Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HISTORY
FUNGAL SINUSITIS:
RECENT TRENDS
QUIZ
ALLERGIC FUNGAL
RHINOSINUSITIS
FUNGAL SINUSITIS:
CURRENT TRENDS
RADIOLOGY OF
FUNGAL SINUSITIS
JOURNAL SCAN
QUIZ
Dear colleagues,
Being an academician for more than twenty years, I have witnessed
the ever changing scenario of teaching and acquiring knowledge. We
have come a long way from attending lectures, flocking the librar-
ies to now, virtually sitting at home and getting all the information
at click of a button. Shaking hands with the technological advance-
ment and to further our knowledge of Otorhinolaryngology, we have
decided to launch a newsletter. Each issue of this e- newsletter
will focus on a particular topic of clinical or academic importance
and will touch upon everything, from historical aspects to the re-
cent trends. The success of this endeavor will depend on your con-
tributions and feedback. This concept is originated by youngsters
and should be encouraged. I hope that this will receive all your
support and guidance. I wish the editors and authors the best of
luck and congratulate them for their effort.
DR. A. K. AGARWAL
Dean and Director Professor ENT,
Maulana Azad Medical College
The most significant advances in medicine in this century have been the discovery of antibiotics, the
invention of various computerized scans and endoscopy of the various body cavities.
The first revolutionary change in the surgical treatment of the sinuses was the introduction and refine-
ment of endoscopic techniques. The second important development in the modern history of rhinol-
ogy was the introduction of powered instrumentation. Now we are seeing a third turning point, which
is the use of intraoperative image guidance in endoscopic sinus surgery.
Endoscopes are used in many branches of medicine today, so much so, there is no body cavity one
cannot have a look into. The endoscopes used for nasal sinus endoscopy are rigid tubes consisting of
rod lenses. The optical system used has been developed by Prof. H.H.Hopkins has larger viewing an-
gles and transmit brighter light.
Special instruments developed for the purpose are passed alongside the endoscope into the nose
and operations are carried out using key hole surgery principle. Though the idea was conceived and
early work was done by Prof. Messerklinger of Graz, Austria, it is Prof.H.Stammberger who popularized
Endoscopic sinus surgery in the English speaking world. The radical Endoscopic spheno-fronto-maxillo
-ethmoidectomy we do for massive polyps and fungal sinusitis would not fit into the original descrip-
tion of FESS by Dr. Kennely and Prof. Stammberger. Hence it is referred to as Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
(ESS).
The first powered instrument (microdebrider, or soft tissue shaver) was designed and patented by an
Otolaryngologist, Dr. J.C. Urban, in 1969, for use in microscopic ear surgery. Powered instruments be-
came very useful in orthopedic arthroscopic surgery in the 1970s and were used in Otolaryngology-
Head & Neck Surgery in the 1990s, after the introduction of endoscopic techniques made their use
more practical.
Reuben Setliff was the first physician to successfully demonstrate that powered cutting tools could be
used with precision control and safety in the nose and paranasal sinuses in humans. The first Micro-
Debrider was adapted from a tool produced for use in small joint arthroscopy in the wrist and TMJ.
y
Immunotherapy
Bacterial
infection
Steroids
Inflammation
Eosinophilic inflammation
MBP, ECP, etc)
Soft tissue attenuation areas with internal hyperdensity are seen on non-contrast CT scans. These findings are although
not specific for AFRS, but they are relatively characteristic and provide preoperative information supportive of the
diagnosis of AFRS. The ethmoid sinus is the most commonly involved sinus, whereas the lamina papyracea is the most
common bone to exhibit demineralization. The presence of accumulations of heavy metals (iron, manganese) and
calcium salt precipitation within the inspissated allergic mucin is the most likely cause of these radiologic findings.
On MRI, presence of hypointense central T1 signal, central T2 signal void, and increased peripheral T1/T2 enhance-
ment is highly specific for AFRS as compared with other forms of fungal sinusitis. The high protein and low water
concentration of allergic fungal mucin, coupled with the high water content within surrounding edematous paranasal
sinus mucosa, gives rise to specific MR characteristics.
Laboratory findings:
Immunologic tests: Total IgE levels is a useful indicator of AFRS clinical activity. It is generally elevated to more than
1000 U/ml. Patients usually demonstrate positive skin test and in vitro ( RAST) responses for both fungal and nonfungal
antigens.
