ISSUES IN BRAZILIAN ARCHAEOLOGY

1980. Estilistica e Cronologia na PROUS, A. & F.L. DE PAULA. Arte Rupestre de Minas Gerais, Pesquisas (skrie Antropologia) 31: 121-46. PROUS, A. & W. PIAZZA.1977. CEtat de Santa Catarina: documents pourla pr4histoire du Br6sil Miridional2. Paris: Mouton. PROUS, A. & H. RIBEIRO. 1985. Histdria da Pesquisa e Bibliografia 1 , Arqirivos Arqueoldgica no Brasil, Bibliografia Geral 1 do Museu de Historia Natural 10: 46-169. PROUS, A,, G.R. SILVA & M.E.C. SOLA. 1984. A la recherche d'une methode de prospection specialiske pour l'art rupestre au Bresil, Revista de Pre-historia 6: 235-42. ROOSEVELT, A.C. 1991. Moundbuilders of theAmazon:geophysical archaeologyon Marajo Island, Brazil. New York (NY): Academic Press. 1993. The rise and fall of Amazonian chiefdoms, L'Homme 126/128,33(2-4): 255-83. SCATAMACHIA, M.C.C. 1993. A pratica arqueoldgica no Brasil, Revista d e Arqueologia Americana 7: 117-29. SCHMIDT DIAS, A. 1995. Um projeto para a arqueologia Brasileira: Breve historic0 da implementaq8o do PRONAPA, Revista do CEPA 19(22):25-39. Santa Cruz do Sul. SCHMITZ, P.I. 1973. A Pesquisa arqueoldgica no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, DBdaIo 17/18: 67-78. 1982. Arqueologia; AvaliaCcio e Perspectivas 47. Brasilia: CNPq. 1984. CaGadores e Coletores da Pr6-histdria do Brasil. SBo Leopoldo: Instituto Anchietano de Pesquisas, UNISINOS. 1986. Arqueologia n o B r a d : Avaliagio e Perspectivas/1980. Brasilia: CNPq. 2987. Prehistoric hunters and gatherers of Brazil, fourno/ of World Archaeology l(11:53-126. 1994. Brazil: tendencies and growth, in A. Ouyela-Caycedo (ed.),History ofLatin American archaeology. 22-35. Aldershot: Avebury. L.K.M. 1 9 8 9 . 0 nascimento dos Museus Brasileiros, SCHWARCS, 1890-1910, in S . Miceli (ed.),HistMa dus Cienncias Socinis no Rrasil: 20-71. SBo Paulo: Vertice. SIMOES,M.S. [ed.). 1967. Programa Nacional de Pesquisas Arqueologicas 1: Restrltados Preliminares do Priineiro Ano (196.5-1966). Belem: Museu Paraense Emilin Goeldi. Publicaqijes Avulsas 6. 1969. Programa Nacional de Pesquisas Arqueologicas 2: ResultadosPreliminars do Segundo Ano (1966-19fi71. Belkm: Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi. PublicaCBes Avulsas 10.

581

1970. Programa Nacional de Pesquisas Arqueologicas 3: Resultados Preliminares do Terceiro Ano (1 967-1968). Bel6m: Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi. PublicaCBes Avulsas 13. 1971. Programa Nacional de Pesquisas Arqueolbgicas 4: Belch: Resultados Preliminares do QuarZo Ano ( I 968-1969% Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi. Publicaqijes Avulsas 15. 1972. Index das fases arqueoldgicas Brasileiros, 1950-1 971. Belem: Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi. 1974. Programa Nacional de Pesquisas Arqtreol6gicos 5: Resultados Preliminares do Qirinto Ano (1 969-1 9701. Belem: Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi. PublicaqBes Avulsas
STAHL, P.W. (ed.). 1995. Archaeologyin the lowland American tropics: current analytical methods and recent applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. UCKO, P.J. [ed.). 1995. Theory in archaeology: a world perspective. London: Routledge. VELOZ MACGIOLO, M. 1984. La arqueologia de la vida cotidiana: matices, historia, y diferencias, Boletim de Antropologia Americana 10: 5-21. VIALOU,A.V. & D. VIXLOU. 1989. Abrigo Pre-Historic0 Santa Elina, Mato Grosso: Habitats e Arte Rupestre, Revisto de Pre-Historia 7: 34-53. 1955. Method and theory in AmeriWILLEY. G.R. & P. PHILLIPS. can archaeology 1 1 : historical-developmental interpretations, American Anthropologist 57: 723-819. 1974. A history of American arWILLEY, G.R. & J.A. SABLOFF. chaeology. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman. WUST, I. 1975. A Cergmica Caraja de Aruan8, Anuario de Divulga@o Cientifica da Universidade Catrilica de Goids 2: 91-165. 1983. Aspectos da ocupaCBo pre-colonial em uma area do Mato Grosso de Goias - tentativa de analise espacial. Master's dissertation, Departamento de Antropologia, Universidade de SBo Paulo. 1990. Continuidade e Mudanqa: para uma interpretaqBo dos grupos pr6-coloniais na Bacia do Ria Vermelho, Mato Grosso. Doctoral dissertation, Departamento de Antropologia, Universidade de SBo Paulo. 1994. The Eastern Bororo from an archaeological perspective, in A.C. Roosevelt (ed.), Amazonian Indians: from prehistory to present: 315-42. Tucson (AZ): University of Arizona Press.
26.

