The World Bank Implementation Status & Results

Indonesia URBAN SECTOR DEVELOPMENT AND REFORM PROJECT (P071296)

Public Disclosure Copy
Operation Name: URBAN SECTOR DEVELOPMENT AND REFORM Project Stage: Implementation Approval FY: Seq.No: 11 2005 Status: ARCHIVED

Report No: ISR8029

Archive Date:

03-Dec-2012

PROJECT (P071296)
Country: Indonesia Product Line: IBRD/IDA Region: EAST ASIA AND PACIFIC Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan

Implementing Agency(ies): Ministry of Public Works, DG Human Settlements

Key Dates
Board Approval Date Effectiveness Date

07-Jun-2005 18-Jan-2006

Original Closing Date 30-Jun-2011 Revised Closing Date 31-May-2013

Planned Mid Term Review Date 15-Apr-2008 Actual Mid Term Review Date

Last Archived ISR Date 03-Apr-2012

16-Mar-2009

Project Development Objectives

Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document)

The project development objective is to assist the Borrower to strengthen local governance and improve the provision of selected urban services by participating Urban Local Governments (ULGs) and additional participating ULGs.
Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project?

Yes

No

Component(s)
Component Name Component Cost

Urban Reform and Institutional Support Component Urban Investment Component

9.00 52.12

Overall Ratings
Previous Rating Current Rating

Public Disclosure Copy

Progress towards achievement of PDO Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Overall Risk Rating

Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory

Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory

Implementation Status Overview

The project is nearing completion of physical works and governance reforms being undertaken by 10 urban local governments (ULGs). The investment subprojects are mostly aimed at upgrading and rehabilitating public markets, and have already provided better, cleaner, and more modern facilities for vendors and customers, and increased revenues for operation and maintenance. The ULGs have also strengthened governance by improving transparency and accountability, systematically disclosing public information, establishing complaints handling mechanisms, evaluating performance of contractors/suppliers, improving financial management regulations and systems, and finalizing the national urban strategy, policy, and economic development plans.

Page 1 of 10

The World Bank

Report No: ISR8029

Locations
Country First Administrative Division Location Planned Actual

Public Disclosure Copy

Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia

Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered

Kotamadya Yogyakarta Toboli Propinsi Sulawesi Tengah Kabupaten Sidenreng-Rapang Kotamadya Semarang Kotamadya Parepare Kota administratip Palu Palopo Kabupaten Musibanyuasin Kabupaten Manokwari Mangkang Kota Administratip Cimahi Kotamadya Blitar Kemirimuka Kecamatan Gamping Kabupaten Sleman Desa Umbulharjo Kecamatan Pangkajene Kotamadya Depok Kecamatan Moutong Lakessi

Public Disclosure Copy

Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia

Results
Project Development Objective Indicators

Page 2 of 10

The World Bank

Indicator Name Core Unit of Measure Baseline Value Date Comments Current

Report No: ISR8029

End Target

Public Disclosure Copy

Increased revenue, operations and maintenance expenditures, and satisfaction rates among users and consumers of selected urban services in at least 70% of ULGs with completed subprojects

Percentage

0.00 18-Jan-2006 Overall ULG target (70%) is based on achievement of four sub-indicators that each have their own targets, and are in turn determined by individual baselines and values achieved for each subproject. At inception of the project, overall baseline is zero as the project investments have not yet taken place.

30.00 18-Jul-2012 30 % ULG have increased monthly revenue. At least another 30 % ULGs are preparing the USDRPfinanced infrastructure to operation. t The PBME for assessing users revenue and satisfaction will be prepared prior project closing. However, 10% ULGs have carried out satisfaction survey to traders and resulted that more than 50% traders satisfy to the facilities provided and the use of infrastructure 30.00 18-Jul-2012 30 % ULG have increased monthly revenue. At least another 30 % ULGs are preparing the USDRPfinanced infrastructure to operation 0.00 18-Jul-2012 Seven ULGs have completed subprojects in which five ULGs have subprojects in operation, but data on O&M expenditures is not yet available. 0.00 18-Jul-2012

70.00 31-May-2013 Target value is the percentage of participating ULGs with completed investment sub-projects that have achieved the individual goalsin each of the four subindicators.

