Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care / Jul-Dec 2011 / Vol 1 | Issue 2 73
Efficacy of intravenous fluid warming for
maintenance of core temperature during lower segment cesarean section under spinal anesthesia ABS T R AC T Introduction: Maintenance of body temperature of obstetrical patients undergoing cesarean section is complicated by a variety of factors including heat loss to atmosphere, infusion of fuids at room temperature, disruption of thermoregulatory mechanisms by epidural or spinal anesthesia and redistribution hypothermia. Infusion of warm fuids is an important method of heat conservation. Hence, we evaluated the effcacy of intravenous fuid warming in preventing hypothermia by observing the change in core temperature with intravenous fuids at room temperature (22C and 39C) in patients undergoing lower segment cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Materials and Methods: Sixty-four patients belonging to ASA grade I and II were randomly allocated to either of the two groups. Group I received intravenous fuids at room temperature (22C) and group II received intravenous fuids via fuid warmer (39C). Core temperature was recorded at every 1 min for the frst 5 min, followed by 10 min till the end of surgery using a tympanic thermometer. Results: The mean decrease in core temperature in group I was 2.184 0.413 and 1.934 0.439 in group II. The comparison of group I and II showed a statistically signifcant difference in mean core temperatures at times 5, 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90 min and immediately on arrival in the recovery room. A lower incidence of shivering was seen in group II patients, but the difference in the two groups was not statistically signifcant. Conclusion: Infusion of warm intravenous fuids resulted in a lesser degree of fall in core temperature, thereby providing a signifcant temperature advantage; however, this did not translate to prevention of postoperative shivering. Key words: Hypothermia, intravenous fuid warming, shivering, spinal anesthesia Original Article Parveen Goyal, Sandeep Kundra, Shruti Sharma, Anju Grewal, Tej K. Kaul, M. Rupinder Singh Department of Anesthesiology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India Address for correspondence: Dr. Sandeep Kundra, Department of Anesthesiology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana 141 001, Punjab, India. E-mail: sandeepkundra@redifmail.com INTRODUCTION H ypothermia, defned as core temperature below 36C, during spinal anesthesia is certainly far more common than generally appreciated. The maintenance of body temperature of obstetrical patients undergoing cesarean section is complicated by a variety of factors, including heat loss to atmosphere due to cool operating room, the infusion of fuids at operating room temperature, disruption of the normally coordinated thermoregulatory mechanisms by epidural/ spinal anesthesia and redistribution hypothermia. [1] Neuraxial anesthesia impairs central autonomic thermoregulatory control, [1] possibly by increasing apparent (as opposed to actual) leg skin temperature. [2] Core temperatures 12C below normal have been associated with adverse outcomes, such as shivering, an increased incidence of surgical wound infection, prolonged hospitalization, morbid cardiac events, increased blood loss, allogeneic transfusion requirements, etc. [3,4] Apart from the distress hypothermia causes to the patients, shivering produces undesirable physiological consequences such as raised oxygen consumption and hypoxemia, increased cardiac work, raised carbon dioxide production, lactic acidosis and lower mixed venous oxygen saturation and decreases the motherbaby bonding in the postoperative period. [5] Access this article online Quick Response Code: Website: www.joacc.com DOI: 10.4103/2249-4472.93990 [Downloadedfreefromhttp://www.joacc.comonSaturday,December22,2012,IP:114.79.2.169]||ClickheretodownloadfreeAndroidapplicationforthisjournal 74 Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care / Jul-Dec 2011 / Vol 1 | Issue 2 Among the many methods to maintain body temperature in the operation theater and recovery room, the administration of warm intravenous fluids (I.V.) seems to be easy and physiological. Patients who receive operating room temperature intravenous fuids had a higher incidence of shivering than patients who were given warm fuids. [5,6] It has been shown that rapid infusion of warm I.V. fuids may alter the rate of shivering, depending on the temperature of the fuids. [7] Few studies have, however, reported that warming I.V. fuids did not prevent