Early hunter-gatherers in the Americas: perspectives from central Brazil

RENATO KIPNIS"
Key-words: hunter-gatherer, late Pleistocenelearly Holocene adaptation, subsistence pattern, Central Brazil

There is a preconception among American archaeologists that the late Pleistocene (c.12,00010,000 b,p.) and early H ~ human] occupation of the ~~~~i~~~ would have had highly formalized and diagnostic technologies (Bryan 1986), as seen in bifacial fluted projec-

tiles (Clovis and/or Folsom points1) or Palaeo1 Northern Palaeoindian cultures appear ~ ~ ~ ~ t o begin ~ with clovis a n d Folsom, dated C . 11,200-10,900 a n d C . 10,90010,200 years b.p. respectively, and e nd in the early Holocene at c. 8500 years b.p. (Taylor e t 01. 1996; Koosevelt e t a]. 199fi).

* Museum of Anthropology, Ilniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI 48109-1079, USA. rkipnis@unlich.edu

ANTIQ~JITY 72 (1998): 581-92

582

SPECIAL SECTION

arctic microblades. This bias carries with it two presumptions which have no reason to exist: Clovis and related industries had to be diffused throughout the Americas; and there should be a big-game hunting horizon in South America. In short, the North American archetype is being used: if there is a late Pleistocene human occupation in South America, then it should look like the one in North America, Although several archaeological sites in South America are of the same age as Clovis and Folsom, they do not show the characteristics typical of North American Palaeoindian occupation (Dillehay et al. 1992).IJntil very recently, a late Pleistocene human occupation in South America was not accepted by mainstream North American archaeologists (Fiedel 1996; West 1991).This can be explained by three factors: there was no undisputed pre-Clovis site in North America, as there should be if there were Clovis contemporaneous occupations in South America and the migration went from north to south; the lack of discrete chronological horizon in South America, similar to Clovis period in North America; and scarcity of information about South American archaeology being done by South American archaeologists. The recent publications of Monte Verde site reports (Dillehay 1989; 1997) and site visit by a group of archaeologists (Meltzer et al. 1997; Pedler & Adovasio 1997) put an end to the preClovis occupation debate with the indisputable evidence of human occupation in southern Chile c. 12,500 years b.p. Along with that we hope that more attention will be geared to other South American late Pleistocene sites, and more importantly, to the variability of early human adaptations in the Americas. This article presents evidence of late Pleistocene human occupations at several sites in the eastern tropical lowlands of South America, specifically in central Brazil, that are not characterized by the presence of specialized big-game hunting assemblages. The archaeological record from this region shows that until c. 3500 years b.p. the region was occupied continuously by egalitarian foraging groups subsisting entirely on wild animals and plants. Reviewing archaeological evidences of this early occupation, this article suggests that adaptation was based pri-

marily on plants and small mammals, with an expedient lithic assemblage geared to manufacturing wood implements. The fact that late Pleistocene lithic assemblages from South America are distinct from North America should not be a surprise. Clovis, Folsom, Lindenmeier and other North American late Pleistocene and early Holocene periods are specific adaptations to particular ecological context and subsistence strategy. When humans migrated to South America they encountered a very ecologically diverse land, and had to adapt and adjust to this new environment. From an ecological point of view, important once we deal with subsistence strategies, we are talking about local adaptation during a period of important palaeoclimatic changes. The variability found among human occupation in the Americas during late Pleistocene and early Holocene periods can be partially explained by regional adaptations of people facing environmental risk.

Theoretical framework The human ecological approach to huntergatherer studies has shown those societies use a broad range of ways to mitigate risk, including mobility, storage, logistical collecting, exchange, communal sharing, intensification and diversification (e.g. Colson 1979; Goland 1991; Halstead & OShea 1989; Spielmann 1986; Wiessner 1982; Winterhalder 1990).Combinations of these mechanisms have been used to define contrasting strategies: foragers/collectors (Binford 1980), immediate return systemddelayed return systems (Woodburn 1980),nomadic hunter-gatheredsedentary hunter-gatherers (Testar 1982), generalized hunter-gatherers/ complex hunter-gatherers (Hayden 1990).These strategies are culturally defined adaptive responses to specific sets of environmental conditions, which vary both spatially and temporally in a given environment. Anthropologists interested in environmental adaptation have argued that diversification (exploitation of a broader spectrum of resources) is a particularly effective mechanism of risk management. Diversification, together with intensification (increase in productivity, intensification proper and specialization; Morrison 1994) are likely adaptive responses to climatic instability in the late Pleistocene and early Holocene in the Old and in the New Worlds: both may have been key to the development of

ISSUES IN BRAZILIAN ARCHAEOLOGY

583

complex hunter-gatherer societies (Price 1991; Price & Brown 1985),and to the origin of agriculture (Binford 1968; Cohen 1977; Flannery 1986; Redding 1988). On the basis of the archaeological record from central Brazil it has been suggested that diversification and intensification were also mechanisms employed by hunter-gatherer groups in this region during the late Pleistocene and early Holocene, a period marked by palaeoclimatic instability and major environmental changes (Schmitz 1981; 1987a).

(grazing animal biomass and distribution), as well as primary productivity for gatherers (Low 1990). The variability among late Pleistocene and early Holocene human occupation throughout the Americas can be partially explained by regional adaptation to local palaeoenvironmental conditions.

