U.S.

Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review

Board ofImmigration Appeals Office of the Clerk

5107 leesburg Pike, Suite 2000 Falls Church, Virginia 20530

Richard H. Trais Law Offices of Richard H. Trais 2501 W. Lawrence Avenue, Suite H Chicago, IL 60625

OHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel - CHI 525 West Van Buren Street Chicago, IL 60607

Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center | www.irac.net

Name: OLUFUNMI, OLUWOLE

A 045-081-162

Date of this notice: 10/17/2013

Enclosed is a copy of the Board1s decision and order in the above-referenced case. Sincerely,

DCWU- caJ\A)
Donna Carr Chief Clerk

Enclosure Panel Members: Holmes, David B.

)1 1

c\; ! i; I (

Userteam: Docket

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished

Cite as: Oluwole Olufunmi, A045 081 162 (BIA Oct. 17, 2013)

U.S. Department of Justice

Falls Church, Virginia 20530

Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Exeutive Office for Immigration Review

File:

A045 081 162 - Chicago, IL

Date:

oct 11 2013

In re: OLUWOLE OLUFUNMI

IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS

Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center | www.irac.net

MOTION ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: APPLICATION: Reopening ORDER: Considering the totality of circumstances presented with the respondent's motion, which has not been opposed by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the proceedings are reopened under the provisions of 8 C.F.R. 1003.2(a). The record will be remanded to the Immigration Judge to provide the respondent an opportunity to pursue an application for adjustment of status based on the approved immediate relative visa petition filed on his behalf by his United States citizen wife, to whom the respondent has been married since June 2006. 1 FURTHER ORDER: The record is remanded to the Immigration Judge for further Richard H. Trais, Esquire

proceedings not inconsistent with this order and for the entry of a new decision.

FOR THE BOARD

The record before us shows that the respondent moved to withdraw from his grant of voluntary Accordingly, the respondent is not

departure before the voluntary departure period expired.

barred from adjustment of status based on failure to comply with the voluntary departure order. See Dada v. Mukasey, 554 U.S. 1 (2008).

Cite as: Oluwole Olufunmi, A045 081 162 (BIA Oct. 17, 2013)