hypothermia in term parturients undergoing elective cesarean section. [8] In view of the conficting reports by various authors, we evaluated the efcacy of I.V. fuid warming in maintenance of core temperature in patients undergoing lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) under spinal anesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS Te study was conducted afer approval by the Hospital Ethical Committee on 64 obstetrical patients belonging to ASA grade I and II, scheduled for elective LSCS under spinal anesthesia. A written informed consent was taken from all patients prior to inclusion in the study. Patients were randomly divided using computer-generated random numbers into two groups I and II of 32 patients each. Group I: Patients were infused I.V. fuids at operating room temperature (22C). (I.V. fuid containers having been kept in the operation theater at least 1 h before start of surgery and also ensuring that the surface temperature of the fuid container was as required.) Group II: Patients were infused with warm I.V. fuids (39C) by using a fuid warmer (Astotherm plus AP220, FUTUREMED). A thorough preanesthetic check up was carried out on all patients as per standard protocols. Patients with preoperative temperature >38C or <36C; patients with impacted wax, external/middle ear infection, tympanic membrane perforation, urinary tract infection, diabetic autonomic neuropathy or any neurological disease, emergency surgery; and patients with indwelling epidural catheter for labor analgesia were excluded from the study. All patients received premedication in the form of tablet Ranitidine 150 mg the night before surgery and 150 mg in the morning of the surgery with a sip of water. Baseline blood pressure, pulse rate, SpO 2 and core temperature (tympanic membrane) were recorded preoperatively in all patients. Te operating room temperature was also recorded at this time. Te operation room temperatures remained between 21 and 22 degrees centigrade throughout the surgery, which is a norm in our hospital settings. All patients were preloaded with 0.9% sodium chloride 10 mL/kg transfused within 30 min before establishment of the subarachnoid block. Te temperature of the infusing fuid depended on the group of the patient (either 22C in group I or 39C in group II). Subarachnoid block was achieved under strict aseptic precautions in the lef lateral position using a 26 G (Quinckes) needle introduced in the L 3 -L 4 intervertebral space. Afer obtaining a free fow of cerebrospinal fuid, bupivacaine 0.5% (heavy) 2.5 mL was injected in the subarachnoid space. Te patient was made supine immediately and surgery commenced afer achieving block level of T6. During the intraoperative period, patients were completely covered in surgical drapes. Vital parameters like NIBP, HR and SpO 2 were recorded at every 1 min for the initial 5 min, followed by every 10 min till the end of surgery. All patients received I.V. infusion at temperatures depending on the group allocation, at the rate of 10 mL/kg/h of crystalloid solution. Core temperature (tympanic membrane) was recorded at every 1 min for the frst 5 min followed by 10 min till the end of surgery using a tympanic thermometer. Room temperature was also recorded at the start of surgery, afer half an hour and afer the end of surgery. Afer completion of surgery, patients were shifed to the recovery room. Core temperature was noted on arrival, afer 30 min, 60 min and 90 min in the recovery room. Presence or absence of shivering and number and type of interventions for treating the shivering (radiant heat, intravenous pethidine 12.5 mg given when patient either complained of shivering or cold distress) were noted. Patients were discharged from recovery when the modifed Alredttes score was 9 or more, patients were able to fex their foot and had proprioception in the great toe. [9] Time to discharge was also noted. All observations were recorded and subsequently tabulated and analyzed using Students t-test and z-test. RESULTS Demographic profile (age, height, weight and body mass index) of all patients in both groups I and II was statistically comparable [Table 1]. In groups I and II, the baseline mean core temperature was 37.83 0.144C and 37.89 0.113C, respectively. Tere was no statistical diference between the two groups. Tere was a decrease in the core temperature thereafer. Te decrease in core temperature from baseline (0 min) to the end of surgery (90 min) was statistically signifcant, with a P-value <0.01 for both groups I and II [Figure 1]. Comparison of core temperature at 5, 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90 