Palaeo-climate Climatic changes did not affect the whole of the central Brazil region equally; recent palaeoclimatic studies from different areas are producing different results. Pollen sequences from two regions in Minas Gerais indicate an increase in seasonality with a concomitant extension of the dry season and a reduction in winter cooling at the end of the Pleistocene and early Holocene. Over the past 17,000 years, a rapid succession of different forest types in the pollen record from Salitre is interpreted as reflecting rapid climate changes (Ledru et al. 1996). Between c. 9000 and c. 5500 b.p., climatic shifts from coldlhumid to warmldry were observed in one pollen sequence (Ledru 1993); at 5000 years there was an arid interval. Another pollen record from Lago do Pires, a transitional zone from cerrado to forest, recorded a moist phase between 8810 and 7500 b.p.; at 5530 b.p. a major change in vegetation, from cerrado to extensive forests, took place (Behling 1995).A fourth pollen record from Minas Gerais suggested a brief cooling period at 5000 b.p. (Oliveira 1992). Another recent palaeoclimatic study in Goias indicated an increase of precipitation c. 10,400-7700 b.p. Humidity continued to increase in the next period (6500-3500 b.p.), with highest levels at the Climatic Optimum (Vicenti 1993). Climatic and vegetation changes in central Brazil seem to have had local variations. Late Pleistocene and early Holocene huntergatherers living in this region had to cope with both climatic instability and local ecological variation with inter-annual rainfall fluctuation, unpredictability, and long-term environmental change amongst the critical variables. Rainfall is an important environmental variable, ultimately determining the food base for hunters

Archaeological record Evidence of human occupation in central Brazil dates back to the PleistocenefHolocene transition, with the earliest radiocarbon date at c. 12,000 b.p. (TABLE 1).The main archaeological sites are in the state of Minas Gerais (several sites at Peruaqu Valley and Grande Abrigo de Santana do Riacho), Mato Grosso (Santa Elina), Pernambuco (several sites at SZo Raimundo Nonato), and Goias (GO-JA-01)(FIGURE 1).From the very limited archaeological record Schmitz (1981; 1987a) proposed three temporal divisions for the late Pleistocenelearly Holocene human occupation of Central Brazil: Beginning ofHolocene (11,000-8500 b.p.): Transitional Period (8500-6500 b.p.1: and Climatic Opt i m u m 2(6500-4000 b .p .) . According to Schmitz, the Beginning of the Holocene was a homogeneous cultural horizon. Central Brazil was occupied by hunter-gatherers in dispersed and highly mobile bands, with a subsistence pattern based on hunting large mammals (tapir, peccaries, deer),supplemented by anteaters, armadillos, turtles, lizards, rhea, birds and fishes (Jacobus 1983; Moreira 1983-4). Molluscs are absent, fruit seeds, especially from palm trees, are present (Schmitz 1981; Schmitz et al. 1989). The Transitional Period is associated with modifications in subsistence, technology and settlement. There is archaeological evidence that terrestrial molluscs assume an important subsistence role and that fruits were consumed in large quantities. The increased abundance of terrestrial molluscs in interior sites, such as the rock-shelters of Goias and Minas Gerais, is accompanied on the coast by the first specialized gatherers of marine and lagoon shellfish (sambaquis) (Schmitz 1987a; 1987b).Sites are still dispersed, and there is no significant change in their number (Schmitz 1981; Schmitz et al. 1989).
2 Mid-Holocene interval of warm climate between 7000 and 4000 b.p. (AbSaber 1981;Smitz 1981).

584

SPECIAL SECTION
context
14C determination

state & site

lab. no.
BETA-10017 BETA-10015 SI-6748 SI-5565 SI-7160 SI-2347 SI-3696 SI-3695 SI-3697 SI-3698 51-3 700 N-2348 SI-3699 SI-3699 N-2348 SI-3107 SI-3108 51-3 110 SI-3111 SI-5562 SI-5563 SI-2769 SI-3479 SI-3476 GIF-9367 GIF-8954 BETA-22634 BETA-22645 P-519 P-521 51-2 373 51-32 10 SI-6837 BETA-98573 CDTN-1077 CDTN-3011 CDTN-1004 CDTN-3015 CDTN-3114 CDTN-1080 CDTN-3009 CDTN-1084 CDTN-2264 CDTN-2403 CDTN-1008 CDTN-1007 BETA-100392 BETA-89592 BETA-100391 BETA-100396 BETA-100397 Birm-868

Bahio

Abrigo PilZo Abrigo Pi120 BA-RC-28 Morro Furado Morro Furado

Goids GO-JA-01 GO-JA-01 GO-JA-01 GO-JA-01 GO-JA-01 GO-JA-01 GO-JA-01 GO-JA-01 GO-JA-01 GO-JA-01 GO-JA-02 GO-JA-02 GO-JA-03 GO-JA-14 GO-JA-26 GO-JA-26 GO-NI-49

rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter open air open air rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter roc k-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter

9390f90 96101-90 91101-100 8860+115 9110+100

8740f 90

8805+100 891 51-115 9020f70 9060f65 9510+60 10,400f130 10,580f115 10,580f115 10,740+90 9195+75 10,120i80 9765f75 10,740+85 8370f75 8880f90 10.750+300 9370f70 10,405+100 9460+90 10,120+60 10,090+70 10,340+110 902Of120 9720+128 8215f120 8620+110 1 0 , l90f 120 9350+80 9870f260 9870f485 10,000+232 10,250f345 10,910f140 11,440+240 11,440+475 12,000f300 12,000+500
12,070+170

