

47216733c4

/2013/05/29/of-de

Sign me up
Powered by WordPress.com

<img src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?v=noscript" style="height:0px;width:0px;overflow:hidden" alt="" />

ads not by this site

You might also like