Professional Documents
Culture Documents
dissociations
Dissociation Double dissociation
A B
potential pitfalls
a damaged brain may reorganize itself patients may adopt strategies to compensate a damage in one area may have an effect on all connected areas (one cannot say that one particular area is the sole substrate for that process)
neglect
unilateral (right hemisphere)
Balints sydrome
bilateral (parietal lobe)
Patients do not respond to stimuli in particular regions in the visual field (not related to peripheral sensory and motoric losses)
5
EXTINCTION
Typically associated with right-parietal damage (also other uni-lateral lesions are possible) Patients can judge stimuli on either side quite normally; but when presented with two concurrent stimuli they fail to judge the one towards the contralesional side
first observed by Oppenheim (1885) in the clinic by a method called confrontation
vrije Universiteit amsterdam Cognitive Psychology
7
missing contralesional stimuli in double stimulation conditions extinction in clinical tests may disappear (ceiling effects) and it appears that the patient recovered (it still can be shown in lab tests)
The person orients to the side opposite of the more active hemisphere
vrije Universiteit amsterdam Cognitive Psychology
10
extinguished
damage
extinguished
UNILATERAL NEGLECT
Typically associated with right-parietal damage (also other uni-lateral lesions are possible)
first observed by Hughlings Jackson, 1876)
show severe impair in every day life may have eyes, head, body to the ipsilesional side may ignore people that address them at the contralesional side may not eat food from their plate at the contralesional side
are not aware of their contralesional deficits
vrije Universiteit amsterdam Cognitive Psychology
14
Clinical tests
Bisection task Cancellation test Drawing task
15
16
17
18
extinction vs neglect
extinction a mild form of neglect? double dissociation suggest otherwise
methodological concerns
19
20
22
BALINTS SYNDROME
symmetrical bilateral lesions (posterior parietal lobe or parieto-occipital junction)
described by Balint (1909)
Patients have:
difficulty in spatial localization (misreaching objects) fixity of gaze (no normal eye movements) experience is dominated by one object (simultanagnosia)
(failing to light a cigarette)
vrije Universiteit amsterdam Cognitive Psychology
24
GROUPING EFFECTS
object based attention: covered attention works on segmented objects rather than just on unstructured regions of space
how much grouping of the scene in distinct objects takes place before spatial attention is complete
extinguished or neglected regions depend strongly on grouping factors > grouping takes place on the neglected side suggesting that grouping processes do not completely depend on spatial attention impaired by the damaged brain
vrije Universiteit amsterdam Cognitive Psychology
25
26
deficit can be eliminated when the two targets are linked together
vrije Universiteit amsterdam Cognitive Psychology
27
target objects compete for attention the ipsilesional of the two objects will usually win (due to spatial imbalance caused by the lesion) when two target are linked into a common object they become allies rather than competitors for attention
vrije Universiteit amsterdam Cognitive Psychology
28
Normals see a green figure against a red background; the jegged edges belonging to the green figure
30
left neglect patient: one would expect figure (jagged contour) to the left results in poorer performance
Yet if the figure green is seen as the figure then the jagged contour appears to the right
left neglect patient: - draw the jagged edge of the black object - draw the jagged edge of the white object what about the performance for the jagged edge?
Conclusion: patients were able to segment figure from ground both in the ipsilesional and contralesional side of the figure. The visual system can segment across the visual field; neglect arises at later stages
vrije Universiteit amsterdam Cognitive Psychology
31
32
The visual system described shapes in relation to their principal axis of symmetry
Tested on left neglect patients
Ss looked at displays in which two objects were present; they judges whether the shapes were identical or not Left neglect patients tended to miss differences on the left
vrije Universiteit amsterdam Cognitive Psychology
33
Left neglect patients continued to miss (or detect) the same differences even though they fell to the right of the patient
vrije Universiteit amsterdam Cognitive Psychology
34
patients with left neglect one patient left hemianopia lexical decision task (word- nonword) results: faster when the drawing was semantically related (equivalent in size both for ipsi and contralesional) No priming for the hemianopic patient Is this processing truly unconscious? Letter matching task; the initial drawing was now relevant since patient had to decide which of the two targets matched. Results: at chance level when the object was on the neglected side McGlinchey-Berroth et al. (1993)
vrije Universiteit amsterdam Cognitive Psychology
37
FIT
Feature binding: Cohen & Rafal (1991) showed more conjunction errors than feature errors in the contralesional side compared to ipsilesional side Only conjunction tasks should be affected by attention
e.g. Riddich & Humphreys (1987) showed that conjunction targets presented contralesional were detected more slowly than ipsilesional (not for feature search)
Balints patient (have loss of location information); very high rate of illusory conjunction: often mis-combining one color with another shape
vrije Universiteit amsterdam Cognitive Psychology
38
OVERVIEW
segmentation, feature coding, shape-based recognition is relatively spared in patients but patients cannot respond to them or become aware of these objects awareness may require linkage between ventral and dorsal areas
Ventral: object segmentation object recognition Neglect usually affects the dorsal areas
vrije Universiteit amsterdam Cognitive Psychology
39
40