Mato Grosso Abrigo do Sol Abrigo do Sol Santa Elina Santa Elina

Mato Grosso do S u l
MS-PA-02 MS-PA-02 Minus Gerais Cerca Grande, Abrigo 6 Cerca Grande, Abrigo 6 Gruta do Gentio I1 Gruta do Gentio I1 Gruta do Gentio I1 Lapa do Boquete Lapa do Boquete Lapa do Boquete Lapa do Boquete Lapa do Boquete Lapa do Boquete Lapa do Boquete Lapa do Boquete Lapa do Boquete Lapa do Boquete Lapa do Boquete Lapa do Draggo Lapa do Drag50 Lapa dos Bichos Lapa dos Bichos Lapa dos Bichos Lapa dos Bichos Lapa dos Bichos LapaPequena

10,000f255 11,000+300 8640+90 8890f90 9140f90 939Of 160

10,4 5O f 70

8240+160

1. Late Pleistocene/early Holocene radiocarbon determinations for central Brazil. TABLE

ISSUES IN BRAZILIAN ARCHAEOLOGY

585

state & site

Minus Gerais (continued) Lapa Vermelha MG-VG-11 MG-VG-11 MG-VG-19 Santana do Riacho Santana do Riacho Santana do Riacho Santana do Riacho Santana do Riacho Santana do Riacho Santana do Riacho Santana do Riacho Santana do Riacho Pernambuco Brejo de Madre de Deus 3 Brejo de Madre de Deus 3 ChZ do Caboclo ChZo do Caboclo Chlo do Caboclo Pedra do Caboclo
Piaui BaixZo do Perna I BoqueirZo da Pedra Furada BoqueirZo da Pedra Furada BoqueirLo da Pedra Furada BoqueirZo da Pedra Furada Boqueirlo da Pedra Furada BoqueirZo da Pedra Furada BoqueirLo da Pedra Furada BoqueirZo da Pedra Furada BoqueirZo da Pedra Furada BoqueirZo da Pedra Furada BoqueirZo da Pedra Furada BoqueirZo da Pedra Furada Caldeirlo do Rodrigues I Sitio do Meio Sitio do Meio Sitio do Meio Sitio do Meio Sitio do Meio Toca da Baixa do Cip6 Toca da Barra AntoniZo Toca da Boa Vista I Toca da Boa Vista I Toca da Boa Vista I Toca da Boa Vista I Toca da Boa Vista I1 Toca da Boa Vista I1 Toca de Cima do PilZo Toca do Bojo I Toca do Bojo I Toca do Bojo I Toca do Bojo I Toca do Bojo I Toca do Paraguaio Toca do Paraguaio Toca do Paraguaio

context
rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter open air open air open air rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-s helter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter rock-shelter

14C determination

lab. no.
gif-3208

9580f200 8865+110 9135f105 8845k90 8150f150 8185f110 8230f150 83815280 8400+300 8500f500 8840f130 9460fllO 11,9601250 8495k75 11,060+90 8100k135 9250f160 11,000f250
8400f200

SI-5509 SI-5508 SI-5511 GIF-5087 CDTN 1039 GIF-5088 CDTN-1044 CDTN-1002 CDTN-1001 CDTN-1069 GIF-4508 GIF-5089 3-6296 SI-6298 MC-1042 MC-1056 MC-1046 MC-1003 GIF-5414 GIF-4625 GIF-6157 GIF-6436 g1f-6 162 GIF-8350 FZ-436 GIF-8351 g1f-8 389 GIF-8352 GIF-5862 FZ-430 BETA-22859 GIF-5650 BETA-47494 BETA-47493 BETA-65856 GIF-4628 GIF-5403 GIF-6957 GIF-8712 GIF-5864 BETA-32972 GIF-4629 BETA-32971 MC-2481 MC-2513 BETA-27345 GIF-4626 GIF-170 GIF-4925 GIF-4624 GIF-4627 MC-2510 MC-2480 MC-2 511

9540k170 8050f170 8080f120 8170f80 8450rt80 8600f60 9506+135 9800f60 10,040f80 10,050+80 10,400fl80 10,454+114 10,540f350 9480f170 8800f60 8960f70 9200+60 12,200f600 12,330+230 8700590 96 70f 140 9160+170 9650f100 97305140 10,530f 110 9700f120 9850f120 10,390F80 8050f170 80805170 9080f170 97005120 9700k200 8600f100 86 70f 120 8780k120

TABLE 1 (continued). Late Pleistocene/early Holocene radiocarbon determinations for central Brazil.

586

SPECIAL SECTION

FIGURE 1.Main arch a eol ogical research regions and archaeological sites. 1 Cerra da Capivara (Toca do Boqueircio and Toca do Sitio do Meio). 2 PeruaCu valley (Lapa do Boquete and Lapa dos Bichos). 3 Serro do Cipo (Santana do Riacho). 4 Rondonopolis region (Santa Elina and GO-JA-01).

At the Climatic Optimum, according to Schmitz, there is increased use of smaller vertebrates. Food remains continue to emphasize molluscs, but in smaller quantities and consisting almost exclusively of large gastropods. Remains of large and medium-sized vertebrates are not numerous; small mammals predominate. Exploitation of birds appears to have intensified. Avariety of seeds and palm nuts often fill pits or form lenses in hearths. After 5000 b.p. the number of sites increases, suggesting significant demographic growth (Prous 1992). Rock-shelters and caves intensively used in the previous periods are abandoned during this

period in the south of Piaui, Pernambuco, parts of Minas Gerais and Goias (Schmitz 1981; Prous These changes in subsistence pattern as reflected in the archaeological record may be responses to climatic changes and their effects on the ecosystem. It has been argued that the palaeoclimate of central Brazil became more humid during the period between the early Holocene and the Climatic Optimum (AbSaber 1981; Schmitz 1987a);with an increase in humidity, molluscs proliferated, vegetation became denser, and mammals became more dispersed (so terrestrial game declined in abundance).
1992).