Histology of allergic fungal mucin: Allergic mucin is the hallmark of this disease. Grossly, it is thick, tenacious, and
highly viscous in consistency; its color may vary from light tan to brown or dark green. Histologic examination reveals
branching noninvasive fungal hyphae within sheets of eosinophils and Charcot-Leyden crystals.
Culture of fungi: Fungal cultures provide some supportive evidence helpful in diagnosis and subsequent treatment of
AFRS, but it is important to realize that the diagnosis of AFRS is not established or eliminated on the results of these
cultures. Various species of fungi have been cultured including Bipolaris, Curvalaria, Aspergillus, Exserohilum and
Alternaria.
Although certain signs and symptoms , as well as radiographic, intraoperative, and pathologic findings, may
cause the physician to suspect allergic fungal sinusitis, no standards had been defined for establishing the
diagnosis.
Parameters which enhanced the index of suspicion were as stated by Waxman et al (laryngoscope 1987):
(1)Young adults, (2)Recurrent polyposis, (3)History of asthma, (4)Multiple affected sinuses, (5)History of poor
response to medical management, (6)Multiple surgical procedures, (7)Thick inspissated intracavity mucus, (8)
Atopic patients with nasal polyps.
Many others used the combination of radiologic, laboratory and histologic parameters to distinguish AFRS from
other forms of rhinosinusitis.
In 1996, Bent and Kuhn laid down the diagnostic criteria, which are the most widely accepted.
These are as follows:
Of the criteria mentioned, allergic or eosinophilic mucin and atopy (Type I hypersensitivity) are considered
the most diagnostic of all.
Treatment:
Long term control of AFRS requires both elimination of fungal antigen by surgical therapy and control of its
recurrence by medical therapy. As early as 1979, it was established by McGuirt et al, that the treatment of
paranasal sinus aspergillosis is surgical and the key to which is the removal of diseased mucosa and aeration
and drainage of the involved sinus. Previously, procedures such as open antrostomies, intranasal sphenoeth-
moidectomies, lateral rhinotomies, and craniofacial resection were done. More radical procedures were also
being done because the clinical and radiographic evidence of invasion into adjacent spaces, were interpreted
as evidence of malignancy or invasive fungal disease. And hence, more morbidities and mortalities were en-
countered.
Changes have evolved in both medical and surgical arms of therapy. Radical surgery for AFRS has given
way to more conservative, tissue-sparing techniques, “conservative, but complete” as proposed by Mabry et
al.
• Surgery should result in complete extirpation of all allergic mucin and fungal debris, reducing or eliminating the
antigen-inciting factor within the atopic individual. Polyps can provide an important intraoperative role by serving as a
marker of disease.
• Second goal of the surgery is to provide permanent drainage and ventilation of the affected sinuses while preserv-
ing the integrity of underlying mucosa.
• Final goal of the surgery is to provide postoperative access to the previously diseased areas, as even under ideal
conditions, some residual fungus may remain in situ inciting recurrence if not controlled postoperatively.
Medical therapy:
Corticosteroids: Topical corticosteroids are accepted as standard therapy in postoperative treatment of AFRS, but they
possess a limited benefit before surgery because nasal access is restricted. Kupferberg et al refined the endoscopic
follow-up into a staging system, which allows closer control of the mucosal response to medical management, that is,
oral steroids.
Oral prednisone tapered to zero, intranasal steroid spray continued for 1 year
Follow up till 5 years : endoscopy and serum IgE levels monthly for 6 months, bimonthly for 3-5 years.
Immunotherapy: The similarity between AFRS and ABPA led to a theoretical concern that immunotherapy using spe-
cific fungal antigens in patients with either of these diseases might incite further allergic reactions by adding to the pa-
tient’s fungal antigenic stimulus and possible exacerbation of immune complex development and deposition. However,
in the case of AFRS, surgery theoretically allows removal of the inciting fungal load from the paranasal sinuses and
hence, immunotherapy after surgery may be beneficial rather than harmful.
Allergy evaluation and testing( RAST and quantitative skin tests) for relevant fungal
and non-fungal antigens appropriate for the area.