min Goyal, et al.: Effcacy of IV fuid warming for core temperature maintenance [Downloadedfreefromhttp://www.joacc.comonSaturday,December22,2012,IP:114.79.2.169]||ClickheretodownloadfreeAndroidapplicationforthisjournal Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care / Jul-Dec 2011 / Vol 1 | Issue 2 75 revealed statistically signifcant diferences between groups I and II. Te diference in the decrease in mean core temperature between the two groups was also found to be statistically signifcant (P < 0.01). In group I, 24 of 32 patients had a core temperature <36C while in group II, only 13 of 32 patients had a core temperature <36C at the time of arrival in the recovery room, and this diference in number of patients was found to be statistically signifcant (P < 0.05). On arrival in the recovery room, the mean core temperature of group I patients was signifcantly less as compared with group II (P < 0.05) (35.49 0.414C versus 35.77 0.456C). Similarly, at 30 min afer arrival in the recovery room, the mean core temperature of group I patients was 35.47 0.385C and that of group II patients was 35.99 0.449C, which was statistically signifcant between the two groups. Te mean core temperature comparison was statistically nonsignifcant afer 60 and 90 min. In group I, shivering was present in 10 patients and in group II, shivering was present in eight patients, but this diference was statistically not signifcant [Table 2]. In group I, intervention was needed to be carried out in 10 patients and in group II, intervention was needed in eight patients [Table 3]. Te number of interventions needed was signifcantly higher in group I in comparison with group II. Te mean discharge times in group I was 105.50 9.48 min and in group II was 107.30 9.21 min. In both the groups, there was no statistically signifcant diference in discharge time from recovery room [Table 4]. DISCUSSION Regional anesthesia causes redistribution of heat from the core to the periphery secondary to peripheral vasodilatation. [10] It also decreases the shivering threshold by 0.6C, triggering vasoconstriction and shivering (above the level of block), [11]
and, by blocking the autonomic control to the afected region, prevents vasoconstriction and shivering in the region of the block. [12] Tese efects predispose patients to the development of hypothermia during regional anesthesia, resulting in postoperative shivering, increased oxygen consumption and may also be a causative factor for neonatal hypothermia. [13,14]
Furthermore, neuraxial anesthesia also impairs behavioral thermoregulation with the result that patients ofen do not consciously perceive that they are hypothermic. [14] Various methods have been tried for prevention of hypothermia in cesarean patients with variable success rate. The most important methods for preventing preoperative hypothermia are intravenous fuid warming and forced-air heating. [15] Each liter of fuid infused at ambient temperature decreases the mean Table 1: Dermographic prole of patients Variable Group I (n = 32) Group II (n = 32) P-value Age 27.16 4.30 26.84 5.77 >0.10 (NS) Height 156.33 1.92 156.33 1.96 >0.10 (NS) Weight 64.06 5.76 66.60 7.09 >0.10 (NS) BMI 26.21 2.20 27.23 2.75 >0.10 (NS) Group 1: Patients receiving intravenous uids at ambient temperature Group 2: Patients receiving warm intravenous uids Table 2: Incidence of shivering Shivering Group I (n = 32) Group II (n = 32) No. % No. % Yes 10 31.25 8 25.00 No 22 68.75 24 75.00 P-value NS, Z-value 0.63 Table 3: Distribution according to intervention done (radiant heat, meperidine) to prevent shivering Intervention done Group I (n = 32) Group II (n = 32) Radiant heat, meperidine No. % No. % Yes 10 31.25 8 25.00 No 22 68.75 24 75.00 Z-value 0.63, P-value NS Table 4: Distribution according to discharge time from recovery room Discharge time from recovery room (min) Group I (n = 32) Group II (n = 32) No. % No. % 96101 17 53.13 14 43.75 101107 5 15.62 3 9.38 107113 0 0 7 21.88 113119 4 12.50 1 3.12 119125 6 18.75 7 21.88 Mean SD 105.50 9.48 107.30 9.21 t-value 0.77, P-value >0.10 (non signicant) Goyal, et al.: Effcacy of IV fuid warming for core temperature maintenance Figure 1: Trends in mean core temperature (C) in the two study groups [Downloadedfreefromhttp://www.joacc.comonSaturday,December22,2012,IP:114.79.2.169]||ClickheretodownloadfreeAndroidapplicationforthisjournal 76 Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care / Jul-Dec 2011 / Vol 1 | Issue 2 body temperature by 0.25C in an average-sized patient. [16] Administration of room temperature intravenous fluids contributes