Let's just see how objective the Asbury Park Press is...

Here is the filing by FIVE of the independent candidates in the Senate Special Election FILED BEFORE THE POLLS EVEN OPENED. Read it for yourself. http://www.scribd.com/doc/176336043/UnitedStates-Senate-filing-RE-NJ-SPECIAL-SENATE-ELECTION-CONTESTED

The Election Board and ALL 21 NJ County Clerks willfully and knowingly violated election law when giving Lonegan a "preferred" ballot column. The standard required for a so-called "major" party to receive a "preferred" position on the ballot is that a minimum of voters show up at the primary - that minimum standard is set by State Law as 10% of the total votes cast for ASSEMBLY in the prior general election. In fact, on that basis, NEITHER party achieved that "lofty" standard of only 10% of our anemic turn-out at the polls. You heard right. NEITHER party met the standard for the General Election two weeks from now. Here is the certification by Lt Governor Guadagno as to requirement: http://www.scribd.com/doc/178983860/Guadagno-Party-Certification-needed-pdf and here are the real numbers from the June Primary...http://www.scribd.com/doc/178984498/THE-REAL-NUMBERS-doc If you view those three documents, you will see that it is quite clear that neither party "earned" the preferred ballot real estate conferred upon them. You are fed by the mainstream media the message that only the Democrat or Republican candidates are worthy of consideration. That myth is perpetuated by those who cash the checks from the party bosses. Bought and paid for. The County Clerk's knew that they were violating the law. The Superior Court judge assigned to the original case, "LaVergne v Lonegan, et al", docket # L -1933-13 (View HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/178984498/THE-REAL-NUMBERS-doc) took the unbelievable action of agreeing that the laws had been broken, but offering NO REMEDY other than court costs (which are still not received) AND declined to recommend prosecution under the Hatch Act and State and Federal election laws broken intentionally by the Election Officials and Clerks. How did the judge arrive at the decision to make no remedy? She believed the Assistant Attorney General Donna Kelly's assertion that insufficient time remained to "re-draw" for the positions assigned and re-configure the Electronic Voting Machines before the election...her assertion being that it would take more than two weeks (the argument that the cost was prohibitive was no argument, and the judge agreed on that point. How often is it, however, that one does not get the opportunity to profit from violation of the law at a Judge's specific direction? Worse still, our - YOUR - assistant Attorney General's argument was completely untrue based on her own testimony and the assertions of the person in charge of the

programming - (read HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/176732894/Certification-ofRobert-Giles-Docket-L-1933-13-NJ-Superior-Court) She lied - giving the judge the daylight she needed to find for her "sponsors". Robert Giles' Certification was submitted BY Donna Kelly as evidence in another case - IN THE SAME COURTROOM - a few weeks before. "Did she lie THEN, or was she Lying NOW", asked LaVergne - (full proceeding may be viewed here - all one hour and forty minutes of it - don't miss your chance to watch your government officials lie to a judge.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sh1aIEeZ9U4) The Press and the Media have ignored these actions...because independents don't spend millions - the MILLIONS spent in the Special Election - on advertising in the press, aand on the air...all because the party bosses made a hand-shake deal to keep the Governor's Mansion "Republican" in exchange for keeping the Senate Seat "Democrat". Why do you think that two weak opponents were selected to run against Christie and Booker? There were and are plenty of more qualified individuals - but they were told they would not have party backing. Now, Lonegan has been left twisting in the wind by his own party officials, saddled with debt incurred during the election while funds raised on his behalf remain in the party coffers. He has had to go back out to his "constituency", hat in hand, just to get back to Zero. The AG's office HAD to fight over the ballot position - why? Because the programming in the Sequoia Electronic Voting Machines would end up assigning votes to/from the "wrong" wrong candidates. (duplication of "wong" is intentional) The exhibits in a case manipulated to dismissal in Atlantic County this week by convening the court an hour before the plaintiff was to appear, then dismissing the case without hearing it - (a stunt tried in the Superior Court as well...I was there...) - see the exhibit referencing the 'Fixed' election in Cumberland County last year, where the ballot machines were programmed to assign votes cast for one candidate to another. It was never about giving votes to Booker - it was about keeping the race close, so the contributions would keep rolling in. If you thought that Lonegan trailed Booker by 60 points, no matter who you supported, would you have opened your checkbook, or would you accept the two-horse race (a myth) as a foregone conclusion? Even the polling agent, Eagleton, admitted IN WRITING that they used a technique called a "push-pole" to skew the results, making the candidates appear to poll more closely - as they had been hired to do. If the ballots had been re-drawn, as the law required, it would have screwed up the programming, and might have had embarrassing results. They shaved votes from the independents to discredit them, and shaved votes from Booker to Lonegan to make the race look closer than it was. Did you ever notice that our twelve Congressional Districts are split exactly 50/50 - Democrat/Republican? Wonder why? Will the Press tell the truth?

We'll see. Frederick John LaVergne, "Democratic-Republican" for Congress, NJ District Three, 2014. "Stand for what's right, or settle for what's left" addendum: In the furtherance of the "Two-Party only" clique/myth - the networks NBC and ABC violated FCC Regulations in refusing to have the independent candidates involved in the televised debates. They blame their non-compliance on the shut-down and ignorance of the law...they were notified BEFORE the shut-down by the candidates, and persisted. Why is that wrong? Well, let's put it this way - if you leave six horses in the stable, and only race two - and the same stable "owns" both horses, is that a race. Here is the FCC filing: http://www.scribd.com/doc/174747987/LaVergne-FCC-Complaintand-Petition-Expedited-Clarification-of-Geller, which remains unresolved...story to continue... Because the NETWORKS were hosting the debates, rather than, say, the "League of Women Voters", they were bound by the Equal Time requirement tied to their LICENSES. They weren't "reporting" news - they were "manufacturing" it. I have met almost all of the Independents, and, had they been on stage with Lonegan and/or Booker, the outcome of the election may have been very different, indeed...of course, now, with the data deleted, we really don't know the outcome...do we? My statement regarding the "vote-shaving" has an analogy in the world of sports betting near and dear to many in New Jersey...POINT SHAVING. You don't rig the game to change the outcome, JUST THE SPREAD. As such, had the voting machines, which are required to be 'locked down' for a period of AT LEAST fifteen days - (the coming Thursday) - by both Federal and State law, should still be untouched...they're not. The election board began illegally erasing the tapes (yup, our hi-tech Electronic Voting Machines are based in 1980's technology and 1990 hardware) with the programming, selling the idea that a duplicate of the fraudulent print-out should be sufficient (concealing the violations) to confirm the votes tallied. IF I copy the same fraudulent document, that doesn't suddenly make it true. This is the fraud disclosed in the Cumberland County Case. Not to put too fine a point on things, "Point Shaving" is an illegal act. So is "Ballot Shaving". It could even be argued that the tacit dtente between the D's and R's on this election would rise to the level of a RICO case.

YOU (and I), as a New Jersey voter, deserve better. Both parties have broken your trust. What will you do about it? VERY IMPORTANT - no matter who you support, or where you stand - set the bar - VOTE in the NOVEMBER election - and make sure you vote for TWO assembly candidates...whomever you support/prefer. Don't leave them blank.