Avoidance measures Treatment protocol explained to patient
Pharmacotherapy Informed consent
adjusted
One vial prepared of all positive non-fungal antigens
Second vial of all positive fungal antigens
(vial test with each performed)
Weekly immunotherapy placing one injection from each vial in a different arm
(for accurate recognition of cause of any local reactions)
Goals to be achieved
• To keep clinical rhinosinusitis minimal and forestall the need for recurrent sinus surgery.
• To taper oral corticosteroids without significant worsening of condition.
• To minimize treatment related steroid side effects.
Author details:
Dr. Pooja Kataria, Specialist, ESI Hospital, Basaidarapur, New Delhi.
The classification which is currently being followed for fungal sinusitis is proposed by de
Shazo et al:
Syndrome Common Host character- Associated con- Histopathologi- Clinical presen- Treatment Prognosis
causes istics ditions cal findings tation
Allergic fungal Bipolaris Immunocompe- Chronic Eosinophil-rich Chronic pansi- Debridement, Recurrence
rhinosinusitis Species, Curvu- tent, frequently rhinosinusitis, mucoid material nusitis nasal aeration, oral common
laria lunata & atopic nasal polyps (allergic mucin) polyps, prop- and topical cor-
Aspergillus tosis or eye– ticosteroids, ?
fumigatus muscle entrap- immunotherapy
ment in children
Sinus fungal A. fumigatus Immunocompe- Chronic Dense accumu- Rhinosinusitis Debridement, Excellent
ball and A. flavus tent rhinosinusitis lation of fungal ( often U/L), aeration, anti-
(mycetoma) elements in a Nasal obstruc- fungal agents
mucoid matrix tion, green- not required
brown nasal
discharge
Acute invasive Mucorales and Immunocom- Diabetes melli- Fungal elements Fever, cough, Radical debride- Fair when dis-
fungal Aspergillus promised, rarely tus, malignant in mucosa, sub- crusting of nasal ment until his- ease is limited
rhinosinusitis immunocompe- conditions, mucosal, blood mucosa, epis- tologically nor- to sinus, poor
tent Immunosuppres- vessels or bone, taxis, headache, mal tissue is with intracranial
sive therapy extensive tissue mental status evident, antifun- involvement
necrosis change gal agents,
treatment of
underlying con-
ditions
Chronic inva- A. fumigatus Immunocompe- Diabetes Necrosis of mu- Orbital apex Radical debride- Variable, long-
sive fungal tent mellitus cosa, submuco- syndrome, ment, antifungal term survey
rhinosinusitis sal, bone & nerve palsy agents required
blood vessels,
low grade
inflammation
Granulomatous A. flavus Immunocompe- None Granulomas Unilateral prop- Debridement, Good, but dis-
invasive fungal tent with multinucle- tosis aeration, and ease can recur
rhinosinusitis ate giant cells, antifungal
histiocytes agents
Otolaryngologists have employed computer-aided surgery, or image-guided surgery, over the past two decades to en-
hance surgeon’s confidence, allow more thorough surgical dissections and possibly reduce the complication rate of
endoscopic sinus surgery. Computer-aided surgery utilizes preoperative imaging to provide real-time localization of
surgical instruments in the surgical field. Although computer-aided surgery originated in the neurosurgical realm, oto-
laryngologists soon appreciated that this technology could assist in identifying critical orbital or intracranial structures
surrounding the paranasal sinuses, and potentially aid in decreasing complications. In this article, the history of image-
guidance systems and their application to surgery of the paranasal sinuses and skull base will be reviewed. The compo-
nents of computer-aided surgery systems and the currently available technologies for surgical instrument tracking are
discussed, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of each of the tracking technologies.
• The term "stereotactic" was coined from Greek and Latin roots meaning "touch in space”.
• Use images of the paranasal sinusis and the brain to guide the surgeon to a target within the brain by utilizing the
stereotactic principle of co-registration of the patient with an imaging study.
• Relies on anatomical landmarks on the patient’s head and/or fiducial markers (temporary skin markers) which are
taped to the scalp before the brain is imaged.
• In the operating room the orientation of these markers is used to register the computer containing the brain im-
ages.
• References this coordinate system with a parallel coordinate system of the three-dimensional image data of the
patient that is displayed on the console of a computer-workstation so that the medical images become point-to-
point maps of the corresponding actual locations.