to hypothermia; hence, infusion of warm fuids has been evaluated as an important method of heat conservation. Warm intravenous fuids can increase the core temperature by 0.50.7C and lower the incidence of hypothermia. [3,17] Te results of our study make it evident that fuid warming resulted in a lesser fall of core temperature as compared with fuids given at operating room temperature. In the present study, the mean core temperature of patients in group 2 was higher than that of patients in group 2 at arrival and at 30 min. Warm intravenous fuids thus contributed to less-signifcant heat losses and hence attainment of the plateau phase of thermoregulatory responses. Te incidence of shivering in the two groups was not statistically signifcant. Similarly, no statistically signifcant diferences in discharge times from recovery room were noted. Te results of our study are in concordance with the results obtained in the study conducted by Smith et al., who demonstrated that outpatients receiving warmed intravenous fuids were more likely to be normothermic at the end of surgery and on arrival in the recovery room than those who received fluids at operating room temperature. However, neither hypothermia nor postoperative shivering delayed discharge afer these ambulatory surgical procedures. [17] Tey also studied the efcacy of intravenous fuid warming in patients undergoing cesarean sections under regional anesthesia and found that the fall in core temperature was less in patients who received warmed intravenous fuids (-0.8 0.1) as compared with patients who received intravenous fluids at ambient temperature (-1.2 0.1). Te infusion of warm fuids resulted in a 0.40.5C temperature advantage as compared with room temperature fuids in their study. [6] Yokoyama et al. also confirmed this higher temperature advantage in patients receiving prewarmed fuids. In addition, APGAR scores in the neonate and umbilical pH were higher in patients receiving warmed intravenous fuids, suggesting better neonatal outcomes as well. [18] Similar results were obtained by Aglio et al., [6] wherein the
authors observed that the infusion of warm fuids during cesarean delivery and in labor resulted in less fall in temperature and a signifcantly reduced incidence of shivering as compared with patients receiving intravenous infusions at room temperature. Tis advantage of a reduction in incidence of shivering was however not observed in our study. Post spinal shivering is a poorly understood entity with multiple possible etiologies. Neuraxial anesthesia per se leads to a reduction in shivering threshold. [14] Te consequent hypothermia occurring during neuraxial anesthesia is attributed to multifactorial causes, with redistribution hypothermia being a leading cause. [14] Tis could have accounted to variance in the results of our study. Furthermore, Aglio et al. evaluated too small a study group, which could have led to a bias in their study. However, large sample sized randomized controlled trials are needed to further delineate the advantage of intravenous fuid warming to postoperative normothermia and shivering. In conclusion, infusion of warm intravenous fuids to parturients undergoing cesarean section under regional anesthesia decreases the degree of hypothermia and is associated with a 0.25C temperature advantage compared with intravenous fuids infused at ambient temperature of the operating room. However, it was not efective to prevent shivering and to decrease time to discharge from recovery room. REFERENCES 1. Ozaki M, Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R, Schroeder M, Moayeri A, et al. Termoregulatory thresholds during epidural and spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1994;81:282-8. 2. Emerick TH, Ozaki M, Sessler DI, Walters K, Schroeder M. Epidural anesthesia increases leg temperature and decreases the shivering threshold. Anesthesiology 1994;81:289-98. 3. Smith CE, Fisgus JR, Kan M, Lengen SK, Myles C, Jacobs D, et al. Efcacy of IV fuid warming in patients undergoing cesarean section with regional anesthesia. Am J Anesthesiol 2000;27:84-8. 4. Schmied H, Kurz A, Sessler DI, Kozek S, Reiter A. Mild intraoperative hypothermia increases blood loss and allogeneic transfusion requirements during total hip arthroplasty. Lancet 1996;347:289-92. 5. Bhattacharya RK, Bhattacharya L, Jain RK, Aggarwal RC. Post Anesthesia shivering (PAS): A Review. Indian J Anaesth 2003;47:88-93. 6. Aglio LS, Johnson MD, Datta S, Ostheimer GW. Warm intravenous fuids reduce shivering in parturients receiving epidural analgesia. Anesthesiology 1988;69:A701. 