2013 2022

20135

.....................................................................................................................1
10 ..................................................................................2

1 | .......................................................................................3

2 | ..........................................................................................4
3 | 2013-2022 ................................................................................... 11
4 | 2022 ..................................................................18
5 | .................................................................................19
6 | .............................................................................................................24
....................................................................................................................25

20135

10

2022
40%

2022
1.270.8

2011

2017

2022

2022

2022

55%

1.27

1.0

0.8

-20%

-40%
2

22%

23%

1.

80%36%

0.97

2013-

1.27

2022

19%
22%

/ 4%
3%
2%
2%
1%

44%

3%

2011
20119,000

2.

0.77

0.95

1.00

1.36

0.95/

3.

1995

19
(2011)

2017

1994
:
2,513

2019

61
35

33
(2011)

:
6,131

110
61

:
4,814

100
43

1994

2015

8
(2011)

1990
2019/2020

13

20,000

4.

1.110.39

1
65%

4,200

1995

1995

2000
2011

2,8504

1.5

1.2

0.9

0.6

()

2000

1995

()

0.3

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

: Dr. Kwang-yim Kim, Performance of Waste Management Policy in Korea-Volume-based

Waste Fee System and Packaging Waste EPR, 2008, Korea Environment Institute.,

1. : 2010
2. Dr. Kwang-yim Kim, Performance of Waste Management Policy in Korea-Volume-based Waste Fee System and Packaging Waste
EPR, 2008, Korea Environment Institute.
3. 2011
4. Korea Zero Waste Movement Network (KZWMN), http://www.waste21.or.kr/html/eng.asp.

10

()

()

1990

1994

1995

1997

1998

2000

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2010

2013

101

1.

2.

6
%
100

1%

2%

80

52%

51%

46%

48%

48%

52%

60

19%

20%

79%

40

61%

20

21%
0

2011

2010
/

2011

**

2011

2009
/

**59%48%

10

2013-2022

11

2013-2022

2013-2022

1.
1A.

2013

1B.

2.
2A.

(BYOB)

2B.

2C.

2D.

3.
3A. (BEAM Plus)

3B.

1.
1A.

201212

1B.

5,000

2010

2.

3.
3A.

3B.

12

2013-2022

1.
1A.

2013

1B.

1C.

2.
2A.

2B.

2013(HATS)

2C.

2002016

3002017

2D.

3.
3A.

2013

13

2013-2022

2013-2015

2016-2018

(1A)
(1B)
(2A)

2019-2022

(2D)

(2B)
(2C)
(3A)
(3B)

(1A)(1B)(2)(3A)(3B)

(1A)
(1B)
(2)

(3A)
(3B)

(1B)

(1A)
(1C)

(2C)

(2A)
(2B)
(2C)
(2C)
(2D)
(3A)

14

(2D)

2013-2022

500

13,4582011

= +

5
2006

10

4.0

3.5

10

3.0

2.5

2.0

1.5

3,300

1.0

0.5

25%
0.0

2000

2001

2002

2003

15

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2013-2022

120
880,000
12%

1,550

70%

5,000

3,600
10

16

103

2012
1
B5
(95%5%
)

17

2022

2022

2017

20%1.27

2022

0.82011

40%

11

2011

2017

1.27

1.0

()

-20%

2022

0.8

-40%

2017

201120%

2022

1.
2. 20111.27

18

2013-2022

12 ()

12 2022

3,900

1,500

500

19

3,000

13

520/

14

14

20

/
2012
50,000

2016

21

2013

22

48%52%

15

2022

15

2011

2022

52%

22%
23%

48%

()

55%

23

2022

29

0.64
30

2017

1.2

2025 1.2720%1
43 0.8
1.42

201140%

6.822

2017

1.2720%1
0.8
201140%

5. Hoornweg, Daniel; Bhada-Tata, Perinaz; What a Waste: A Global Review of Solid Waste Management, 20127

24

1998

2008

()
(1.5x1.5)

2009

2005

2007

2010

2010

2010

2011

530

2011

2012

1990

1993

1993/
//

2007

2006 2008 2008

2008

2008

25