Image-guided surgery (IGS), also known as surgical navigation, is a specific technology that visually correlates intraop-
erative anatomy with preoperative CT scans. Often IGS is considered to be analogous to the global position system
(GPS), a technology that permits individuals to show their relative position on computer-generated map. For IGS, the
preoperative CT scan serves as the map, and the intraoperative tracking system is similar to the satellites and devices
that are used for GPS.
During nasal surgery, an IGS system will show the position of an instrument tip relative to the preoperative CT scan
images. Thus, the surgeon is better able to correlate intraoperative anatomy with the preoperative CT scans.
The CT scan images represent the coronal and reconstructed sagittal and axial views. The probe is at the level of the
middle turbinate. As you can see, the cross-hairs indicate exactly where the probe is on each of the coronal, sagittal
and axial views.
The primary advantages to using our navigation solutions for FESS include:
• Procedures are much less invasive than open surgical operations.
• Precision is greater, resulting in lower risk to the patient.
• Patient discomfort is minimal.
• Procedure recovery time is shorter.
The ENT system is not only significantly more complex, it has to be more intuitive, as the cranial anatomy with all its
sinuses, and nerves, and arteries and veins, is much more intricate.
The system's navigation coordinates are provided by the Patient Registration Mask.
• Sinus guide catheter is introduced into the nasal cavity under endoscopic visualization, sinus guide wire is intro-
duced through the catheter and advanced into the target sinus.
• The sinus balloon catheter is introduced over the sinus guide wire and is positioned across the blocked ostium.
The position of the balloon catheter is confirmed, and the balloon is gradually inflated to remodel the nar-
rowed or blocked ostium.
• The balloon catheter is then deflated and removed, leaving the ostium open.
Author details:
Dr. Sumit Mrig, Senior Resident, Department of ENT & Head and Neck surgery, Maulana Azad Medical
College, Lok Nayak Hospital & Associated Hospitals.
In ENT practice, CT offers great help not only in diagnosis but also in planning of sinus surgery, where half the exercise is already per-
formed before actually starting the surgery by reconstructing 3D images of sinuses in the head of the operating surgeon.
The radiologic characteristics of fungal sinusitis are very specific and aid in diagnosis and also guide towards the mode and the tim-
ing of appropriate treatment. Understanding the different types of fungal sinusitis and knowing their particular radiologic features
allows the radiologist to play a crucial role in alerting the clinician to use appropriate diagnostic techniques for confirmation. Prompt
diagnosis and initiation of appropriate therapy are essential to avoid a protracted or fatal outcome.
a b
Hypoattenuating mucosal thickening or soft-tissue attenuation within the lumen of the involved paranasal sinus and nasal cavity is
seen on NCCT. There is a predilection for unilateral involvement of the ethmoid and sphenoid sinuses. Rapid, aggressive bone de-
struction of the sinus walls is seen with intracranial and intraorbital extension of the inflammation. However, bone erosion may
even be absent or very subtle and fungi tend to extend beyond the sinuses, along the blood vessels. Other complications include
cavernous sinus thrombosis, carotid artery invasion, occlusion, or pseudoaneurysm with resulting cerebral infarct and hemorrhage.
Whereas CT is better to assess for bone changes, MR imaging is superior in evaluating intracranial and intraorbital extension of the
disease. Obliteration of the periantral fat is a subtle sign of extension beyond the maxillary sinus & should be specifically looked for.
Leptomeningeal enhancement may be seen with intracranial invasion and with progressive infection, adjacent cerebritis, granulo-
mas, and abscess formation may be seen. Intracranial granulomas appear hypointense on both T1- and T2-weighted images with
minimal enhancement on contrast enhanced images.
a b c
Chronic invasive fungal sinusitis:
(a) Clinical photograph of the patient showing perforation of the hard palate.
(b) Coronal and T2W image showing left maxillary and ethmoid sinusitis . There is destruction of nasal turbinates, ethmoidal septae and
hard palate forming an oro-nasal fistula (arrow).
(c) Coronal post gadolinium showing a fungal granulomas with peripheral enhancing rim in left cavernous sinus & evidence of perineu
ral spread with thickened enhancing mandibular division of trigeminal nerve coursing through the widened foramen ovale (black arrow)
c d
The T2 signal void is also attributed to a high protein and low free-water content of the allergic mucin. The inflamed mucosal lining
is relatively hypointense on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted images and demonstrates enhancement after
intravenous administration of gadolinium contrast material. There is no enhancement in the center or in majority of the sinus con-
tents, which distinguishes this condition from neoplastic entities. Although the condition is not considered invasive, if left un-
treated, the involved sinuses expand and there is smooth bone erosion with subsequent intracranial or intraorbital extension and
resulting cranial or orbital symptoms. Intracranial extension is usually limited by the dura to the extradural space.
