COURSEOUTLINE I.'?

CRIMINAL PROCEDURB by Judge Jean Marie A, Bacorm-Villena

I. Introduction Definition Systems of Criminal Jurisdiction(Atr\,f) PrincipleofDue Process Requisites for ttrevalid exercise of criminal jruisdiction (PST) Cases: *Mirandau. Tuliao,3l March 2006. *Tiiamv. Sibonghanoy, LSApril 1968. e. GsnralPrincipleson Jurisdiction *Lacsonv.Executive Secretary301 SCRA298 f. Jurisdictionof diferent courts BP 129,The JudioiaryReorganization Act RA8249 il. WarrantlessArrest and Inquest Rule 113,Sections 5,8,9 RepublicAct No. 7438 Article trI, Sec 12,Constitution Rule 112,Section 7 Cases: f--qffiit--] Gov. CA,11 Feb'ruary 1992 L-sts!:19!4 Peopleu. Molina, f9 February 2001 D avid u.Arroyo, April 2006
I rbrre

a. b. c. d.

rnl @ ,Pry
J
I

People u.Mengote,zlMty 1994 Havey u CID,162 SCRA 840 People u. Tangliben, 184 SCRA 220 Peopleu.Malmstedt,19 Jme 1991 Peopleu. Chua,17 June 1999 Peoplev.Satrcedo, fune 17, 1997

III. s"archandseizure
Rule126 Art IIl, Sec 2, 1987Consti Cases: People v. Mariacos-16 Jrme 2010 Roanv. Gonzales 25 November 1986 Solid TriangleSales v. SanlyCorp. 23 November2001 Sps. ldarimlav. People,16October20019 Peoplev. CA, 8 Decernbsr 2000

IY.

Bail
Rule114 RA 7659 fDeathpenalty Law]

RA9346 (Prohibiting Imposition of DeathJ fusticeandfuvenileAct of 2006 Child and YouthWelfareCode Ruleof fuvenile In Conflictwith the Law RA6036 &. Definition
I

D. Purpose
I

C. Where to post? O. Bail,as a matter of right and of disretion e. Kinds Cases: USAv. PURUGGAIiAII, 389 SCRA623 CTOVERNMENT OF HONGKONGV. OLALL\ 19 Apn12W7 PAIITILAV. CA-31 July 1996 PADERAI.{GAV. CA. 247 SCRA741 MIRAIIDAV. TULIAO - 31 March 2006 1997 OBOSAV.CA- 16 January BASCO V. RAPAXALO.5 Ldarch1997

V.

Preliminary Investigation r-@iri--) krle 112 RA 8249 (3 October2005) A.M. No. 05-8-26-SC
t ,w.bb6.m I

,Fm v-x

a. Scope b. Procedure Cases: cOV. CA- ll Febnnry 1992 2001 YUSOPv. SAIIDIGAIIBAYAI,{- 22 Feb'ruary 1998 DUTT,RTE v. SAI.IDIGAIIBAYA]*I- 27 April BAUTISTAv. CA- 6 Juty 2001 \llEBB v. DE LEON 23 August 1995 HO v. PEOPLE- 9 October1997 fl. Definition
I

D. Purposes

C. Scope d. N"trt. of the rightto preliminaryinvestigation . EffectofabsenceofPl f. Officersto conductPI . (October 3, 2005) NoteA.M. No. 05-8-26-SC g. Procedure (section3)

h. Stages

VI.

Commencementof CourtAction: lnformation v. Comptaint Rule110

&. Whereto file - [Rule110,Section] 2; Section 4J b. Irrfor*ation (Section 2 and 3) C. Complaint(sections subscribedby the -sworn statement,written, charginga personwith an offense;, offendedparty with any peaceofficer par!y''- to whom the offenderis civilly liable;seeArt 100 and 101 of the "offended RPC d. S.,ffi.i*nry of tnfo or Complaint Place ApproximateTime Nameof theAccused Designation of the Offense Actsor Omissions Nameof the OffendedParty of Accusation . Cause . .

IPJ

f r-Y,f@

must be sfated Quali$ringand aggravatingCirf*_*ffi;-Fces RA 7659 fDeath PenaltyLaw; HeinousCrimeAct]

Cases Crespo v.Mogul, 151SCRA462 2007 Ricsze v. Court ofAppeals,9February 2008 DOJ,29 January Santos-Conciou Zald*tau. Reyes,3July 1992 Peopleu.Aquino,6 August2002 CA,287SCRA58f Larranagav. Agastin u.Pamintuan,22 Augttst2005 People u.Feloteo,5June1998 2A07 Pacoyu. Umali, 28 Septembet Peopleu Catubig,23August2001

VII.

of Civil A,ction Prosecution Rule 111 Art 100,RPC - Arts. 1157,21762177,1902-1910, 32-34, Civil Code Casos: Laroya,26 August2002 Casupananv. Hanbonu.CA,MarchL7,20O3 Janiolq 30 June2009 DreamworkCon.structianu Manlilic v. Calaunan,25 Jmuary 2A07 2,1994 Peopleu Bayotas,September

Madarangv. CA,14 July 2005 Sps. Jue v. Sps.Suarez,30 June2008 Marbella-B&ts u.Bobis,3l Juty2000 Peaple u.Aragon,g4 Phil.357

a. b.

c. d.

Definition, concptof civil action? of Civil Obligations Sources Art. 1756,NCC: Arts. 100-103 RPC@urelyex-delicto) How institutsd? PrejudicialQuestion

VIII. Rights oftheAccused kile 115 a. Right to be informed in personandby cormsel b. Right to be presentanddefended 12(2), 1987Consti) -T rial in absentia(Afim, Sectioar and cross-examine to on his behalf Ri$ht not testfi c. d. Rigltt not to be compelledaswitnessagainsthimself rigltt but may b waived substantial e. Right to Cross-xamine; trial (seeSpeedy TFtalAct of 1997) Rieht to speedy g. Public frial

Cases: f*-*ffiT-l SCRAI Nazareno,160 Gimenezv. Peoleu.Alvarez, 201 SCRA264 u. CA, 24 SCRA663 Chartez 29 Decmbet1962 Cabalu.Capunan, Peopleu Teeha*ea,6 October1995

D(.

Motion to Quash RuIe117 Art m, Section21,1987Consti. Cases: AGUILAR v. SAN PEDRO PEOPLEV SAIIDIGAI\IBAYAhI PACOYV. CAJIGAL, . PEOPLEV. TAhI, V. LACSON PEOPLE 17,2010 September March 2l,20ll 28,2W7 September Jttly 26, 2010 October 7,2003

X.

Arraignment Rule110* comductedHow arraignment

a.

-a
b. c. d" e. f.
)il. )ilI. of Arraigrrnent Suspension Duties oflawyero Duties o'fProsecutofs Duties ofJudges/Corts questions Searching Pre-Trial* Trial $ Rule119 Rule 132(PresentdionofEvidence) Trial Act of 1998) RA 8493(The Speedy RA 6981(WitnessProtectionProgun) 1988 SC Circ. No. 4, 22 September 1989 SCCirc. No. 1-89,19January Peoplev. Latroylxlroy, 38 Phit 330 21 tvlaroh2011 Pooplev. Smdiganbayarq 2011 30lvlarc'h People v. Cristobal, )ilIL )ilu.

Judgment* Rule 120 Enguerrav.people,108Phil 1078 Peo,ple

untr4lt
t7 -4EJ f--qtu,is---l

*List ofreleliant cassto follow

w.hkb..m