Professional Documents
Culture Documents
test/Sign test WHEN TO USE One Sample Is there a reason to believe that the median specific gravity of the urine do not differ with 1 STEPS Analyze > Non Parametric > Legacy Dialogues > Binomial Test > (Category: Test Variable(e.g. Specific gravity); Cut point: Tinetest na value(e.g. if not = 15 then 15) Test proportion = 0.50 Analyze > Non Parametric > Legacy Dialogues > Two-independent samples test > Test variable > (what is needed) grouping variable > define groups > (depends sa variable view) > continue > OK Input Z, kahit negative, alisin lang yung (-) Split file > group to be split Analyze > Non-parametric > Legacy dialogues > two related > epithelial cells before, after > OK Analyze > Non-Parametric > K-independent > Test variable > Kung ano needed > grouping variable > minimum(minimum group) max also > Kruskal Wallis If kailangan alisin group Data > select cases > if condition is satisfied; group > 1
Two independent groups Is there a significant difference in the color, transparency, protein, epithelial, alkaline phosphatase of the ctrl & const. workers?
Two dependent groups or paired Suppose a treatment was done to reduce the epithelial cells. Data are in epithelial cells 1 (before), epithelial cells 2 (after). Is there sufficient evidence that the epithelial cells of const. workers significantly decrease after the treatement? More than two independent groups On the group of construction workers (welder, mason, painter), is there a significant difference in the urinary findings?
PARAMETRIC TESTS NAME 1) Z test for single mean 2) T test for single mean 3) Students T-test 4) Welch T test 5) Paired T test 6) ANOVA WHEN TO USE If population std. dev If Sample std. dev STEPS Mano mano formula lang
Analyze > compare means > one-sample Ttest > test variable (kung ano na sa Ho) Inference in two means = variances are equal Analyze > compare means > independent samples t-test > test variable (kung ano yung na sa Ho) Variances are not equal Same lang pero this time F ng levenes is less than 0.05 If 2 means are dependent Analyze > compare means > T test > get the df > get the critical value > decide (if reject or accept ho) 3 or more means Analyze > compare means > one way ANOVA > dependent list (un ung gusto imeasure i.e. zone of inhibition) > factor (i.e grouping variable like the treatment) Post hoc > tukey s> sig level (0.05) Randomly selected 50 children and 8 of them Manual > P value (SPSS) > Analyze > have found to have osteoporosis nonparametric test > legacy dialogue > binomial (test variable list) > test proportion (input pi) > ok If may 2 ratios are given Analyze > descriptive statistics > cross tabs > rows and columns > statistics > chi square If more than two proportions Generate the table like in inference in two proportions (chi square lang din kasi) If association is asked Analyze > cross tabs > rows and columns > statistics > chi square If correlation is asked Analyze > correlate > bivariate > input 2 variables > check pearson > check spearman > check one tailed (then lalabas correlation matrix) If correlation is asked Same as above* If 1 variable affects another Analyze > regression > linear > dependent is
8) Inference in two proportions 9) Inference in two or more proportions 10) Bivariates (chi square test of association) 11) Pearson correlation
always the y, independent always the x > statistics > check confidence interval > save > unstandardized the predicted and residuals > continue > ok Same as above but the independent input ALL factors being tested Analyze > regression > binary logistics > dependent (being tested) > covariates (factors being tested) > options >check CI > check hosmmer lemme show good fit > ok Data is the coefficient Wald is the chi square stat P value is the sig Odds ratio estimate is the Exp(B)