70% of ULGs increase their local revenue from urban services financed by the project by at least 10%

Percentage
Sub Type

Value Date Comments

0.00 18-Jan-2006 Sub-indicator based on individual baselines for each ULG and subproject. Data are collected through municipal records on revenues from each facility or service. 0.00 18-Jan-2006 Sub-indicator based on individual baselines for each ULG and subproject. Data are collected through municipal records on O&M expenditures for each service infrastructure financed by the project. 0.00 18-Jan-2006

70.00 31-May-2013 Percentage of ULGs with completed subprojects that have met the revenue target.

Breakdown

70% of ULGs increase expenditures for O&M of infrastructure financed by the project by at least 10%

Percentage
Sub Type

Value Date Comments

70.00 31-May-2013 Percentage of ULGs with completed subprojects that have met the O&M expenditure target.

Breakdown

Public Disclosure Copy

Percentage of ULGs in which at least 50% of users express increased satisfaction in doing business in the improved facility.

Percentage
Sub Type

Value Date Comments

70.00 31-May-2013

Breakdown

Baseline is zero because the Data will be collected through Percentage of ULGs with target is based on percentage an impact assessment completed subprojects that of ULGs meeting targets for (PBME) conducted either a

Page 3 of 10

The World Bank

user satisfaction in facilities that were not yet improved and in some cases not identified. Increased satisfaction for individual subprojects will not include and ex-ante baseline but rather through a survey of current users who also were users of the unimproved infrastructure. "Users" refers to vendors orother stakeholders that use the facilities improved through project investments to conduct business activities and provide commercial services. Percentage of ULGs in which at least 50% of consumers express increase satisfaction of using the facilities Percentage
Sub Type Value Date Comments

Report No: ISR8029

Public Disclosure Copy

year after each subproject's have met the user satisfaction infrastructure becomes target. operational, or at the close of the project. However, 10% ULGs have carried out satisfaction survey to traders and resulted that morethan 50% traders satisfy to the facilities provided and the use of infrastructure

0.00 18-Jan-2006 Baseline is zero because the target is based on percentage of ULGs meeting targets for consumer satisfaction in facilities that were not yet improved and in some cases not identified. Increased satisfaction for individual subprojects will not include and ex-ante baseline but rather through a survey of current consumers who also were consumers of the services before they were improved. "Consumers" refers to customers of vendors or recipients of services provided through the facilities.

0.00 18-Jul-2012 Data will be collected through an impact assessment (PBME) conducted either a year after each subproject's infrastructure becomes operational, or at the close of the project. However, 10% ULGs have carried out satisfaction survey to traders and resulted that morethan 50% traders satisfy to the facilities provided and the use of infrastructure

70.00 31-May-2013 Percentage of ULGs with completed subprojects that have met the consumer satisfaction target.

Breakdown

Public Disclosure Copy

Intermediate Results Indicators

Page 4 of 10

The World Bank

Indicator Name Core Unit of Measure Baseline Value Date Comments Current

Report No: ISR8029

End Target

Public Disclosure Copy

Participating ULGs have public feedback mechanisms in place incl:(i) the use of at least one type of media(s) for public complaintsmanaged by complaint handling unit; (ii) availability

Text

0.00 18-Jan-2006 At the inception of the project, baseline was zero as the project has not started its facilitation and values vary across ULGs. Information is collected during the supervisions missions and recorded in the Aide Memoires with qualitative information on the progress. Indicators were only specified in June 2010 during project restructuring. 0.00

(i) 70%; (ii) 100%; (iii) 70% 18-Jul-2012 70 % ULGs have a systematic use of media for managing complaints and feedback 100 % ULGs have specific unit to manage 70 % ULGs have SOP of complaints handling

80 31-May-2013

Participatory planning process: (i) allocation of block grants to kecamatan and/or kelurahan from the ULG and/or from at least oneagency with Standard Operating Procedure for the use of block grants

