Fakulti Kejuruteraan Elektronik & Kejuruteraan Komputer Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka.

LONG REPORT ASSESSMENT (4th YEAR)

Name/Matrix No. Subject/Code Title of Experiment Course/Section : ___________________________________________________________________________________ : ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ : ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ : _________________________ Date: ____________________________

No

Description Title / Learning Outcome / Equipment Background information from research based knowledge

Very Weak (1) No documentation at all. No background information form research based knowledge provided.

Weak (2) Poorly documented.

Modest (3) Not all documented; or missing some information. Provide some background information from research based knowledge, but still missing some major points. Missing some important research experimental details.

Good (4) Moderately documented.

Excellent (5) Carefully documented.

Weight

Score

PO Access PO8

1.

1 /5 Background information from research based knowledge is nearly complete; missing some minor points. Important research experimental details are covered; some minor details are missing. Background information from research based knowledge is complete and well-written; provides all necessary information for the experiment. All research experimental details are covered and wellwritten.

2.

Very little background information from research based knowledge provided or information is incorrect. Missing several important research experimental details.

/20

PO 4

Research Procedures / Methodologies 3.

No research experimental details at all or copied directly from lab sheet.

2 /10 5 /25

4.

Results Unable to elaborate, interpret and evaluate result.

@ Depend on marking scheme (capping up to 25 marks) Poor elaboration, interpretation and evaluation of result. Able to elaborate, interpret and evaluate result analytically; but missing some important points. Not all important points are summarized; sufficient elaboration. Report is organized but not according to the complied format. Moderate appearance. Able to elaborate, interpret and evaluate result analytically; but minor improvements are needed. All important points are summarized; missing some minor points, sufficient elaboration. Report is organized and according to the complied format. Acceptable appearance. Able to elaborate, interpret and evaluate result analytically.

5.

Discussion

4 PO3 /20

Concluding paragraph is not apparent. 6. Conclusion

Attempt to summarize; but draws a weak elaboration.

Summarizes all important points; appropriately addressed the objective, result and discussion. Report is organized and according to the complied format. Very good appearance.

3 /15

7.

Report format, organization and appearance

Report is unorganized and not according to the complied format. Unacceptable appearance.

Report is organized but not according to the complied format. Poor appearance.

PO8

/5 Total Marks = 100 (20%)

Long Report Assessment Rubric: Degree 4th Year