ISSUES IN BRAZILIAN ARCHAEOLOGY

587

Hunting would have been more difficult. The Climatic Optimum saw an extraordinary expansion of vegetation: forests appeared, parklands expanded and thorn-scrub forests were reduced. Terrestrial game further decreased in abundance. By Schmitzs (1981; 1987a) argument, humans responded by altering their resource base, with greater emphasis on plants, and much less reliance on animals, particularly large ones. The great majority of the archaeological evidence dated to late Pleistocene and early Holocene periods is found in rock-shelters and caves (in contrast to the open-air sites of North America). This does not mean that people were living only in caves; a bias of survival and discovery has to be taken into consideration, and we have to spend some energy in searching for open-air sites. But we do have sites with very good preservation, well-defined stratified deposits (FIGURE 2), and rich sequences of remains from the Pleistocene/ Holocene transition to the 19th century. Systematic research in central Brazil is being done in three main areas: the regions of Rondon6polos, Mato Grosso; Cerra da Capivara, Paiui; and Vale do Peruaqu, Minas Gerais (FIGURE 1). This large area of Brazil shows a clear and recurrent pattern of sites sharing similar material culture, subsistence pattern, and a consistent range of radiocarbon dates which is strong evidence of human occupation in South America c. 12,000 years b.p. It also shows that, contrary to Schmitzs generalized hunting-based economy, the the early inhabitants of this region were primarily gatherers. Three important archaeological sites in eastendcentral Brazil -Grande Abrigo de Santana do Riacho, Lapa dos Bichos and Lapa do Boquete, in the state of Minas Gerais -are rockshelters presenting excellent organic preservation, and rich stratified sequences of remains dating from the Pleistocene/Holocene transition to the Holocene (FIGURE 2). Grande Abrigo de Santana do Riacho, a rockshelter formed by the falling of quartzite blocks from the base of a cliff, is an exception in an area dominated by karstic caves and rock-shelters. Excavations conducted in the southern part of the rock-shelter cover 100 sq. m. The occupation dates back to 11,960+ 250 b.p. (GIF-5089) and is continuous up to 3990k70 b.p. (Prous 1992; 1993). Lapa do Boquete and Lapa dos Bichos are located in the Peruaqu valley, in the northern

region of Minas Gerais. The Peruaqu rivers origin is located in the gneiss, 80 km northwest on the left margin of the S5o Francisco river. Its middle course cuts through Precambrian calcareous formations, and in the past it was almost entirely subterranean. A roof collapse exposed the river bed, forming a canyon with cliffs of 50-100 m , with karstic forms (lapies, dolines and residual forms), and subterranean sections 1-3 km long (Prous 1991b). The canyon, intensively occupied by prehistoric groups, offers material culture, subsistence remains, burials and numerous cave paintings and engravings. Lapa do Boquete and Lapa dos Bichos are two of more than 60 known sites in the canyon where systematic excavations have been carried out in just a small part. These three sites are important to understanding the Postglacial period in eastern central Brazil: all three have excellent organic preservation including rich botanical and animal remains, perishable wooden and reed artefacts, and human burials. Several occupation levels span most of the Postglacial period. In the first archaeological level at Lapa do Boquete (12,000+170years b.p., CTDN-2403)and at Lapa dos Bichos (10,450+_70 years b.p., BETA-100397) a lithic industry has flint and silicified sandstone artefacts and the by-products of their manufacture, characterized by end-scrapers and rare bifacial projectile points. Microscopic usewear analysis shows that many implements have been used; most of the wear is associated with woodworking (Prous et al. 1992). At Santana do Riacho the lithic industry, mainly on quartz and quartzite, has sidescrapers, end-scrapers, borers and rare bifacial projectile points (Prous 1991). Use-wear studied in a sample of the Santana do Riacho lithic collection also showed general evidence of woodworking (Alonso 1991). Although there may be local variation in the lithic industries of centraI Brazil, the industries from Minas Gerais resemble those from other parts of this region: an expedient lithic assemblage, with not many multifunctional tools, many scrapers, very rare bifacial points, and few highly curated tools (FIGURE 3). It presents not only clearly morphological patterning (limaces) but other indicators of human modification: cores, flakes and conjoining flakes. Other important characteristics which attest to a human presence are the artefacts and

588

SPECIAL SECTION

dated to 9140&90 (BETA-100391 1. Irregular black circles represent charcoal, and irregular white closed geometric forms are lithics.