Text

Value

70% ULGs has block grant mechanism or indicative budget 18-Jul-2012

50

Date Comments

18-Jan-2006

31-May-2013

Public Disclosure Copy

At the inception of the project, 70% ULGs has block grant baseline was zero as the mechanism or indicative project has not started its budget facilitation and values vary across ULGs. Information is collected during the supervisions missions and recorded in the Aide Memoires with qualitative information on the progress. Indicators were only specified in June 2010 during project restructuring. 0.00 18-Jan-2006 At the inception of the project, baseline was zero as the project has not started its facilitation and values vary across ULGs. Information is collected during the 9i) 100%; (ii) 100%; and (iii) 70% 18-Jul-2012 100 % ULGs have local regulation concerning the Principle of Regional Finance 100% ULGs have local regulation concerning Policies, Systems, and 80 31-May-2013

Participating ULGs practicing sound Fin. Mgt: (i) issuance of local regulation (PERDA or Decree or Perbup/Perwal) on Principle of Regional Financial Management; (ii) Issuance of local regulation

Text

Value Date Comments

Page 5 of 10

The World Bank

supervisions missions and recorded in the Aide Memoires with qualitative information on the progress. Indicators were only specified in June 2010 during project restructuring. Center of Excellence: (i) Unit Informasi Pembangunan Permukiman dan Bangunan (UIP2B) functioned as a Prov. Center of Excellence to support reforms in the ULGs in the province; (ii) Work Plan for Text
Value

Report No: ISR8029

Public Disclosure Copy

Procedures for the Preparation and Execution of APBD 70 % ULGs published annual audited financial report

0.00

1 PIP2B is established. Organizational structure and budget are available, and annual work plan is issued

Center of Excellence: at least 1 Province has (i) and (ii) Local Economic Development and City Development Strategy: At least 60%of Partic ipating ULGs have (i) and at least 50% of Participating ULGs having the LED-focu sed City Development Strategy achieve (ii) 31-May-2013

Date Comments

18-Jan-2006 At the inception of the project, baseline was zero as the project has not started its facilitation and values vary across ULGs. Information is collected during the supervisions missions and recorded in the Aide Memoires with qualitative information on the progress. Indicators were only specified in June 2010 during project restructuring. 0.00

18-Jul-2012 1 PIP2B is established. Organizational structure and budget are available, and annual work plan is issued

Public Disclosure Copy

Participating ULGs implemented subprojects: (i) Participating ULGs sign Sub- project Loan Agreements (SLAs) with Ministry of Finance for urban investment subprojects; (ii) Participating ULGs complete

Text

Value

(i) 10 ULGs; (ii) 7 ULGs

(i) 100% of Participating ULGs signed SLAs (ii) At least 80% of Participating ULGs completed construction of urban investment subproject 31-May-2013

Date Comments

18-Jan-2006 At the inception of the project, baseline was zero as the project has not started its facilitation and values vary across ULGs. Information is

18-Jul-2012 100 % ULGs have signed SLA 70 % ULGs have completed subproject construction

Page 6 of 10

The World Bank

collected during the supervisions missions and recorded in the Aide Memoires with qualitative information on the progress. Indicators were only specified in June 2010 during project restructuring. Participating ULGs practicing sound Procurement: (i) Min. 75% of the bids be awarded within the bid validity period, and publicizedin the public domain, e.g. website, local bulletin; (ii) Min 50% of Text
Value

Report No: ISR8029

Public Disclosure Copy

0.00

i) 90%; (ii) 100%; (iii) 30% in progress

At least 60 % of participating ULGs achieve (i) and (ii) and at least 60% of participating ULGs achieve (iii) 31-May-2013

Date Comments

18-Jan-2006 At the inception of the project, baseline was zero as the project has not started its facilitation and values vary across ULGs. Information is collected during the supervisions missions and recorded in the Aide Memoires with qualitative information on the progress. Indicators were only specified in June 2010 during project restructuring. 0.00 18-Jan-2006 At the inception of the project, baseline was zero as the project has not started its facilitation and values vary across ULGs. Information is collected during the supervisions missions and recorded in the Aide Memoires with qualitative information on the progress. Indicators were only specified in June 2010 during project restructuring.

