Criteria for Evaluating 2013 ICIRI Oral Presentations Well done (5) Very Good (4) to Good (3)

Content The content is clear and The content provides concise and deals with an persuasive information and important issue in the field of is accurate. study and includes goals/motivating questions. Information is accurate. Organization Researcher presents Researcher presents information in logical, information in logical interesting sequence which sequence which audience audience can follow. can follow. Subject Researcher demonstrates full Researcher is at ease with Knowledge knowledge (more than expected answers to all required) by answering all questions, but fails to questions with explanations elaborate. and elaboration. Eye Contact Researcher maintains eye Researcher maintains eye contact with audience, seldom contact most of the time but returning to notes. frequently returns to notes. Elocution Researcher uses a clear voice Researchers voice is clear. and correct, precise Researcher pronounces pronunciation of terms so that most words correctly. Most all audience members can hear audience members can hear presentation. presentation. Graphics/ PowerPoint presentation Researcher's graphics explain and reinforce screen text and presentation. Graphics are clear and easy to follow. No misspellings or grammatical errors

Fair (2) The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose

Poor (1) The content lacks a clear point of view

Audience has difficulty following presentation because researcher jumps around. Researcher is uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions. Researcher occasionally uses eye contact, but still reads most of report. Researchers voice is low. Researcher incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation. Researchers graphics relate Researcher occasionally to text and presentation and uses graphics that rarely are readable. support text and presentation.

Audience cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information. Researcher does not have grasp of information; researcher cannot answer questions about subject. Researcher reads all of report with no eye contact. Researcher mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly for researchers in the back of class to hear. Researcher uses superfluous graphics and graphics are difficult to read and understand.

Scoring for 2013 ICIRI Oral Presentations Session Date: Venue/ Session Hall: See attached sheet for instructions; use more than one line for additional comments if necessary Score each criteria from 1-5 reflecting Excellent (5), Very Good (4), Good (3), Fair (2), Poor (1) Presenters Name Content Organization Subject Knowledge Eye Contact Elocution Graphics/ PowerPoint Presentation Judge:

TOTAL

Comments