You are on page 1of 2

In the interest of full-disclosure, the presentation for tomorrows meeting of true-conservatives in the 8th Congressional District is to be provided succinctly

herein; the goal is to afford prep-time for all of those true-patriots who might opt to disagree with any link in this logical-stream. All assertions herein have been thoroughly documented, and the goal is to demonstrate the reasons[s] why it is desirable ASAP to ID a potential primary-contender against the [extremely well-liked] Rep. Michael G. Fitzpatrick. This is all business, illustrated by an essay that discusses why "Moderate" Republicans are simply trying to manage "better" the ongoing leftward drift, and why its preferable to try to change direction; noting the Dem-Meltdown [triggered by ObamaCare], it is assumed is thatagainst either Demany reputable GOP-candidate should be able to emerge victorious. It is also assumed that alia jacta est because it seems the already-extant database provides a reasonable basis for conclusions to be drawn; ultimately, because most prognosticators feel there are too-few seats up-for-grabs, dire predictions that challenging Mike could threaten GOP-control over the House are rejected as insufficient justification [assuming a quality-individual emerges, not merely a placeholder] to give him a free-ride to November. Before launching, note the funniest-video-about-israel-you-will-ever-see, advising that the world give-the-middle-east-to-the-jews; noting its citation of a debt of only ~$13T, this has been available for awhile [and this physician recalls having viewed it previously]. It is so succinct that its desirable both to watch it and to pick-choose from others that emerge @ the end [on youtube], for its a penultimate manifestation of Jewish humor. Mike has violated the core campaign-promise [shared by most-everyone in his class of 2010] to work slavishly to rid America of ObamaCare; his rationale was retroactively manufactured, for the Dems and the media inflated the impact of the partial governmental slow-down to hype the GOP into capitulation. He was duped, despite having noted the ability of the GOP to band-together; the double-whammy that allegedly tipped him to abandon this pledge was [covertly] the weekend meeting led by Valerie Jarrett [subbing for BHO] in the White House with CEOs and [overtly] the polling [by the biased-combo of NBC/WSJ, representing K-St./Wall-St.] that reflected the successful effort to blame this faux-catastrophe on the GOP. Tossed under-the-bus was Main St., USA [as manifest by the TEA Party Movement], and prophylactically maligned [anticipating 16] was Ted Cruz; they had no strategy was their catch-phrase, despite the fact that their plan was to starve the beast [as per the Constitution, Article I Section 7]. Taking a respite from this distillation, note these hyperlinks about Common Core [carrying specific correlates with ObamaCare, the website for which was characterized by Rush as a vacuum-cleaner for highly-personal in-bulk data, ripe for hackers]: Common Core Is about Politics, Not Academic Standards, Its about Snooping, Not Standards and 12th Grader Schools School Board over Common Core National Standards. The claim that Mike generally votes conservatively [ la Reagan] must also be debunked, both by providing the precise-quote and by exploring its precise import. Note that the foundational concept [The person who agrees with you 80% of the time is a friend and an ally, not a 20% traitor, unsourced] does not take into account the weight of a given decision, nor its implications; here, Mike trashed those who had served as his core-supporters, and there is every indication [based upon his remarks delivered on 8/3/2013 @ Lower Bucks Community College] that he supports some-sort of Amnesty [before the border has been secured and provision of proof of nondiscretionary law-enforcement]. Adding his other bloated-budget votes [e.g., the Sandy Bills] to his version of moderate-conservatism yields his having positioned himself politically for re-election optimally [perhaps], but at definable cost.

It is also desirable to probe how he failed to comport with his campaign-promise to hold monthly Town Hall events, particularly with regard to the 8/3/2013 event with the head of No Labels, David Walker. One might view it as a filibuster, for there was minimal Q & A and anyone who chose to check-out the website [as noted recently, herein] would want to hear him speak-out against the provision of a no-bid high-cost contract [via the Bensalem School Board] to Pat Poprick; a rationalization that this is merely a local matter that doesnt merit critique by a federal officer DOES NOT COMPUTE, because this good-government concept [when there was no emergency as, arguably, existed when Halliburton was chosen by Cheney to pitch-in after the Iraqi invasion] must be honored @ all levels [from local to national]. It is not a trap to invite critique when the issue will clarify whether political linkages will trump public service. One must appreciate the fact that fingers are connected to hands, and anyone who claims that he/she will oppose Popricks control during the next four yearsovertly [by voting for a competitor] or covertly [by pledging to change the bylaws]would be subject to cogent credibility-critique. Of course, someone not living in Bucks may be perceived as being facile when suggesting a massive recruitment effort would be necessary [as part of a precinct-project], but its necessary to confront stark-reality in this regard. Thus, when Mike doesnt condemn Pat for accepting this no-bid non-emergency contract, he is then acquiescing to business as usual that necessarily uses The Forgotten Taxpayer as a patsy. He then shows hes subject to Wall St./K St. over Main St., besmirching the core of the TEA Party Movement. One must, finally, appreciate what might have been had Mike not facilitated the deal [read: surrender] to BHO. First, BHO would have been able to tap into the BILLIONS of tax-$ which he has segregated for the supplements starting on 1/1/2014, thereby undermining the narrative that the government would have not paid its debts. Second, by not having funded ObamaCare, it would be far easierat this pointto be shutting-down this leviathan simply by starving-the-beast [depriving it of sustenance]. [All of these points are contingent upon good policy makes good politics, a quote from Mike Kibbe that he uttered @ the end of last nights FreedomWorks tele-conference; thus, even had polling sunk further in October, data in Novemberand beyondwould have shown the citizenry that the GOP would boldly champion its core-desires.] Q.E.D.

You might also like