FIGURE 2. Stratigraphic profile of test pit G17, Lapa dos Bichos - all archaeological levels. Level 10

flakes made of exotic raw material, the presence of burned lithic material in areas where natural fire could not have occurred [caves) and the use-wear already mentioned. We know very little about botanical remains in central Brazil despite very good preservation at Santana do Riacho and sites in the PeruaCu Valley. The general picture shows the exploitation of wild fruits (coquinhos, guariroba, licuri, chicha, pequi, jatoba, and other cerrado

fruits). This exploitation does not stop with the advent of corn and manioc agriculture [Veloso & Resende 1992). Although subsistence shows spatial and temporal variation throughout the post-Pleistocene period in central Brazil, it is characterized by a broad-spectrum diet based on gathered fruits and roots. There are a few faunal case-studies. Faunal remains from PeruaCu Valley sites and Santana do Riacho are currently being analysed (by the

ISSUES IN BRAZILIAN ARCHAEOLOGY

589

I
I -

ri

- --Clll
_ -

I
~

c'

FIGURE 3. A range of stone tools from late Pleistocene human occupation sites. A Scrapers from Santana d o Riacho. B Flake tools from Santana do Riacho. C Flake tools from Lapa do Boquete. D Scrapers from Lapa do Boquete. (Redrawn from Prous 1991a; 1991b; Prous et al. 1992.)

590

SPECIAL SECTION

author). The pattern becoming clear is of small and medium-sized animals predominating in the archaeological record from central Brazil. The majority are mammals (rodents, armadillos, primates, sloths, Brazilian rabbits, anteaters), with some reptiles, birds and fishes. Bigger animals (deer, peccaries, tapir), rare to start with, are more represented in later occupations. The working hypothesis is that, with the advent of agriculture, people who had minimized the risk of subsistence stress were taking more chances in hunting bigger animals. There is no clear evidence of late Pleistocene people hunting extinct mega-fauna, The appearance of domesticated plants in the archaeological record of central Brazil is not well dated. The appearance of ceramic in the archaeological sequence of rock-shelter sites in central Brazil is usually interpreted as evidence of the first horticultural groups, and is known as the Una tradition. Sometimes the pottery is associated with domesticated plants (i.e. corn and manioc). The earliest evidence for the Una tradition in central Brazil dates to 3490 b.p. (Prous 1992).This tradition is defined by the presence of a few ceramic vessels (small and undecorated) and almost exclusive to rockshelters. Although a survey and/or preservation bias might explain the lack of open-air sites, another plausible explanation is that this is evidence of mutualistic interaction between hunter-gatherers and horticulturalists. The fact that the lithic industry from the lina traditiion is not different from the previous occupations (Prous 1992; Schmitz et al. 1989) might be an indicator the latter explanation is correct. If this is the case, the increase of large mammal hunting could be associated with the hunter-gatherer/ horticulturalist interaction, where meat was exchanged for domesticated plants, as seen for example between the Maki and Tukgno societies from northwest Ainazonia (Silverwood-Cope 1990). Some characteristics of the fauna from those sites are also strong evidence of a human presence during the late Pleistocene period. There are fish remains in all levels in sites that are and were more than 50 m above the river. Although rare, other non-karstic: animals - peccaries -are present. Burned (calcined)bones, broken bones that refit, and cut-marks are also evidence of human occupation of these habitats as early as 12,000 years ago.

Other important features in sites from central Brazil are well-structured hearths, and burials. At Santana do Riacho, 24 burials were found containing approximately 40 individuals; one burial (Sep. XII) dates to 9460k110 b.p. (GIF-4508) (Prous 1992; 19931. This collection is currently being reanalysed; preliminary results show a high incidence of caries among the population from Santana do Riacho in all archaeological levels3 (Neves et al. 1996), an indication of a diet rich i n carbohydrates (Saunders & Katzeberg 1992). The slight available data shows pattern. There is strong evidence for a late Pleistocene human occupation in eastern South America. The diverse lithic assemblages dating from c. 12,000 years b.p. are unequivocally human made; they are distinct from the North American industries of Clovis and Folsom. Wood-working tools might have been important. The subsistence of early groups in central Brazil was based on a foraging strategy, focusing on the exploitation of wild plants and small animals; preliminary work based on faunal and osteological analysis supports the hypothesis that plants were the staple diet. That subsistence pattern is similar to the one reported by Gnecco (1997) and Roosevelt et al. (1996) for late Pleistocenelearly Holocene hunter-gatherer occupation in the Amazon region, where subsistence strategy relied more on gathering than hunting - a pattern again very different from the North American, where big-gamehunting was important. It differs from Schmitzs (1987a)model for central Brazil, where the first people had a strategy geared to large mammals (deer, peccaries, tapir etc.),and later shifted to a plant-based subsistence. Discussion In sum, early human occupation of eastern South America is characterized by generalized foragers, very different from the big-game hunters in North America. Plant resources, both as food and as raw material for tool manufacture, were very important. A clearly diverse lithic assemblage is not geared towards hunting activity. I suggest we put an end to the spear/projectile point tyranny, and begin to look at cultural dynamics instead. The documented variabil9.0% of permanent teeth have caries: and if we take only adults, this number goes to 11.0%.

ISSUES IN BRAZILIAN ARCHAEOLOGY

591

ity in the archaeological record can be partially explained by adaptation to the tropical region, with great dependence on plant foods. Major changes in technology and subsistence pattern in central Brazil occurred around the mid Holocene, similar to Australia (Edwards & OConnell 1995) than to other regions of the world. The general approach to stone technology in Australia and eastern South America share similar general features - small tools, many scrapers, and rare projectile points; and extinct megafauna seem to have been hunted neither in Australia nor in South America. Schmitzs (1987a) model for late Pleistocene and early Holocene adaptations is an attempt to correlate environmental and behavioural changes in central Brazil that mimicprocesses that occurred i n the Old World and North America. The archaeological record from central Brazil discussed above does not support the behavioural changes suggested, despite similar environmental changes. Although not com-

mon, and often not explicit, traditionally the Old World (Upper Palaeolithic and Mesolithic) and North America (Palaeoindian and Archaic) are used as models for comparison and frameworks to interpret early human occupation in Brazil. It is time we began to broaden our view and knowledge, and look at other places as well, specifically Australia. To understand the specific developments and organization of late Pleistocene and early Holocene hunter-gatherers in central Brazil, we clearly need more detailed archaeological and palaeoenvironmental data. So far, description and explanation of the archaeological record has been based on qualitative and incomplete archaeological data, biased survey methods and very general palaeoclimatic reconstruction. With more germane studies on cultural dynamics of human migration and adaptation, a different pattern of Pleistocene and early post-glacial adaptation will emerge, which should change the traditional view of the First Americans.