Fungus Ball
Fungus ball appears as a mass within the lumen of a paranasal sinus and is usually limited to one sinus. The maxillary sinus is the
most commonly involved sinus. A fungus ball typically appears hyperattenuating at noncontrast CT due to dense matted fungal
hyphae & may demonstrate punctuate calcifications. The bony walls of the sinus may be sclerotic and thickened or expanded and
thinned with focal areas of erosion from pressure necrosis. The fungus ball is hypointense on T1-weighted and T2-weighted im-
ages owing to the absence of free water. Calcifications and paramagnetic metals such as iron, magnesium, and manganese also
generate areas of signal void on T2-weighted images.
Author Details:
Dr. Vaibhav Jain, Consultant, Department of Radiology, Max Hospital
Pitampura, New Delhi.
de Shazo RD, Chapin K, Swain RE. Fungal sinusitis. New England Journal of Medicine. 1997; 337:
254-9.
Katzenstein AL, Sale SR, Greenberger PA. Allergic Aspergillus sinusitis: a newly recognized form of si-
nusitis. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 1983; 72: 89-93.
Waxman JE, Spector JG, Sale SR, Katzenstein AL. Allergic Aspergillus sinusitis: concepts in diagnosis
and treatment of a new clinical entity. Laryngoscope. 1987; 97: 261-6.
Bent 3rd JP, Kuhn FA. Diagnosis of allergic fungal sinusitis. Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Sur-
gery. 1994; 111: 580-8.
Mabry RL. Allergic and infective rhinosinusitis:differential diagnosis and interrelationship. Otolaryngol-
ogy and Head and Neck Surgery. 1994; 111: 335-9.
Marple BF. Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis: current theories and management strategies. Laryngoscope.
2001; 111: 1006-19.
Lorenz KJ, Frühwald S, Maier H. The use of the Brain LAB Kolibri navigation system in endoscopic
paranasal sinus surgery under local anaesthesia-An analysis of 35 cases. Head and Neck Otology. 2006
Nov;54(11):851-60.
Ebbens FA, Georgalas C, Luiten S. the effect of Topical Amphotericin B on inflammatory markers in pa-
tients with chronic rhinosinusitis: A multicenter randomized controlled study. Laryngoscope. 2009; 119:
401-8.
2. The following are true regarding the treatment and follow-up of patients with AFRS except:
A. directional trending of total serum IgE level can be prognostic
B. Current research indicates oral antifungal drugs are effective as adjunctive treatment
C. Amphotericin B is generally contraindicated
D. oral corticosteroids have been found to decrease both symptoms and time to surgical recurrence
E. Patients should be co-managed by both medical and surgical specialists.
4. Match the following radiological descriptions to the most probable type of fungal sinusitis:
A. Mixed low & hyperattenuating material in left maxillary sinus on CT with tiny calcific specks.
B. A diabetic with complaints of nasal obstruction & discharge for four months, with recent onset
proptosis showing hyperattenuating soft tissue opacification of left ethmoid & maxillary sinuses,
erosion & sclerosis of maxillary sinus walls & orbital cellulitis on CT.
C. Bilateral frontal, anterior ethmoid & posterior ethmoid sinus involvement with hyperintense mate-
rial on T1W and hypointense on T2W images, with mild expansion.
D. T2 hyperintense mucosal thickening in maxillary, ethmoid and sphenoid sinuses with lack of visuali-
zation of flow void of left intracavernosal ICA.
http://enttrends.webs.com/
The opinions published in this publication are those of the contributors and do not
necessarily reflect the opinion or recommendations of the publishers. The publisher
assumes no liability for any injury and or damage to persons and property as a matter of
products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from use of operation of any methods,
products instructions or ideas contained in the material herein. No warranties, either ex-
press or implied, are made with respect to its accuracy, completeness, or timeliness. Due
to rapid advance in medical science, an independent verification of the methodologies and
references quoted here is strongly recommended.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………Publisher