Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Background
Over the years, DNV has developed a number of tools for safety analysis of Offshore installations Offshore Hazard and Risk Analysis Toolkit (OHRAT)
- First version released in 1992 in direct response to Piper Alpha disaster - Joint industry project with numerous Operators, Consultants and EPCs
Neptune
- The OHRAT concept taken into Microsoft Windows environment (1999)
Spreadsheet models (e.g. SOQRATES) (2005+) Phast also used for Offshore consequences All these tools have their own respective benefits and drawbacks As a result, in 2009 DNV started discussing a new tool to harness our Offshore experience so far and build a new tool for the future Welcome to Safeti Offshore!
Safeti Offshore
A joint collaboration involving significant investment between:
- DNV Consulting, providing their Offshore QRA and domain experience - DNV Software, delivering software engineering and mathematical modelling expertise
Design discussions during 2009-2010 Project and coding kick-off January 2011, starting with Proof of Concept First internal release planned for end-2012, plus regular interim releases Key project goals:
- Develop an integrated and uniform approach to Offshore QRA based upon international standards such as ISO 17776 and NORSOK Z013 - Integration of separate QRA models within one common software tool - Support risk management throughout the lifecycle of an installation from planning to decommissioning - Provision of a standardised tool building on the well-established Phast architecture - Benefit from software economies of scale
Integration of DNV Express, a probabilistic model for module explosions New compartment fire model taking into account module geometry and flame development Subsea releases Escalation modelling
Process Tab:
Define Isolatable Sections Define Equipment items Define Process Case options Define Risers & Pipelines Define Wellgroups
Generate Leak Locations (Scenarios) and Cases (Safety Systems) for each section Add User Defined Scenarios
3. Next add physical safety barriers, such as walls and decks. These will be used later as explosion targets for your Leak Locations (scenarios)
10
0.2000
0.4000
0.6000
0.8000
1.0000
1.2000
1.000E-01
1.000E-02
1.000E-03
Leak Location
Small (main)
IS1-G
1.000E-04
1.000E-05
1.000E-06
1.000E-01
0.0
200.0
400.0
600.0
800.0
1000.0
1200.0
1400.0
1600.0
1800.0
2000.0
Pressure [bar]
1.000E-02 1.000E-03 1.000E-04 1.000E-05
Probability
Time [s]
11
Also handles scenario where fire walls are damaged or removed by initial explosion prior to fire
12
13
Flame grows in size. Spreads to adjacent module (represented as cuboid) and outside the platform (represented as cylinders)
14
Fire in adjacent module now grows larger and it extends outside platform in multiple locations. External wind effects now tilt the external flames.
Fire now at maximum size inside the module. Fire model considers transition of burning process from fuel controlled to ventilation controlled inside the module. This is shown as a similar fire size inside the module (despite the increased spill rate) coupled with increased external fires
15
Risk Results
Detailed risk results produced for each potential outcome Work on-going to develop sophisticated reporting mechanisms
16
Consequence results
- Discharge, release rate data (by event scenario and safety system) including flow rate, duration - Explosion results: EXPRESS / DAL detailed results; overpressure / impact at targets; escalation result - Fire results: fire and radiation extent; impact at targets; escalation result - Toxic results: dispersion extent; impact at targets - Smoke results: dispersion extent; impact at targets
17
- Potential loss of life (PLL) per area and for the entire facility - FAR (Fatal accident rate), for personnel inside the plant. The fatal accident rate (FAR) is the expected number of fatalities per 108 hours of exposure:
- FAR value for a defined group of personnel e.g. process operators. - FAR value for one specific area (Area FAR)
- IRPA (Individual Risk per Annum). The probability of a given individual becoming a fatality in a year as a result of their work associated with an installation or group of installations. Positional IRPA - FN curves, Societal risk or Aggregate risk
18
19
20
21
22
23
If anyone has specific needs for their own Offshore QRA analysis, now is a good time to talk with us. We have the possibility to include:
- New calculation models - Specific features and customisations - Additional reporting mechanisms
24
25