18-Jul-2012 awarded the bids within bid validity period, however only 90% of ULGs published the bid award in the public domain, e.g. website, local bulletin (ii) 100% ULGs have national certified tender committee (iii) At least 30% ULGs are preparing institutions and mechanism for giving award to best-performers 90.00 18-Jul-2012 Value: varies across ULGs, range from 70-100% for six types of specified information have been published in websites or in printed media (details are shown in the following six indicators below)

Transparency, Participation and Accountability: ULGs that post semi-annual updates on websites or in printed media for specified information

Percentage

Value Date Comments

80.00 31-May-2013 Value: At least 80% of participating ULGs post the specified information at six months intervals

Public Disclosure Copy

Page 7 of 10

The World Bank

Transparency, Participation and Accountability: ULGs that post semi-annual updates on websites or in printed media for information on local development activities/programs Percentage
Value Date Comments

Report No: ISR8029

0.00 18-Jan-2006 At the inception of the project, baseline was zero as the project has not started its facilitation and values vary across ULGs. Information is collected during the supervisions missions and recorded in the Aide Memoires with qualitative information on the progress. Indicators were only specified in June 2010 during project restructuring. 0.00 18-Jan-2006

90.00 18-Jul-2012 100% ULGs published local development activities/ programs on the website or printed media

80.00 31-May-2013 Value: At least 80% of Participating ULGs post the information on local development activities/ programs at six month intervals

Public Disclosure Copy

Transparency, Participation and Accountability: ULGs that post semi-annual updates on websites or in printed media for specified information: Mid-term development Plan (RPJMD)

Percentage

Value Date Comments

80.00 18-Jul-2012

80.00 31-May-2013 Value: At least 80% of Participating ULGs post the information on RPJMD at six month intervals

At the inception of the project, 90% ULGs published baseline was zero as the summary RPJMD on the project has not started its website or printed media facilitation and values vary across ULGs. Information is collected during the supervisions missions and recorded in the Aide Memoires with qualitative information on the progress. Indicators were only specified in June 2010 during project restructuring. 0.00 18-Jan-2006 At the inception of the project, baseline was zero as the project has not started its facilitation and values vary across ULGs. Information is collected during the supervisions missions and recorded in the Aide Memoires with qualitative information on the progress. Indicators were only specified 60.00 18-Jul-2012 70% ULGs published summary of local budget of the ongoing FY, and 60% published summary of budget realization of previous FY

Public Disclosure Copy

Transparency, Participation and Accountability: ULGs that post semi-annual updates on websites or in printed media for specified information: summary of Local Budget (APBD)

Percentage

Value Date Comments

80.00 31-May-2013 Value: At least 80% of Participating ULGs post the information on the summary of APBD at six month intervals

Page 8 of 10

The World Bank

in June 2010 during project restructuring.

Report No: ISR8029

Public Disclosure Copy

Data on Financial Performance (as of 09-Oct-2012)

Financial Agreement(s) Key Dates
Project Ln/Cr/Tf Status Approval Date Signing Date Effectiveness Date Original Closing Date Revised Closing Date

P071296 P071296 P071296

IBRD-47860 IBRD-77600 TF-53555

Effective Effective Effective

07-Jun-2005 06-Jul-2009 20-Oct-2005

20-Oct-2005 06-Jul-2009 20-Oct-2005

18-Jan-2006 06-Jul-2009 18-Jan-2006

30-Jun-2011 30-Jun-2011 30-Jun-2011

31-May-2013 31-May-2013 31-May-2013

Disbursements (in Millions)

Project Ln/Cr/Tf Status Currency Original Revised Cancelled Disbursed Undisbursed % Disbursed

P071296 P071296 P071296

IBRD-47860 IBRD-77600 TF-53555

Effective Effective Effective

USD USD USD

45.00 45.00 5.00

45.00 38.44 5.00

0.00 6.57 0.00

0.00 34.64 4.26

0.00 3.80 0.74

0.00 90.00 85.00

Disbursement Graph

Public Disclosure Copy

Key Decisions Regarding Implementation

The next supervision mission is scheduled for December 2012. It will include discussion of final steps to complete unfinished works and activities prior to project closing, and plans for ensuring the long-term sustainability of project investments. Page 9 of 10

The World Bank

Restructuring History
Level one Approved on 04-Jun-2010, Level two Approved on 13-Apr-2011, Level two Approved on 14-Jun-2012

Report No: ISR8029

Public Disclosure Copy Public Disclosure Copy

Related Projects
There are no related projects.

Page 10 of 10