References ABSABER, A.N. 1981 Paleo-clima e pileo-ecologia, Anuario d e Divulgapio Cientifica 5: 33-51 ADOVASIO,J.M. & D.R. PEDLER. 1997. Monte Verde and the antiquity of humankind in the Americas, Antiquity 71: 573ALONSO, M. 199la. Inddstria litica de Santana do Riacho: analise funcional de microtraceologia, Arquivos do Museu d e Historia Natural 1 2 : 275-84. BINFORD, L.R. 1968. Post-Pleistocene adaptations, in S.R. Binford & L.R. Binford (ed.), New perspectives in orchaeology: 237-34. Chicago: Aldine. 1980. Willow smoke and dogs tails: hunter-gatherer settlement systems and archaeological site formation, American Antiquity 45(1): 4-20. BRYAN, A. 1986. Paleoamerican prehistory as seen from South America, in A. Bryan (ed.),New evidence for the Pleistocenepeopl~ngoftheAmericas: 1-14. Orono (ME): Center for the Study of Early Man, University of Maine. CASHDAN, E. (ed.). 1990. Risk a n d uncertainty in tribal a n d peasant economies. Boulder (CO): Westview. 2 . 1979. In good years and in bad: food strategies of COLSON, self-reliant societies, Journal ofAnthropological Research 35(1): 18-29. COHEN, M.N. 2977. The world food crisis in prehistory. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press. T.D. 1989. Monte Verde: a Late Pleistocene settleDILLEHAY, ment in Chile 1: Paleoenvironment a n d site context. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press. 1997. Monte Verde: a Late Pleistocene settlement in Chile 2: The archaeological context. Washington (DC): Smithsanian Institution Press. DILLEHAY, T.D., G.A. CALDERON,G. POLITIS, & M. DA CONCEICAO DE M.C. BELTRAO. 1992. Earliest hunter-gatherers of South America, Journal of World Prehistory 6(2): 145-204. 1995. Broad spectrum diets EDWARDS, D.A. & J.F. OCONNELL. in arid Australia, Antiquity 69: 769-83. FIEDEL, S. 1996. Paleoindians in the Brazilian Amazon, Science 274: 1823-4.
80.

FLANNERY, K.V. (ed.). 1986. Guild Naquitz: archoic foraging a n d earlyagriculture in Oaxaca, Mexico. New York (NY): Academic Press. CNECCO, C. & S. MORA. 1997. Late Pleistoceneiearly Holocene tropical forest occupations at San Insidro and Peiia Roja, Colombia, Antiquity 71: 683-90. GOLAND, C. 1991. Cultivating diversity: field scattering as agriculturalriskmanagement in Cuyo, Cuyo, Dept. of Puno, Peru. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan. P. & J. OSHEA (ed.). 1989. Badyeareconomics: culHALSTEAD, tural responses to risk and uncertainty Cambridge: Cambridge LJniversity Press. B. 1990. Nimrods, piscators, pluckers and planters: HAYDEN, the emergence of food production, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 9(1):31-69. JACOBUS, A.L. 1983. Restos alimentores d o sitio GO-JA-01, Serranopolois, Goias; Nota Previa. SBo Leopoldo: lnstituto Anchietano de Pesquisas. LEDRU, M-P. 1993. Late Quaternary environmental and climatic changes in central Brazil, Quaternary Research 39: 90-98. F. SOLJBI~S, M. FOURNIER, L. MARLEDRU, M-P., P.I.S. BRAGA, TIN, K. SUCUIO & B. TURCQ. 1996. The last 50,000 years in the Neotropics (southern Brazil] evolution of vegetation and climate, Paloeogeogrphy, Palaeoclimatology, Polaeoecology 1 23: 2 39-5 7. LOW, B.S. 1990. Human responses to environmental extremeness and uncertainty: a cross-cultural perspective, in Cashdan (ed.): 229-55. MOREIRA, L.E. 1983/4. Caipdores: dieta e alimentaGZo, Arquivos do Museu de Historia natural 8/9: 35-54. K.D. 1994. The intensification of production: arMORRISON, chaeological approaches, Journal afArchaeological Method a n d Theory 2(1): 111-60. NEVES,W. S. CORNERO & A. PROUS. 1996. Incidihcia d e caries na populaGBo de Santana do Riacho e o mito do PaleoIndio C a p d o r . IV Congress0 d e La Asociacion Latino Americana de Antropologia Bioldgico. Bueiios Aires: Asociacion Latino Americana de Antropologia Biolbgica.