7. Imrie MM, Hall GM. Body temperature and anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1990;64:346-54. 8. McCarroll SM, Cartwright P, Weeks SK, Donati F. Warming intravenous fuids and the incidence of shivering during caesarian sections under epidural anesthesia. Can Anesth Soc J 1986;33:S72-3. 9. Aldrete JA. Te post-anesthesia recovery score revisited. J Clin Anesth 1995;7:89-91. 10. Matsukawa T, Sessler DI, Christensen R, Ozaki M, Schroeder M. Heat flow and distribution during epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1995;83:961-7. 11. Kurz A, Plattner O, Sessler DI, Huemer G, Redl G, Lackner F. Te threshold for thermoregulatory vasoconstriction during nitrous oxide/isofurane anesthesia is lower in elderly than young patients. Anesthesiology 1993;79:465-9. 12. Hendolin H, Poikolainen E, Mattila MA, Alhava E, Hanninin A, Puttonen E, et al. Efect of dihydroergotamine on leg blood fow during combined epidural and general anaesthesia and postoperative deep vein thrombosis afer cholecystectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1993;37:288-95. 13. Vassilief N, Rosencher N, Sessler DI, Conseiller C. Shivering threshold during Spinal Anesthesia is reduced in elderly patients. Anesthesiology 1995;83:1162-6. 14. Sessler DI, Ponte J. Shivering during epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1990;72:816-21. 15. Kurz A, Kurz M, Poeschl G, Faryniak B, Redl G, Hackl W. Forced-air warming maintains intraoperative normothermia better than circulating- water mattresses. Anesth Analg 1993;77:89-95. Goyal, et al.: Effcacy of IV fuid warming for core temperature maintenance [Downloadedfreefromhttp://www.joacc.comonSaturday,December22,2012,IP:114.79.2.169]||ClickheretodownloadfreeAndroidapplicationforthisjournal Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care / Jul-Dec 2011 / Vol 1 | Issue 2 77 16. Sessler DI. Consequences and treatment of perioperative hypothermia. Anesth Clin North Am 1994;12:425-56. 17. Smith CE, Gerdes E, Sweda S, Myles C, Punjabi A, Pinchak AC, et al. Warming intravenous fuids reduces perioperative hypothermia in women undergoing ambulatory gynecological surgery. Anesth Analg 1998;87:37-41. 18. Yokoyama K, Suzuki M, Shimada Y, Matsushima T, Bitto H, Sakamoto A. Efect of administration of pre-warmed intra venous fuids on the frequency of hypothermia following spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. J Clin Anesth 2009;21:242-8. Cite this article as: Goyal P, Kundra S, Sharma S, Grewal A, Kaul TK, Singh MR. Effcacy of intravenous fuid warming for maintenance of core temperature during lower segment cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. J Obstet Anaesth Crit Care 2011;1:73-7. Source of Support: Nil, Confict of Interest: None declared. Goyal, et al.: Effcacy of IV fuid warming for core temperature maintenance Author Help: Online submission of the manuscripts Articles can be submitted online from http://www.journalonweb.com. For online submission, the articles should be prepared in two files (first page file and article file). Images should be submitted separately. 1) First Page File: Prepare the title page, covering letter, acknowledgement etc. using a word processor program. All information related to your identity should be included here. Use text/rtf/doc/pdf files. Do not zip the files. 2) Article File: The main text of the article, beginning with the Abstract to References (including tables) should be in this file. Do not include any information (such as acknowledgement, your names in page headers etc.) in this file. Use text/rtf/doc/pdf files. Do not zip the files. Limit the file size to 1024 kb. Do not incorporate images in the file. If file size is large, graphs can be submitted separately as images, without their being incorporated in the article file. This will reduce the size of the file. 3) Images: Submit good quality color images. Each image should be less than 4096 kb (4 MB) in size. The size of the image can be reduced by decreasing the actual height and width of the images (keep up to about 6 inches and up to about 1800 x 1200 pixels). JPEG is the most suitable file format. The image quality should be good enough to judge the scientific value of the image. For the purpose of printing, always retain a good quality, high resolution image. This high resolution image should be sent to the editorial office at the time of sending a revised article. 4) Legends: Legends for the figures/images should be included at the end of the article file. [Downloadedfreefromhttp://www.joacc.comonSaturday,December22,2012,IP:114.79.2.169]||ClickheretodownloadfreeAndroidapplicationforthisjournal