There is an outstanding request for assistance and support from other attorneys across the USA.

You may use this letter as a template and send to the CFPB at amicus@cfpb.gov and/or mail or fax to Richard Cordray, the Director at the CFPB. Homeowners are also welcome to submit this.
October 25, 2013 Richard Cordray Director Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 1700 G Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20552 (202) 435-7000

Dear Director Cordray: I am writing to request that you intervene, on behalf of the CFPB, and/or file Amicus briefs in connection with the following case: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1821 (9: ll-cv-00395-SB) JAMES P. SCHEIDER, JR.; TAFFY G. SCHEIDER Plaintiffs - Appellants v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee of the IndyMac INDA Mortgage Loan 2006-AR2 Mortgage Pass-through Certificates, Series 2006- AR2 under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated August 1, 2006; INDYMAC MORTGAGE SERVICES; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED; ONEWEST BANK, F.S.B.; FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF CHARLESTON and I, Defendants - Appellees I INDYMAC BANK FEDERAL BANK; MERS, INCORPORATED; MORTGAGE NETWORK INCORPORATED; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; JOHN DOE 1-1000, inclusive, representing a class of unknown persons who claim or have the right to claim an interest in certain real property located in Beaufort County, South Carolina; INDYMAC MBS INCORPORATED

Defendants MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF QUESTIONS TO NEW YORK STATE COURT OF APPEALS This case may be one of the most important in the country regarding a homeowners right to challenge defects in securitization. If decided against homeowners it would have a devastating and long lasting impact. This Motion for Certification to the Fourth District Court of Appeals arises out of a ruling by a South Carolina court that is directly contrary to the well- reasoned decisions of numerous courts around the country. Virtually all judges and courts of appeal to address the question, have decided contrary to the South Carolina court, in many different states and types of courts. This includes the recently published California decision in Glaski v. Bank of America, ___ F.3d ___ [2013 WL 3480207], the Alabama Court of Appeals, the Illinois Court of Appeals, the New York trial courts, Texas bankruptcy courts, and others (Attached). In addition at least one class action has been certified on this basis (Attached, and now on Interlocutory Appeal). Scholarly articles have also been written discussing the legal theories involved. I am attaching the items mentioned above. I am also hopeful that many other public and private organizations around the country will also support the Appellants and intend to circulate and publish this to as many advocates as I can. Sincerely, YOUR NAME YOUR ADDRESS YOUR PHONE YOUR EMAIL cc: Antonia C. Lucia, Attorney for Appellants 843-352-4435 FAX 843-757-2889 Vaux & Marscher, P.A. 1251 May River Road, Post Office Box 769 Bluffton, SC 29910
antonia.lucia@vaux-marscher.com