592

SPECIAL SECTION 1987b. CaCadores antigos no sudoeste de Goias, Brasil, Estudos Atacomefios 8: 16-35. 1989. SCHMITZ, P.I.,A.S. BARBOSA, A.L. JACOBUS & M.B. RIBEIRO. Arqueologia nos Cerrados do Brasil Central, Serranbpolos, Pesquisas (serie antropologia) 44. SILVERWOOD-COPE, P.L. 1990.OsMakd:Povo caGadordonoroeste da AmazBnia. Brasilia: Editora Universidade de Brasilia. SPIELMANN, K. 1986. Interdependence among egalitarian societies, Journal ofAnthropologica1 Archaeology 5: 279-312. JR & M. STUIVER. 1996. Clovis and TAYLOR, R.E., C.V. HAYNES, Folsom age estimates: stratigraphic context and radiocarbon calibration, Antiquity 70: 515-25. TESTAR, A. 1982. The significance of food storage among huntergatherers: residence patters, population densities, and social inequalities, Current Anthropology 23: 523-30. VELOSO,T.P.G. & E.M.T.P. DE RESENDE. 1992. Vestigios alimentares nos sitios arqueol6gicos sob abrigos de Minas Gerais, Annois do 3 O Congresso da Associapjo Brasileira de Estudos do Quaternbrio: 389414. Belo Horizonte: AssociaC&O Brasileira de Estudos do Quaterndrio. VICENTINI, K.R.C.F. 1993. Analise Palinoldgica de uma Vereda em Crominia -GO. MA dissertation, University of Brasilia. WEST, F.H. 1991. Archaeology i n the press: science misserved?, Review of Archaeology l l ( 2 ) : 25-32. WIESSNER, P. 1982. Risk, reciprocity and social influences on Kung San Economics, in E. Leacock & R. Lee (ed.), Politics and history in band societies: 61-84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1980. A history of American arWILLEY, G.R. & J.A. SABLOFF. chaeology 2nd edition. San Francisco (CA): W.H. Freeman. WINTERHALDER, B. 1990. Open field, common pot: harvest variability and risk avoidance in agricultural and foraging societies, i n Cashdan (ed.):67-88. B. 1990. Hunters and gatherers today and reconWOODBURN, struction of the past, in E. Gellner (ed.). Soviet and western anthropology: 95-117. London: Duckworth.

OLIVEIRA, P.E. 1992. A palynological record of Late Quaternary vegetation and climatic change i n southeast Brazil. Ph.D dissertation, Ohio State University. PRICE, T.D. (ed.11989. The chemistry ofprehistoric human bone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1991.The view from Europe: concepts and questions about terminal Pleistocene societies, in T. Dillehay & D.J. Meltzer (ed.), Thefirst Americans: search and research: 185-208. Boca Raton (FL]: CRC Press. PRICE, T.D. & L.A.BRowN.1985. Prehistoric hunter-gatherers. New York (NY): Academic Press. PROUS, A. 199la. Santana do Riachci - Tom0 I, Arquivos do Museu de Histdrio Natural 12: 3 - 3 4 , 199lb. Fouilles de L'Abri du Boquete, Minas Gerais, Brkil, Journal de la Societe des Amdricanistes 77: 77-109. 1992. Arqueologia Brasiliera. Brasilia: Editora UnB. 1992-3. Santana do Riacho - Tom0 11, Arquivos do Museu de Histdrio Natural 13/14: 3 4 2 0 . PROUS, A,, M.A. LIMA, E. FOGACA XT M.E. BRITTO.1992. A inddstria litica da camada VIII da Lapa do Boquete, Vale do Rio PeruaGu, MG (Brasil), in Annais do 3" Congresso da Associapio Brasileira de Estudos do Quaternario: 34262. Belo Horizonte: AssociaGBo Brasileira de Estudos do Quaterndrio. REDDING, R.W. 1998. A general explanation of subsistence change: from hunting and gathering to food production, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 7: 56-97. ROOSEVELT, A.C. et al. 1996.Pdeoindian cave dwellers i n the Amazon: the peopling of the Americas, Science 272: 373-84. (ed.]. 1992. Skeletal biolSAUNDERS, S.R. & M. A. KATZENBERC ogy ofpast peoples: research methods. New York (NY): Wiley-Liss. SCHMITZ, P.I. 1981. La evolucion de la cultura en el centro y nordeste de B r a d en 14,000y 4000 afios antes del presente, Pesquisas (shrie antropologia) 32: 7-39. 1987a. Prehistoric hunters and gatherers of Brazil, Journal of World Prehistory l(1): 53-125.

Considerations of the sambaqzzs of the Brazilian coast

MARIA DULCE GASPAR"
Key-words: shellmound, Brazilian coast, social identity

Sambaqui is the name given to a certain type of archaeological evidence left by fisher/hunter/ gatherer groups who inhabited large expanses of the Brazilian coast. The word is of Tupi etymology, tamba meaning shellfish and ki a piling-up (Prous 1991: 204). The Tupi were a horticultural/potter group who lived on the Brazilian coast at the time of the first European arrivals; they coined the term which describes the main characteristic of the sites -the accu-

mulation of great quantities of mollusc shells (FIGURE 1 ) . The sambaquis are made up of faunal remains such as shells and fish bones related to the diet of their builders. Whole artefacts (hone arrowheads, perforated teeth, polished stone axe-blades, hammers and manos, grinders, stone flakes, shell scrapers), remains from the manufacture of artefacts (cut bones, quartz flakes) and fragments of used objects are also found

* Project '0 Aproveitametno Ambiental das PopulaqBes Pre-Hist6ricas n o estado d o Rio d e Janeiro' FINEPIFUJBIMN. Museu Nacioiial, UFRJ. CNPq.
ANTIQUITY 72 (1998): 592-615